On Tue, 2006-05-23 at 15:22 -0400, Joe Smith wrote:
Jamie Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Based on my understanding of Japanese law, the original document being
in Japanese is the one that is legally binding, even if the author makes
an English translation
On Tue, 2006-05-23 at 15:21 -0400, Joe Smith wrote:
Jamie Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Only if an adequate
English version was available [1], pruning the Japanese docs would be
an option IMO (and only because ~99.9% of Japanese people have good
On Wed, 2006-05-24 at 14:52 +0800, Ying-Chun Liu wrote:
Jamie Jones wrote:
On Tue, 2006-05-23 at 13:27 +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 02:30:50PM +1000, Jamie Jones wrote:
In the event of any license related issues perhaps caused by
mis-translation, the Japanese
as the English version.
In the event of any license related issues perhaps caused by
mis-translation, the Japanese version is the canonical version that must
be followed.
Regards,
--
Jamie Jones
Proprietor
E-Yagi Consulting
ABN: 32 138 593 410
Mob: +61 4 16 025 081
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web: http
On Tue, 2006-05-23 at 13:27 +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 02:30:50PM +1000, Jamie Jones wrote:
In the event of any license related issues perhaps caused by
mis-translation, the Japanese version is the canonical version that must
be followed.
Isn't this the case only
it is not a *NIX style kernel)
Regards,
--
Jamie Jones
Proprietor
E-Yagi Consulting
ABN: 32 138 593 410
Mob: +61 4 16 025 081
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web: http://www.eyagiconsulting.com
GPG/PGP signed mail preferred. No HTML mail. No MS Word attachments
PGP Key ID 0x4B6E7209
Fingerprint E1FD 9D7E
On Sat, 2005-05-21 at 14:28 +0300, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
Personally, I wouldn't use this for compiling the package after you have
done with the debian related development, but the ccache author claims
it's totally safe for that as well.
I haven't had any problems with ccache on my
On Thu, 2005-04-28 at 16:29 +0300, Stanislav Maslovski wrote:
No problems. Built the new package on amd64. Still some warnings in
avinfo.c about cast from pointer to integer of different size
Jamie
--
GPG/PGP signed mail preferred. No HTML mail. No MS Word attachments
PGP Key ID 0x42E2C1E5
On Wed, 2005-04-27 at 16:54 +0300, Stanislav Maslovski wrote:
If somebody tests it on archs different from i386 or Sparc it
will help me a lot! If somebody decides to sponsor it that will
be even better ;-)
Builds on amd64.
--
GPG/PGP signed mail preferred. No HTML mail. No MS Word
On Thu, 2005-04-28 at 00:23 +1000, Jamie Jones wrote:
On Wed, 2005-04-27 at 16:54 +0300, Stanislav Maslovski wrote:
If somebody tests it on archs different from i386 or Sparc it
will help me a lot! If somebody decides to sponsor it that will
be even better ;-)
Builds on amd64.
Oops
Can anybody suggest some good revision control systems for maintaining
Debian packages. I'm about to outgrow using RCS on the debian directory
and wanted to get an idea of what other maintainers are using for their
packages.
Thanks
Jamie
--
GPG/PGP signed mail preferred. No HTML mail. No MS
On Wed, 2005-04-13 at 08:39 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Wed, 13 Apr 2005, Christoph Berg wrote:
Re: Jamie Jones in [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can anybody suggest some good revision control systems for maintaining
Debian packages. I'm about to outgrow using RCS on the debian
On Wed, 2005-04-13 at 14:31 +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Jamie Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005.04.13.1317 +0200]:
Can anybody suggest some good revision control systems for maintaining
Debian packages. I'm about to outgrow using RCS on the debian directory
and wanted to get
On Wed, 2005-03-30 at 10:23 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
This should be better documented indeed, but most if not all tools
Time to file a bug report. What is the package responsible for the BTS
documentation on the web?
I
G'day,
I maintain a few unoffical Debian packages. Before I make my repository
available to the world, I'd like to ensure that if someone runs
reportbug on one of my packages, it will email me, and not the Debian
BTS.
The packages are targeted at sarge or better.
Thank you for your kind
On Tue, 2005-03-08 at 18:28 -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
On Wed, 09 Mar 2005, Jamie Jones wrote:
G'day,
I maintain a few unoffical Debian packages. Before I make my repository
available to the world, I'd like to ensure that if someone runs
reportbug on one of my packages, it will email
16 matches
Mail list logo
