://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/secpanel
- Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main
contrib non-free
- dget
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/secpanel/secpanel_0.5.2-1.dsc
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Kind regards
Bruno
On Sunday 08 July 2007 13:05, Paul Wise wrote:
On 7/8/07, Bruno Costacurta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any reason for using debhelper 4 instead of 5?
I used dpkg-buildpackage to build package secpanel 0.5.2-1
Should I avoid dpkg-xxx and prefer debhelper tools ?
By debhelper 5, I mean
On Sunday 01 July 2007 18:15, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
On Sunday 1 July 2007 18:12, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
Otherwise it looks fine.
One more thing: there's some bugs open against the package, including a
wishlist bug regarding a new upstream version. Perhaps you want to take a
look at those
://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/secpanel
- Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main
contrib non-free
- dget
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/secpanel/secpanel_0.5.2-1.dsc
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Kind regards
Bruno
On Saturday 07 July 2007 14:52, Paul Wise wrote:
On 7/4/07, Bruno Costacurta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/secpanel/secpanel_0.5.2-1.di
ff.gz
No time for sponsoring, some comments:
Why the changes from /bin/sh to /usr/bin/wish? The wish manpage says
this package for me.
Kind regards
Bruno Costacurta
--
PGP key ID: 0x2e604d51
Key fingerprint = 713F 7956 9441 7DEF 58ED 1951 7E07 569B 2E60 4D51
--
pgpkxN2trj544.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Bruno Costacurta
--
PGP key ID: 0x2e604d51
Key fingerprint = 713F 7956 9441 7DEF 58ED 1951 7E07 569B 2E60 4D51
--
pgpLSpSJBz88p.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sunday 01 July 2007 18:12, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
Hi Bruno,
On Sunday 1 July 2007 18:01, Bruno Costacurta wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.41+0.4.2-4
of my package secpanel.
Thanks for your effort to adopt an orphaned package.
I meet few Debian
On Sunday 01 July 2007 18:15, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
On Sunday 1 July 2007 18:12, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
Otherwise it looks fine.
One more thing: there's some bugs open against the package, including a
wishlist bug regarding a new upstream version. Perhaps you want to take a
look at those
9 matches
Mail list logo