Re: Remove package from unstable?

2024-02-28 Thread Dominik George
Hi, > a) The version numbering rules provide for a '1:' prefix to be used to >deal with version numbering mistakes. A version number starting with >'1:' counts as higher than any without such a prefix; a '2:' counts as >higher than '1:', etc. So you could re-upload 2.10.08+ds-1 with version

Bug#1060913: Re: Bug#1060913: RFS: sdaps/1.9.11-0.1 [NMU] [RC] -- scripts for data acquisition with paper-based surveys

2024-01-16 Thread Dominik George
Hi, > Here I am not a member of DebianEdu team and told if am not a member > of one team there is no reason to do team upload. > Ideally, I should contact the team to join in or tell team I am going > to fix ftbfs issue. Whether the maintainer is a team doesn't matter here (it just means I am

Bug#1060913: RFS: sdaps/1.9.11-0.1 [NMU] [RC] -- scripts for data acquisition with paper-based surveys

2024-01-16 Thread Dominik George
Hi, is there a reason why you are not working with the packaging team, and doing NMUs without contacting the team beforehand? -nik

Re: MIT license vs Expat license in packages

2024-01-10 Thread Dominik George
Hi, >If I wanted to package software licensed under MIT, and the version given >upstream matches the Expat license word-for-word, does the above sentence mean >I should replace all references to the MIT license with Expat? Yes. > Should my copyright file look like this? No. The MIT block and

Re: New package: ITP or RFP ?

2023-06-20 Thread Dominik George
Hi, > Is it ok for source code to be in Github? No. In my opinion (and I am aware that sadly, the majority of the project probably does not share this opinion), that is a direct violation of Debian's Code of Conduct, and its Social Contract as well. GitHub has discriminatory terms of use that

Re: Not install files in Debian package

2023-05-05 Thread Dominik George
Hi, > Now I need to move some files to another package. Is there an easy > method the exclude some files from this package or do I have to compile > a positive list (which might vary between versions)? In debian/rules: override_dh_auto_install: dh_install -ppackage1 -Xexclude1

Re: parse SPDX-License-Identifier to produce copyright file

2022-08-22 Thread Dominik George
Hi, > Does there exist a tool for Debian that will parse a package directory (its > source files), extract the "SPDX-License-Identifier:" and produce something > that would fit into a machine-readable debian/copyright file? AFAIK, the reuse tool (which also generates these annoying headers) can

Re: vSMTP - looking for a sponsor

2022-07-12 Thread Dominik George
Hi, > Written in Rust, it is safer, faster, and greener. There is quite a huge piece missing in this chain of argumentation. -nik

Re: How to use local font in dh_auto_test

2022-04-01 Thread Dominik George
Hi, > I tried to copy that font file to ${HOME}/.fonts and fc-list is even > listing the font in question[1]: > >    /tmp/.fonts/yudit.ttf: Yudit Unicode:style=LR > > but finally the test fails have you tried updating the fontconfig cache (using fc-cache -f)? Cheers, Nik

Re: URL is OK in browser but returns 404 with uscan

2021-10-09 Thread Dominik George
gz *snip* HTH, Nik From 8179eb9c8fc787d8d32d5fb5cf9ac9d604af3658 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dominik George Date: Sat, 9 Oct 2021 22:07:39 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Correctly scan S3 bucket in d/watch --- debian/changelog | 4 +++- debian/watch | 4 ++-- 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions

Re: URL is OK in browser but returns 404 with uscan

2021-10-09 Thread Dominik George
Hi, On Sat, Oct 09, 2021 at 09:46:51PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi, > > when I try to visit > > https://alkesgroup.broadinstitute.org/BOLT-LMM/downloads/ > > with any browser I get a list of files. However, the watch file > of bolt-lmm[1] pointing to that web page returns: You don't

Bug#930633: i3gaps

2019-06-18 Thread Dominik George
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Control: tags -1 = moreinfo Control: noowner -1 Hi, > Certainly, a merge is the superior solution and i am glad its actually > being considered, but my understanding is that code refactoring/cleaning > could take a considerable amount of time, and

Bug#930633: i3-gaps RFS/ITP

2019-06-17 Thread Dominik George
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi antisocrates, > Ingo will outline what needs to be done to get i3-gaps into a mergable > state, so that we can eventually bring these features to all i3 users. > > For the time being, our recommendation is to NOT add i3-gaps to Debian or > any

Bug#930633: RFS: i3-gaps/4.16.1-1 [ITP]

2019-06-17 Thread Dominik George
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 > Thanks for your contribution! I looked into your package and have the > following remarks: Oh, plus, also please fix the issues listed on your package's mentors page as well, obiously ☺. - -nik -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-

Bug#930633: RFS: i3-gaps/4.16.1-1 [ITP]

2019-06-17 Thread Dominik George
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi, On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 04:10:03AM +0300, antisocrates wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "i3-gaps" Thanks for your contribution! I looked into your package and have the following remarks: * Did you talk to the i3-wm

Re: GPG Key errors

2019-05-02 Thread Dominik George
>To show where you can find the information is more helpful than to one >specific inforamtion. Except that the needed information - how to get debsign to find the correct key - cannot be found where the newcomer was pointed. -nik

Re: Not using the pristine-tar branch

2019-04-18 Thread Dominik George
>> I saw many people are stop using the "pristine-tar" branch, since the >> "pristine-tar" tool can do just that. > >To add more content, this is where the idea comes from: >https://joeyh.name/blog/entry/generating_pristine_tarballs_from_git_repositories/ I do not understand what you are trying

Re: Help with removal of conffiles

2018-12-14 Thread Dominik George
Hi, >However, after reading the manpage for dh_installdeb [4] (more >specifically, the section `package.maintscript', I changed my mind and >added lines such as: > > rm_conffile /etc/bash_completion.d/harbour 1:2.8-5~ > >So... Is that the right thing to do? I.e. regardless of the version >at

Bug#906536: Bug#915249: ITP: cavestory-nx -- Nostalgic side action adventure game

2018-12-03 Thread Dominik George
>Copyright is a severe thing. You can bring Debian into severe legal >problems. >Remove at least the game data from mentors and Debian infrastructure >ASAP until copyright is settled. All very unclear, but very obviously not free:

Re: My debian/control and possible-unindented-list-in-extended-description

2018-12-01 Thread Dominik George
Hi, > My debian/control has the > possible-unindented-list-in-extended-description warning. > > I've checked back-and-forth several times but really couldn't figure > out where that possibility could be. It comes from the (not possibly, but certainly) unindented list on lines 30 to 45 ;).

Bug#906536: RFS: cavestory-nx/1.2.0-1 [ITP] -- Nostalgic side action adventure game

2018-08-18 Thread Dominik George
Hi, >Sorry, is there anything wrong with being on the BSD-2-Clause license >and the non-free/games section? If it's BSD licenced, it's not non-free. Maybe some parts are not BSD? -nik

Bug#906536: RFS: cavestory-nx/1.2.0-1 [ITP] -- Nostalgic side action adventure game

2018-08-18 Thread Dominik George
Hi, > * License : BSD-2-Clause > Section : non-free/games Huh? -nik

Bug#860905: RFS: libdsk/1.5.4+dfsg-1 [ITP]

2017-04-21 Thread Dominik George
dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libd/libdsk/libdsk_1.5.4+dfsg-1.dsc Changes since the last upload: libdsk (1.5.4+dfsg-1) unstable; urgency=low * Initial release (Closes: #168591) -- Dominik George <n...@naturalnet.de> Wed, 19 Apr 2017 18:26:06 +0200 Regards, D

watch file - remove or only comments?

2016-10-11 Thread Dominik George
[0]: https://lintian.debian.org/tags/debian-watch-file-is-missing.html [1]: https://udd.debian.org/dmd/?nik%40naturalnet.de -- PGP-Fingerprint: 3C9D 54A4 7575 C026 FB17 FD26 B79A 3C16 A0C4 F296 Dominik George · Hundeshagenstr. 26 · 53225 Bonn Mobile: +49-1520-1981389 · https://www.dominik-george.de/ T

Bug#839831: RFS: bucklespring/1.4.0-1 -- upload new upstream version ☺

2016-10-05 Thread Dominik George
* Source package contains proper copyright note now. * Fix VCS-Git URL. * Drop Debian patches, upstream incorporated all of them. -- Dominik George <n...@naturalnet.de> Wed, 05 Oct 2016 15:36:56 +0200 Regards, Dominik George -BEG

Bug#839650: RFS: xloadimage/4.1-24

2016-10-03 Thread Dominik George
* Add VCS fields. -- Dominik George <n...@naturalnet.de> Mon, 03 Oct 2016 16:10:21 +0200 Regards, Dominik George -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQJhBAEBCABLBQJX8m+SMRpodHRwczovL3d3dy5kb21pbmlrLWdlb3JnZS5kZS9n cGctcG9saWN5LnR4dC5hc2MSHG5pa0BuYXR1cmFsbmV0LmRl

Bug#839648: RFS: morse2ascii/0.2+dfsg-2

2016-10-03 Thread Dominik George
mpat level. + No changes needed. * Fix copyright file style. * Enable hardening flags. * Make package lintian clean. * Add VCS URLs. -- Dominik George <n...@naturalnet.de> Mon, 03 Oct 2016 15:12:54 +0200 Regards, Dominik George -BEG

Bug#838575: RFS: flask-compress/1.3.1-1 [ITP]

2016-09-28 Thread Dominik George
Control: reopen -1 Hi, >>I am looking for a sponsor for my package "flask-compress" > > >where did the package go? It went to "found a sponsor, had to change something, did not reupload because sponsor does not use mentors" ;). -nik

Bug#838566: RFS: mimerender/0.6.0-1 [ITP]

2016-09-28 Thread Dominik George
Hi Mattia, thanks for looking at the package! > so, this package is in DPMT, hence I'm looking only at the git repo. I removed it from mentors and, as you are not far from sponsoring it ;), did not re-upload the fixed version. In case the sponsorship will not work out, I will re-upload it to

Bug#838575: RFS: flask-compress/1.3.1-1 [ITP]

2016-09-22 Thread Dominik George
ress_1.3.1-1.dsc Flask-Compress is an extension for the popular Flask micro-framework for web applications. Regards, Dominik George -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQJhBAEBCABLBQJX4/Q2MRpodHRwczovL3d3dy5kb21pbmlrLWdlb3JnZS5kZS9n cGctcG9saWN5LnR4dC5hc2MSHG5pa0BuYXR1cmFsbmV0LmRlAAoJELeaPBa

Bug#838576: RFS: osmalchemy/0.1.post1-1 [ITP]

2016-09-22 Thread Dominik George
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "osmalchemy" * Package name: osmalchemy Version : 0.1.post1-1 Upstream Author : Dominik George <n...@naturaln

Bug#838566: RFS: mimerender/0.6.0-1 [ITP]

2016-09-22 Thread Dominik George
ain/m/mimerender/mimerender_0.6.0-1.dsc The package is a dependency of the soon to be added flask-restless package. Regards, Dominik George -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQJhBAEBCABLBQJX49MdMRpodHRwczovL3d3dy5kb21pbmlrLWdlb3JnZS5kZS9n cGctcG9saWN5LnR4dC5hc2MSHG5pa0BuYXR1cmFsbmV0LmRlAAoJE

Bug#732138: RFS: libjs-forge/0.2.22+dfsg-1 [ITP]

2013-12-14 Thread Dominik George
as co-maintainer under the pkg-javascript umbrella if that is desired, though. Regards, Dominik George - -- System Information: Debian Release: jessie/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel

Re: Correcting a version number

2013-12-10 Thread Dominik George
Hi, I have realised that in an earlier package upload, I made a blunder with regards the version of the package. Where is that package now? On mentors, or in Debian? -nik -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact

Re: Correcting a version number

2013-12-10 Thread Dominik George
[2] http://qa.debian.org/cgi-bin/watch?pkg=vpcs_0.5b0-1 In that special case, I'd even say your versioning mistake is good because upstream's ~ notation is a mess. That char is reserved for Debian ;) (yes, that's false and not so humble ;))! Why not keep your version numbering as it is and use

Re: Upstream tarballs with varying line endings

2013-11-19 Thread Dominik George
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Felix Natter fnat...@gmx.net schrieb: hello, my problem is that Freeplane's git is configured such that native line endings (LF on UNIX, CRLF on Windows) are used in checkouts and thus the Upstream tarballs are either CR or CRLF, depending on on

Bug#729601: RFS: vokoscreen/1.8.1-1 [ITP] -- easy to use screencast creator

2013-11-16 Thread Dominik George
Hi, to the maintainer and any sponsor: ** Please do a very, very careful license review! ** We had a very long discussion about this software at debianforum.de [0][1][2] because the upstream author wanted us to test the software, but was reluctant to grant us a view at the code all through the

Re: Cannot create regular file under /usr/share/man/man1

2013-11-11 Thread Dominik George
Hi, for d in glimpse.1 glimpseindex.1 glimpseserver.1 ; do \ /usr/bin/install -c -m 444 $d /usr/share/man/man1 ; \ done Obviously, that should be ${DESTDIR}/usr/share/man/man1 . Cheers, Nik -- * concerning Mozilla code leaking assertion failures to tty without D-BUS *

Re: Cannot create regular file under /usr/share/man/man1

2013-11-11 Thread Dominik George
I took a look at the good build, which is glimpse-4.18.5, and I see: for d in glimpse.1 glimpseindex.1 glimpseserver.1 ; do \ /usr/bin/install -c -m 444 $d /export/build/glimpse/bld/ glimpse-4.18.5/debian/tmp/usr/share/man/man1 ; \ done Do you know what

Bug#728300: RFS: dh-make/0.62+nmu1 [NMU] [RC] -- fix RC bug #726653

2013-10-30 Thread Dominik George
{PWD}. (Closes: #726653) -- Dominik George n...@naturalnet.de Wed, 30 Oct 2013 12:57:10 +0100 Regards, Dominik George - -- System Information: Debian Release: jessie/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign

Bug#727733: RFS: rssdrop/0.2-1 [ITP]

2013-10-25 Thread Dominik George
) -- Dominik George n...@naturalnet.de Fri, 25 Oct 2013 23:23:05 +0200 Regards, Dominik George -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.15 (GNU/Linux) iQJOBAEBCAA4BQJSauOAMRpodHRwczovL3d3dy5kb21pbmlrLWdlb3JnZS5kZS9n cGctcG9saWN5LnR4dC5hc2MACgkQt5o8FqDE8pZ8uQ//RHdWThQ2jWzzOK8imKtH

Re: possible-gpl-code-linked-with-openssl

2013-10-16 Thread Dominik George
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Richi Lists ricu...@gmail.com schrieb: Or can I add the excpetion myself, assuming since the author chose to link agains openssl, he is ok with it? Definitely not. Upstream did not link against it - you do that. - -nik -BEGIN PGP

Re: possible-gpl-code-linked-with-openssl

2013-10-16 Thread Dominik George
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Gert Wollny gw.foss...@gmail.com schrieb: The real issue is, who linked the binary that gets distributed, and therefore, who has to comply with the GPL, and this is not the upstream author. To rephrase Dominik's comment: Upstream did not link

Re: possible-gpl-code-linked-with-openssl

2013-10-16 Thread Dominik George
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Russ Allbery r...@debian.org schrieb: Dominik George n...@naturalnet.de writes: That said, I my personal opinion is that doing the above is plain nonsense from a FOSS point of view, and if upstream's intention is to produce open software

Re: Bug#724807: RFS: yt/2013.09.28-1 [ITP]

2013-09-28 Thread Dominik George
Dear mentors, I have worked closely together with Javier on fixing issues with his youtube-cli (formerly yt) package. It appears to be of good quality now, and I found Javier to be a good teamplayer and accepting and reacting to criticism really well, so I'd consider him fit for maintainership of

Re: Upgrading the Debian Policy

2013-09-24 Thread Dominik George
Hi, The package should be updated to follow the last version of Debian Policy (Standards-Version 3.9.4 instead of 3.8.3). This is at first nothing more than the Standards-Version field in debian/control. I never knew the details of Debian Policy before […] Sorry to disapoint you, but you

Re: Upgrading the Debian Policy

2013-09-24 Thread Dominik George
Lintian does not down-scale its checks based on the S-V field; so you will get (almost) the same result regardless of what value you put in the field. The obvious exception is checks that actually cares about the content of the S-V field (which is something like 5 tags or so). Yes, and yet

Re: Upgrading the Debian Policy

2013-09-24 Thread Dominik George
Andrew Shadura bugzi...@tut.by schrieb: Hello, On 24 September 2013 14:48, Dominik George n...@naturalnet.de wrote: lintian --color=always -I -E -i --pedantic lintian -vIiE --pedantic --color=auto Properly reads as -Evil :) Hi, please fix your font and/or try not to be funny when you

Re: Upgrading the Debian Policy

2013-09-24 Thread Dominik George
Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net schrieb: On 2013-09-24 16:42, Dominik George wrote: Andrew Shadura bugzi...@tut.by schrieb: Hello, On 24 September 2013 14:48, Dominik George n...@naturalnet.de wrote: lintian --color=always -I -E -i --pedantic lintian -vIiE --pedantic --color=auto

Re: Upload modified package to mentors

2013-09-17 Thread Dominik George
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi, I updated one of my packages on mentors earlier and wanted to clarify whether each upload increment the build number? (For example 0.4b2-1 would become 0.4b2-2) Yes, each upload should increase the Debian revision, and contain a changelog

Re: Upload modified package to mentors

2013-09-17 Thread Dominik George
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 I think the current compatibility level is 8, not 9. Forget it. - -nik - -- Natureshadow Auf welchem Server liegt das denn jetzt…? mirabilos Wenn es nicht übers Netz kommt bei Hetzner, wenn es nicht gelesen wird bei STRATO, wenn es

Re: skype4py, any sponsors?

2013-09-03 Thread Dominik George
Hi, I do not see why this should be supported by Debian. Skype is proprietary and, allegedly, malicious spyware that we should not encourage our users to use. IMHO you should go support Telepathy or some other framework that allow programming for less malicious software. -nik Gianfranco

Please review: geierlein - free Elster client for German tax declarations

2013-06-06 Thread Dominik George
Hi, following up on RFP #695204, I have started packaging the Geierlein client needed by German folks to send VAT declarations to the fiscal authorities. It is quite an important package as our authorities do not provide a Linux version of their official client. Geierlein is the successor of

Bug#698853: RFS: gosa/2.7.4-4.1 [RC] [NMU] -- make package installable again

2013-01-24 Thread Dominik George
the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/gosa Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gosa/gosa_2.7.4-4.1.dsc Changes since the last upload: see attached debdiff. Regards, Dominik George -- diff

Bug#698853: RFS: gosa/2.7.4-4.1 [RC] [NMU] -- make package installable again

2013-01-24 Thread Dominik George
Unfortunately the fix is not good enough. Two issues: a/ the script uses set -e, this means it will it exit with an error if a2enmod is missing No, why should it? That's the whole point of the test before the call of a2enmod. If it doesn't exist, it is never called. b/ [[ (double brackets)

Bug#695986: RFS: mediawiki/1:1.15.5-2squeeze4.1 [NMU] [RC]

2012-12-15 Thread Dominik George
Prevent session fixation in Special:UserLogin + Prevent linker regex from exceeding backtrack limit I intentionally did not touch any lintian warning that were not introduced by these changes to make the changes to squeeze minimal and only security-related. Regards, Dominik

Bug#695986: RFS: mediawiki/1:1.15.5-2squeeze4.1 [NMU] [RC]

2012-12-15 Thread Dominik George
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi, Did you coordinate this upload with the Security Team? Did the team authorize the upload? (See devref §5.8.5 [1] for details) I CC'ed debian-security on this bugreport. I am not fmailiar with uploads to squeeze-security and was hoping for

Bug#695597: RFS: ldap2zone/0.2-3.1 [NMU][RC]

2012-12-10 Thread Dominik George
/ldap2zone/ldap2zone_0.2-3.1.dsc Changes: ldap2zone (0.2-3.1) unstable; urgency=low * Non-maintainer upload. * Fix unbound variable in ldap2bind script (Closes: #690377). Regards, Dominik George -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject

Bug#695292: RFS: python-webob/1.1.1-1.1 [RC] [NMU] -- fix for RC bug #695050

2012-12-06 Thread Dominik George
response header bug reported by Mehdi Abaakouk (Closes: #695050). -- Dominik George n...@naturalnet.de Tue, 04 Dec 2012 00:09:48 +0100 I propose uploading to DELAYED/5 to give the maintainer some more time to respond to the bug report themselves, but to squash RC bugs I'd really love

Bug#694431: RFS: couchdb/1.2.0-2.1 [NMU] [RC]

2012-11-26 Thread Dominik George
] -- Dominik George n...@naturalnet.de Mon, 26 Nov 2012 12:54:05 +0100 The debdiff is attached. Regards, Dominik George diff -Nru couchdb-1.2.0/debian/changelog couchdb-1.2.0/debian/changelog --- couchdb-1.2.0/debian/changelog 2012-07-19 20:35:03.0 +0200 +++ couchdb-1.2.0/debian/changelog

Bug#694164: RFS: redmine/1.4.4+dfsg1-2 [NMU] [RC]

2012-11-25 Thread Dominik George
Hi, Thank you all for this work - Dominik, would you work directly on the git repository of the redmine package ? That would allow much easier maintenance. Currently, I do not really plan on doing more work on the package, just RC bug fixing. Michael, please send follow-ups directly

Bug#694164: RFS: redmine/1.4.4+dfsg1-2 [NMU] [RC]

2012-11-25 Thread Dominik George
Hi Michael, I incorporated the changes you requested. Cheers, Nik -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive:

Bug#694164: RFS: redmine/1.4.4+dfsg1-2 [NMU] [RC]

2012-11-24 Thread Dominik George
the last upload: * NMU to fix RC bugs. * debian/control: add dependency on rubygems or recent enough ruby (Closes: #693994). * debian/postinst: replace exit status -1 with 2 for shell compatibility (Closes: #687449). Regards, Dominik George -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian

Bug#694164: Wrong version

2012-11-24 Thread Dominik George
retitle 694164 RFS: redmine/1.4.4+dfsg1-1.1 [NMU] [RC] kthxbye Sorry, I meant 1.1, not 2. -nik -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive:

Re: RFS: cr3

2011-02-08 Thread Dominik George
Hi, * changelog field says, that you want to upload your package to lucid, but you should change it to unstable or experimental (you are uploading to Debian, not directly yo Ubuntu) apart from that, wouldn't lucid be just a bit outdated either ;) ? Cheers, Nik -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Re: CHowning files - or not?

2010-03-02 Thread Dominik George
On Tue, 2 Mar 2010 12:37:25 +0200, Peter Pentchev r...@ringlet.net wrote: On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 12:23:25AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: Dominik George d...@naturalnik.de (26/02/2010): OK, as it is done in postinst, there does not seem to be a difference to my current chown setup. dpkg

Re: CHowning files - or not?

2010-03-02 Thread Dominik George
Mmm, in this case by local changes we (at least I, but I assume also KiBi and Paul Wise) mean what the sysadmin has done by hand after installing a previous version of the package, not what some parts of the package installation have done during the installation itself. I know what local

Re: CHowning files - or not?

2010-02-26 Thread Dominik George
I do wonder why some scripts have to be owned by a particular user instead of root, could you explain this? Although I don't see how this answers my question, it is intended to have the execution of these scripts limited to users within a group. Please read debian-policy 10.9 and 10.9.1:

CHowning files - or not?

2010-02-25 Thread Dominik George
Hi, I am packaging some scripts (for local distribution), so I am both upstream and maintainer ;). The sources tree includes a Makefile providing the default targets for building and installing. The preinst script creates a system user, and this is the user the scripts should be owned by

RFS: twittare

2009-05-12 Thread Dominik George
Dominik George signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Packaging without Makefile

2008-04-23 Thread Dominik George
Hello mentors, I am just packaging my Pidgin Last.fm Plugin for Debian and am wondering how to get a .changes file. The problem is that the plugin consists of a single perl script which is copied to /usr/lib/pidgin. What I already did is: - Create a fodler structure with the file system tree

Re: Packaging without Makefile

2008-04-23 Thread Dominik George
$ dh-make $ cd debian/ edit/copy in control, copyright, changelog and edit rules remove unwanted files $ cd ../ $ dpkg-buildpackage Sounds easy - but how do I get it to copy my one single file? What Dmitry suggested does not quite work ...