On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 09:56:35AM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> >It's using it indirectly for the crypto support. I've added the
>
> >Build-Depends to make the use more explicit and asked the upstream
> >author to add the linking exception for ssl. He agreed about adding it
>
On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 04:26:32PM +0200, Tobias Frost wrote:
> Hi Goswin,
>
> Am Montag, den 11.07.2016, 15:44 +0200 schrieb Goswin von Brederlow:
>
> > Package: sponsorship-requests
> > Severity: normal
> >
> > Dear mentors,
> >
> > I
On Sat, Jul 30, 2016 at 07:12:24PM +0200, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Jul 2016 15:44:39 +0200 Goswin von Brederlow <goswin-...@web.de>
> wrote:
>
> > Dear mentors,
> >
>
> Hi,
>
> > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ifstat
ble; urgency=low
* Update to debhelper version 9 (Closes: #817499, #828348).
* Add multiarch support.
* Fix bandwidth spelling in manpage (Closes: #617336).
* Use dpkg-buildflags for hardening.
-- Goswin von Brederlow <goswin-...@web.de> Mon, 11 Jul 2016 12:03:29 +0200
The changes are pu
On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 10:01:28PM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
[ CC'ing ia32-libs maintainers for their opinion. ]
On 2012-07-01 16:04 +0200, Gregor Jasny wrote:
Hello,
currently my source package v4l-utils builds lib32v4l-0 and
lib32v4l-dev packages on amd64. I'd like to get rid of
On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 10:27:34PM +0200, Gregor Jasny wrote:
Hello,
On 7/1/12 10:01 PM, Sven Joachim wrote:
[ CC'ing ia32-libs maintainers for their opinion. ]
Is the 20120616 or 20120701 version of ia32-libs supposed to go into Wheezy?
Yes, 20120616 is already unblocked and 20120701
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package ia32-libs:
Package name: ia32-libs
Version : 20120701
Upstream Author : Goswin von Brederlow goswin-...@web.de
URL : NA
License : GPL
Section
Marc Haber mh+debian-ment...@zugschlus.de writes:
Hi,
Debian QA decided recently that it is bad to have a system/package
account created with its home directory in /home/package, as it is
adduser --system's default btw. I am therefore faced with having to
change /home to some non-/home
Marc Haber mh+debian-ment...@zugschlus.de writes:
On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 03:23:03PM +0200, Arno Töll wrote:
On 23.06.2012 15:17, Marc Haber wrote:
How can I build two flavors of a program with different configure
parameters if upstream does not properly handle out-of-tree building
and I
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package libaio-ocaml
* Package name: libaio-ocaml
Version : 1.0.1-1
Upstream Author : Goswin von Brederlow
* URL :
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-ocaml
Mathieu Malaterre mathieu.malate...@gmail.com writes:
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 11:54 AM, Goswin von Brederlow
goswin-...@web.de wrote:
Mathieu Malaterre mathieu.malate...@gmail.com writes:
Paul,
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 6:50 AM, Paul Elliott
pelli...@blackpatchpanel.com wrote:
I can unpack
Russ Allbery r...@debian.org writes:
Goswin von Brederlow goswin-...@web.de writes:
But then you have to split your workflow again. You have to edit
upstream files in the master branch and debian files in the debian
branch. Switching between the branches becomes a pain and working in 2
Mathieu Malaterre mathieu.malate...@gmail.com writes:
Paul,
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 6:50 AM, Paul Elliott
pelli...@blackpatchpanel.com wrote:
I can unpack this thingy with:
rpm2cpio source.rpm | cpio -i
But I have questions:
Assuming I have the url of the source rpm, how would one write
Bernhard R. Link brl...@debian.org writes:
* Goswin von Brederlow goswin-...@web.de [120311 19:51]:
git-dpm?
http://git-dpm.alioth.debian.org/
http://wiki.debian.org/PackagingWithGit/GitDpm
That would still make git think that your upstream branch is based on
your master branch and thus
Russ Allbery r...@debian.org writes:
Goswin von Brederlow goswin-...@web.de writes:
I tried creating the upstream branch from the master branch and then
removing the debian dir. But then on the next merge git complains about a
merge conflict (modify/delete) when any file in debian
Bernhard R. Link brl...@debian.org writes:
* Goswin von Brederlow goswin-...@web.de [120311 08:10]:
I tried creating the upstream branch from the master branch and then
removing the debian dir. But then on the next merge git complains about a
merge conflict (modify/delete) when any file
Hi,
I've just uploaded libaio-ocaml_1.0-1_amd64.changes to mentors [1] and
also taged it in git [2,3] as debian/1.0-1.
The debian/rules file now has a release target that creates the orig
tarball, imports it into the upstream branch and pristine-tar branch if
needed and tags the release.
I
Russ Allbery r...@debian.org writes:
Goswin von Brederlow goswin-...@web.de writes:
Russ Allbery r...@debian.org writes:
http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/notes/debian/git.html
Where were you 2 years ago when I first asked about how to use git when
being both upstream and debian maintainer
Brian Mercer Esq br...@mercerlegal.com writes:
OK, probably a newb question:
In Ondrej's php5-fpm.prerm script he has:
[ -z $DPKG_MAINTSCRIPT_NAME ] DPKG_MAINTSCRIPT_NAME=php5-fpm
dpkg-maintscript-helper mv_conffile /etc/php5/fpm/main.conf
/etc/php5/fpm/php-fpm.conf 5.3.5-1 -- $@
but
below pans
out you will get your non-native package.
Le 06/03/2012 10:36, Goswin von Brederlow a écrit :
Even with a single repository I need to roll out a new orig.tar.gz for
every upstream change or have to commit upstream changes to
debian/patches/* every time I build a source package and send
Benoît Knecht benoit.kne...@fsfe.org writes:
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Benoît Knecht benoit.kne...@fsfe.org writes:
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
[...]
The package is native because I am both maintainer and upstream
author. Does a watch file make sense for a native package
Stéphane Glondu glo...@debian.org writes:
Le 07/03/2012 09:52, Goswin von Brederlow a écrit :
That is what major, minor and subversions (x.y.z) are for. If I change
only something in Debian I would not increment x or y and I would not
create a new tarball for release on e.g. ocamlforge.
I
Stéphane Glondu glo...@debian.org writes:
Le 07/03/2012 09:14, Goswin von Brederlow a écrit :
With a moments thought I would have 3 branches:
- master
- upstream
- pristine-tar
All developement would happen in the master branch. Then before the
Debian upload I would merge master
Russ Allbery r...@debian.org writes:
Goswin von Brederlow goswin-...@web.de writes:
Given the above idea how would you lay out the git then?
With a moments thought I would have 3 branches:
- master
- upstream
- pristine-tar
All developement would happen in the master branch. Then before
tags 662632 - moreinfo
thanks
Stéphane Glondu glo...@debian.org writes:
Le 05/03/2012 12:33, Goswin von Brederlow a écrit :
I am looking for a sponsor for my package libaio-ocaml
I've looked at the git repository (037a448). It is written explicitly in
[1]:
Do not close RFS bugs
Benoit Knecht benoit.kne...@fsfe.org writes:
Hi Goswin,
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Benoît Knecht benoit.kne...@fsfe.org writes:
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package libaio-ocaml
* Package name: libaio-ocaml
Version : 1.0~rc1
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal [important for RC bugs, wishlist for new packages]
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package libaio-ocaml
* Package name: libaio-ocaml
Version : 1.0~rc1
Upstream Author : Goswin von Brederlow goswin-...@web.de
Benoît Knecht benoit.kne...@fsfe.org writes:
retitle 662632 RFS: libaio-ocaml/1.0~rc1 [ITP] -- OCaml bindings for libaio
tags 662632 moreinfo
thanks
Hi Goswin,
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package libaio-ocaml
* Package name: libaio-ocaml
Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com writes:
(replying on -mentors)
Hi Goswin,
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Having multiarch packages and ia32-libs installed will lead to some
confusion. The runtime linker will not be able to differentiate between
multiarch or ia32-libs libs. One of /usr
Thibaut Paumard mlotpot.n...@free.fr writes:
Le 09/02/12 15:53, Goswin von Brederlow a écrit :
Hi,
now that a multiarch dpkg has been uploaded to experimental it looks
like we can finaly get rid of ia32-libs* for wheezy.
!!!HURAY!!!
The problem now is the transition:
1) multiarch
, Feb 09, 2012 at 04:43:04PM +0100, Thibaut Paumard wrote:
Le 09/02/12 15:53, Goswin von Brederlow a écrit :
now that a multiarch dpkg has been uploaded to experimental it looks
like we can finaly get rid of ia32-libs* for wheezy.
!!!HURAY!!!
The problem now is the transition:
1
Hi,
now that a multiarch dpkg has been uploaded to experimental it looks
like we can finaly get rid of ia32-libs* for wheezy.
!!!HURAY!!!
The problem now is the transition:
1) multiarch and ia32-libs are incompatible
Having multiarch packages and ia32-libs installed will lead to some
Samuel Thibault sthiba...@debian.org writes:
Goswin von Brederlow, le Thu 09 Feb 2012 15:53:35 +0100, a écrit :
3) What about stable users?
I don't see a way to transition stable users slowly. As said above I
intent to request removal of ia32-libs for wheezy. So there will be no
transition
Thijs Kinkhorst th...@debian.org writes:
On Mon, January 16, 2012 23:26, Paul Wise wrote:
I just wanted to ask how mature Package-format 3.0 (git) became until
now.
It is not currently accepted by the Debian archive:
http://bugs.debian.org/642801
My experience until now is that it's
Luis Henriques hen...@camandro.org writes:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package xxxterm.
* Package name: xxxterm
Version : 1:1.9.0-1
Upstream Author : Several (Marco Peereboom ma...@peereboom.us)
* URL :
Hi,
please do not sponsor the ia32-libs* uploads with +nmu in the
version.
Remi: If you want to join the ia32-libs team you are more than welcome
to do so. Ia32-libs could certainly use some fresh blood. Request
membership in the ia32-libs project on alioth and you will get write
access to the
Russ Allbery r...@debian.org writes:
Sven Joachim svenj...@gmx.de writes:
Er no, this is not how dpkg behaves. It never converts symlinks to
directories or vice versa, so the actual outcome is¹ that your file gets
actually installed into /usr/lib through the symlink. This means that
if
Sven Joachim svenj...@gmx.de writes:
On 2011-06-13 12:11 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Sven Joachim svenj...@gmx.de writes:
On 2011-06-11 09:22 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Except for how dpkg behaves. If your package has a file in /usr/lib64/
and gets installed then dpkg
Sven Joachim svenj...@gmx.de writes:
On 2011-06-11 09:22 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Except for how dpkg behaves. If your package has a file in /usr/lib64/
and gets installed then dpkg records that that directory belongs to your
package. Then the next time libc6 gets updated dpkg
Gregor Jasny gja...@googlemail.com writes:
Hello,
I'm the maintainer of v4l-utils and ran into the following problem:
The last v4l-utils Debian package added a build dependency to libjpeg,
and because I also build 32bit libs on amd64 (for Skype) I had to add an
build dependency on
Michael Wild them...@users.sourceforge.net writes:
Hi all
I have a question concerning multiarch [1,2]. From what I read it is
conceivable to have something like this on a system:
/usr/{lib,include}/i386-linux-gnu
/usr/{lib,include}/x86_64-linux-gnu
/usr/{lib,include}/x86_64-kfreebsd-gnu
David Bremner brem...@debian.org writes:
On Thu, 09 Jun 2011 15:41:34 -0700, Russ Allbery r...@debian.org wrote:
9.1.1 point 2:
The requirement for amd64 to use /lib64 for 64 bit binaries is
removed.
Yeah, that is the point that confused me. For me, removing the
requirement is
Andriy Senkovych jolly_ro...@itblog.org.ua writes:
Hello, Elliott.
Yes, quilt can remove files. Here is example command sequence to achieve this:
quilt new patch-name.diff
quilt add file/to/be/removed
rm file/to/be/removed
quilt refresh
quilt pop -a
2011/6/1 Paul Elliott
Paul Wise p...@debian.org writes:
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 9:54 AM, Paul Wise p...@debian.org wrote:
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 1:56 AM, Nikolaus Rath nikol...@rath.org wrote:
What's the proper way to fix this warning?
Get this bug fixed:
An addendum, fuse looks like it needs a new
Adam Borowski kilob...@angband.pl writes:
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 10:48:04AM +0200, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
* Daniel Stender dan...@danielstender.com [110429 10:37]:
is it best practice to set LC_MESSAGE=C in debian/rules to prevent
things like test suite breaking when building within
Daniel Lazzari busytes...@gmail.com writes:
Hello,
Hopefully I have the correct list for this question. If not, I
apologize in advance.
I have a collection of SDK packages we are building using dpkg -b that
we need to distribute to our external developers. Because some of the
libraries
Roger Leigh rle...@codelibre.net writes:
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 07:09:44PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Output at http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/build-rule-check.bz2
I haven't had time to analyse this, if someone else wants to,
that would be cool.
Done on lintian.debian.org
Roger Leigh rle...@codelibre.net writes:
On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 08:23:59PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 01:29:12PM -0600, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
In 20101120183255.gf12...@khazad-dum.debian.net, Henrique de Moraes
Holschuh
wrote:
On Fri, 19 Nov 2010, Boyd
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. b...@iguanasuicide.net writes:
In 20101120183255.gf12...@khazad-dum.debian.net, Henrique de Moraes
Holschuh
wrote:
On Fri, 19 Nov 2010, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
But hey, all the maintainer has to do is add 1, in words ONE, char to
debian/rules. Just change
David Kalnischkies kalnischk...@gmail.com writes:
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 19:25, Ø£ØÙ
د اÙÙ
ØÙ
ÙدÙ
aelmahmo...@sabily.org wrote:
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 07:07:07PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
And as discussed before policy disagrees with reality in this.
Would you please
Roger Leigh rle...@codelibre.net writes:
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 04:40:57PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
David Kalnischkies kalnischk...@gmail.com writes:
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 19:25, Ø£ØÙ
د اÙÙ
ØÙ
ÙدÙ
aelmahmo...@sabily.org wrote:
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 07:07:07PM
Didier 'OdyX' Raboud did...@raboud.com writes:
anatoly techtonik wrote:
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 10:02 AM, Ø£ØÙ
د اÙÙ
ØÙ
ÙدÙ
aelmahmo...@sabily.org
wrote:
Hello,
I thought Build-Depends-Indep is for build-deps that are not needed by
clean target.
What is the meaning of name
anatoly techtonik techto...@gmail.com writes:
Hello,
I've described situation around Build-Depends-Indep at
http://wiki.debian.org/Build-Depends-Indep
I hope it will be useful for people who are looking for description of
this field. However, I am not expert in packaging, and some
Hi,
I just clicked as Yes, I want a sponsor for ia32-libs-core on
mentors.debian.net and got:
Details about package 'ia32-libs-core'
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /var/www/mentors.debian.net/cgi-bin/maintainer-packages, line 332, in ?
Goswin von Brederlow goswin-...@web.de writes:
Hi,
I just clicked as Yes, I want a sponsor for ia32-libs-core on
mentors.debian.net and got:
sorry, wrong destination.
MfG
Goswin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe
Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk writes:
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 04:50:49PM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Wed, 10 Nov 2010, Bob Proulx wrote:
The packages for Debian there add a source.list.d file as you
describe. (And it really confused me until I figured out what it had
Ian Jackson ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk writes:
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh writes (Re: How to add dependencies that exist
in another repository):
On Wed, 10 Nov 2010, Bob Proulx wrote:
The packages for Debian there add a source.list.d file as you
describe. (And it really confused me
Scott Howard showard...@gmail.com writes:
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 3:00 AM, Charles Plessy ple...@debian.org wrote:
Le Tue, Nov 02, 2010 at 01:02:25PM +0100, Daniel Lombraña González a écrit :
After that, I kept reading about git-buildpackage and it seems that it
should be more easy to
anatoly techtonik techto...@gmail.com writes:
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 12:30 PM, Goswin von Brederlow
goswin-...@web.de wrote:
Ansgar Burchardt ans...@43-1.org writes:
anatoly techtonik techto...@gmail.com writes:
Can anybody point me to the part of the policy where Build-Depends and
Build
Ansgar Burchardt ans...@43-1.org writes:
anatoly techtonik techto...@gmail.com writes:
Can anybody point me to the part of the policy where Build-Depends and
Build-Depends-Indep differences are explained?
They differ in when they must be satisfied (that is for running which
target in
Asheesh Laroia ashe...@asheesh.org writes:
The cool thing is, you (and others) can do that starting right now:
Just email the debian-mentors list saying, Hey, I'm not a DD, but I
can review someone's package. First reply I get is what I'll review!
And if other people like the idea, they'll
Paul Wise p...@debian.org writes:
On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 4:58 AM, Francesco Poli f...@firenze.linux.it wrote:
However, I still need confirmation that the git work-flow I am planning
to follow won't mess everything up.
Could someone please review it (see http://bugs.debian.org/588636#39)?
A
Michael Tautschnig m...@debian.org writes:
Asheesh Laroia ashe...@asheesh.org writes:
The cool thing is, you (and others) can do that starting right now:
Just email the debian-mentors list saying, Hey, I'm not a DD, but I
can review someone's package. First reply I get is what I'll
://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main
contrib non-free
- dget
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/i/ia32-libs/ia32-libs_20100919.dsc
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Kind regards
Goswin von Brederlow
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
Martin Owens docto...@gmail.com writes:
Hey everyone,
I'm trying to sort out the packaging of barry-0.17-git snapshots and
it's got some undesirable features which is making packaging a pain and
I don't really know what the best way to deal with them is.
It's got multiple binary packages
Christoph Egger christ...@debian.org writes:
Hi!
Martin Owens docto...@gmail.com writes:
Add to that the upstream has a tendency to merge in the debian changes
into the trunk and I think he would like to merge in this directory too.
I understand that upstream should avoid adding debian to
Martin Owens docto...@gmail.com writes:
On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 11:44 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Do we need both? We have neither in Debian (testing/sid) it seems
anyway.
Personally I'd say no, but this is for a ppa/unstable so it probably has
different considerations. At the same
Ben Finney ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au writes:
Karl Schmidt k...@xtronics.com writes:
debchange -v 0.0.20100823
I don't use that tool (I use Emacs's mode for Debian changelogs), but
the âdebchange(1)â manpage says the â--newversionâ option requires
that
you specify the complete
Osamu Aoki os...@debian.org writes:
Hi,
It is complicated.
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 04:45:59PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Osamu Aoki os...@debian.org writes:
=
Case 2: package transition rule
All
Chris Baines cbain...@gmail.com writes:
Sorry, replying to my own message, I have just stumbled upon the Debian
Shared Library Packaging guide
(http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/column/libpkg-guide/libpkg-guide.html#naminglibpkg
). Which explains the solution to my problem.
Chris
On Thu,
Bernhard R. Link brl...@debian.org writes:
Not answering the Conflics/Breaks issue, but some remark about Provides.
* Osamu Aoki os...@debian.org [100726 17:27]:
=
Case 2: package transition rule
All the contents of
Osamu Aoki os...@debian.org writes:
Hi folks,
Breaks field was added to policy in 3.8 and current stable dpkg supports
it as I understand. So we are ready to use it, as I understand.
Under this new situation, I would like to confirm what is the best
practice for each case scenario.
Sébastien Barthélemy barthel...@crans.org writes:
Hi,
I'm trying to package libcolladadom, and I get a few generic questions.
I already asked them in the RFS [1], but later realized that I would get a
wider audience asking them separately. So here I am.
Besides collada-dom, the upstream
Paul Wise p...@debian.org writes:
2010/7/17 Sébastien Barthélemy barthel...@crans.org:
The project is quite inactive, I don't think they'll bother to make a
new release. But, I'll file a bug.
An inactive upstream is another problem. I would suggest joining or
taking over upstream. At
Osamu Aoki os...@debian.org writes:
Hi,
I just uploaded xpdf and then realized I was not closing bug for the
changelog entries from un-uploaaed versions.
I just closed them manually but what did I miss to be like this.
Is there some trick to indicate previos upload was not the previous
Nicolas Joseph nicolas.jos...@valaide.org writes:
Hello,
I try to build a package for i386 and amd64. I cross-build the i386 package
with
the recommendation of the FAQ: http://wiki.debian.org/DebianAMD64Faq#line-95
but
independent architecture packages (common.dev, dev.dev and
Nicolas Joseph nicolas.jos...@valaide.org writes:
Maybe but debarchiver reject my upload because the file is already added and
has
a different md5 sum.
how do you do for real repositories?
2010/5/16 Goswin von Brederlow goswin-...@web.de:
Nicolas Joseph nicolas.jos...@valaide.org writes
Ignacio Valdes ival...@hal-pc.org writes:
Finally it works!
The problem was that if you have a tag in the control file like
Conflicts: with no value it will not warn you and will tell you (far)
downstream that something is wrong with dependencies but that is all.
So the problem was simply a
Ignacio Valdes ival...@hal-pc.org writes:
Does reprepro run on rpm based systems? So far I am not finding that
it does. I currently have to use a rpm based repository server for
reasons of history... -- IV
Package: reprepro
Depends: libarchive1 (= 2.0.25), libbz2-1.0, libc6 (= 2.7), libdb4.8,
Thomas Goirand tho...@goirand.fr writes:
- Original message -
We were talking about dpkg-parsechangelog.
MfG
        Goswin
Are you saying that dpkg-parsechangelog must also be available in RedHat like
distros? Sorry, I didn't get it, but now I think you are quite
Hector Oron hector.o...@gmail.com writes:
Hello,
I am trying to build a package (binutils for cross targets) which now
also builds a shared library (libbfd) which fullfills the dependency
of some binaries just built (objdump; objcopy).
The upstream code builds fine, but, when I trigger
Russ Allbery r...@debian.org writes:
Ignacio Valdes ival...@hal-pc.org writes:
Hi all, Building an apt-get repository on CentOS. There seems to be many
documents on apt-get repository building but they point to many
different commands like apparently deprecated dpkg-scanfiles, reprepro
and
Thomas Goirand tho...@goirand.fr writes:
Russ Allbery wrote:
Thomas Goirand tho...@goirand.fr writes:
then in your debian/rules build rule, you can do something like:
MY_VERS=`head -n 1 debian/changelog | cut -d'(' -f2 | cut -d')' -f1 |
cut -d'-' -f1`
Thomas Goirand tho...@goirand.fr writes:
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Then change that. :)
We have rpm in Debian. Let them have dpkg.
MfG
Goswin
As much as I know, dpkg and debootstrap are both available as RPM
packages for CentOS. But that doesn't mean you can use dpkg
Ignacio Valdes ival...@hal-pc.org writes:
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 6:45 AM, Thomas Goirand tho...@goirand.fr
To my experience, it's a lot more easy to be able to maintain BOTH the
rpm
and the Debian package rather than just porting from one to another. If you
want to avoid redundancy and
Ignacio Valdes ival...@hal-pc.org writes:
Hi, I want to define a variable such as package_initials in control
file and be able to access %{package_initials} in postinst file. Do I
define it in control file as:
XC-package_initials: the_initials
or some other way?
-- IV
mv debian/postinst
David Bremner brem...@unb.ca writes:
I'm packaging the latest syncevolution (beta2) which needs a snapshot of
libsynthesis (3.4.0.5+ds1). It builds fine, and seems to work, but the
calculated depencies are wrong.
src:libsynthesis makes two library binary packages, libsynthesis0 and
Tanguy Ortolo tanguy+deb...@ortolo.eu writes:
Le lundi 08 février 2010, Noel David Torres Taño a écritâ¯:
I do not use it that way. I use 3.0 to have several .orig.tgz files and no
patches. This is because my package uses content from several upstreams.
Take that in account when you
Wesley J. Landaker w...@icecavern.net writes:
On Friday 05 February 2010 04:43:05 Hideki Yamane wrote:
This is true in general, although it's perhaps worth noting that a rare
pre- depends on a priority required package like debconf by a priority
optional or extra package isn't likely to
Karl Goetz k...@kgoetz.id.au writes:
On Wed, 03 Feb 2010 13:21:56 +0100
Goswin von Brederlow goswin-...@web.de wrote:
Karl Goetz k...@kgoetz.id.au writes:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 4.2.27-3
of my package apt-move.
thanks,
Karl Goetz
Isn't
Hideki Yamane henr...@debian.or.jp writes:
Hi Matthew,
On Wed, 3 Feb 2010 16:04:13 +1100
Matthew Palmer mpal...@debian.org wrote:
In short: you don't.
You should make it clear in the NEWS.Debian file that there are
compatibility issues, and your README.Debian should describe how to
Karl Goetz k...@kgoetz.id.au writes:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 4.2.27-3
of my package apt-move.
It builds these binary packages:
apt-move - Maintain Debian packages in a package pool
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The package can be found
Simon Richter s...@debian.org writes:
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 03:44:54PM +0100, M. Frey wrote:
I got the Package A with the version 1.0 and 2.0. From version 2.0
on it's not necessary to keep track of the file fileB.txt. But I
want to keep fileB.txt on the target system anyway.
This
Hi,
others have given alternatives to the epoch already and I would follow
them. You can never get rid of an epoch again so think hard about adding
one for the first time. Now to the reason i reply:
Mats Erik Andersson mats.anders...@gisladisker.se writes:
In setting a positive epoch in the
Russ Allbery r...@debian.org writes:
Eric Lavarde d...@zorglub.s.bawue.de writes:
I fear I know the (negative) answer, but perhaps I missed something: I
have one source package which creates a library and an application,
where each has its own (different) version. The logical approach would
Erik Schanze schan...@gmx.de writes:
Hi mentors,
I have a question regarding repacking and hope you could give me some
suggestions.
I'd like to run a special x86 based device with Debian.
I could use most of the common Debian packages, but I have to repack some of
them
for the use on
Mats Erik Andersson mats.anders...@gisladisker.se writes:
Hello all mentors,
I am in the process of fulfilling an ITA filed on an orphaned package.
However, I now experience a desire to begin patching the upstream
source for compiling errors and spelling errors in the manual page.
To my
Joachim Wiedorn ad_deb...@joonet.de writes:
Hello,
Mats Erik Andersson mats.anders...@gisladisker.se wrote:
To my dismay the previous maintainer chose to let the 'orig.tar.gz'-file
contain the packaged and compressed upstream tar archive. My personal
taste is to abondon this practice, if
Paul Gevers p...@climbing.nl writes:
Craig Small wrote:
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 06:51:01PM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
On 2009-11-11 16:43 +0100, Christoph Egger wrote:
Depends: emacs21 | emacs22 | emacs23 | xemacs21,
gnus | emacs22 | emacs23 | xemacs21
This does not give you any guarantee
Thibaut Paumard mlotpot.n...@free.fr writes:
Le 21 oct. 09 à 11:03, Jonathan Niehof a écrit :
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 5:48 AM, Ben Finney
ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au
wrote:
* Remove the convenience copy from the original source archive, or
merely from the binary package?
Related
1 - 100 of 420 matches
Mail list logo
