On 2004-04-29 Andreas Metzler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
automake --add-missing --copy autoconf
‐‐force‐missing is missing. - Just for the archives.
cu andreas
On 2004-04-29 GCS [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I maintain a package, which needs en_US locale for testing the build. I
did it as writing en_US to /etc/locale.gen and generate the locales
again, if it's not yet done. Then set LC_ALL to en_US, and do the test.
So far, so good, it works. But now I
On 2004-04-29 Zak B. Elep [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Apr 27, 2004 at 09:43:32AM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
[...]
Imho the build-depency on gnutls should simply be droppep, gtklp does
not use gnutls, it is just a libtool artefact caused by
libcupsys2-dev, which already depends
On 2004-04-29 Andreas Metzler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
automake --add-missing --copy autoconf
forcemissing is missing. - Just for the archives.
cu andreas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 2004-04-29 GCS [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I maintain a package, which needs en_US locale for testing the build. I
did it as writing en_US to /etc/locale.gen and generate the locales
again, if it's not yet done. Then set LC_ALL to en_US, and do the test.
So far, so good, it works. But now I
On 2004-04-27 Zak B. Elep [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
* New maintainer (Closes: #244199, #245619)
* New upstream version (Closes: #209172, #194459)
* Fixed typo in man page (#170642), patch forwarded to upstream
* Fixed translation bug (#226839), patch forwarded to upstream
On 2004-04-27 William Ballard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Apr 27, 2004 at 11:27:59AM +0200, GCS wrote:
public part to any keyserver like pgp.mit.edu then search someone who
volunteers to sign your key and plan a meeting.
[...]
I don't understand how to do the snipped part above. On
On 2004-04-27 Zak B. Elep [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
* New maintainer (Closes: #244199, #245619)
* New upstream version (Closes: #209172, #194459)
* Fixed typo in man page (#170642), patch forwarded to upstream
* Fixed translation bug (#226839), patch forwarded to upstream
On 2004-04-27 William Ballard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Apr 27, 2004 at 11:27:59AM +0200, GCS wrote:
public part to any keyserver like pgp.mit.edu then search someone who
volunteers to sign your key and plan a meeting.
[...]
I don't understand how to do the snipped part above. On
On 2004-04-16 Steffen Nissen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When trying to upload files to mentors.debian.net an error occurs
because of errors in the .changes file. I can see what the error is, but
unfortunately I do not know how to fix them.
The files section is as follows and I believe that the
On 2004-04-16 Steffen Nissen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When trying to upload files to mentors.debian.net an error occurs
because of errors in the .changes file. I can see what the error is, but
unfortunately I do not know how to fix them.
The files section is as follows and I believe that the
On Fri, Apr 09, 2004 at 08:12:02AM -0600, Benjamin Cutler wrote:
Brian Nelson wrote:
Benjamin Cutler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
* You should change the RFP for stripclub to an ITP (just change the bug
title), and then close the bug in the changelog.
My first attempt to do this kinda
On Fri, Apr 09, 2004 at 08:12:02AM -0600, Benjamin Cutler wrote:
Brian Nelson wrote:
Benjamin Cutler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
* You should change the RFP for stripclub to an ITP (just change the bug
title), and then close the bug in the changelog.
My first attempt to do this kinda
On 2004-04-07 Erik Bourget [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matt Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[adding users]
adduser is the correct tool. See policy 9.2.2.
I do not think that useradd follows, e.g., the uid allocation guidelines in
that section, and adduser's semantics are more convenient
On 2004-04-07 Erik Bourget [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matt Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[adding users]
adduser is the correct tool. See policy 9.2.2.
I do not think that useradd follows, e.g., the uid allocation guidelines in
that section, and adduser's semantics are more convenient
On 2004-04-06 Erik Bourget [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What's the best/accepted way to have a package add users to a Debian
system?
Policy 9.2.
| Packages which need a user or group, but can have this user or
| group allocated dynamically and differently on each system, should
| use adduser
On 2004-04-06 Erik Bourget [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What's the best/accepted way to have a package add users to a Debian
system?
Policy 9.2.
| Packages which need a user or group, but can have this user or
| group allocated dynamically and differently on each system, should
| use adduser
On Mon, Apr 05, 2004 at 09:24:10AM +, n.v.t n.v.t wrote:
I have simple question which I could not find in the debian policy, maybe
someone could point me out to that section or the right documentation? Or a
explanation would be nice. I'm debianizing a package that I would like to
split
On Mon, Apr 05, 2004 at 05:17:47PM +0200, GCS wrote:
I am applied[1] for a Debian Developer role, but as I see, Front Desk
is stalling; I can't see any progress on applicants who have been
advocated. So I have a couple of questions:
- may I hope that Front Desk will assign an AM to me before
On Mon, Apr 05, 2004 at 09:24:10AM +, n.v.t n.v.t wrote:
I have simple question which I could not find in the debian policy, maybe
someone could point me out to that section or the right documentation? Or a
explanation would be nice. I'm debianizing a package that I would like to
split
On Mon, Apr 05, 2004 at 05:17:47PM +0200, GCS wrote:
I am applied[1] for a Debian Developer role, but as I see, Front Desk
is stalling; I can't see any progress on applicants who have been
advocated. So I have a couple of questions:
- may I hope that Front Desk will assign an AM to me before
On 2004-04-02 Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to package some very useful set of utilities[1].
It depends on library of the same author[2].
Unfortunatelly SONAME of this library changes with every new version.
And to make this problem more annoying, new
On 2004-04-02 Benjamin Cutler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
First off I'll admit I only gave a quick glance at the Debian New
Maintainters' Corner, but from what I saw, it looked like the first
step wasn't an automated thing. It sounds like the first thing I need to
do it get to know some of the
On 2004-04-02 Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to package some very useful set of utilities[1].
It depends on library of the same author[2].
Unfortunatelly SONAME of this library changes with every new version.
And to make this problem more annoying, new
On 2004-04-02 Benjamin Cutler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
First off I'll admit I only gave a quick glance at the Debian New
Maintainters' Corner, but from what I saw, it looked like the first
step wasn't an automated thing. It sounds like the first thing I need to
do it get to know some of the
On 2004-03-31 Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[..]
man (mostly) supports you running in a UTF-8 locale by means of some
complicated iconv kludges.
[...]
Hmm. I seem to be doing something seriously wrong. man is completely
unuseable for me in uxterm with UTF-8 locale.
On 2004-03-31 Andreas Metzler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2004-03-31 Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[..]
man (mostly) supports you running in a UTF-8 locale by means of some
complicated iconv kludges.
[...]
Hmm. I seem to be doing something seriously wrong.
[...]
indeed
On 2004-03-31 Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[..]
man (mostly) supports you running in a UTF-8 locale by means of some
complicated iconv kludges.
[...]
Hmm. I seem to be doing something seriously wrong. man is completely
unuseable for me in uxterm with UTF-8 locale.
On 2004-03-31 Andreas Metzler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2004-03-31 Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[..]
man (mostly) supports you running in a UTF-8 locale by means of some
complicated iconv kludges.
[...]
Hmm. I seem to be doing something seriously wrong.
[...]
indeed
On 2004-03-30 Martin-Éric Racine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
If I change my locale setting to [EMAIL PROTECTED] [1], debsign can
no longer find my GPG key, because it expects the accent on my name
to be encoded in UTF-8, even though the key was created in Latin-1.
Have you tried adding a
On 2004-03-30 Steve Halasz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My package, qgis, has failed to build on arm. The error is:
uic: error while loading shared libraries: libICE.so.6: cannot open
shared object file: No such file or directory
Which was caused by broken X11 maintainer scripts at this time.
On 2004-03-30 Martin-Éric Racine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
If I change my locale setting to [EMAIL PROTECTED] [1], debsign can
no longer find my GPG key, because it expects the accent on my name
to be encoded in UTF-8, even though the key was created in Latin-1.
Have you tried adding a
On 2004-03-30 Steve Halasz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My package, qgis, has failed to build on arm. The error is:
uic: error while loading shared libraries: libICE.so.6: cannot open
shared object file: No such file or directory
Which was caused by broken X11 maintainer scripts at this time.
On 2004-03-28 Brian T Glenn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Before attempting to post a bug to Debian directly, I wanted to ask the
people here if perhaps I am doing something incorrectly.
I installed Debian sarge on the sparc64 arch, then went out and grabbed
the 2.6.4 kernel source from
On 2004-03-28 Brian T Glenn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Before attempting to post a bug to Debian directly, I wanted to ask the
people here if perhaps I am doing something incorrectly.
I installed Debian sarge on the sparc64 arch, then went out and grabbed
the 2.6.4 kernel source from
On 2004-03-26 Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 12:03:15AM +0100, Carlos Perelló Marín wrote:
Hi, my packages (ttf-isabella and alleyoop) are now available with
unstable but the wnpp bug reports are still open. The bug reports are:
#190317, #208916
On 2004-03-26 martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am packaging libhid for Debian, which I wrote and prepared with
libtool. Next to the library, the libhid0 package also includes
a binary /usr/bin/libhid-config, which is linked against libhid0.
When I make the Debian package,
On 2004-03-22 Number Six [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some of the scripts I include with my package use less (as well as
sed, tr, and grep). I know for a fact less is not installed by
default. (Not sure about this others).
Should every little ordinary thing like less be included in my
On Mon, Mar 22, 2004 at 04:39:19PM +0100, Silke Reimer wrote:
First I don't know how to fill the Depends for libgdal1-dev
correctly.
http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/column/libpkg-guide/libpkg-guide.html#AEN75
explains the following:
The -dev package should depend on all -dev
On Mon, Mar 22, 2004 at 04:26:49PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
Stephen Frost [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
* Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Sunday 21 March 2004 20.49, Stephen Frost wrote:
.la files shouldn't be included in anything, they're just plain
On 2004-03-22 Roger Leigh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andreas Metzler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, Mar 22, 2004 at 04:26:49PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
[libtool brokenness]
Yes, it did :-|. Could you point me to a documentation where I could
read about these problems, and under what
On 2004-03-22 Number Six [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some of the scripts I include with my package use less (as well as
sed, tr, and grep). I know for a fact less is not installed by
default. (Not sure about this others).
Should every little ordinary thing like less be included in my
On Mon, Mar 22, 2004 at 04:39:19PM +0100, Silke Reimer wrote:
First I don't know how to fill the Depends for libgdal1-dev
correctly.
http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/column/libpkg-guide/libpkg-guide.html#AEN75
explains the following:
The -dev package should depend on all -dev
On Mon, Mar 22, 2004 at 04:26:49PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
Stephen Frost [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
* Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Sunday 21 March 2004 20.49, Stephen Frost wrote:
.la files shouldn't be included in anything, they're just plain
On Mon, Mar 22, 2004 at 06:28:43PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
Andreas Metzler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
Personally I think the payoff is ok, due to dlopen in glibc (NSS,
iconv) static linking is unreliable anyway.
This I don't understand. What is the relation between dlopen calls
On 2004-03-22 Roger Leigh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andreas Metzler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, Mar 22, 2004 at 04:26:49PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
[libtool brokenness]
Yes, it did :-|. Could you point me to a documentation where I could
read about these problems, and under what
On 2004-03-21 GCS [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a small package, which generates configure, Makefile[.in] at
every compilation.
Why? Do you patch configure.(in)? See
/usr/share/doc/autotools-dev/README.Debian.gz, especially the part
after »fix the timestamp skews using a proper chain of
On 2004-03-20 Soumyadip Modak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 2004-03-20 at 03:06, Brian Nelson wrote:
The configure script that comes with the aspell dicts is homebrew (not
created by autoconf), and thus does not accept most of those options.
Edit those out of the debian/rules file.
On 2004-03-20 Soumyadip Modak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 2004-03-20 at 03:06, Brian Nelson wrote:
The configure script that comes with the aspell dicts is homebrew (not
created by autoconf), and thus does not accept most of those options.
Edit those out of the debian/rules file.
On 2004-03-18 Everton da Silva Marques [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Matthew Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd start hitting up the maintainers (and upstreams) of packages
which *could* use SRV records, regardless of whether they
currently do or not, and suggest it to them.
I plan to push
On 2004-03-18 Stephen Gran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This one time, at band camp, Colin Watson said:
There's ~, but you can't use that until sarge has been released.
In the absence of that, something like 0.69-really-0.70-rc-1 (or what
you suggest) is a common workaround. It's not too bad
On 2004-03-18 Everton da Silva Marques [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Matthew Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd start hitting up the maintainers (and upstreams) of packages
which *could* use SRV records, regardless of whether they
currently do or not, and suggest it to them.
I plan to push
On 2004-03-18 Stephen Gran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This one time, at band camp, Colin Watson said:
There's ~, but you can't use that until sarge has been released.
In the absence of that, something like 0.69-really-0.70-rc-1 (or what
you suggest) is a common workaround. It's not too bad
On 2004-03-16 Number Six [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If dh_make generates debian/control at Standards-Version: 3.6.0, and
the latest Standards-Version: is 3.6.1, how can I verify my project
actually meets the correct standards (if I just bump the number)?
Can a tool do it?
No.
Check policy's
On 2004-03-16 Number Six [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If dh_make generates debian/control at Standards-Version: 3.6.0, and
the latest Standards-Version: is 3.6.1, how can I verify my project
actually meets the correct standards (if I just bump the number)?
Can a tool do it?
No.
Check policy's
On 2004-03-13 Magosányi Árpád [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am trying to check if I could fix an arch-dependent bug, so I have
to compile my package on an arm, powerpc or s390.
Picked bruckner from the list, done a dchroot sid. Now I would need
tla to get the source (I could work around it), and
On 2004-03-13 Magosányi Árpád [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am trying to check if I could fix an arch-dependent bug, so I have
to compile my package on an arm, powerpc or s390.
Picked bruckner from the list, done a dchroot sid. Now I would need
tla to get the source (I could work around it), and
On 2004-03-10 Jörgen Hägg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to compile and pack on different architectures, but
after my first attempt I realized
that all Debian hosts are running Woody, not Sid.
Question: how and where do I build for Sid?
Has '+chroots' anything to do with it?
(Like
On 2004-03-09 Luca Pasquali [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
and now a strange, dumb-sounding request:
if you mentors have better/more useful packaging exercises to
suggest me, I'll welcome the advices, it may be a strange request but
I'm not a programmer, I mainly use console to do network
On 2004-03-10 Jörgen Hägg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to compile and pack on different architectures, but
after my first attempt I realized
that all Debian hosts are running Woody, not Sid.
Question: how and where do I build for Sid?
Has '+chroots' anything to do with it?
(Like
On 2004-03-09 Luca Pasquali [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
and now a strange, dumb-sounding request:
if you mentors have better/more useful packaging exercises to
suggest me, I'll welcome the advices, it may be a strange request but
I'm not a programmer, I mainly use console to do network
Hello,
I know this is a standard szenario, but the natural solution conflicts
with suggestions in policy.
When jumping from 4.3 to 4.5 I'd like to rename pgrep to pcregrep and
to provide seamless upgrades I'd introduce a dummy package pgrep
depending on pcregrep, however replaces/conflicts gives
On 2004-03-07 Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 11:23:40AM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
When jumping from 4.3 to 4.5 I'd like to rename pgrep to pcregrep and
to provide seamless upgrades I'd introduce a dummy package pgrep
depending on pcregrep, however replaces
On 2004-03-07 Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 01:17:46PM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
On 2004-03-07 Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 11:23:40AM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
When jumping from 4.3 to 4.5 I'd like to rename pgrep
Hello,
I know this is a standard szenario, but the natural solution conflicts
with suggestions in policy.
When jumping from 4.3 to 4.5 I'd like to rename pgrep to pcregrep and
to provide seamless upgrades I'd introduce a dummy package pgrep
depending on pcregrep, however replaces/conflicts gives
On 2004-03-07 Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 01:17:46PM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
On 2004-03-07 Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 11:23:40AM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
When jumping from 4.3 to 4.5 I'd like to rename pgrep
On 2004-03-06 Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've recently been given write access to the tetex directories on
cvs.debian.org, but it seems when I login, the password is blown over
the net in plaintext.
I have put my rsa key into the LDAP system, and can login e.g. into
gluck with
On 2004-03-06 Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've recently been given write access to the tetex directories on
cvs.debian.org, but it seems when I login, the password is blown over
the net in plaintext.
I have put my rsa key into the LDAP system, and can login e.g. into
gluck with
On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 04:24:01PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
although I've read the policy again, I am not sure whether it is allowed
to store scripts in /usr/share/$package? In particular, scripts that are
only meant to be called by postinst (or prerm), never by a user. They
could go to
On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 04:24:01PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
although I've read the policy again, I am not sure whether it is allowed
to store scripts in /usr/share/$package? In particular, scripts that are
only meant to be called by postinst (or prerm), never by a user. They
could go to
On 2004-03-04 Jörgen Hägg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm maintaining a package in non-free, which means that it will probably
never be compiled automatically (lowest priority).
So I need to do that myself. And I can find the available compile hosts
on http://db.debian.org/machines.cgi.
I
On 2004-03-04 Jörgen Hägg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm maintaining a package in non-free, which means that it will probably
never be compiled automatically (lowest priority).
So I need to do that myself. And I can find the available compile hosts
on http://db.debian.org/machines.cgi.
I
On 2004-02-20 Eike zyro Sauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Raphael Goulais schrieb:
- Why do you remove /var/log/cvs-autoreleasedeb.log at postrm, since
the log files are in /var/log/cvs-autoreleasedeb/ ? Also, I don't
think you should remove the log files anyway, even on a purge.
Is
On 2004-02-20 Eike zyro Sauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Raphael Goulais schrieb:
- Why do you remove /var/log/cvs-autoreleasedeb.log at postrm, since
the log files are in /var/log/cvs-autoreleasedeb/ ? Also, I don't
think you should remove the log files anyway, even on a purge.
Is
On 2004-02-12 Magosányi Árpád [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There are some files in /etc which are actually data files representing
the state of the system. Like /etc/mtab, /etc/network/ifstate, or
/etc/lvmconf/* (it is not even a text file).
These files are written by programs in occasions one
On 2004-02-13 Bernhard R. Link [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Magosányi Árpád [EMAIL PROTECTED] [040212 22:52]:
-if one wants to make the boot process unable to modify configuration,
they will also be stumbled upon. (And given the fact that mount
actually deletes and recreates /etc/mtab, the
On 2004-02-12 Filippo Rusconi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
I effectively get the said file in
debian/polyxmassdata/etc/polyxmass.d/polyxmassdata.conf
telling me that the make install target has worked ok.
However, I also noticed that this file is referenced here:
On 2004-02-12 Filippo Rusconi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
I effectively get the said file in
debian/polyxmassdata/etc/polyxmass.d/polyxmassdata.conf
telling me that the make install target has worked ok.
However, I also noticed that this file is referenced here:
On Wed, Feb 04, 2004 at 03:19:04PM +0100, Mattia Dongili wrote:
[I'm sending this message here as it seems that debian-x wasn't the most
appropriate place]
xfree86-driver-synaptics is an xserver-xfree86 driver that supports
special features of synaptics touchpad devices (a pointing device).
On Wed, Feb 04, 2004 at 03:19:04PM +0100, Mattia Dongili wrote:
[I'm sending this message here as it seems that debian-x wasn't the most
appropriate place]
xfree86-driver-synaptics is an xserver-xfree86 driver that supports
special features of synaptics touchpad devices (a pointing device).
On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 02:15:18PM +0100, Robert Lemmen wrote:
i am looking for a sponsor for secure-delete, it's a small package that
quite some people might find usefull. from the control file:
Description: tools to wipe files, free disk space, swap and memory
Even if you overwrite a
On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 04:01:33PM -0500, Stephen Gran wrote:
I am working on a multi-binary source, and what I want to do is pass
different options to different packages. Is this possible? I see the
-p option common to all debhelper programs, but how to do this?
dh_installinit -p foo -n
On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 10:30:47AM +0100, Alexander Bürger wrote:
Anyhow, besides the fact I don't like your changelog entry for -2.1
( * Fix packaging problem - which? I know, but changelog is
for documenting the actual changes)
i'll see over this, the package otherwise is ok and
On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 06:45:41PM +0100, Alexander Bürger wrote:
Argh. This is just plainly _wrong_. Read policy and developers reference
about versioning what -2.1 actually means...
I'm sorry, but I cannot find anything negative about 2.1 as debian
revision.
[...]
says lt to me. Please
On Mon, Jan 26, 2004 at 03:47:56PM +0200, Jarno Elonen wrote:
Delayed uploading by ftp doesn't seem to work (missing directory)
and ftp-master doesn't let me in with SSH/SCP (altough master, for
example, does).
Is this still an intentional restriction due to the server
compromise or/and am
On 30.12.03 12:12 Benoit Mortier wrote:
Le Lundi 29 Décembre 2003 23:54, Jochen Friedrich a écrit :
[...]
- do you really need to link /usr/share/doc/ike-scan to /usr/doc?
If not, you might remove the postinst and prerm scripts.
thats what lintian wanted but linda not so i removed it
You should
On 30.12.03 12:12 Benoit Mortier wrote:
Le Lundi 29 Décembre 2003 23:54, Jochen Friedrich a écrit :
[...]
- do you really need to link /usr/share/doc/ike-scan to /usr/doc?
If not, you might remove the postinst and prerm scripts.
thats what lintian wanted but linda not so i removed it
You
On Sat, Dec 20, 2003 at 03:25:10PM +, n.v.t n.v.t wrote:
I noticed that dh_make doesn't create diffs , why is that?
dh_make does not creat debs or .dsc either
Is there a way
to (re)generate the the *.diff.gz ?
Manually generate (by simple ranaming of the upstream sources) a
correctly
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 04:17:21PM -0500, Matthew A. Nicholson wrote:
[..]
I was planning on posting the packages on my website (although I don't
have much bandwith), but I am having problems making a package that
replaces sysv-rc. In order for bootsplash to operate correctly it needs
to
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 04:17:21PM -0500, Matthew A. Nicholson wrote:
[..]
I was planning on posting the packages on my website (although I don't
have much bandwith), but I am having problems making a package that
replaces sysv-rc. In order for bootsplash to operate correctly it needs
to
Hello,
How do I conflict with a certain range of versions?
The package is exim4 and I want to conflict with passwd =1:* but
=1:4.0.3-8. - Both versions up to 2902-12 and later than
1:4.0.3-8 work for me and I do not want to conflict with them.
Is there a nicer way than
Conflicts: passwd
Hello,
How do I conflict with a certain range of versions?
The package is exim4 and I want to conflict with passwd =1:* but
=1:4.0.3-8. - Both versions up to 2902-12 and later than
1:4.0.3-8 work for me and I do not want to conflict with them.
Is there a nicer way than
Conflicts: passwd
On Fri, Dec 12, 2003 at 08:10:47PM +0100, Florian Zaehringer wrote:
On Thu, 11 Dec 2003 23:35:16 +0100
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Dec 11, 2003 at 11:00:45PM +0100, Florian Zaehringer wrote:
So I wonder how I can do that? Is there some ChangeLog for the
Debian
On Fri, Dec 12, 2003 at 08:10:47PM +0100, Florian Zaehringer wrote:
On Thu, 11 Dec 2003 23:35:16 +0100
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Dec 11, 2003 at 11:00:45PM +0100, Florian Zaehringer wrote:
So I wonder how I can do that? Is there some ChangeLog for the
Debian
Hello,
I'd like to see http://www.jetmore.org/john/code/swaks (Swiss Army
Knife SMTP) in Debian. As the name suggests this is a wonderful tool
to test SMTP servers (including starttls and lots of SMTP auth), for
all of us who are tired of telnet foo 25. ;-)
However this is only 40KB (with pod)
On Thu, Dec 11, 2003 at 01:46:58PM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
Andreas Metzler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
However this is only 40KB (with pod) and I think it might be rejected
by ftp-master. - Are there any better possibilities?
Why should they reject it? Only 40kb is not a reason.
(If its
Hello,
I'd like to see http://www.jetmore.org/john/code/swaks (Swiss Army
Knife SMTP) in Debian. As the name suggests this is a wonderful tool
to test SMTP servers (including starttls and lots of SMTP auth), for
all of us who are tired of telnet foo 25. ;-)
However this is only 40KB (with pod)
On Thu, Dec 11, 2003 at 01:46:58PM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
Andreas Metzler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
However this is only 40KB (with pod) and I think it might be rejected
by ftp-master. - Are there any better possibilities?
Why should they reject it? Only 40kb is not a reason.
(If its
On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 at 06:26:15PM -0800, Jess Mahan wrote:
I made a lot of changes to my packages (Thanks BTW for all the helpfull
comments from everyone.
Can you please check them out now, and see if I did it right this time?
deb http://digitalssg.net/debian/ stable main non-US
On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 at 06:26:15PM -0800, Jess Mahan wrote:
I made a lot of changes to my packages (Thanks BTW for all the helpfull
comments from everyone.
Can you please check them out now, and see if I did it right this time?
deb http://digitalssg.net/debian/ stable main non-US
201 - 300 of 539 matches
Mail list logo
