Hi,
On 4 June 2014 07:24:27 CEST, Cameron Norman camerontnor...@gmail.com wrote:
I think users installing this piece of software will expect it to be
started at boot, and we should do just that.
Where I do not agree with your conclusion is that _users_ do not install
software, _admins_ (aka
Hi Perrin,
you might want to start with https://www.debian.org/intro/help to decide on
what you exactly want to do to work on contributing to Debian, which is a
rather broad concept.
If indeed you want to help package software, which is the topic of this list,
your next step is probably to read
On 25/05/14 09:59, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
What 'bodgification' means?
Let me google it for you: http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/bodge
Eric
--
I'm subscribed on debian-java, debian-mentors, pkg-java-maintainers and
pkg-vdr-dvb-devel.
No need to CC me on these lists.
--
To
Hi Hugo,
On 24/05/14 18:35, Hugo Lefeuvre wrote:
But, if you think it's buggy, I'll change it. Naturally, I can also try
to speak with the Upstream to change the name of the source program but
I think it will be... very long.
I think, everybody agrees that it's quite buggy, but you can do both
Hi Andrew,
you might want to start with https://www.debian.org/intro/help to decide on
what you exactly want to do to work on the development of Debian, which is a
rather broad concept.
If indeed you want to help package software, which is the topic of this list,
your next step is probably to
Hi,
On 10/05/14 09:36, Vincent Bernat wrote:
The suggestion for powerline package should not pull vim, zsh, tmux and
ipython. I don't really see a use case where a user will install vim
because they installed powerline. powerline enhances vim but I don't
think that vim enhances powerline.
You
In the section TIMTOWTDI I suggest apt-cache showpkg.
Eric
On 10 May 2014 03:35:02 CEST, Fernando Toledo ftol...@docksud.com.ar wrote:
El 06/05/14 03:35, Jörg Frings-Fürst escribió:
Hi,
is there a way to determine in how many and in which packages a
package is added as a dependency?
Hi,
On 01/05/14 18:41, Dale Mellor wrote:
Hello, a couple of days ago I uploaded a new version of
mcron to the upload FTP server, and heard not a titter about
it (it does not seem to have gone through). It is a while
since I last did this... can someone help me please?
To which FTP server?
Hi,
On 2 May 2014 03:59:15 CEST, Paul Wise p...@debian.org wrote:
On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 6:32 AM, Dale Mellor wrote:
Is this person always this condescending or am I being bullied?
As far as I can tell there was neither condescension nor bullying in
the mail by Eric, he was simply asking
Hi,
On 28 March 2014 09:20:01 CET, Dominique Dumont d...@debian.org wrote:
On Thursday 27 March 2014 22:21:55 Nico Schlömer wrote:
The question is: how to avoid breaking the above package when upgrading
netcdf
to netcdf-c, netcdf-fortran, netcdf-cxx ?
What about declaring netcdf-bin as dummy
...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Eric,
Thanks for checking out the project. Where should I improve the
project description? The debain control files has proper description
about the project. Where else should I change?
Thanks
On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 12:40 AM, Eric L.
ewl+debian+nospam2...@lavar.de wrote:
Hi
Hi,
I would recommend to improve the short description. The homepage states cross
platform transliterator for Indian languages which sounds more informative to
me.
Eric
On 22 March 2014 07:18:18 CET, Navaneeth K N navaneet...@gmail.com wrote:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Hi,
On 08/02/14 20:13, Roelof Wobben wrote:
So they have to use some sort of hack to find the files of the second package.
If this is the way Debian wants the packages, how can I do the same with dh7.
Not too sure about this part and what the actual question is...
All the parts are of a
Hi,
The point is probably more that the package description is relatively useless,
and should rather explain that it's a test runner; what about e.g. PlainBox
based test runner?
Eric
Sylvain Pineau sylvain.pin...@canonical.com wrote:
On 22/01/2014 18:15, Sune Vuorela wrote:
On 2014-01-22,
Hi,
I would tend to agree with what Paul wrote but IANAL and you should ask on
debian-legal for a more authoritative answer.
A few more comments below:
Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org wrote:
On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 07:36:42PM +0100, Felix Natter wrote:
(upstream) Freeplane 1.3.x will have
15 matches
Mail list logo
