Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On Fri, May 07, 2021 at 10:45:35AM +0200, Jörg Frings-Fürst wrote:
>...
> dmidecode (3.3-2) experimental; urgency=medium
> .
>* Add upstream recommended patches (Closes: #987033):
> - New debian/patches/0145-Fix_condition_error_in_ascii_filter.patch.
> -
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On Sat, Feb 13, 2021 at 01:13:00AM +0100, Dennis Braun wrote:
>...
>* Drop gtk Depends for now, gtk3 still not supported
>* Fix build without gtk2
Why not go back to building with gtk2?
> Regards,
> Dennis
cu
Adrian
On Sun, Nov 08, 2020 at 07:02:27PM +0100, Jörg Frings-Fürst wrote:
> Hello Adrian,
Hi Jörg,
> CVE-2020-26159 was released following a review with Coverity. This resulted in
> 27 errors. One of them was a false positive.
>
> Which of the bugs led to the CVE report I cannot judge.
>
> The
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On Sun, Nov 08, 2020 at 01:19:46PM +0100, Jörg Frings-Fürst wrote:
>...
> Changes since the last upload:
Looks good, except:
>...
>* New upstream release.
>...
> - Fix CVE-2020-26159 (Closes: #972113).
>...
What is the status of this CVE?
If the comment in
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On Sun, Oct 18, 2020 at 08:25:11PM -0300, Fabio Augusto De Muzio Tobich wrote:
>...
> Changes since the last upload:
>
> ipcalc-ng (1.0.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium
>...
>* debian/manpage/ipcalc-ng.1: added to provide a manpage generated from the
> upstream
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On Wed, Nov 04, 2020 at 10:37:14AM -0300, Carlos Henrique Lima Melara wrote:
>...
> Changes since the last upload:
Looks good to me, except:
> pekwm (0.1.17-4) unstable; urgency=medium
>...
>- 50_fix-FTBFS-with-gcc-10.patch: created to fix a FTBFS bug.
>
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 10:36:29AM +0200, Gürkan Myczko wrote:
>...
> Changes since the last upload:
>
> klystrack (0.20171212-5) unstable; urgency=medium
> .
>* Add -fcommon to upstream CFLAGS. (Closes: #957407)
>...
Please use the proper upstream fix instead:
On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 11:47:30PM -0300, Carlos Henrique Lima Melara wrote:
> Hi, Adrian.
Hi Charles,
please always Cc people in the BTS, except for the maintainer noone gets
automatically subscribed.
> On Thu, 27 Aug 2020 11:41:48 +0300 Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > Looks
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On Sat, Jul 11, 2020 at 02:02:43PM +0200, Nicolas Schier wrote:
>...
> Changes since the last upload:
>...
>* Enable autopkgtest by using upstream tests (Closes: #944957)
This likely worked when you posted the sponsorship request,
but new pylint makes it fail:
...
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On Sun, Jul 05, 2020 at 07:15:01PM +0800, Nick Gasson wrote:
>...
> Changes since the last upload:
Looks good, except:
>...
> - Update debhelper compatibility level to 13.
-Build-Depends: cdbs, debhelper (>= 9)
+Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 9), debhelper-compat
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On Sat, Jul 25, 2020 at 11:36:12AM -0300, charlesmel...@outlook.com wrote:
>...
> devtodo (0.1.20-8) unstable; urgency=medium
>...
Looks good, except:
>* debian/rules: replaced override_dh_auto_install with dh_bash-completion
> for the installation of
On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 08:40:29AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Fri, 2020-06-12 at 00:50 +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > Control: tags 962669 moreinfo
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 08:18:38PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2020-06-11 at 13:
Control: tags 962669 moreinfo
On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 08:18:38PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Thu, 2020-06-11 at 13:48 -0500, Michael Shuler wrote:
> > On 6/11/20 1:33 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > Just to confirm - will the certificates be automatically re-added
> > > (assuming that
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On Wed, Jun 03, 2020 at 08:04:45AM +, Håvard Flaget Aasen wrote:
>...
> Changes since the last upload:
>...
>* d/rules
> - Change to dh-sequence
>...
>* d/control
>...
> - Remove unnecessary Depends field
>...
This was necessary, it was just broken
On Fri, Jun 05, 2020 at 08:06:28AM -0500, Michael Shuler wrote:
> On 6/5/20 4:15 AM, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > Compared to 20200601 and 20200601~deb10u1 this contains the following
> > additional files:
> >
> > /usr/share/ca-certificates/mozilla/AddTrust_Low-Value_Services
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On Thu, Jun 04, 2020 at 08:37:24PM -0500, Michael Shuler wrote:
>...
> Changes since the last upload:
>
>* Rebuild for stretch.
>* Merge changes from 20200601
> - d/control
>* This release updates the Mozilla CA bundle to 2.40, blacklists
>
On Wed, Jun 03, 2020 at 08:40:02AM -0500, Michael Shuler wrote:
>...
> Generally, expiry date has not been an issue remaining in the bundle until
> removal upstream, since the certification authorities have managed migration
> to new roots well and openssl>=1.1.1 handles this gracefully. This
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On Mon, Jun 01, 2020 at 06:05:56PM -0500, Michael Shuler wrote:
>...
> To access further information about this package, please visit the
> following URL:
>
> https://mentors.debian.net/package/ca-certificates
>...
> Changes since the last upload:
>
> *
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On Mon, Jun 01, 2020 at 08:29:42PM +0200, Jörg Frings-Fürst wrote:
>...
> Changes since the last upload:
>...
> - New debian/not-installed:
>+ Add all files of dh_missing errors.
This would be followed by
RFS: uriparser/0.9.4+dfsg-2 [RC]
* Fix ftbfs
Control: tags 960678 moreinfo
Control: tags 887534 - patch
On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 08:31:31PM +0100, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> This error is not reproducible any more
>...
It is still there, both for me locally and in reproducible:
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 09:50:16PM +0200, Dennis Braun wrote:
>...
> Changes since the last upload:
>...
Looks good, except:
>...
> * New upstream version 0.9.14
> + Fixes FTCBFS (Closes: #945905)
>...
This bug was already fixed in upstream verison 0.9.13,
and it is
On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 08:56:50PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
>...
> On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 11:19:27AM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > What does fix the problem is disabling OpenMP.
> > I suspect OpenMP is somehow broken in gcc >= 8 on mipsel.
>
> I wonder how we could
Hi,
I tried to narrow down what broke clustalo on mipsel.
The test from 1.2.4-5 passes with the binary in buster,
but not when rebuilding it in buster.
gcc versions:
7: works
8: broken
9: broken
10: broken
clustalo in buster was built with gcc 7, a rebuild with the gcc 8 now in
buster
On Sun, Jun 09, 2019 at 02:56:53PM +0200, Philip Hands wrote:
> Adrian Bunk writes:
> > On Sun, Jun 09, 2019 at 12:55:14PM +0200, Jonas Meurer wrote:
>...
> >> [1] Let me give two examples for such "infrastructure projects":
> >> */ Many in Debian
On Sun, Jun 09, 2019 at 12:55:14PM +0200, Jonas Meurer wrote:
> Hi,
Hi Jonas,
>...
> So here's the idea we came up with: We could explicitely broaden the
> scope of debian-mentors to include any questions regarding Debian
> infrastructure software.
> That basicly would mean to explicitely
On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 09:39:42PM +0200, Juhani Numminen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Adrian Bunk kirjoitti 24.11.2018 klo 13.50:
> > On Fri, Nov 23, 2018 at 07:47:28PM +0200, Juhani Numminen wrote:
> >> ...
>
> > Thanks, uploaded.
> >
> > Note that for t
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On Sat, Nov 24, 2018 at 12:34:52AM +0100, Gunter Königsmann wrote:
>...
> Changes since the last upload:
>
> * New upstream release that drastically improves the drawing speed, provides
> a better lisp mode,
>improves the loop of the program and fixes many bugs
sked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
Description: Correct the libMUSCLE.la dependency
This allows automake to generate proper depe
Control: tags -1 - help moreinfo
On Sun, May 20, 2018 at 09:05:48AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Control: tags -1 help
>
> Hi,
>
> the build log of prime-phylo[1] has:
>
> ...
> cd /build/prime-phylo-1.0.11/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/src/cxx/libraries/prime &&
> /usr/bin/c++ -DONLY_ONE_TIMESAMPLE
Control: owner -1 !
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 10:58:19AM +0100, Mateusz Łukasik wrote:
>...
> Changes since the last upload:
> * New upstream release. (Closes: #892054)
> + Drop all patches included upstream.
> * debian/control:
> + Bump debhelper version to
On Sat, Mar 10, 2018 at 07:53:47PM +0800, Boyuan Yang wrote:
>...
> I have prepared an NMU for package lmms with some of its uploaders'
> acknowledgment [1] and am looking for a sponsor to upload it into
> DELAYED/7 queue. Feel free to tell me if I should wait any longer.
>...
> Changes since
On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 10:45:27AM +0200, Juhani Numminen wrote:
>...
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pentobi"
>
> * Package name: pentobi
>Version : 14.0-1
>...
Thanks, uploaded.
> With best regards,
> Juhani
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?"
On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 08:13:08PM +0200, Mateusz Łukasik wrote:
>...
> debdiff attacted.
>...
Thanks, uploaded.
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er
On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 07:23:20AM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> Hello,
>
> > rnahybrid FTBFS on armel:
>
>
> the warning above is somewhat important
> (too many nested loops), and this usually relates badly with
> high optimization levels
>...
The warning is about an off-by-one in the
On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 08:19:35PM -0400, Patrick Hetu wrote:
> > > On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 05:59:11PM -0400, Patrick Hetu wrote:
> > > > * Fixed compatibility with Guile 2.0. (Closes: #707903)
> >
> > Thank you for your work to fix this bug.
> >
> > What is the source of the patch you have
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 03:10:57AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sun, 2016-10-16 at 18:57 +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> [...]
> > You should fix your package so that it works on the lowest supported
> > hardware of each port.
>
> Right.
>
> > Autobuilding is
On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 02:14:47PM +, lumin wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I encountered an unexpected FTBFS on amd64 that I can't repro.[1]
> And I'd like to ask the list before fixing it by e.g. an binary
> only upload.
>
> My package lua-torch-torch7/experimental fails[2] to build from
> source
On Thu, 17 May 2001, Eric Van Buggenhaut wrote:
It's your package. One thing you could do when you start working on it is
to remove the conflict between xabacus and xmabacus - there are better
solutions in Debian when two packages share the same file.
OK, thanks.
I've been looking thru
On Sun, 25 Mar 2001, Ivo Timmermans wrote:
I'm trying to find a fix for bug #90673:
Proftp'd postinst contains at least one thing that modifies
/etc/proftpd.conf:
echo "Editing /etc/proftpd.conf ... "
sed "s/^## //" /etc/proftpd.conf /etc/proftpd.conf.dpkg-tmp
mv
On Wed, 7 Mar 2001, Todd J. Troxell wrote:
Hello mentors
Hi Todd,
I've created my first package (wmxres) and would like to verify that
it is correct before I begin another. I would eventually like to be
sponsored. It is available at http://www.xtat.f2s.com/debian/. It is
a dockable app
On Wed, 14 Mar 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, I have put my package c2050 online. You can find it at url
http://www.prato.linux.it/~mnencia/debian/
Now I need a sponsor :)
I can sponsor and advocate you when you:
- raise the Standards-Version of the package to at least 3.1.0
(you have
On Wed, 7 Mar 2001, Todd J. Troxell wrote:
Hello mentors
Hi Todd,
I've created my first package (wmxres) and would like to verify that
it is correct before I begin another. I would eventually like to be
sponsored. It is available at http://www.xtat.f2s.com/debian/. It is
a dockable app
On Wed, 14 Mar 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, I have put my package c2050 online. You can find it at url
http://www.prato.linux.it/~mnencia/debian/
Now I need a sponsor :)
I can sponsor and advocate you when you:
- raise the Standards-Version of the package to at least 3.1.0
(you have
On Tue, 20 Mar 2001, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
I've changed my e-mail address, so my last upload of a package seems to
be a NMU, how I fix the problem ?
This is the line reported in the last changes file, the second is my new
e-mail address:
Maintainer: Stefano Zacchiroli [EMAIL
On Tue, 20 Mar 2001, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
I've changed my e-mail address, so my last upload of a package seems to
be a NMU, how I fix the problem ?
This is the line reported in the last changes file, the second is my new
e-mail address:
Maintainer: Stefano Zacchiroli [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 7 Mar 2001, Corrin Lakeland wrote:
I'm packaging gnubg (gnu backgammon program). I'm a bit worried that this
name is too short and I should call it gnubackgammon or something.
Why do you think this name is too short? There are even many packages that
have names with only 2 or 3
On Wed, 7 Mar 2001, Corrin Lakeland wrote:
I'm packaging gnubg (gnu backgammon program). I'm a bit worried that this
name is too short and I should call it gnubackgammon or something.
Why do you think this name is too short? There are even many packages that
have names with only 2 or 3
On 5 Mar 2001, Mikael Hedin wrote:
Hi,
Hi Mikael,
I'm waiting for DAM approval since new years eve. As the waiting goes
on, I'm looking for sponsors for the following packages (I have
ITP/ITA for them long ago):
I can sponsor you.
Below follows which packages are already uploaded and
On Thu, 1 Mar 2001, Michael Janssen (CS/MATH stud.) wrote:
Hi all --
Hi Michael,
I am looking for a sponsor for two packages that I have completed -
I am in the NM queue (next on the list for an AM).. The two packages are:
I can sponsor your packages.
vgrabbj -- a program for grabbing
On Thu, 1 Mar 2001, Michael Janssen (CS/MATH stud.) wrote:
Hi all --
Hi Michael,
I am looking for a sponsor for two packages that I have completed -
I am in the NM queue (next on the list for an AM).. The two packages are:
I can sponsor your packages.
vgrabbj -- a program for grabbing
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
All help, suggestions, comments, much appreciated. Thanks
Please read the Debian New Maintainers' Guide at [1]. That's a good
written tutorial for beginners and reading it should answer your
questions.
Holgar Ostermann
cu
Adrian
[1]
On Fri, 16 Feb 2001, Luis Arocha wrote:
- Forwarded message from Debian Installer [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 15:07:01 -0500
From: Debian Installer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Luis Arocha [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: xmorph_2428-2_i386.changes REJECTED
Rejected:
On Fri, 16 Feb 2001, Luis Arocha wrote:
Why do you want to upload the .orig file? You are uploading a package with
the same upstream .orig.tar.gz as the package already in unstable, that
means it would be a waste of bandwidth to upload it again.
I changed the name and directory of
On Fri, 16 Feb 2001, Luis Arocha wrote:
Why do you want to upload the .orig file? You are uploading a package with
the same upstream .orig.tar.gz as the package already in unstable, that
means it would be a waste of bandwidth to upload it again.
I changed the name and directory of
On Thu, 15 Feb 2001, Sven LUTHER wrote:
Hello, ...
Hi Sven,
I am sponsoring someone who wants to become a new maintainer, and well, i have
checked the packages and there are ok.
Now, what is the correct way for his packages to be uploaded into debian.
I thought that buildiing and signing
On Tue, 13 Feb 2001, Luis Arocha -data- wrote:
Hi,
Hi Luis,
Which are the common steps/time for a package to go from incoming to testing?
there is an explanation in section 5.6.1 of the Developer's Reference. It
takes at least 10/5/2 days (for the urgency low/medium/high).
TIA
cu,
Adrian
On Tue, 13 Feb 2001, Joe Drew wrote:
dh_shlibdeps
dh_gencontrol
dpkg-gencontrol: error: current build architecture alpha does not appear in
package's list (i386)
dh_gencontrol: command returned error code
make: *** [binary-arch] Error 1
This probably corresponds to lxdoom-svga
On Tue, 13 Feb 2001, Luis Arocha -data- wrote:
Hi,
Hi Luis,
Which are the common steps/time for a package to go from incoming to testing?
there is an explanation in section 5.6.1 of the Developer's Reference. It
takes at least 10/5/2 days (for the urgency low/medium/high).
TIA
cu,
Adrian
On Tue, 13 Feb 2001, Joe Drew wrote:
dh_shlibdeps
dh_gencontrol
dpkg-gencontrol: error: current build architecture alpha does not appear in
package's list (i386)
dh_gencontrol: command returned error code
make: *** [binary-arch] Error 1
This probably corresponds to lxdoom-svga
On Mon, 12 Feb 2001, Ben Collins wrote:
I'm not sure if this was covered in the last round of ROM-talks, but:
If I have free source to a ROM image (GPL, say) for a free emulator,
but the tools to build the image are DFSG non-free, does the resulting
binary image need to go into
On Mon, 12 Feb 2001, Ben Collins wrote:
I'm not sure if this was covered in the last round of ROM-talks, but:
If I have free source to a ROM image (GPL, say) for a free emulator,
but the tools to build the image are DFSG non-free, does the resulting
binary image need to go into non-free
On Sun, 4 Feb 2001, Joshua Haberman wrote:
...
http://www.reverberate.org/potato/audacity_0.94_i386.deb
http://www.reverberate.org/woody/audacity_0.94_i386.deb
Lintian complained at the very end of the latter build:
W: audacity: unknown-section unknown
Is that a section in the executable
On Fri, 2 Feb 2001, Drew Parsons wrote:
...
W: meschach: binary-has-unneeded-section ./usr/lib/libmeschach.so.1.2 .note
W: meschach: binary-has-unneeded-section ./usr/lib/libmeschach.so.1.2 .comment
I got no idea whatsoever what the second two messages mean. I'm compiling
the library with
On Fri, 2 Feb 2001, Drew Parsons wrote:
...
W: meschach: binary-has-unneeded-section ./usr/lib/libmeschach.so.1.2 .note
W: meschach: binary-has-unneeded-section ./usr/lib/libmeschach.so.1.2 .comment
I got no idea whatsoever what the second two messages mean. I'm compiling
the library with
On Fri, 26 Jan 2001, Rick Younie wrote:
...
Not really. If the sponsor does not change the changelog entry, email
goes to whomever is listed there (at least that's how it behaved the last
time I sponsored someone).
I found the easiest way to do this is for the sponsor to build the
On Fri, 26 Jan 2001, Rick Younie wrote:
...
Not really. If the sponsor does not change the changelog entry, email
goes to whomever is listed there (at least that's how it behaved the last
time I sponsored someone).
I found the easiest way to do this is for the sponsor to build the
On Thu, 25 Jan 2001, Moshe Zadka wrote:
(Please CC me: I'm not on the list)
Where are each virtual package capabilities listed?
/usr/share/doc/debian-policy/virtual-package-names-list.text.gz
I mean, something like: to provide a "mail-transport-agent",
there must be a /usr/lib/sendmail,
On Thu, 25 Jan 2001, Moshe Zadka wrote:
(Please CC me: I'm not on the list)
Where are each virtual package capabilities listed?
/usr/share/doc/debian-policy/virtual-package-names-list.text.gz
I mean, something like: to provide a mail-transport-agent,
there must be a /usr/lib/sendmail,
On Fri, 19 Jan 2001, Thomas Smith wrote:
hello!
Hi Thomas,
If someone would take the time to give these packages a
quick check-over and upload them (I'm in NM queue, etc.),
I would be much obliged.
...
I can sponsor you. I'll write you in a seperate mail which packaging
errors need to be
On Fri, 19 Jan 2001, Thomas Smith wrote:
hello!
Hi Thomas,
If someone would take the time to give these packages a
quick check-over and upload them (I'm in NM queue, etc.),
I would be much obliged.
...
I can sponsor you. I'll write you in a seperate mail which packaging
errors need to be
On Mon, 15 Jan 2001, Brian Russo wrote:
When adopting packages, for which there is essentially no reason to upload..
i.e.. no new version, no bugs, no planned changes, is there anything one
should do apart from emailing override, before closing the bug in wnpp?
Do an upload to change the
On Mon, 15 Jan 2001, Brian Russo wrote:
When adopting packages, for which there is essentially no reason to upload..
i.e.. no new version, no bugs, no planned changes, is there anything one
should do apart from emailing override, before closing the bug in wnpp?
Do an upload to change the
On Sat, 13 Jan 2001, Stephen Langasek wrote:
Hi all,
Hi Stephen,
I'm taking on the packaging of a library that has a build-time dependency on
the dev package from another library. Do any of the dpkg-dev or debhelper
tools check for this line in the control file? I've poked around a bit
On Sat, 13 Jan 2001, Stephen Langasek wrote:
Hi all,
Hi Stephen,
I'm taking on the packaging of a library that has a build-time dependency on
the dev package from another library. Do any of the dpkg-dev or debhelper
tools check for this line in the control file? I've poked around a bit in
On Fri, 12 Jan 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
If it takes a year to complete my application, I will quit. I have a number
of other projects I'd like to do - Project Gutenberg, GCC, several free
software projects of my own. It's not worth hanging around a year for a
project to accept me as
On Fri, 12 Jan 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
What bothers me most about the delays in the NM queue are their
capriciousness. I got through the process relatively quickly (about three
months or so, a fair time), but others have no such luck. And it is luck,
not [always] lack trying on
On Fri, 12 Jan 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
If it takes a year to complete my application, I will quit. I have a number
of other projects I'd like to do - Project Gutenberg, GCC, several free
software projects of my own. It's not worth hanging around a year for a
project to accept me as
On Fri, 12 Jan 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
What bothers me most about the delays in the NM queue are their
capriciousness. I got through the process relatively quickly (about three
months or so, a fair time), but others have no such luck. And it is luck,
not [always] lack trying on
On Mon, 8 Jan 2001, Michael Moerz wrote:
Hi!
Hi Michael!
I have adopted metamail to make it work with unstable, but I used
autoconfautoconf to rewrite the build-process. The problem was
that things were defined in a metamail header file that were
later redefined by an included system
On Mon, 8 Jan 2001, Michael Moerz wrote:
Hi!
Hi Michael!
I have adopted metamail to make it work with unstable, but I used
autoconfautoconf to rewrite the build-process. The problem was
that things were defined in a metamail header file that were
later redefined by an included system
On 7 Jan 2001, Jason Henry Parker wrote:
Hi,
Hi Jason,
The byacc upstream tarball on ftp.debian.org 52916 bytes long, but on
my development system, it compresses to 52930 bytes. (There hasn't
been an upload of this package in about a year, shame on me.) I need
to do an upload to fix
On 7 Jan 2001, Jason Henry Parker wrote:
Hi,
Hi Jason,
The byacc upstream tarball on ftp.debian.org 52916 bytes long, but on
my development system, it compresses to 52930 bytes. (There hasn't
been an upload of this package in about a year, shame on me.) I need
to do an upload to fix
On 20 Dec 2000, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
...
It has a Architecture: all in the control file. However, building
with dpkg-buildpackage generates a
fortunes-bofh-excuses_1.1-1_i386.changes, not
fortunes-bofh-excuses_1.1-1_all.changes as I would expect.
Is it supposed to be that way? I
On 20 Dec 2000, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
...
It has a Architecture: all in the control file. However, building
with dpkg-buildpackage generates a
fortunes-bofh-excuses_1.1-1_i386.changes, not
fortunes-bofh-excuses_1.1-1_all.changes as I would expect.
Is it supposed to be that way? I
On Wed, 13 Dec 2000, Othmar Pasteka wrote:
What's the best way of maintaining or creating a man page?
I'll be needing to do that with some of my packages, but it just occurred to
me I don't actually know how, apart from cutting and pasting in a text
editor. My guess is there's a simple
On Tue, 12 Dec 2000, Pete Lypkie wrote:
...
gcc2.95.2-20
...
First of all, i believe you should compile 2.2.17 with gcc version 2.7.2
you can install it from the package called "gcc272".
IIRC, the 2.4 series has moved to using gcc 2.95, but 2.2 still needs gcc
2.7.2
...
It's
On Tue, 12 Dec 2000, Pete Lypkie wrote:
...
gcc2.95.2-20
...
First of all, i believe you should compile 2.2.17 with gcc version 2.7.2
you can install it from the package called gcc272.
IIRC, the 2.4 series has moved to using gcc 2.95, but 2.2 still needs gcc
2.7.2
...
It's a
On Mon, 11 Dec 2000, Toni Mueller wrote:
Hello,
Hi Tony,
I'm in the process of qualifying for a Debian Maintainer and need
to deliver some working packages. I've done some, but have problems
understanding how the toolchain works (so my Build-Depends and Depends
are out of line). Where do
On Mon, 11 Dec 2000, Toni Mueller wrote:
Hello,
Hi Tony,
I'm in the process of qualifying for a Debian Maintainer and need
to deliver some working packages. I've done some, but have problems
understanding how the toolchain works (so my Build-Depends and Depends
are out of line). Where do
On Sun, 26 Nov 2000, Roberto Suarez Soto wrote:
cdcover
wallp
I would like to adopt these two. I'm not using wallp now, but I used
it a while ago and I liked it; and I hope to buy a cd-burner soon and have a
reason to use cdcover :-)
They are now your packages.
cu,
Adrian
On Sun, 26 Nov 2000, Mariusz Przygodzki wrote:
...
have to use it just once. Probably you will not avoid to rebuild configure
stuff but I think it's not a problem, just only bigger *.diff.gz.
You can avoid the bigger *.diff.gz if you remove generated files like
configure in the clean target.
On Sun, 26 Nov 2000, Roberto Suarez Soto wrote:
cdcover
wallp
I would like to adopt these two. I'm not using wallp now, but I used
it a while ago and I liked it; and I hope to buy a cd-burner soon and have a
reason to use cdcover :-)
They are now your packages.
cu,
Adrian
--
On Sun, 26 Nov 2000, Mariusz Przygodzki wrote:
...
have to use it just once. Probably you will not avoid to rebuild configure
stuff but I think it's not a problem, just only bigger *.diff.gz.
You can avoid the bigger *.diff.gz if you remove generated files like
configure in the clean target.
On Sun, 26 Nov 2000, Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
Easy packages (good for new maintainers):
xearth
I would like to take this one if anyone does not take it.
It's yours.
I am very near a new maintainer (perhaps in the last stage
of new maintainer process, awaiting for DAM approval) but
not
On Sun, 26 Nov 2000, Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
Easy packages (good for new maintainers):
xearth
I would like to take this one if anyone does not take it.
It's yours.
I am very near a new maintainer (perhaps in the last stage
of new maintainer process, awaiting for DAM approval) but
not
On Fri, 24 Nov 2000, zhaoway wrote:
hi,
i have a bug on compiling on m68k. i have no experience beyond i386.
is there some guideline/step-by-step/tutorial on dealing with such
bugs?
According to http://db.debian.org/machines.cgi there's with
kullervo.debian.org a m68k machine you can get
Hi,
I maintain some packages I do no longer use. I won't put them on the WNPP
list and I can continue maintaining them, but if someone else wants to
take one or more of them I'm happy to give them away.
Easy packages (good for new maintainers):
cdcover
hindent
penguineyes(-gnome)
wallp
Hi,
I maintain some packages I do no longer use. I won't put them on the WNPP
list and I can continue maintaining them, but if someone else wants to
take one or more of them I'm happy to give them away.
Easy packages (good for new maintainers):
cdcover
hindent
penguineyes(-gnome)
wallp
On Fri, 24 Nov 2000, zhaoway wrote:
hi,
i have a bug on compiling on m68k. i have no experience beyond i386.
is there some guideline/step-by-step/tutorial on dealing with such
bugs?
According to http://db.debian.org/machines.cgi there's with
kullervo.debian.org a m68k machine you can get an
On Thu, 23 Nov 2000, zhaoway wrote:
hi,
should bug-fix-upload be a batch job? i.e. every upload
fixes as many as possible bugs/lintian errors etc. ?
or is it okay to upload for easy-fix-bug(s) while leave
other maybe-difficult-but-obvious-bugs for the next upload?
It's OK if you can fix
1 - 100 of 134 matches
Mail list logo
