Bug#1021364: RFS: ghostwriter/2.2.0-1 [RC] -- Distraction-free, themeable Markdown editor

2022-10-06 Thread Sebastien Chavaux
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ghostwriter": * Package name : ghostwriter Version : 2.2.0-1 Upstream contact : wereturtle * URL : https://wereturtle.github.io/ghostwriter/ * License

Bug#1012196: buglist

2022-10-06 Thread André
Is there an easier way to obtain all used licenses? Actually I use `licensecheck --check '.py|js|html|rst|sh' --recursive --deb-machine --merge-licenses --lines 0 *` Or can I use just its output?

Bug#1021355: RFS: csv2latex/0.23-1 -- command-line CSV to LaTeX file converter

2022-10-06 Thread Benoît Rouits
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "csv2latex": * Package name : csv2latex Version : 0.23-1 Upstream contact : Benoît Rouits * URL : http://brouits.free.fr/csv2latex/ * License :

Bug#1021353: RFS: zvbi/0.2.37-1 -- Vertical Blanking Interval (VBI) utilities

2022-10-06 Thread Ileana Dumitrescu
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "zvbi": * Package name : zvbi Version : 0.2.37-1 Upstream contact : Ileana Dumitrescu * URL : https://github.com/zapping-vbi/zvbi * License :

Bug#1012196: buglist

2022-10-06 Thread Bastian Germann
Control: tags -1 moreinfo On Mon, 3 Oct 2022 17:36:53 + =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcsOp?= wrote: > No. Please check the copyright format description for the "with" keyword. > Also, please try to present the copyright info in a more consice way. When two file groups have the same copyright >

Bug#1021340: RFS: qabc/1.9.3-1 -- minimal GUI for ABC music notation

2022-10-06 Thread Benoît Rouits
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "qabc": * Package name : qabc Version : 1.9.3-1 Upstream contact : Benoît Rouits * URL : http://brouits.free.fr/qabc/ * License : GPL-3+ * Vcs

Re: autopkgtest : s390x is considered regression but never built

2022-10-06 Thread Paul Wise
On Thu, 2022-10-06 at 09:18 +0200, Tobias Frost wrote: > Oh, sorry; I missed that you meant d/test/control… > (Though, Reading [1], I'm not sure if there is support for "!", but I > guess it is worth a try…) elbrus confirmed on #debci that ! is supported in d/t/c Architecture. -- bye, pabs

Re: autopkgtest : s390x is considered regression but never built

2022-10-06 Thread Paul Wise
On Thu, 2022-10-06 at 07:15 +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > On Tue, 2022-10-04 at 08:50 +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > > > Is there a way to de-activate explicitly s390x from the default > > autpkgtest list ? > > I asked about this #debci on IRC and got this answer: More discussion on #debci,

Re: autopkgtest : s390x is considered regression but never built

2022-10-06 Thread Tobias Frost
On Thu, Oct 06, 2022 at 08:47:56AM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > On Thu, Oct 6, 2022 at 8:33 AM Tobias Frost wrote: > > > > On Tue, Oct 04, 2022 at 09:02:07AM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > > The "!" syntax is not supported in Architecture:, you'd > > have to spell out all archs in

Re: autopkgtest : s390x is considered regression but never built

2022-10-06 Thread Tobias Frost
On Tue, Oct 04, 2022 at 09:02:07AM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > On Tue, Oct 4, 2022 at 8:50 AM Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > > > > [cc me please] > > > > Hi there, > > > > I am staring at the autopkgtest results for jpeg-xl: > > > > * https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/jpeg-xl > > > > It seems CI

Re: autopkgtest : s390x is considered regression but never built

2022-10-06 Thread Mathieu Malaterre
On Thu, Oct 6, 2022 at 8:33 AM Tobias Frost wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 04, 2022 at 09:02:07AM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 4, 2022 at 8:50 AM Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > > > > > > [cc me please] > > > > > > Hi there, > > > > > > I am staring at the autopkgtest results for jpeg-xl: