Hello,
On Sat, 20 Aug 2011 10:11:10 +0200
Javier Sancho j...@jsancho.org wrote:
Andrew O. Shadoura wrote:
i) What's the point of it, how is it different from Iceweasel?
The goal of the IceCat project is to provide a completely free version
of the popular Mozilla source code.
Iceweasel
Hello,
On Fri, 19 Aug 2011 09:04:44 +0200
Javier Sancho j...@jsancho.org wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package icecat.
i) What's the point of it, how is it different from Iceweasel?
ii) Why doesn't your package use pre-existing XULRunner in Debian?
--
WBR, Andrew
signature.asc
Hello,
On Wed, 17 Aug 2011 21:19:44 +0100
Tony Houghton h...@realh.co.uk wrote:
roxterm-legacy: binaries compiled and linked with GTK2
roxterm: binaries compiled and linked with GTK3
roxterm-common: All the other files
An off-topic question: why've you chosen this naming scheme? Why
Hello,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package 'bmake'.
* Package name: bmake
Version : 20110622-1
Upstream Author : Simon J. Gerraty s...@void.crufty.net
* URL : http://www.crufty.net/help/sjg/bmake.htm
* License : BSD
Section : devel
It builds
Hello Vitaly,
I'm glad to see you're going to maintain tkpath, as it's really useful
piece of software (and I thought of making a package myself once).
However, your packaging ([1]) has some problems which would be good to
fix.
Also, I'm not a DD so I can't upload, sorry :)
Well, let's start.
Hello,
On Thu, 11 Aug 2011 15:46:48 +0300
Andrew O. Shadoura bugzi...@tut.by wrote:
ix) Vcs-* fields. Put your packaging under version control and upload
it to Alioth using whatever VCS you like (it may be Git or Mercurial
or anything else). There are some tools which simplify (or not
really
Hello,
On Wed, 29 Jun 2011 23:39:31 +0200
Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org wrote:
* Andrew O. Shadoura bugzi...@tut.by, 2011-06-30, 00:30:
5. Lintian issues (lintian -iI --pedantic):
W: tnat64: package-name-doesnt-match-sonames libtnat64-0.1
W: tnat64: non-dev-pkg-with-shlib-symlink
Hello,
On Thu, 30 Jun 2011 13:07:12 +0200
SZERB, Tamas t...@rulez.org wrote:
* Andrew O. Shadoura bugzi...@tut.by, 2011-06-30, 00:30:
5. Lintian issues (lintian -iI --pedantic):
W: tnat64: package-name-doesnt-match-sonames libtnat64-0.1
W: tnat64: non-dev-pkg-with-shlib-symlink
Hello,
On Thu, 30 Jun 2011 17:18:50 +0200
Kilian Krause kil...@debian.org wrote:
Isn't really relevant, as this is a LD_PRELOAD-able library.
this discussion about moving a shared lib into private namespace is
somewhat puzzling me. If the code it provides is only used internally
- why
Hello,
On Thu, 30 Jun 2011 17:21:05 +0200
Kilian Krause kil...@debian.org wrote:
5. Lintian issues (lintian -iI --pedantic):
W: tnat64: package-name-doesnt-match-sonames libtnat64-0.1
W: tnat64: non-dev-pkg-with-shlib-symlink
usr/lib/libtnat64.so.0.1 usr/lib/libtnat64.so I:
Hello,
On Wed, 29 Jun 2011 16:11:56 -0500
Elías Alejandro eal...@gmail.com wrote:
I am not a DD, so I can't sponsor your contribution. I'm sorry. But
here my fast review about your package:
1. Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.2
Yes, I know.
2. Maybe you can use debhelper version 8 under:
Hello,
On Sat, 25 Jun 2011 22:38:16 +0100
Luis Henriques luis.hen...@gmail.com wrote:
Upgrading zlib1g-dev from 1:1.2.3.3.dfsg-14 to
1:1.2.3.4.dfsg-3 helped, however.
First of all, thanks for testing the package (it actually the first
time I try to build a debian package).
Anyway, I'm
Hello,
On Sat, 25 Jun 2011 21:03:14 +0100
Luis Henriques luis.hen...@gmail.com wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package xxxterm.
FTBFS here:
$ dpkg-buildpackage -b
dpkg-buildpackage: export CFLAGS from dpkg-buildflags (origin: vendor): -g -O2
dpkg-buildpackage: export CPPFLAGS from
Hello,
On Sat, 25 Jun 2011 23:33:45 +0300
Andrew O. Shadoura bugzi...@tut.by wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package xxxterm.
FTBFS here:
Upgrading zlib1g-dev from 1:1.2.3.3.dfsg-14 to
1:1.2.3.4.dfsg-3 helped, however.
--
WBR, Andrew
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hello,
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 22:56:00 +0200
Maxime Chatelle m...@gmx.com wrote:
Ah I see where that comes from. Those packages with tarball-in-
tarball
are rather rare these days. Changing the tarball without renaming it
won't technically work however. You can still rename the tarball to
Hello,
On Mon, 30 May 2011 17:39:40 +0800
Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org wrote:
It's much harder to read it for humans than old good traditional
debian/copyright.
Which format are you talking about? The old good traditional
format is in fact no format at all, with no rules, and we had
all
Hello,
On Mon, 30 May 2011 01:05:02 +0800
Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org wrote:
P.S: What's blocking DEP5 from reaching the policy?
I think it's great the way it is right now already...
Isn't it way too machine-oriented to be in the policy?
It's much harder to read it for humans than old
Hello,
On Wed, 27 Apr 2011 18:10:35 +0200
Stefan Ott ste...@ott.net wrote:
- Port id3v2 to libid3tag [5]. This is a different id3 tagging library
which supports v2.4 tags. I did some work in this direction but I
realized that this would require major modifications to id3v2 since
it's closely
Hello,
On Sat, 14 May 2011 14:05:01 +0400
Dmitry Shachnev mity...@gmail.com wrote:
override_dh_auto_clean:
dh_auto_clean
rm -rf debian/icons
rm -f retext
rm -f wpgen/wpgen
Dmitry Shachnev
You can use the debian/clean file. No need to add any overrides ;)
--
Hello,
On Sun, 15 May 2011 17:19:22 +0200
Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org wrote:
rm -rf debian/icons
You can use the debian/clean file. No need to add any overrides ;)
However, you can't remove directories via debian/clean, and I assume
that debian/icons is a directory.
You can remove
Hello,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package mcs.
* Package name: mcs
Version : 0.7.2-1
Upstream Author : William Pitcock neno...@sacredspiral.co.uk
* URL : http://www.atheme.org/projects/mcs
* License : BSD
Section : libs
It builds these binary
Hello,
On Tue, 3 May 2011 23:37:13 +0700
Maia Kozheva si...@ubuntu.com wrote:
Any progress on this? There is also a gtk2-engines-equinox package in
Ubuntu already (I packaged it independently before that); perhaps it
would be worth basing your package on that instead of reinventing the
Hello,
On Tue, 3 May 2011 23:24:18 +0300
Andrew O. Shadoura bugzi...@tut.by wrote:
Why don't you just becoma a maintainer of it in Debian too?
Become, even. Anyway, it'd be easier to keep the two packages in sync.
--
WBR, Andrew
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hello,
On Mon, 2 May 2011 13:50:08 +0200
Håkon Nessjøen haakon.nessj...@gmail.com wrote:
mactelnet-client - Console tools for telneting and pinging via MAC
addresses
mactelnet-server - Telnet daemon for accepting connections
via MAC addresses
My opinion is that the description is a bit
Hello,
On Mon, 2 May 2011 17:07:01 +0200
Markus Becker m...@comnets.uni-bremen.de wrote:
[ I'm not a DD, but I'd like to share some my ideas about your RFS,
however. ]
* Package name: socketcan
Version : 0.0.1+svn1240-1
Upstream Author : Volkswagen Group Electronic
Hello,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package 'tnat64'.
* Package name: tnat64
Version : 0.02-1
Upstream Author : Andrew O. Shadoura bugzi...@tut.by
* URL : https://bitbucket.org/andrew_shadoura/tnat64/
* License : GPL-2+
Programming Lang: C
Description
Hello dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package twms.
* Package name: tayga
Version : 0.9-1
Upstream Author : Nathan Lutchansky lutch...@litech.org
* URL : http://www.litech.org/tayga/
* License : GPL-2+
Section : net
It builds these
Hello,
On Tue, 28 Dec 2010 08:58:32 +0200
Andrew O. Shadoura bugzi...@tut.by wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package twms.
Sorry, of course I mean tayga. But if you want to sponsor twms as
well... you know :)
--
WBR, Andrew
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hello.
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package twms.
* Package name: twms
Version : 0.01q-1
Upstream Author : Darafei Praliaskouski m...@komzpa.net
* URL : http://code.google.com/p/twms
* License : GPL-3+
Section : science
It builds
Hello.
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package twms.
* Package name: twms
Version : 0.01q-1
Upstream Author : Darafei Praliaskouski m...@komzpa.net
* URL : http://code.google.com/p/twms
* License : GPL-3+
Section : science
It builds
Hello.
The previous maintainer on tclxml package orphaned it, while package has a bug
rendering it completely unusable, and there's a new upstream version available
with that bug fixed.
I'd like to take over maintainance, and I need a sponsor for that.
Package name: tclxml
Version: 3.2-1
Hello.
On Tuesday 10 November 2009 18:36:16 Sven Hoexter wrote:
Ok a few short remarks after a first look:
* There are a lot of commented out lines in debian/rules - need them or
delete them. ;)
Ok, removed most of them.
* Is there a reason to build-dep on tcl 8.4? Otherwise build-dep on
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package libnatspec.
* Package name: libnatspec
Version : 0.2.5-1
Upstream Authors: Vitaly Lipatov l...@etersoft.ru,
Pavel Vainerman p...@etersoft.ru
* URL : http://natspec.sourceforge.net/
* License
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package libnatspec.
* Package name: libnatspec
Version : 0.2.5-1
Upstream Authors: Vitaly Lipatov l...@etersoft.ru,
Pavel Vainerman p...@etersoft.ru
* URL : http://natspec.sourceforge.net/
* License
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package gdigi.
* Package name: gdigi
Version : 0.1.8.hg-1
Upstream Author : Tomasz Moń
* URL : http://desowin.org/gdigi
* License : GPLv3
Section : sound
It builds these binary packages:
gdigi -
repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable
main contrib non-free
- - dget
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gdigi/gdigi_0.1.8~hg-1.dsc
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Kind regards
Andrew O. Shadoura
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG
36 matches
Mail list logo
