Bug#1068958: marked as done (RFS: elpa-snakemake/2.0.0+git20231210.4ad41da-1 [RC] [Team] -- Run Snakemake workflows from Emacs)

2024-04-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 15 Apr 2024 08:54:21 +0800 with message-id <87r0f71m4i@melete.silentflame.com> and subject line Re: Bug#1068958: RFS elpa-snakemake has caused the Debian Bug report #1068958, regarding RFS: elpa-snakemake/2.0.0+git20231210.4ad41da-1 [RC] [Team] -- Run Snakemake

Bug#1066873: RFS: tracy/0.10+ds-1 [ITP] -- Hybrid frame and sampling profiler

2024-04-14 Thread Alan M Varghese
> But this also means you haven't tried building your package in a minimal sid chroot I have been using podman containers based on sid instead. But, I think that should be fine? > Manually on a host system? `apt build-dep` or `mk-build-deps -ir` > Recommends are not installed when installing

Bug#1066873: RFS: tracy/0.10+ds-1 [ITP] -- Hybrid frame and sampling profiler

2024-04-14 Thread Alan M Varghese
> This FTBFS: "! LaTeX Error: File `lmodern.sty' not found." lmodern.sty comes from the package `lmodern`. This package should be installed (as a transitive dep) when 'texlive-fonts-extra' is installed. What is the process for installing build-deps? When I run `apt install

Bug#1066873: RFS: tracy/0.10+ds-1 [ITP] -- Hybrid frame and sampling profiler

2024-04-14 Thread Andrey Rakhmatullin
On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 01:25:05AM +0530, Alan M Varghese wrote: > > This FTBFS: "! LaTeX Error: File `lmodern.sty' not found." > > lmodern.sty comes from the package `lmodern`. This package should be > > installed (as a transitive dep) when 'texlive-fonts-extra' is installed. No, see below. But

Bug#1068651: RFS: bisect-ppx/2.8.3-1 [ITP] -- Code coverage for OCaml and ReScript (dev files)

2024-04-14 Thread Bo YU
Hi, On Tue, Apr 9, 2024 at 2:18 PM Stéphane Glondu wrote: > > Dear Bo, > > Le 08/04/2024 à 17:05, Bo YU a écrit : > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "bisect-ppx": > > [...] > > I've reviewed the packaging and I have a few comments. > > Standards-Version is not the latest. > > Upstream

Re: Bug#1068101: RFS ping mini-httpd/1.30-10 -- Small HTTP server

2024-04-14 Thread Alexandru Mihail
Hello, Thanks for your help ! > I had a look. > > It's not called "SystemD". You're correct, I'll fix the typo :) > > Why is this line commented? > > #PrivateUsers=yes This should have been deleted. I will fix that. I was doing some experiments with PrivateUsers which turned out to make CGI

Re: Bug#1066033: RFS: galvani/0.34-1 [ITP] -- reads data from a device with graphical plots and evaluation

2024-04-14 Thread Dr. Burkard Lutz
Am Dienstag, dem 09.04.2024 um 03:11 + schrieb mentors.debian.net: > > A comment has been posted to a package you uploaded: > > From: Alex Myczko > Package: galvani > Url: https://mentors.debian.net/package/galvani/ > > --- > Vcs fields are easy to fix, do you already have an account on >

Bug#1068958: RFS: elpa-snakemake/2.0.0+git20231210.4ad41da-1 [RC] [Team] -- Run Snakemake workflows from Emacs

2024-04-14 Thread Xiyue Deng
Control: retitle -1 RFS: elpa-snakemake/2.0.0+git20231210.4ad41da-1 [RC] [Team] -- Run Snakemake workflows from Emacs Some obvious silly copy-and-paste error in the title. Now it should be fixed :P -- Xiyue Deng

Bug#1068958: Xiyue Deng

2024-04-14 Thread Xiyue Deng
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "elpa-snakemake": * Package name : elpa-snakemake Version : 2.0.0+git20231210.4ad41da-1 Upstream contact : Kyle Meyer * URL :

Redefinition of _Int (Was: acedb: FTBFS: acein.c:2045:15: error: implicit declaration of function ‘add_history’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration])

2024-04-14 Thread Andreas Tille
H again, Am Sun, Apr 14, 2024 at 07:17:41AM +0200 schrieb Andreas Tille: > Am Sat, Apr 13, 2024 at 10:46:17PM +0100 schrieb Jeremy Sowden: > > > > The one after this looks like a GTK problem, and that's the point at > > which I bow out. I was able to fix some more missing declaration issues