On 2023-07-11, Pierre Gruet wrote:
> Unfortunately, it turns out fields were added to some class (of which
> size thus increased) in the shared library, so that binaries built
> against a previous version of it now segfault as they are not allocating
> enough space.
Either you need to do a pac
Hello again,
>In short, considering debian-legal's input, should I mention the NCSA
>copyright notice in debian/copyright for Files: htpasswd.c, adding a
>separate License: NCSA field to clarify the provenance of said source
>?
After a bit more research into how other projects treat NCSA bits I'd
Hi tobi,
Le 11/07/2023 à 16:52, Tobias Frost a écrit :
Hi Pierre,
On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 04:10:49PM +0200, Pierre Gruet wrote:
Dear Mentors,
I maintain a package that builds a shared library. I uploaded a new upstream
version of it to Debian, with no removed symbols, no ABI change... Fine.
On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 04:10:49PM +0200, Pierre Gruet wrote:
> I maintain a package that builds a shared library. I uploaded a new upstream
> version of it to Debian, with no removed symbols, no ABI change... Fine.
Tobias already explained that there was actually an ABI change, but...
> How shoul
Hi Pierre,
On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 04:10:49PM +0200, Pierre Gruet wrote:
> Dear Mentors,
>
> I maintain a package that builds a shared library. I uploaded a new upstream
> version of it to Debian, with no removed symbols, no ABI change... Fine.
> Unfortunately, it turns out fields were added to
Dear Mentors,
I maintain a package that builds a shared library. I uploaded a new
upstream version of it to Debian, with no removed symbols, no ABI
change... Fine.
Unfortunately, it turns out fields were added to some class (of which
size thus increased) in the shared library, so that binari
6 matches
Mail list logo
