Bug#962669: Bug#962672: buster-pu: package ca-certificates/20200611~deb10u1

Hi Michael, On Fri, 2020-06-12 at 08:21 -0500, Michael Shuler wrote: > > On 6/12/20 7:36 AM, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 08:40:29AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: [...] > > > > Wouldn't embedded setups be more likely to have a hard-c

Bug#962669: Bug#962672: buster-pu: package ca-certificates/20200611~deb10u1

On Fri, 2020-06-12 at 00:50 +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: > Control: tags 962669 moreinfo > > On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 08:18:38PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > On Thu, 2020-06-11 at 13:48 -0500, Michael Shuler wrote: > > > On 6/11/20 1:33 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:

Bug#950760: RFS: libbpf/0.0.6-1 -- eBPF helper library (development files)

On 2020-02-06 08:12, Paul Gevers wrote: Hi, On 06-02-2020 00:07, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Wed, 2020-02-05 at 22:42 +, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 10:22 PM Christian Barcenas wrote: Because this changes the versioning scheme from kernel releases (libbpf-dev and libbpf0

Bug#950760: RFS: libbpf/0.0.6-1 -- eBPF helper library (development files)

On Wed, 2020-02-05 at 22:42 +, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 10:22 PM Christian Barcenas > wrote: > > Because this changes the versioning scheme from kernel releases > > (libbpf-dev and libbpf0 currently are at 5.4.13-1 in sid) to libbpf > > version numbers (0.0.6-1), the

Re: Why is tk8.4 removal triggering autoremoval messages of not depending packages at this point in time (Was: staden is marked for autoremoval from testing)

On Sat, 2016-12-31 at 15:38 +0100, Thibaut Paumard wrote: > I would believe removing tk8.4 by hand from testing could fix the lot of > associated autoremovals. > > Dear release team, thoughts on that? tk8.4 and tcl8.4 were already re-removed from testing this morning. Regards, Adam

Bug#845311: Bug#843775: jessie-pu: package mdadm/3.3.2-5+deb8u2

Control: tags 843775 + pending On Tue, 2016-11-22 at 12:43 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > (dropping debian-boot@, adding 845311@) > > Hi Jens, > > Jens Sauer (2016-11-22): > > Thank you for reviewing this package. It was my first time doing this, > > I hope everything is

Re: xfe is marked for autoremoval from testing

On Fri, 2015-12-18 at 23:06 +0100, Joachim Wiedorn wrote: > Hello release team, > > Debian testing autoremoval watch wrote on 2015-12-18 04:39: > > > > xfe 1.41-3 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2015-12-28 > > > > It is affected by these RC bugs: > > 806579: xfe: FTBFS:

Bug#702849: RFS: php-soap/0.12.0-2.1 [NMU] [RC]

On Tue, 2013-03-12 at 23:28 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote: Prach Pongpanich in the mentors list is trying to fix #701134. He is removing the Pre-Depends which was added for the release of Squeeze, because of #605867, which I filled, but can't remember what it was about. The bug report says:

Re: Bug#680798: Help with gcc-4.7 needed (Was: poco: FTBFS with multiarch libmysqlclient-dev)

On Thu, 2012-07-26 at 14:45 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: BTW, it seems to me that libpoco development only happens in experimental and unstable does not deserve the attention it would need. Please help fixing the problem to make sure the reverse depends can stay in testing. Stay would imply

Re: RFS: libconfig (requires transition)

On Fri, 2012-01-27 at 01:02 +, Jonathan McCrohan wrote: Assuming updating the Build-depends field in debian/control (to reflect the new package name) is not counted as a source change: In this context, the difference between can binNMUed and needs source change is basically whether an

Re: freej - FTBFS (#614458)

[Reply-To overridden, as I have no idea if the other recipients are reading -mentors, but reset to there having noted that. Please Cc: me on replies if relevant as I am not subscribed] On Fri, 2011-06-24 at 21:09 +0100, Michael Tautschnig wrote: It seems to me that no one has replied (in

Re: Bug#609947: RFS: git-core [lenny, 1:1.5.6.5-3+lenny3.3]

tag 609947 + pending thanks On Fri, 2011-01-14 at 22:10 +0100, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: Hi, Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com writes: I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1:1.5.6.5-3+lenny3.3 of the package git-core. Uploaded. and flagged for acceptance at the next dinstall;

Re: (future unblock) RFS: mobile-broadband-provider-info (updated package)

On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 22:03 +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 10:12:29PM +0530, Bhavani Shankar R wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 20110103-1 of my package mobile-broadband-provider-info. If the release team will indicate that there is any chance

Re: RFS(future freeze exception): mobile-broadband-provider-info (updated package)

On Thu, 2010-09-30 at 13:59 +0800, Paul Wise wrote: On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 1:29 PM, Bhavani Shankar R bh...@ubuntu.com wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 20100930-1 of my package mobile-broadband-provider-info. Uploaded since it matches previous unblocks, please

Re: font policy - maintainerless program

On Sat, 2008-07-19 at 16:58 -0700, Paul Hardy wrote: I have been getting ready to release a font plus sources and auxiliary programs for Debian. The Policy Manual requires using the update-fonts-dir script when installing a font. I was going to post a change to the update-fonts-dir script

Re: look for a package

On Wed, 2006-05-31 at 21:36 +0200, Rakotomandimby Mihamina wrote: Hi, Would you know if a package of this software exists: http://zippo.taiyo.co.jp/~gotoh/ssh/connect.html I looked into the orphaned and so on but did not find. A quick apt-cache search yields:

Re: looking for a sponsor

Roger Leigh wrote, Wednesday, February 15, 2006 9:15 PM: john aikins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [nothing] It's customary to provide details of what you would like sponsoring, plus pointers to the sources. Given his messages of two and four days previously, he appears to want himself

Re: understand dpatch

On Tuesday, January 24, 2006 11:01 AM, Rakotomandimby Mihamina [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, 2006-01-22 at 18:59 +0100, Christoph Haas wrote: To get working dpatches I recommend using the 'dpatch-edit-patch' command. [...] I had a look at the man page, but I did not see how to go on or

Re: How to close Bugs in experimental

On Wednesday, January 18, 2006 1:55 PM, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 18 Jan 2006, Steve Langasek wrote: [...] need close or -done (and yes, katie would implement this using -done, just as it already does for maintainer uploads to unstable). If the BTS will cope

Re: ifenslave hacks and policy, plus: Re: Needing explanations about BTS usage for wishlist

On Wednesday, October 19, 2005 7:22 PM, Justin Pryzby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] You might contact the maintainer, and if you don't receive a response, email [EMAIL PROTECTED] and ask is this person mia (and Cc: them in that message). The recommended method is to mail [EMAIL PROTECTED],

Re: Request for substitute sponsor (vim-vimoutliner) and some questions

On Tuesday, October 11, 2005 5:38 AM, Justin Pryzby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 11:26:55PM -0400, Matej Cepl wrote: [...] Or what should I do with persistent user claiming that he wants to have it fixed in stable? On the other hand, 0.3.3-6 (which is what is in sarge)

Re: problem with hppa arch.,

On Tue, 2005-08-09 at 13:39 -0300, Jose Carlos do Nascimento wrote: http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=snake4ver=1.0.12-4arch=hppastamp=1123556808file=logas=raw at: /usr/bin/fakeroot debian/rules clean /usr/bin/fakeroot: line 152: 2780 Segmentation fault

Re: Packaging a shared library with non-PIC assembly

On Tuesday, July 12, 2005 7:46 AM, Justin Pryzby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] You need to make sure the package is listed in packages-arch-specific: http://www.buildd.net/buildd/Packages-arch-specific That's a horribly out-of-date (and unofficial) copy. Not altogether surprising given

Re: one lintian output correcting question

On Tuesday, July 05, 2005 11:21 AM, John Hendrickson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: W: xdm-options: packages-installs-file-to-usr-x11r6 usr/X11R6/lib/X11/xdm-option Is this informational or am I supposed to somehow register this so lintian won't complain? [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ echo 'W:

Re: how to contact dh-make-perl developpers ?

On Thursday, May 19, 2005 11:57 AM, Marc Chantreux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] any idea to contact the dh-make-perl team ? In the same way as any other Debian package: [EMAIL PROTECTED] hth Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?

Re: CERN root

On Friday, December 17, 2004 9:38 AM, Stefan Fritsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] Are you sure that the ROOT license permits binary redistribution? I read something different [1] but I have not looked at the license myself. [...] [1] http://borex.princeton.edu/~kmccarty/ The license is at

Re: Think I found errors in apt-get, need help with wine package

On Tue, 2004-11-30 at 01:59 -0800, Scott Ritchie wrote: My package is a rather unusual change, so it wouldn't surprise me if I've uncovered a few bugs in apt-get. I know for certain I've found at least one. Not that haven't already been reported, afaics. This doesn't make any sense, since

Re: Think I found errors in apt-get, need help with wine package

On Tue, 2004-11-30 at 16:58 +0200, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote: On 20041130T103405+, Adam D. Barratt wrote: That's to be expected, you appear to be misunderstanding what a Replaces: header does. The purpose of the Replaces: is to say if I install wine-dev, then remove libwine-dev first

Re: Think I found errors in apt-get, need help with wine package

On Tue, 2004-11-30 at 01:59 -0800, Scott Ritchie wrote: My package is a rather unusual change, so it wouldn't surprise me if I've uncovered a few bugs in apt-get. I know for certain I've found at least one. Not that haven't already been reported, afaics. This doesn't make any sense, since

Re: Think I found errors in apt-get, need help with wine package

On Tue, 2004-11-30 at 16:58 +0200, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote: On 20041130T103405+, Adam D. Barratt wrote: That's to be expected, you appear to be misunderstanding what a Replaces: header does. The purpose of the Replaces: is to say if I install wine-dev, then remove libwine-dev first

Re: gprolog: buildds not touching it

Salvador Abreu wrote, Monday, August 16, 2004 11:55 AM: I've tried to deal with this with a control line: Architecture: i386 amd64 sparc mips alpha powerpc so that it only builds on some architectures. The trouble is I can't get a hold of any machine of these architectures to make binary

Re: gprolog: buildds not touching it

Salvador Abreu wrote, Monday, August 16, 2004 11:55 AM: I've tried to deal with this with a control line: Architecture: i386 amd64 sparc mips alpha powerpc so that it only builds on some architectures. The trouble is I can't get a hold of any machine of these architectures to make binary

Re: RFS: hotway-cvs: send and receive mail via Hotmail, Lycos, Spray, and MSN

On Friday, August 13, 2004 2:13 AM, Lawrence Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello! I am aware that another hotway package exists in Debian. However, i have been unable to reach the maintainer for the past 3 months and it no longer works with Hotmail ( due to MS 'upgrades' to the service

Re: RFS: hotway-cvs: send and receive mail via Hotmail, Lycos, Spray, and MSN

On Friday, August 13, 2004 2:13 AM, Lawrence Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello! I am aware that another hotway package exists in Debian. However, i have been unable to reach the maintainer for the past 3 months and it no longer works with Hotmail ( due to MS 'upgrades' to the service

Re: naim - IM client

On Wednesday, July 21, 2004 7:50 PM, Rohit Pidaparthi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: naim is an ncurses based console IM client that supports various [...] The source, diff, dsc etc can be found at: http://mithrandir.dyndns.org/debs/source/ The packages are policy compliant. (use the 0.11.7

Re: naim - IM client

On Wednesday, July 21, 2004 7:50 PM, Rohit Pidaparthi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: naim is an ncurses based console IM client that supports various [...] The source, diff, dsc etc can be found at: http://mithrandir.dyndns.org/debs/source/ The packages are policy compliant. (use the 0.11.7

Re: RFS: naim - IM client

On Wed, 2004-07-21 at 19:50, Rohit Pidaparthi wrote: naim is an ncurses based console IM client that supports various protocols including IRC, ICQ, AIM and lily. It supports the TOC protocol and it can store buddy lists on the AOL servers. It is great for SSH users who want to be able to

Re: RFS: akregator - RSS feed aggregator for KDE

On Thursday, July 01, 2004 8:50 AM, Peter Rockai (mornfall) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thursday 01 July 2004 08:55, Jeremy Lainé wrote: [...] - the package versions look dodgy, as there are 2 dashes (1.0-beta4-1). Furthermore you are going to run into problems when the final 1.0 version

Re: RFS: akregator - RSS feed aggregator for KDE

On Thursday, July 01, 2004 10:16 AM, Christoph Wegscheider [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Adam D. Barratt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The final version will be labelled 1.0.0-1 of course. Erm, no, please don't. 1.0.0 is an NMU version number. I thougth x-1.1 would be a NMU version number? You're

Re: RFS: akregator - RSS feed aggregator for KDE

On Thursday, July 01, 2004 8:50 AM, Peter Rockai (mornfall) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thursday 01 July 2004 08:55, Jeremy Lain wrote: [...] - the package versions look dodgy, as there are 2 dashes (1.0-beta4-1). Furthermore you are going to run into problems when the final 1.0 version comes

Re: RFS: akregator - RSS feed aggregator for KDE

On Thursday, July 01, 2004 10:16 AM, Christoph Wegscheider [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Adam D. Barratt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The final version will be labelled 1.0.0-1 of course. Erm, no, please don't. 1.0.0 is an NMU version number. I thougth x-1.1 would be a NMU version number? You're

Re: How to get package in main with the same version to upgrade over a mentors.debian.net version?

Geert Stappers wrote, Friday, June 04, 2004 7:38 AM: On Thu, Jun 03, 2004 at 03:30:12PM -0700, Matt Brubeck wrote: Geert Stappers wrote: [...] Gee, I real need to find back that document that wrote to use 1.0-0.1, 1.0-0.2, 1.0-0.3 etc for non official debian packages. I don't

Re: How to get package in main with the same version to upgrade over a mentors.debian.net version?

On Fri, 2004-06-04 at 16:57, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: Adam D. Barratt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [...] If the current version in the archive is 1.1, and you upload an NMU of 1.2, that NMU should be 1.2-0.1 (so that a maintainer upload of 1.2-1 supersedes it). It should be 1.1-0.1 so

Re: How to get package in main with the same version to upgrade over a mentors.debian.net version?

Geert Stappers wrote, Friday, June 04, 2004 7:38 AM: On Thu, Jun 03, 2004 at 03:30:12PM -0700, Matt Brubeck wrote: Geert Stappers wrote: [...] Gee, I real need to find back that document that wrote to use 1.0-0.1, 1.0-0.2, 1.0-0.3 etc for non official debian packages. I don't

Re: Need sponsor for wmshutdown barrage

On Wednesday, June 02, 2004 9:43 AM, Rafal Zawadzki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I haven't had a chance to look at the actual packages, but: Bug#251867: Acknowledgement (ITP: barrage -- Rather violent action game) [...] Version : Upstream Author : Name [EMAIL PROTECTED] You

Re: Need sponsor for wmshutdown barrage

On Wednesday, June 02, 2004 9:43 AM, Rafal Zawadzki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I haven't had a chance to look at the actual packages, but: Bug#251867: Acknowledgement (ITP: barrage -- Rather violent action game) [...] Version : Upstream Author : Name [EMAIL PROTECTED] You

debian-security (was: Re: Secure temporary fifo creation)

On Mon, 2004-05-17 at 19:02, Will Newton wrote: On Monday 17 May 2004 03:30, Greg Deitrick wrote: Looking at the man pages for various library calls it appears that tmpfile(3) is probably an acceptable means of creating a temporary file, but this returns a FILE *. The upstram source I'm

Re: debian-security (was: Re: Secure temporary fifo creation)

On Mon, 2004-05-17 at 19:27, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Mon, 2004-05-17 at 19:02, Will Newton wrote: [...] debian-security is an inappropriate address to sent this type of query to. It is intended for security advisories and alerts. Codswallop! That would be d-s-*announce*, which

Re: debian-security (was: Re: Secure temporary fifo creation)

On Mon, 2004-05-17 at 20:15, Andreas Metzler wrote: On 2004-05-17 Adam D. Barratt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] Or, indeed, [EMAIL PROTECTED], which has the same destination as [EMAIL PROTECTED] afaik. [...] No (unless this has changed recently without me noticing), [EMAIL PROTECTED

debian-security (was: Re: Secure temporary fifo creation)

On Mon, 2004-05-17 at 19:02, Will Newton wrote: On Monday 17 May 2004 03:30, Greg Deitrick wrote: Looking at the man pages for various library calls it appears that tmpfile(3) is probably an acceptable means of creating a temporary file, but this returns a FILE *. The upstram source I'm

Re: debian-security (was: Re: Secure temporary fifo creation)

On Mon, 2004-05-17 at 19:27, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Mon, 2004-05-17 at 19:02, Will Newton wrote: [...] debian-security is an inappropriate address to sent this type of query to. It is intended for security advisories and alerts. Codswallop! That would be d-s-*announce*, which

Re: debian-security (was: Re: Secure temporary fifo creation)

On Mon, 2004-05-17 at 20:15, Andreas Metzler wrote: On 2004-05-17 Adam D. Barratt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] Or, indeed, [EMAIL PROTECTED], which has the same destination as [EMAIL PROTECTED] afaik. [...] No (unless this has changed recently without me noticing), [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: RFS: for two orphaned packages

On Wednesday, May 05, 2004 10:31 PM GMT+1, Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Adam D. Barratt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Wed, 2004-05-05 at 19:17, Andreas Metzler wrote: [...] nitpick follows PS: for i in images/*.ppm images/*.pbm; do rm -vf $$i.gz ... hurts my eyes. Please

Re: RFS: for two orphaned packages

On Wednesday, May 05, 2004 10:31 PM GMT+1, Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Adam D. Barratt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Wed, 2004-05-05 at 19:17, Andreas Metzler wrote: [...] nitpick follows PS: for i in images/*.ppm images/*.pbm; do rm -vf $$i.gz ... hurts my eyes. Please

Re: RFS: for two orphaned packages

On Wed, 2004-05-05 at 19:17, Andreas Metzler wrote: [...] nitpick follows PS: for i in images/*.ppm images/*.pbm; do rm -vf $$i.gz ... hurts my eyes. Please quote $$i.gz, ie.: $$i.gz. ;-) PPS: I'd use sind find -print0 ... | xargs -0 rm Even better, xargs -0r rm. That way, rm won't

Re: RFS: for two orphaned packages

On Wed, 2004-05-05 at 19:17, Andreas Metzler wrote: [...] nitpick follows PS: for i in images/*.ppm images/*.pbm; do rm -vf $$i.gz ... hurts my eyes. Please quote $$i.gz, ie.: $$i.gz. ;-) PPS: I'd use sind find -print0 ... | xargs -0 rm Even better, xargs -0r rm. That way, rm won't

Re: RFS: for two orphaned packages

On Tue, 2004-05-04 at 22:22, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote: On Tue, May 04, 2004 at 10:46:50PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote: 2) csmash - a table tennis simulation game I've fixed one outstanding bug and I like this game very much ;) [...] Hello, I have taken a short peek at this

Re: RFS: for two orphaned packages

On Tue, 2004-05-04 at 22:22, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote: On Tue, May 04, 2004 at 10:46:50PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote: 2) csmash - a table tennis simulation game I've fixed one outstanding bug and I like this game very much ;) [...] Hello, I have taken a short peek at this