unstable main
contrib non-free
- dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/fig2sxd/fig2sxd_0.21-2.dsc
I would be glad if someone uploaded these packages for me.
Kind regards
Alexander Bürger
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe
is
corrupted. It also adds one new feature: now there is an option to
rename the styles used in the output file.
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Kind regards
Alexander Bürger
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
Salut Vincent,
Uploaded. Sorry for the delay.
Thanks.
Alexander
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
finally the upload to mentors.debian.net worked :-)
Your upload of the package 'fig2sxd' to mentors.debian.net was
successful. Sponsors can now download it. The URL of your package is:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/fig2sxd
The respective dsc file can be found at:
Hei,
... upstream changelog ...
So, I made a new version 0.20-1 and it is available via
URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/fig2sxd
Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main
contrib non-free
dget
Ouch, I sent my last mail too early. I wanted to add that:
No. I say that uploading in unstable a version that will never go in
testing because of the freeze would put some difficulties on you if you
need to upload a fix (a small fix that would be 0.18-2 for example).
I do not understand
Hi,
URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/fig2sxd
Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main
contrib non-free
dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/fig2sxd/fig2sxd_0.20-1.dsc
Doesn't look like it uploaded to me.
HTTP request
Hi,
... Debian changelog, not upstream ...
Hmm. I do not have an upstream changelog, and all previous
debian/changelog entries have the same problem. So what would you
suggest to do:
* Move all debian/changelog entries actually describing upstream changes
to a new upstream-changelog and
Hi,
The new package is re-uploaded to debian-mentors.
It can be found via:
- URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/fig2sxd
- Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main
contrib non-free
- dget
Hei,
You might want to investigate the 'pbuilder' package for maintaining a
chroot specifically to build your packages inside.
You should also test your packages in unstable too.
So how would I do that efficiently? It is highly unlikely that I buy a
second computer, or that I replace
Hi,
... a virtual machine ...
I set up a virtual machine with debian unstable and re-built the
package. The only change from this step was that the Standards-Version
is now 3.8.0.
The new package is re-uploaded to debian-mentors.
It can be found via:
- URL:
Hi,
... virtual machine with debian unstable ...
... inside the chroot ...
Which chroot?
... make sure it's as functional?
Yes, it is!
Best wishes,
Alexander
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
... also test your packages in unstable ...
... how ... efficiently? ...
... burden ... If you're not able ... re-think ...
Sorry. I do not package very often so I sometimes have basic questions
or problems. I was not sure what would be the simplest acceptable
solution to the 'ubuntu
if someone uploaded this package for me.
Kind regards
Alexander Bürger
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
... acknowledge ... NMU ...
I thought so too, but I did not know what to write there, so I skipped
it. Maybe thanks for the NMU of 0.17-1.1? I can hardly put
(Closes: 455650) as the bug is already closed and archived. What do
you suggest?
Well, an NMU should not close a bug.
Salut Vincent,
... debian/changelog... switched to cdbs ... mention it.
Done.
... acknowledge ... NMU ...
I thought so too, but I did not know what to write there, so I skipped
it. Maybe thanks for the NMU of 0.17-1.1? I can hardly put
(Closes: 455650) as the bug is already closed and
Salut Vincent,
... using dpkg-divert ...
You should divert the manpage too.
Oh yes, sorry.
Did you release a new package with the fix?
Yes, Otfried has uploaded a new version and I just uploaded the new
package to mentors.debian.net. The diff now only modifies debian/ and a
Salut Vincent,
Is your package useful for someone that has ipe ( 6.0pre30-1)? As I
understand, those versions already have figtoipe. Therefore, your
package is useless. This is why you Conflict with this package.
No, the old packages had a version of figtoipe that was unable to
Hi,
0==0
Info for debian-devel: we try to figure out how to package figtoipe.
Before version 6.0pre30-1, a version of figtoipe was included in the ipe
package. Since then, figtoipe is a separate upstream package and also
gone
unstable main
contrib non-free
- dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/fig2sxd/fig2sxd_0.18-1.dsc
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Kind regards
Alexander Bürger
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Hi Nico,
fig2sxd- convert XFig files to OpenOffice.org format
What is OpenOffice.org format?
As is elaborated in the long description, the program produces files
(more or less) compatible with the .sxd format of OpenOffice.org Draw.
Although this description may not be precise, it has
Hi,
... diversion for the file is probably the right way to go.
A new package using dpkg-divert instead of Replaces: has been uploaded
to mentors.debian.net, and I would be happy if it could be sponsored.
Kind regards,
Alexander
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
Hi Vincent,
... using dpkg-divert ...
You should divert the manpage too.
Oh yes, sorry.
... modifying upstream ...
Well, as I am also the upstream maintainer it would be strange to add a
patch. As I cannot upload to the luaforge website, I just did not want
to bother Otfried because of
Hei,
I do not understand Replaces/Conflicts very well.
You should. ;-)
Conflicts avoids that your package is installed along with another
package. Replaces allows your package to replace files from some other
packages during upgrades.
Replaces: ipe ( 6.0pre30-1)
Conflicts:
Hi,
Fill an ITP when working on a package and close it in your changelog.
I submitted one, so I can close #481022 in the changelog.
... figtoipe was provided by ipe in the past, ... Replaces ... Conflicts ...
I do not understand Replaces/Conflicts very well. I believe that all ipe
packages
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package figtoipe.
* Package name: figtoipe
Version : 20080505-1
Upstream Author : Otfried Cheong, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Alexander Bürger, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://tclab.kaist.ac.kr/ipe
* License
Salut Vincent,
Sorry, I was not on the debian-mentors list.
figtoipe has also been removed from the upstream ipe package. The reason
is that the code of ipe and figtoipe has no overlap. When I sent patches
to Otfried Cheong (the author of ipe and figtoipe) to add some features
to figtoipe, he
Good morning,
why 0.17-2 and not 0.17-1?
Version 0.17-1 was the one I had uploaded to mentors.debian.net with the
typo in the number of the closed bug.
Alexander
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
why 0.17-2 and not 0.17-1?
Version 0.17-1 was the one I had uploaded to mentors.debian.net with the typo
in the number of the closed bug.
Well, I know that some DDs require it, but for me debian/changelog file is
to document changes in package for other Debian users and developers and
.
Best wishes,
Alexander Bürger
Hi,
$ gpg --recv-keys 6BCCC58A
gpg: requesting key 6BCCC58A from hkp server pgp.mit.edu
gpgkeys: key 6BCCC58A not found on keyserver
Sorry. This was somehow no problem during the last upload, so I thought
that everything would be ok with the key. Now I ran
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu
if someone uploaded this package for me.
Kind regards
Alexander Bürger
The upload would fix bug 471183 and adds output to stdout as new
feature.
No, it doesn't. There's no bug with such a number.
Sorry, that's true. It is bug 417183, I swapped the second and third
digit. I will make a new package soon.
Alexander
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-1.dsc
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Kind regards
Alexander Bürger
://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/fig2sxd
I would be glad if someone could upload the package for me.
Best regards,
Alexander Bürger
the most recent version available from http://fig2sxd.sf.net/
mentors.d.n
It's there and also on sf.net.
however, i had a look at your package:
* remove the useless empty line at the end of changelog
* bump the standards version to the current one, check with lintian if
there are
be uploaded. Thank
you for your help.
Alexander Bürger
Hi Rene,
Anyhow, besides the fact I don't like your changelog entry for -2.1
( * Fix packaging problem - which? I know, but changelog is
for documenting the actual changes)
i'll see over this, the package otherwise is ok and uploaded.
Please write better changelog entries next time,
Hi,
well, it doesn't hurt.. Although a public key not accessible doesn't
exactly make much sense. ;) And gpg already shows the uid etc so verify
the signature would work when the key is on a keyserver or somesuch.
I sent it to hkp://subkeys.pgp.net with gnupg.
Anyway...
$ dpkg-source -x
Hi,
Argh. This is just plainly _wrong_. Read policy and developers reference
about versioning what -2.1 actually means...
I'm sorry, but I cannot find anything negative about 2.1 as debian
revision. In the policy I read section 5.6.11 which tells me that 2=2.1
which is what I want; my upstream
Hi,
Argh. This is just plainly _wrong_. Read policy and developers reference
about versioning what -2.1 actually means...
I'm sorry, but I cannot find anything negative about 2.1 as debian
revision.
It's not negative -- and every other aspect you mentioned is also true. What
Rene
Hi again,
W: fig2sxd source: newer-standards-version 3.6.0
I cannot reproduce this. I have installed lintian 1.22.9, but it does not
give this warning. How do you get this? Anyway, after reading the
changelog for debian-policy I decided to put Standards-Version: 3.6.1.0
into debain/control.
Hi again,
W: fig2sxd source: newer-standards-version 3.6.0
I cannot reproduce this. I have installed lintian 1.22.9, but it does not
give this warning. How do you get this? Anyway, after reading the
changelog for debian-policy I decided to put Standards-Version: 3.6.1.0
into debain/control.
Hi,
Rene Engelhard wrote:
No.
What I forgot here:
Fix this:
I tried to follow your advice, and I also converted everything to utf-8
(basically the ü from my name, which occurs in almost all the files). Of
course, a new upstream version was necessary, now it's 0.10. The files,
including
Hi,
I have written a utility called fig2sxd which tries to convert from xfig
format to OpenOffice.org Draw format. Although the conversion is not
perfect, it could be useful to others, especially together with pstoedit.
I tried to make a debian package of it; it's small (program, manpage,
Hi,
I have written a utility called fig2sxd which tries to convert from xfig
format to OpenOffice.org Draw format. Although the conversion is not
perfect, it could be useful to others, especially together with pstoedit.
I tried to make a debian package of it; it's small (program, manpage,
46 matches
Mail list logo
