Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gpsd":
* Package name : gpsd
Version : 3.25-1~exp1
Upstream contact : gpsd developers
* URL : https://gpsd.io
* License : ISC, ISC and IBM,
On Mon, 2023-05-15 at 18:14 +0200, Oliver Reiche wrote:
> Could you please tell me if it is acceptable for Debian that I have
> build dependencies (proto files) in ./debian/third_party, with the
> copyright file explicity mentioning those?
Generally all build dependencies should be packaged
>
>
> I know that is is possible to create source packages consisting out of
> more than 1 .orig.tar.gz. Maybe it is a better idea to split that
> additional source into a new tar.gz.
>
> I'm not a DD, hence I can't sponsor your package anyway. Sorry!
I see. That's already very helpful
On 15.05.2023 18:14, Oliver Reiche wrote:
Hi Oliver,
I just updated the package again, with the upstream beta2 release.
Could you please tell me if it is acceptable for Debian that I have
build dependencies (proto files) in ./debian/third_party, with the
copyright file explicity mentioning
Dear Hilmar,
I just updated the package again, with the upstream beta2 release.
Could you please tell me if it is acceptable for Debian that I have build
dependencies (proto files) in ./debian/third_party, with the copyright file
explicity mentioning those?
Many thanks!
Oliver
Hilmar Preuße
On Sat, May 13, 2023 at 02:23:13PM +0200, Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote:
> Control: retitle -1 RFS: lighttpd/1.4.70-1 -- light, fast, functional web
> server
>
> On Sat, May 13, 2023 at 04:27:36AM -0400, Glenn Strauss wrote:
> > (This is not actually an NMU, but a non-DD maintainer upload.)
> If
6 matches
Mail list logo
