Library linknames: symlink to file or to soname?

2004-11-21 Thread Frank Kster
Hello, I just started reading the Program Library HOWTO and found that, according to that document, the linkname of a library can be either a symlink to the real filename, or to the soname. I wanted to know how this is handled in Debian, and first I couldn't find anything in policy (but see

Re: RFS: pdfmerge

2004-03-01 Thread Frank Kster
Philipp Gortan [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: Hi mentors, I packaged pdfmerge and would be happy to get it included into the Debian distribution. pdfmerge is a simple perl script used to merge multiple PDF files into a single output file, using ghostscript. program: pdfmerge version: 1.0

Re: pbuilder on Woody

2004-02-27 Thread Frank Kster
Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: Hello. Is it possible to run Sid chrooted environment on Woody? I've tried to do it with pbuilder, but unfortunatelly I've failed :/ Firstly, debootstrap had too old /usr/lib/debootstrap/scripts/sid script, so I've changed it to the

changelog or changelog.Debian for splitted package?

2004-02-26 Thread Frank Kster
Hi, in debian-tetex-maint we are currently working on splitting of a small package that contains Postscript Type1 font files - these files are useful for non-TeX-related applications, including XFree86. Since teTeX itself is a compilation of packages taken from the CTAN network, these files come

Re: Use /var/lib/dpkg/status directly

2004-02-26 Thread Frank Kster
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: On Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 02:36:30PM +0100, Markus Braun wrote: Hi, for a script I'm writing I need to get information for several packages. Because dpkg -s ... is slow I thought about using grep/awk on /var/lib/dpkg/status directly to get the

moving conffiles: Is there a way to fool dpkg?

2004-02-23 Thread Frank Kster
Hi, when a configuration file is moved from one package to an other one, but the file itself is not changed, then there's a problem with smooth upgrades: dpkg will tell the user he (or a script) has changed the file. The same is true if the file changed its name and content, and is mv'ed to the

Re: RFS: irssi-scripts -- useful collection of scripts for irssi

2004-02-19 Thread Frank Kster
Florian Ernst [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: Checking on Woody won't be necessary, since this package will never make it to Woody. Or did I misunderstand you here? Remember backports. Nobody knows when sarge will be released, and since these scripts are so *useful* ;-), it might be that somebody

Re: problem with files in /etc/dir.d (continued)

2004-02-12 Thread Frank Kster
Filippo Rusconi [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: Hello, Thanks to the persons who have kindly answered my questions about the /etc/dir.d/ problem. At the beginning, the software did use the /usr/etc/dir.d configuration directory, but then the packaging system would complain that this is not a

Re: Help with my program

2004-02-11 Thread Frank Kster
Nico Golde [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: Hello Bartosz, * Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-02-11 13:02]: I have written a binary clock for text mode. It is available on http://www.ngolde.de There is a debian package too. How can this program placed in the debian

Re: Is this sufficient for an application?

2004-02-09 Thread Frank Kster
Florian Effenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: Hi Adrian, Of course, if you're going to build an advocacy/marketing group for Debian (which would certainly be a good idea, IMHO.), this topic has to be reviewed again. That's something I think of, yes! :) And I think for such a purpose it

Re: RFS: hatari

2004-01-26 Thread Frank Kster
Eike \zyro\ Sauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: Filippo Giunchedi schrieb: W: hatari source: newer-standards-version 3.6.0 yes you should update standards-version to the latest policy (see ls -la /usr/share/doc/debian-policy/upgrading-checklist.txt.gz ) This error means that his version is

Re: Call for sponsor for crystallographic software

2004-01-21 Thread Frank Kster
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: Hello, I am the author of tk-brief and lingx http://www.deres-mueller.de/tk_Brief Why do you list this - do you want the package uploaded, too? Have you talked to the current maintainer of tk-brief in Debian? http://www.deres-mueller.de/LinGX and am searching

Re: Maintainer: field in .changes

2004-01-21 Thread Frank Kster
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Scott James Remnant [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: On Tue, 2004-01-20 at 13:07, Frank Küster wrote: Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: * Scott James Remnant [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-01-20 11:36]: You're breaking policy by doing that ;-)

Re: Maintainer: field in .changes

2004-01-20 Thread Frank Kster
Scott James Remnant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Maintainer: field in debian/control contains their ASCIIfied[0] name, [...] [0] this must match that given in changelog for bugs to correctly close, so not using UTF-8 characters is important. What are the problems with UTF-8 in control? I am

Re: shlibdeps warning + #DOCS# problem for procps

2004-01-16 Thread Frank Kster
Eugene Teo [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: Hi everyone, I am trying to create a .deb package for a procps branch[1] by Robert Love (different from the official procps deb). In the program's source directory, it has a shared library, many binaries, and many man pages for those binaries. I

Re: Request for advice: typespeed postinst

2004-01-15 Thread Frank Kster
Dafydd Harries [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: Ar 07/01/2004 am 09:22, ysgrifennodd Dafydd Harries: I'm in the process of adopting the typespeed package. I've made packages with a new upstream version, and I'm happy with the packages I've made overall, with the exception of the postinst file

Re: Request for advice: typespeed postinst

2004-01-15 Thread Frank Kster
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Frank Küster) wrote, that's me: , | OLDFILES=0 | for i in *.old-$$; do | if [ -e $i ]; then OLDFILES=1; fi | done ` [...] 2. The test -e will always yield true if the star in *.old-\$\$ expanded to something, i.e. if the loop is run at all. It is simply not

Re: packaging ckermit: lots of questions

2004-01-10 Thread Frank Kster
Ian Beckwith [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: As ckermit config files are executable via #!/usr/bin/kermit upstream suggests shipping with an executable config file and letting the user run that if desired. This would mean a config file in /usr/bin which is sure to violate policy and certainly

Re: Splitting man pages

2003-12-19 Thread Frank Kster
blacksheep [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: Hallo folks! I had to wrote a lot of man pages for a multiple-binary package. They have to include all the same portion of text for full explanation. A first solution I found was to provide an additional troff document

Re: package building !

2003-12-17 Thread Frank Kster
n.v.t n.v.t [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: Hi 1) After doing: strace -f -o /tmp/log ./configure and for x in `dpkg -S $(grep open /tmp/log|perl -pe 's!.* open\(\([^\]*).*!$1!' |grep ^/| sort | uniq| grep -v ^\(/tmp\|/dev\|/proc\) ) 2/dev/null|cut -f1 -d:| sort | uniq`; do echo -n $x (=

Re: debconf db_input in postinst / horde2

2003-12-12 Thread Frank Kster
Jamin W. Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: On Thu, Dec 11, 2003 at 11:51:01PM +0100, Jeremy Lain? wrote: I can see how it is a Bad Thing to prompt the user for input both in postinst and in config, but the fact still stands that it's the way it's done in horde2, and I'm sure there must be a

Re: RFS: phpgroupware

2003-12-10 Thread Frank Kster
Thomas Viehmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: - The database admin password is stored in debconf. This should not be done. Ask for it, use it, and then remove it from the database. What does this mean for the removal of the database upon purging the package? I don't have the impression that

Re: Adding files to a package...

2003-12-02 Thread Frank Kster
Greg Kiyomi [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: Hello, I'm attempting to create a package from upstream source and I'm wondering how to add a file to the package that is not included in the source (e.g. a config file in /etc or a missing man page). Do I have to add the files in the source itself

Re: Help with init replacement

2003-11-20 Thread Frank Kster
Marc A. Pelletier [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: On Wednesday 19 November 2003 16:43, you wrote: We already have at least one very good dependency-based initscript system in Debian, so daemond is not alone in its troubles. Oh? Don't know it. Care to point me to it? I did already: [EMAIL

Removal of user-edited configuration files?

2003-11-18 Thread Frank Kster
Hi, Policy requires that a package remove any configuration files (not conffiles) that a maintainer script created when it is purged. However, if a user has added configuration files (e.g. because the program reads any file in /etc/$progname/ that corresponds to some naming scheme), the package

Re: Removal of user-edited configuration files?

2003-11-18 Thread Frank Kster
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 10:09:37AM +0100, Frank Küster wrote: So is it then required that a package check wether the configuration file it is about to remove still looks like the one it once created - perhaps with small user changes? It might be

Re: Removal of user-edited configuration files?

2003-11-18 Thread Frank Kster
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hmm. There are two questions here: Right, and thank you. I would not trust my English enough to decide whether configuration files must be preserved when the package is removed, and only deleted when the package is purged. should read must be

Re: Help with init replacement

2003-11-18 Thread Frank Kster
Marc A. Pelletier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In the case of (b) and (c) above, things are complicated by the fact that I don't personally use debian. (b) would be possible if someone would give me a tarball of the set of all possible boot time scripts from a sid install, although testing

When to unregister unused debconf templates?

2003-11-13 Thread Frank Kster
Hi, after changing the configuration scheme considerably, I have a couple of unused debconf templates left. I guess it's a good idea to unregister them from the database to keep it as small as possible. Where should I do this? Not before the new package is unpacked, but also better not wait

Modifying other packages' conffiles: the not-so-ideal way

2003-11-11 Thread Frank Kster
Hi, policy says in section 10.7.4: , | If it is desirable for two or more related packages to share a | configuration file and for all of the related packages to be able to | modify that configuration file, then the following should be done: | |1. One of the related packages (the owning

Re: Modifying other packages' conffiles: the not-so-ideal way

2003-11-11 Thread Frank Kster
Andreas Metzler [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 11:16:39AM +0100, Frank Küster wrote: policy says in section 10.7.4: , | If it is desirable for two or more related packages to share a | configuration file and for all of the related packages to be able to | modify

Re: fastdep finally packaged

2003-11-06 Thread Frank Kster
Zenaan Harkness [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: well lintian is already the newest version, here's the full lintian text again: W: fastdep source: newer-standards-version 3.6.1.0 N: N: The source package refers to a `Standards-Version' which is newer than N: the highest one lintian is

Re: preferred method for coexistence of debconf- and manual parts in conffiles?

2003-11-05 Thread Frank Kster
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 03:03:24PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote: Hi, if a package wants to use debconf to manage a configuration file, but still let the user have the option to manually add entries - is there a preferred way how to do this? Have you

Re: preferred method for coexistence of debconf- and manual parts in conffiles?

2003-11-05 Thread Frank Kster
Andreas Metzler [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 03:03:24PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote: if a package wants to use debconf to manage a configuration file, but still let the user have the option to manually add entries - is there a preferred way how to do this? Parse the file

Re: preferred method for coexistence of debconf- and manual parts in conf[ig ]files?

2003-11-05 Thread Frank Kster
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: The problem with that is, as pointed out in the bug report, is that now both the debconf database and language.dat are under /var, where backups are rarely done on homeusers systems, and he wants it under /etc. Er, if you're not backing up /var/lib,

Re: Problem with dependency declaration

2003-11-04 Thread Frank Kster
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bob Proulx) schrieb: Andreas Metzler wrote: Frank Küster wrote: If coreutils wouldn't be of priority required, I would just add coreutils | stat to the dependencies. What should I do in this case? Stat was in coreutils from the first time it appeared in Debian, so a

Re: Problem with dependency declaration

2003-11-04 Thread Frank Kster
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Eike Sauer) schrieb: Am Sonntag, 2. November 2003 20:56 schrieb Scott James Remnant: You are not required to list dependencies on 'Essential' packages (those marked Essential: yes). But you ar not required doesn't mean you are not allowed. So what would be wrong with

Re: Problem with dependency declaration

2003-11-03 Thread Frank Kster
Andreas Metzler [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: On Sun, Nov 02, 2003 at 08:27:28PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote: in a package that I maintain (sponsored by a DD), I use a call to stat. In sarge, /usr/bin/stat is in coreutils - of course I don't need a dependency on that. However, in woody stat was in

Re: Special requirements for scripts in /etc/rcS.d?

2003-11-03 Thread Frank Kster
Paul Cupis [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: On Sunday 02 November 2003 19:30, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Frank Küster) wrote: I have become the (sponsored) maintainer of netenv, a package that creates a link to it's /etc/init.d/ file in /etc/rcS.d/. Up to recently, it was only depending on stuff in /bin

Re: Special requirements for scripts in /etc/rcS.d?

2003-11-03 Thread Frank Kster
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: As I don't use nfs at all, I don't know how to figure this out safely during configure. Can you point me to the right place? Can you explain in more detail how the call to 'stat' is being used? Is it not possible to detect, at runtime, if the stat

Special requirements for scripts in /etc/rcS.d?

2003-11-02 Thread Frank Kster
Hi, I have become the (sponsored) maintainer of netenv, a package that creates a link to it's /etc/init.d/ file in /etc/rcS.d/. Up to recently, it was only depending on stuff in /bin and /sbin. However, as the result of a bug report I have introduced a call to /usr/bin/stat. Now I wonder wether

Re: RFS: libfilesys-smbclient-perl

2003-10-31 Thread Frank Kster
Amit Shah [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: On Friday 31 Oct 2003 19:06, Gunnar Wolf wrote: Hi, I want to upload this package - However, your .orig.tar.gz is not the same as http://www.cpan.org/modules/by-module/Filesys/Filesys-SmbClient-1.4.tar.g z... Why is it so? The orig.tar.gz contains the

Re: RFS: libfilesys-smbclient-perl

2003-10-31 Thread Frank Kster
Andreas Metzler [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: In ancient times dpkg-source required that the tarfile contained foo-version.orig, but this happened a long time ago (pre-slink?). Today it is not necessary just repack just get foo-version.orig/ and should not be done. Ah, thank you. Although I've

Re: how to make reportbug verbose?

2003-10-25 Thread Frank Kster
Paul Telford [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: On Fri, 24 Oct 2003, [iso-8859-15] Frank Küster wrote: in most bugreports, there's a lot of automatically generated information besides Package name and version: At least the system information with Debian release, Architecture, Kernel and the versions

how to make reportbug verbose?

2003-10-24 Thread Frank Kster
Hi, in most bugreports, there's a lot of automatically generated information besides Package name and version: At least the system information with Debian release, Architecture, Kernel and the versions of packages that $buggy_package depends on. Sometimes there's even more, I guess that's when

Re: Orphaned Packages With Wrong Maintainer

2003-10-24 Thread Frank Kster
Alexander Winston [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: Hi, I came across URI:http://qa.debian.org/orphaned.html yesterday and am interested in helping in any way that I can, but I am not a Debian developer and could not find any directions to follow in the documentation related to fixing bugs in

What does linda mean here?

2003-09-16 Thread Frank Kster
/tmp/netenv line in the here-document, and if k.find means whether any of the arguments is there (and -1 that all are not), it should be that line. That would match the second occurence of tmp below, but then why does the override not work? -- Frank Kster, Biozentrum der Univ. Basel Abt

Re: Multi-source package. Native?

2003-09-15 Thread Frank Kster
. This will allow future developers, upgraders, backporters etc. to reproduce what you've been doing. Bye, Frank -- Frank Kster, Biozentrum der Univ. Basel Abt. Biophysikalische Chemie -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Debconf problem: Question asked twice

2003-09-15 Thread Frank Kster
Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Frank Kster wrote: For tetex-bin, however, we need to set the flag for every user. I think the only solution is to create an additional question that's only used internally to store the information wether the setting of the flag has been done yet. I'm

RFS: netenv

2003-09-15 Thread Frank Kster
architecture all, there's only one small utility that's compiled from C source, and could perhaps be replaced eventually. - -- Frank Kster, Biozentrum der Univ. Basel Abt. Biophysikalische Chemie -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/Zbmd+xs9YyJS+hoRAgQ8AKCRx5

Re: Some debconf questions

2003-09-12 Thread Frank Kster
Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: Frank Kster wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ debconf-show tetex Configuration database frankdb was not initialized. Probably it would be better if you point me to some documentation so that I don't have to bother the list. There no occurence of init

Re: Some debconf questions

2003-09-12 Thread Frank Kster
Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: Frank Kster wrote: - If I set a debconf question's seen flag to false with db_fset, it will still be set to true again if the question is then asked to the user - no need to revert manually? I would be very surprised if this wasn't so, but someone

Re: Debconf problem: Question asked twice

2003-09-12 Thread Frank Kster
Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: Frank Kster wrote: +db_fset tetex-bin/hyphen seen false +db_input medium tetex-bin/hyphen || true +# db_fset tetex-bin/hyphen seen true Please reconsider playing with the seen flag, It wasn't me ;-) One

Re: Some debconf questions

2003-09-11 Thread Frank Kster
Configuration database frankdb was not initialized. Probably it would be better if you point me to some documentation so that I don't have to bother the list. There no occurence of init in debconf(7), debconf-devel(7) or debconf-show(1). Thank you, Frank -- Frank Kster, Biozentrum der Univ. Basel Abt

Debconf problem: Question asked twice

2003-09-11 Thread Frank Kster
medium tetex-bin/hyphen || true +# db_fset tetex-bin/hyphen seen true + db_go fi + +db_fget tetex-bin/hyphen seen + -- Frank Kster, Biozentrum der Univ. Basel Abt. Biophysikalische Chemie -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble

Re: pbuilder: How to get debconf interactive?

2003-09-10 Thread Frank Kster
for general defaults. You probably didn't mean 209375 :-) Bye, Frank -- Frank Kster, Biozentrum der Univ. Basel Abt. Biophysikalische Chemie -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Some debconf questions

2003-09-10 Thread Frank Kster
]:~$ I didn't find the manpages very helpful, is there some other documentation? Thanks, Frank -- Frank Kster, Biozentrum der Univ. Basel Abt. Biophysikalische Chemie -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: pbuilder: How to get debconf interactive?

2003-09-08 Thread Frank Kster
Stephen Gran [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: This one time, at band camp, Frank Kster said: Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: (I'm confused myself atm if it is /etc/pbuilderrc or /etc/pbuilder/pbuilderrc...) The first one works here for me, also according to man pbuilder. But /etc

Re: pbuilder: How to get debconf interactive?

2003-09-07 Thread Frank Kster
Sylvain LE GALL [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: I was having the complementary problem of you... I was trying to do something but i forget to set DEBIAN_FRONTEND. So the last piece of the puzzle : apt-get install dialog Or use readline... Thank you, Frank -- Frank Kster, Biozentrum der Univ

Re: pbuilder: How to get debconf interactive?

2003-09-07 Thread Frank Kster
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 04:41:33PM +0200, Frank Kster wrote: Any ideas? Hmm, you probably tried this but as you don't have mentioned it: Have you set the DEBIAN_FRONTEND in your pbuilderrc? Uh, yes, I have. Or somebody else did. Anyway I didn't

pbuilder: How to get debconf interactive?

2003-09-05 Thread Frank Kster
and choosing dialog (which was on the top anyway, IIRC) debconf stayed silent. I couldn't find any mention of debconf or confmodule in pbuilders manual page, the html documentation or the executables (even in /usr/lib/pbuilder). Any ideas? TIA, Frank -- Frank Kster, Biozentrum der Univ. Basel Abt

Re: backing up/replacing files from another package

2003-09-01 Thread Frank Kster
command). ` Bye, Frank -- Frank Kster, Biozentrum der Univ. Basel Abt. Biophysikalische Chemie -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: backing up/replacing files from another package

2003-09-01 Thread Frank Kster
Andreas Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: * Frank Kster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030901 11:20]: Eric Winger [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: Can't I even Depend on a package and then fine tune its configuration though? Look at http://people.debian.org/~ajt/sarge_rc_policy.txt

Re: backing up/replacing files from another package

2003-08-28 Thread Frank Kster
little package, that configures the autofs configuration a certain way. So we build this package, and cause it to depend on autofs. Probably it would be better to generate a package autofs-$ericscompany and let it Conflict with autofs instead of Depending. Bye, Frank -- Frank Kster, Biozentrum

Re: When to use debconf, and how much?

2003-08-25 Thread Frank Kster
the standard Debian manner. Wether there's an other one, be it hand-taylored or left from a different network-choosing program, is hard to find out; I think I shouldn't rely on recognizing syntax or filenames of other programs I don't use. Thank you for your comments, Frank -- Frank Kster, Biozentrum

When to use debconf, and how much?

2003-08-23 Thread Frank Kster
: Disable and ask nothing (and hope that users will find the Debian sections I added to the html documentation), or keep asking debconf questions? TIA, Frank -- Frank Kster, Biozentrum der Univ. Basel Abt. Biophysikalische Chemie -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject

Problems with UTF-8 in changelog

2003-08-15 Thread Frank Kster
Hi, I am trying to have my debian/changelog file in utf-8, as required by standards-version 3.6.0. However, dpkg-parsechangelog seems not to bee able to parse that: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/src/Packages/netenv/netenv-0.94.2$ iconv -f utf-8 -t ucs-4 debian/changelog /dev/null 21 echo yes [EMAIL

Re: Problems with UTF-8 in changelog

2003-08-15 Thread Frank Kster
Matt Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: On Fri, Aug 15, 2003 at 01:56:22PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote: I am trying to have my debian/changelog file in utf-8, as required by standards-version 3.6.0. However, dpkg-parsechangelog seems not to bee able to parse that: [...] [EMAIL

Re: lintian error file-in-unusual-dir usr/etc/settings/ withQt3-Application

2003-08-15 Thread Frank Kster
Dominik Stadler [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: [conffile in /usr/etc/settings] My question therefore: Is this a case where lintian should allow an exception, because I have no other way of telling the Qt-Library to search in a different directory? Or is it simply not possible? - How do other

Re: Problems with UTF-8 in changelog

2003-08-15 Thread Frank Kster
Matt Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: On Fri, Aug 15, 2003 at 05:41:51PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote: Matt Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: dpkg-parsechangelog seems to have parsed it fine. Perhaps your terminal does not support UTF-8? Hm, I could check this. However, what made

Re: Finding out order of rc scripts?

2003-08-14 Thread Frank Kster
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Frank Küster) schrieb: and pbuilder has been failing to build a sid chroot for a couple of days (because there is no console-tools-libs in sid currently, it seems). Forget that. pbuilder create fails, but upgrading from a woody-base.tgz to a sid-base.tgz seems to work. So

Finding out order of rc scripts?

2003-08-14 Thread Frank Kster
Hi, I have a package which has an init script that depends on beeing called after /etc/rcS.d/S40hostname but before /etc/rcS.d/S40networking. No problem, by lucky chance it's name is netenv... Now I would like to make sure that the order of the scripts didn't change in recent unstable. This is

Re: GNAT 3.15p

2003-08-14 Thread Frank Kster
Ludovic Brenta [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: You should bump Standards-Version to the most recent one (after checking that no changes are necessay). OK, will do. I was wondering where I could find a diff between various Standards-Versions to check for

Re: post-installation script errors

2003-08-14 Thread Frank Kster
Peter Nome [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: On a woody base install, I'm getting lots of post-installation script errors, like this: # dpkg -i sed_3.02-8_i386.deb (Reading database ... 6623 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing to replace sed 3.02-8 (using sed_3.02-8_i386.deb)

Re: Finding out order of rc scripts?

2003-08-06 Thread Frank Kster
Thomas Viehmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: Hi. Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Sorry, I messed things up: This I had found out yet, by the same way. However, /etc/init.d/hostname.sh is from sysvinit, and I couldn't find the place where the rcS.d-link to hostname.sh is made, neiter in

Re: Finding out order of rc scripts?

2003-08-06 Thread Frank Kster
Paul Cupis [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: On Tuesday 05 August 2003 14:10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Frank Küster) wrote: So before sending the package to somebody for testing who has a running sid, I wanted to check wether the order of the symlinks in /etc/rcS.d/ hasn't changed. S40hostname is easy,

Re: Build-Depends-Indep and packages with architecture all

2003-08-04 Thread Frank Kster
Joel Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What concern do porters have with architecture-all-only-packages? With most Arch: all packages, little to none. The concern is actually in *not* having stuff that is *only* needed for -indep targets (which will generally never be built by porting machines)

Re: Build-Depends-Indep and packages with architecture all

2003-08-01 Thread Frank Kster
Thomas Viehmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Frank Küster wrote: In the original package's control file, there is a line of Build-Depends-Indep, but no Build-Depends. Does this make sense for a source package that has no architecture dependent binary packages at all? Why not just use

Re: Build-Depends-Indep and packages with architecture all

2003-08-01 Thread Frank Kster
Joel Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 04:54:42PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote: Hi, for practice and because I want to use it, I am working on a package of the CVS version of auctex, a LaTeX mode for Emacs. Since it's only an Emacs-addon written in Lisp, it's of course

Re: tagging bugs woody?

2003-07-30 Thread Frank Kster
Andreas Metzler [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: Tagging them as fixed,woody sounds wrong to me, they'll be listed as closed in NMU and will probably be rereported again. Oh, does tagging fixed automatically result in that? As far as I understood, a NMU is one possibility, but not the only one.

tagging bugs woody?

2003-07-29 Thread Frank Kster
Hi, users working with Debian woody often do not look at archived bugs when reporting bugs on a package. Therefore it is likely that bugs that have long been fixed in unstable, but will never be in woody will be reported multiple times again. Therefore on [EMAIL PROTECTED] it was suggested to

How to forward a bug to upstream when I'm not the maintainer?

2003-07-22 Thread Frank Kster
Hi, in the last days, I have taken a look at some bugs in a package I frequently use, tetex-base. Some of them should clearly be fixed in upstream. How should I indicate this and inform upstream? I assume that anybody who is not the maintainer (not even a DD in my case) is not allowed to do

Re: How to forward a bug to upstream when I'm not the maintainer?

2003-07-22 Thread Frank Kster
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 11:32:09AM +0200, Frank K?ster wrote: in the last days, I have taken a look at some bugs in a package I frequently use, tetex-base. Some of them should clearly be fixed in upstream. How should I indicate this and inform

Re: RFS agrep

2003-07-18 Thread Frank Kster
Thomas Viehmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: So you think it doesn't matter wether there's two packages named agrep in non-free? What do you mean, two packages named agrep? Clearly, Luk is seeking a sponsor for his ITA (cf. #201367). Oh, excuse me. I

Re: RFS agrep

2003-07-17 Thread Frank Kster
Matt Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 02:48:28PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote: There is an agrep package already in Debian: http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?keywords=agrepsearchon=namessubword=1version=allrelease=all Of course it is

Re: ITP: reportbug says a package of this name exists, but I can'tfind it

2003-07-05 Thread Frank Kster
Rob Weir [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 09:40:40AM +0200, Frank K?ster wrote: Mika Fischer [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: Hi, Frank! * Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003-07-02 19:13]: MOLMOL. But when I entered molmol as the proposed name and reportbug had queried

Re: Should I remove unused directories from the source tree?

2003-07-04 Thread Frank Kster
Thomas Viehmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: Hi. Frank Küster wrote: Should I delete these from the original source? It's clear that this won't reduce download size, because they would still be in orig.tar.gz. It would just avoid confusion among people who want to compile a custom version

Re: Should I remove unused directories from the source tree?

2003-07-04 Thread Frank Kster
Thomas Viehmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote*: Oh, I wasn't aware of that. So I will talk to upstream wether I can just delete them from orig.tar.gz. This archive had to be constructed manually by me, anyway, because the original source is shipped in two

Re: How to figure out the correct build-dependencies?

2003-07-03 Thread Frank Kster
Michel Dänzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: BTW, xlibmesa3 is old; if you aren't running sid, you should use something like pbuilder with a sid chroot to build packages for upload. That will also help verify that the build dependencies are correct. Yes, of course. I'm just doing a first try in

Re: How to figure out the correct build-dependencies?

2003-07-03 Thread Frank Kster
Thomas Viehmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: Hi. Frank Küster wrote: dh_shlibdeps nicely sorts out the libraries that a binary package depends on. Quite nicely, since I get xlibmesa3 | libgl1, but there seems to be no package named libgl1. And how do I figure out the correct

Re: ITP: reportbug says a package of this name exists, but I can'tfind it

2003-07-03 Thread Frank Kster
Mika Fischer [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: Hi, Frank! * Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003-07-02 19:13]: MOLMOL. But when I entered molmol as the proposed name and reportbug had queried the database, it said: A package by this name already exists; continue? [y|N|?]? However, I cannot

Re: How to figure out the correct build-dependencies?

2003-07-03 Thread Frank Kster
Andreas Metzler [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 09:45:23AM +0200, Frank Küster wrote: Thomas Viehmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: Frank Küster wrote: But what about libraries? Can I just assume that for every library in the Dependencies of my binary package, I need the

Should I remove unused directories from the source tree?

2003-07-03 Thread Frank Kster
Hi, in a program I am packaging, a copy of the source of libtiff, libpng and libjpeg is included (and was originally linked statically). In the Debian package, I use the respective Debian libraries, linking dynamically, and these directories are unused. Should I delete these from the original

How to figure out the correct build-dependencies?

2003-07-02 Thread Frank Kster
Hi, dh_shlibdeps nicely sorts out the libraries that a binary package depends on. Quite nicely, since I get xlibmesa3 | libgl1, but there seems to be no package named libgl1. And how do I figure out the correct Build-dependencies:-line? Are there any tools? Of course if I use some utilities not

Re: Packaging a python module

2003-06-30 Thread Frank Kster
Kai Hendry [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: Firstly, I think there is Debian Python Policy. But I can't find it. Any clues? [...] I looked closely at pyblosxom, but I am a little bit confused how under debian/ there is pyblosxom/ with everything again with the directory structure. Is that right?

Howto make one Debian package out of 2 source tar.gz?

2003-06-23 Thread Frank Kster
Hi, inspired by a question on debian-user-german I have compiled the program molmol on my woody machine, which was not trivial, but also not too hard. Now I'd like to build a Debian package and offer it to other people interested (or to the Debian non-free, if I find a sponsor and the authors

Re: Howto make one Debian package out of 2 source tar.gz?

2003-06-23 Thread Frank Kster
Andreas Metzler [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: BTW is 2k part of the name or of the version? Its part of the version. Have you any idea how they are going to increase their version number? If they do strange stuff you might be forced to introduce a epoch soon. The release history goes back

Re: Howto make one Debian package out of 2 source tar.gz?

2003-06-23 Thread Frank Kster
Simon Richter [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: Frank, The program is distributed as two tar.gz files, molmol-2k.2.0-src.tar.gz and molmol-2k.2.0-doc.tar.gz. However they have to make one Debian Package (or at least be mixed), since after compilation everything that comes out of the src.tar.gz is

closing bugs in changelog

2003-04-01 Thread Frank Kster
Hi all, is there any automatic behind the (Closes: #12345) in the changelog? Is this parsed after upload to close bugs? TIA, Frank -- Frank Küster, Biozentrum der Univ. Basel Abt. Biophysikalische Chemie -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?

Isn't the dpkg programmers' manual obsolete?

2003-04-01 Thread Frank Kster
Hi, the manpage of update-rc.d refers the reader to the dpkg programmers' manual. I couldn't find this document on the Debian server, but using google. But the text I found is from 1996 and seems to deal with things that are now in the debian-policy package. So am I missing something, or should

  1   2   >