Bug#699100: RFS: love/0.8.0-1+deb7u1 [RC, NMU, TPU]

2013-01-27 Thread Ivo De Decker
ed-updates; urgency=low . * Non-maintainer upload. . [ Ivo De Decker ] * Upload to testing to backport fixes for wheezy. * Add lintian override for embedded copy of Glee library to avoid ftp-master autoreject. This is fixed in version 0.8.0-2 (for jessie), but this change will n

Bug#696867: RFS: redhat-cluster/3.0.12-3.2+deb7u1 [RC] [NMU] [TPU]

2012-12-28 Thread Ivo De Decker
resource-agents. (Closes: #649068) + + -- Ivo De Decker Fri, 28 Dec 2012 15:09:48 +0100 + redhat-cluster (3.0.12-3.2) unstable; urgency=low * Non-maintainer upload. Regards, Ivo De Decker -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscr

Bug#696437: RFS: nut/2.6.4-2.2 [NMU] [RC]

2012-12-20 Thread Ivo De Decker
Hi, On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 08:14:36PM +0100, Ivo De Decker wrote: > Changes since the last upload: > > diff -Nru -w nut-2.6.4/debian/changelog nut-2.6.4/debian/changelog > --- nut-2.6.4/debian/changelog2012-11-26 21:09:33.0 +0100 > +++ nut-2.6.4/debian/changelog

Bug#696437: RFS: nut/2.6.4-2.2 [NMU] [RC]

2012-12-20 Thread Ivo De Decker
ix typo in package description. Thanks to Julien Cristau +for spotting this. + + -- Ivo De Decker Thu, 20 Dec 2012 19:30:00 +0100 + nut (2.6.4-2.1) unstable; urgency=low * Non-maintainer upload. Regards, Ivo De Decker diff -Nru -w nut-2.6.4/debian/changelog nut-2.6.4/debian/changelog ---

Bug#695728: RFS: mlterm/3.1.2-1.3 [RC] [NMU]

2012-12-11 Thread Ivo De Decker
nks in postinst. +(closes: #688603, #688604, #688605, #688606, 694153). + + -- Ivo De Decker Wed, 12 Dec 2012 00:34:33 +0100 + +mlterm (3.1.2-1.2) unstable; urgency=medium + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Remove previous documentation directories prior to package installation +(closes: #

Bug#695626: RFS: lftp/4.3.6-1+deb7u1 [RC] [NMU] [T-P-U]

2012-12-10 Thread Ivo De Decker
Christoph Egger for the report. +closes: Bug#677861 + + -- Ivo De Decker Tue, 04 Dec 2012 18:08:44 +0100 + lftp (4.3.6-1) unstable; urgency=low * new upstream release from 2012-04-01 diff -Nru lftp-4.3.6/debian/patches/lftp_sys-stdint-kfreebsd.patch lftp-4.3.6/debian/patches/lftp_

Bug#695583: RFS: syslinux/2:4.05+dfsg-6+deb7u1 [RC] [NMU] [T-P-U]

2012-12-10 Thread Ivo De Decker
0 @@ -1,3 +1,12 @@ +syslinux (2:4.05+dfsg-6+deb7u1) testing-proposed-updates; urgency=low + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Upload to testing for wheezy. + * Correctly update syslinux debian themes in extlinux-update +(Closes: #687848). + + -- Ivo De Decker Mon, 10 Dec 2012 12:48:40 +0100 + syslinux

Bug#694872: Why was this bug closed?

2012-12-02 Thread Ivo De Decker
Mike, On Sun, Dec 02, 2012 at 04:36:23PM -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote: > Yes. I don't have a link to the final decision, but you can easily > verify the veracity of that statement by looking at the versioning of > packages that have gone through tpu recently (e.g. cdbs, underscore, > etc.). Sure

Bug#694872: Why was this bug closed?

2012-12-02 Thread Ivo De Decker
Hi Mike, On Sun, Dec 02, 2012 at 03:20:25PM -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote: > > Well, I thought this was only the case when there is no other option, > > because > > the version has to be smaller than the one in unstable (when testing has > > 4.3.6-1 and unstable has 4.3.6-2 with unacceptable chang

Bug#694872: Why was this bug closed?

2012-12-02 Thread Ivo De Decker
Hi, On Sun, Dec 02, 2012 at 06:23:47PM +0100, gregor herrmann wrote: > On Sun, 02 Dec 2012 17:08:24 +, Bart Martens wrote: Thanks for your reply (and thanks gregor for the upload). > > > lftp hasn't been uploaded or removed, so this bug shouldn't be closed. It > > > might be a problem is som

Bug#694872: Why was this bug closed?

2012-12-02 Thread Ivo De Decker
Control: reopen -1 Hi, On Sun, Dec 02, 2012 at 11:45:08AM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > Date: Sun, 02 Dec 2012 04:20:40 + > From: Bart Martens > To: 694872-d...@bugs.debian.org > Subject: closing RFS: lftp/4.3.8-1.1 [NMU] [RC] > > Package lftp has been removed from mentors. l

Bug#694887: RFS: fossil/1:1.22.1+dfsg-0.1 [RC] [NMU] [T-P-U]

2012-12-01 Thread Ivo De Decker
for wheezy. + * Remove non-free src/cson_amalgamation.{c,h} from upstream tarball +(closes: #692623, #692624). + + -- Ivo De Decker Sat, 01 Dec 2012 12:44:37 +0100 + fossil (1:1.22.1-1) unstable; urgency=low * New upstream version Regards, Ivo De Decker -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debi

Bug#694872: RFS: lftp/4.3.8-1.1 [NMU] [RC]

2012-12-01 Thread Ivo De Decker
the report. closes: Bug#677861 Regards, Ivo De Decker -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20121201152921.ga4...@ugent.be

Bug#694869: RFS: fossil/1:1.24+dfsg-0.1 [RC] [NMU]

2012-12-01 Thread Ivo De Decker
2012-12-01 15:15:38.0 +0100 @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ +fossil (1:1.24+dfsg-0.1) unstable; urgency=low + + * Non-maintainer upload with maintainer approval. + * Remove non-free src/cson_amalgamation.{c,h} from upstream tarball +(closes: #692623, #692624). + + -- Ivo De Decker Sat, 01 De

Bug#693925: RFS: harden/0.1.38+nmu1 [RC] [NMU]

2012-11-22 Thread Ivo De Decker
Michael, On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 10:25:52PM -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote: > > Reviewed and uploaded. Thanks! > > Make sure to send your debdiff to the bug report to stay in compliance > with nmu rules: > http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/pkgs.html#nmu-guidelines I filed a b

Bug#693925: RFS: harden/0.1.38+nmu1 [RC] [NMU]

2012-11-21 Thread Ivo De Decker
+++ harden-0.1.38+nmu1/debian/changelog 2012-11-21 20:43:10.0 +0100 @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ +harden (0.1.38+nmu1) unstable; urgency=low + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Lower dependency of harden-remoteaudit on openvas-server to suggests. +Closes: #690656. + + -- Ivo De Decker Wed, 21 Nov 201

Bug#693635: RFS: openclipart2/2.0+dfsg-1 [RC] [QA] remove non-free file from orig.tar

2012-11-19 Thread Ivo De Decker
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 11:21:55AM +0200, Timo Juhani Lindfors wrote: Hi Timo, > I built the package in a sid pbuilder environment. When I compare the > binary packages (2.0-2 vs. 2.0+dfsg-1) I get odd differences, maybe due > to character encoding issues? I see 2 unexpected differences: - The

Bug#693635: RFS: openclipart2/2.0+dfsg-1 [RC] [QA] remove non-free file from orig.tar

2012-11-18 Thread Ivo De Decker
Debian QA Group (cf. #691126). * Remove non-free pbhj_creating_an_oval_vignette.svg (closes: #692735) Regards, Ivo De Decker -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: htt

Bug#693613: RFS: doc-linux-fr/2005.08-1.1 [NMU] [RC] -- remove build-dep to allow removal

2012-11-18 Thread Ivo De Decker
David, On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 02:07:41PM -0400, David Prévot wrote: > >> I'm > >> looking at the package right now if it can be updated too while fixing > >> this important bug, are you interested by this package? Sorry about the wrong changelog. Gregor fixed that (thanks). I was just looking to

Bug#693613: RFS: doc-linux-fr/2005.08-1.1 [NMU] [RC] -- remove build-dep to allow removal

2012-11-18 Thread Ivo De Decker
depends on mirror. Closes: 691570 Regards, Ivo De Decker -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20121118155916.ga26...@ugent.be