Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libfilezilla":
* Package name: libfilezilla
Version : 0.37.0-2
Upstream Author : Tim Kosse
* URL : https://lib.filezilla-project.org/
* License :
On Wed, 2022-04-06 at 16:26 +, Eivind Naess wrote:
> The project is using ./autogen.sh to generate the configure scripts,
> et al for the project. When I got to tag and create a release, I have
> to upload the resulting tarball with the resulting configure scripts
> embedded.
Personally I
Hi,
On Wed, 2022-04-06 at 16:26 +, Eivind Naess wrote:
> Using watch with git tags yields the same thing (snapshot of the
> source code, not the release tarball). I could use the GitLab API and
> fetch a JSON file, but I can't figure out to make that work with the
> watch file.
I once
On Wed, 2022-04-06 at 19:49 +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 06, 2022 at 03:36:31PM +0100, Philip Wyett wrote:
> > > > Could someone point me to the documentation that relates to upload of
> > > > packages that have
> > > > new
> > > > binary
> > > > packages i.e. name change during
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libfilezilla":
* Package name: libfilezilla
Version : 0.37.0-1
Upstream Author : Tim Kosse
* URL : https://lib.filezilla-project.org/
* License :
On Wed, Apr 06, 2022 at 03:36:31PM +0100, Philip Wyett wrote:
> > > Could someone point me to the documentation that relates to upload of
> > > packages that have new
> > > binary
> > > packages i.e. name change during an update? Specifically to the
> > > new/by-hand queue.
> > Can you explain
On Wed, 2022-04-06 at 19:06 +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 06, 2022 at 03:02:07PM +0100, Philip Wyett wrote:
> > Could someone point me to the documentation that relates to upload of
> > packages that have new
> > binary
> > packages i.e. name change during an update? Specifically
On Wed, Apr 06, 2022 at 03:37:33PM +0100, Philip Wyett wrote:
> > > Could someone point me to the documentation that relates to upload of
> > > packages that have new
> > > binary
> > > packages i.e. name change during an update? Specifically to the
> > > new/by-hand queue.
> >
> > Dunno where
On Wed, 2022-04-06 at 16:16 +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 06, 2022 at 03:02:07PM +0100, Philip Wyett wrote:
> > Could someone point me to the documentation that relates to upload of
> > packages that have new
> > binary
> > packages i.e. name change during an update? Specifically to
On Wed, Apr 06, 2022 at 03:02:07PM +0100, Philip Wyett wrote:
> Could someone point me to the documentation that relates to upload of
> packages that have new binary
> packages i.e. name change during an update? Specifically to the new/by-hand
> queue.
Dunno where the docs are, but in short:
*
On Wed, Apr 06, 2022 at 03:02:07PM +0100, Philip Wyett wrote:
> Could someone point me to the documentation that relates to upload of
> packages that have new binary
> packages i.e. name change during an update? Specifically to the new/by-hand
> queue.
Can you explain the context for this? You
Hi all,
Could someone point me to the documentation that relates to upload of packages
that have new binary
packages i.e. name change during an update? Specifically to the new/by-hand
queue.
Regards
Phil
--
*** Playing the game for the games own sake. ***
WWW: https://kathenas.org
Your message dated Wed, 6 Apr 2022 15:12:48 +0200
with message-id <3a9888d0-6484-b52b-ee1c-8e6023ffc...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: RFS: gcc-sh-elf/3 -- GNU C compiler for embedded SuperH
devices
has caused the Debian Bug report #1008891,
regarding RFS: gcc-sh-elf/3 -- GNU C compiler for
Your message dated Wed, 6 Apr 2022 14:44:06 +0200
with message-id <23abf826-824d-25b1-d9ec-eb822ac9b...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: RFS: dictconv/0.2-7.2 [NMU] -- convert a dictionary file
type to another dictionary file type
has caused the Debian Bug report #1008961,
regarding RFS:
Your message dated Wed, 6 Apr 2022 14:26:49 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: RFS: dia2code/0.8.3-4.2 [NMU] [RC] -- a dia-UML code
generator
has caused the Debian Bug report #100,
regarding RFS: dia2code/0.8.3-4.2 [NMU] [RC] -- a dia-UML code generator
to be marked as done.
This
Your message dated Wed, 6 Apr 2022 14:01:18 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: RFS: sstp-client/1.0.17-1 [ITP] -- Connect to a Microsoft
Windows 2008 server using SSTP VPN
has caused the Debian Bug report #1009021,
regarding RFS: sstp-client/1.0.17-1 [ITP] -- Connect to a Microsoft
Your message dated Wed, 6 Apr 2022 12:57:02 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: RFS: prometheus-cpp/1.0.0-1 [ITP] -- Prometheus Client
Library for Modern C++
has caused the Debian Bug report #983585,
regarding RFS: prometheus-cpp/1.0.0-1 [ITP] -- Prometheus Client Library for
Modern C++
Am 06.04.22 um 10:49 schrieb Gregor Jasny:
Should I publish a new 1.0.0-2 version to mentors or delete the existing and
re-upload?
No, I take it from salsa.
18 matches
Mail list logo
