Re: Phantomjs can't find libQt5Core.so.5 via ldd on buster

Hi Andreas and Bartosz I have tested on my Buster machine and it works perfectly. Both before and after upgrade this morning. I don't have any ideas left but please try to reinstall libc6 because it contains /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 but I cannot guarantee it will help.

Re: Phantomjs can't find libQt5Core.so.5 via ldd on buster

Hi Andreas On Thursday, 14 November 2019 10:32:36 CET Andreas Tille wrote: > On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 09:35:20AM +0100, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote: > > On 14/11/19 9:26, Andreas Tille wrote: > > > $ phantomjs --version > > > /usr/lib/phantomjs/phantomjs: error while loading shared libraries:

RFS: sdcc 3.8.0+dfsg-3

Hi list Is anyone willing to upload sdcc 3.8.0+dfsg-3 It closes bug #941546 The package can be found at: https://salsa.debian.org/electronics-team/sdcc.git Regards Gudjon

Re: RFS: comedilib 0.11.0-2

Hi Andreas Thanks a lot for the upload of gspiceui. I'm sorry but it may most probably be removed anyway. I don't think bug #885195 will be fixed. I noticed that after my upload, sorry :( Anyway, it doesn't block wxwidgets anymore. Tomorrow I will ask on the electronics mailing list if I can

RFS: comedilib 0.11.0-2

Hi list Is anyone willing to sponsor an upload of comedilib. It is needed for the python2 removal (Closes: #936321) The package can be found at: https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/comedilib/comedilib_0.11.0-2.dsc Regards Gudjon

RFS: gspiceui 1.2.36+dfsg-1

Hi list Is anyone willing to sponsor an upload of gspiceui? The upload will close the important bug #933457 The package can be found at https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gspiceui/gspiceui_1.2.36+dfsg-1.dsc or https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/gspiceui.git Regards Gudjon

Bug#909326: RFS: easyspice/0.6.8-3

Add patch 02_spelling * Add header to patch 01_docurl * Fix description * Add required targets to rules * Fix build flags * Change watch file from http to https Regards, Gudjon I. Gudjonsson

Bug#886501: RFS: qwt/6.1.3-1

Hi Bas I did apply the changes to the rules file but I built the package and made changes to the symbols file according to the pkd-kde symbols instructions instead of using your patch. I added back the Qt4 support according to our offline discussions. Will remove it when all reverse dependencies

Bug#886501: RFS: qwt/6.1.3-1

Sorry Just fixing the subject line. Regards Gudjon

Bug#886501: RFS: qwt/6.1.3-1 [put in ITP, ITA, RC, NMU if applicable]

ained from https://www.example.com. Changes since the last upload: * New upstream version Regards, Gudjon I. Gudjonsson

Bug#885322: RFS: ngspice/27-1

ast upload: [ Gudjon I. Gudjonsson ] Regards, Gudjon I. Gudjonsson

Bug#885170: RFS: qwtplot3d/0.2.7+svn191+gcc7-2

/pool/main/q/qwtplot3d/qwtplot3d_0.2.7+svn191+gcc7-2.dsc Changes since the last upload: [ Gudjon I. Gudjonsson ] Regards, Gudjon I. Gudjonsson Ps. Below is offlist mail conversation with Andreas Tille about previous work on the package: Hi Gudjon, On Mon, Dec 25, 2017 at 10:24:

gcc-6 and sip help (bug 812138)

Hi list I am trying to fix a sip/gcc-6 related bug in package pyqwt3d but I don't know how. OpeGL_mod.sip contains const int GL_2D; const int GL_3D; const int GL_3D_COLOR; which is converted to sipOpenGLcmodule.cpp which contains: static sipIntInstanceDef intInstances[] = {

Bug#818735: RFS: qwtplot3d/0.2.7+svn191-10

Hi Mattia On Tuesday 22 March 2016 11:02:16 you wrote: > On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 12:38:08AM +0100, Gudjon I. Gudjonsson wrote: > > Do you know of any package where only the a part is built for all > > architectures? > > none come to my mind. > You could do something s

Bug#818735: RFS: qwtplot3d/0.2.7+svn191-10

Hi Mattia > > * you're using any-amd64 and any-i386, then why do you explicitly list > hurd-i386 kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i386 too? Ok. I will remove these. > * you're changing only one binary, what about the others? from what I'm > seeing the failure is in the configure step which is done by

Bug#818735: RFS: qwtplot3d/0.2.7+svn191-10

l problems. Regards, Gudjon I. Gudjonsson

Re: Bug#800759: RFS: sdcc/3.5.0+dfsg-1

Hi Wookey On Sunday 04 October 2015 02:34:23 Wookey wrote: > +++ Wookey [2015-10-03 14:05 +0100]: > > +++ Gudjon I. Gudjonsson [2015-10-03 13:48 +0200]: > > > Changes since the last upload: > > > * New upstream release (Closes: #789831) > > > * Improve ma

Bug#800759: RFS: sdcc/3.5.0+dfsg-1

* Add huge memory model libraries (Closes: #768307) * Add deoendency on graphicsmagick-imagemagick-compat * Exclude example code from compression Regards, Gudjon I. Gudjonsson

Re: [help] how to sensibly work around if upstream fails to deal with SONAMES

Hi Andreas On Wednesday 29 July 2015 10:07:50 Andreas Tille wrote: is there some default behaviour to deal with situations discussed in this bug log: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=754583#12 I think we should bump SONAME but is there any sensible way to not conflict

Bug#754448: RFS: gspiceui-1.0.58svn201+dfsg-1, bugfix version

to fix path to html manual Regards, Gudjon I. Gudjonsson -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1651403.9ShVjijPuI@hekla

Bug#753813: RFS: ngspice_26-1, a new upstream release

to Robert Larice) * Remove stripping of codemodel files * Add -BLT and -ltcl8.6 to configure for tclspice. Needed by libtclspice * Remove ps manual * Remove hardening wrapper and exchange for dpkg-buildflags * Add dependency on libfftw3-dev Regards, Gudjon I. Gudjonsson

pdebuild, not removing build environment

Hi Sorry if I have missed something obvious but, in case of error during build. How can I keep the pbuilder environment when I use pdebuild. I don't want pdebuild to remove the chroot environment after the error occurs. Thanks Gudjon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Re: Different behaviour of dpkg-buildpackage and pbuilder

Hi Siegfried How can there possibly be this difference between these two tools? I don't know what could trigger something like this, but it may be worth checking that you have the same build dependencies (and version of them) installed as pbuilder gets. I cannot see any difference between

Re: Different behaviour of dpkg-buildpackage and pbuilder

Hi Felipe On Monday 16 February 2009 13:29:56 Felipe Sateler wrote: I do have a problem with the debian packaging tools but I don't know how to debug it. When I build one of my packages using dpkg-buildpackage or ./debian/rules binary the library files are installed into

Different behaviour of dpkg-buildpackage and pbuilder

Hi I do have a problem with the debian packaging tools but I don't know how to debug it. When I build one of my packages using dpkg-buildpackage or ./debian/rules binary the library files are installed into debian/tmp/usr/lib/tcltk/spice But if I use pdebuild, the same files are

RFS: ng-spice-rework (new package)

unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/ng-spice-rework/ng-spice-rework_18.dfsg-1.dsc Thanks Gudjon I. Gudjonsson -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas

Re: RFS: ng-spice-rework (new package)

Hi George and the others The lintian warnings are added below. The package is more or less lintian clean :) What does that mean? You better describe what the problem is and find ways to deal with it properly. Uploading a *new* package with already known flaws, is not the same as uploading a

Re: BSD licenses

Hi Sandro And thanks for the answer I am trying to package software that contains code with different BSD licenses. However, none of the licenses are similar to /usr/share/common-licenses/BSD So simply include those licenses in debian/copyright along with the files they're appling

Re: BSD licenses

Thanks Jose 3-clausule BSD is DFSG-compatible [0], there may be infinite BSD-licenses versions, just check they're DFSG-compatible by checking each of these points with the license. What you see different are just clausules the author adds and they may be restrictive at times... So if you're

BSD licenses

Hi I am trying to package software that contains code with different BSD licenses. However, none of the licenses are similar to /usr/share/common-licenses/BSD Is there any homepage with versioned BSD licenses that I can refer to? Thanks Gudjon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL

Re: Need help with a watch file

Hi Michael The following lines version=3 http://www.alwins-world.de/programs/download/kdesvn/(.*)x/kdesvn-(.*)\.tar\.bz2 give me the following results: $ uscan --verbose -- Scanning for watchfiles in . -- Found watchfile in ./debian -- In debian/watch, processing watchfile line:

Re: Best way to move from .diff.gz patches to dpatch

Hi Now, for better maintenance and making life easy for new upstream release, I want to move to dpatch. What are best way to do it? I have done manually with xosview (15 patches scattered in .diff.gz and reading changelog carefully, putting correct patch submitter from BTS -- all hail).

Re: Some help needed for kernel-module and m-a

Hi You need to call prep-deb-files in debian/rules binary-modules: prep-deb-files Now it works happily :) Your package does not work on kernel 2.6.22 and it seems like the archive is buggy since only kernel 2.6.18-5 is available but version 2.6.18-4 is listed. I tried three different

Re: Some help needed for kernel-module and m-a

On Friday 07 September 2007 21:22:28 Bjoern Boschman wrote: Hi, I'm currently debianizing oracleasm. Till now quite some things look pretty well. They point where I'm lost it the module-assistant build. When I install the oracleasm-source_2.0.4-1_all.deb package it unpacks

force-overwrite in pdebuild

Hi I was trying to rebuild my packages against a new version of library but there is a bug in the libraries that one file is in two packages. Is there any way of letting pdebuild force and overwrite of files? Thanks Gudjon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of

Re: DOS line endings in tarball

I am trying to upgrade a package but I have the problem that the line endings in the original tarball are in DOS mode and this makes boring problems with dpatch. How can I fix that without changing the original tarball? I don't want to run dos2unix on all files :) Well, you

DOS line endings in tarball

Hi I am trying to upgrade a package but I have the problem that the line endings in the original tarball are in DOS mode and this makes boring problems with dpatch. How can I fix that without changing the original tarball? I don't want to run dos2unix on all files :) I want to upload the

RFS: pyqwt5

in version 5.0.1 Kind regards Gudjon I. Gudjonsson -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RFS: pyqwt3d

: W: pyqwt3d source: source-contains-cvs-conflict-copy PyQwt3D-0.1.4/Doc/pyqwt3d/.#pyqwt3d.tex.1.15 I have informed the author of these warnings so I hope they will not appear in the next version Kind regards Gudjon I. Gudjonsson -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject

Re: pdebuild, pycentral and gpg

wrote: Hi Gudjon, On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 08:04:04PM +0200, Gudjon I. Gudjonsson wrote: I do have the problem with dh_pycentral, lintian gives the following error message non-standard-dir-perm usr/share/pycentral/python-qwt5-qt3/ 0775 != 0755 I don't think this is a problem

pdebuild, pycentral and gpg

message non-standard-dir-perm usr/share/pycentral/python-qwt5-qt3/ 0775 != 0755 At last I made a silly mistake with my gpg. I put some silly sentence to some field i thought was for remembering my password (has nothing to do with the password). But now my name is in the GPG key Gudjon I. Gudjonsson

I need a sponsor

Dear mentors Does anyone have the time and willingness to sponsor two packages I have made and I am eager to get into the distribution. The first one is: Name:liborigin Version:20070115-1 Uploaded:2007-04-26 13:39:01 Description: liborigin-dev - A library to read files from the Origin plotting