On Mon, 2020-11-16 at 09:28 -0600, Ryan Pavlik wrote:
> Yes, it's disappointing that licensecheck doesn't handle the SPDX
> tags.
Fortunately, SPDX tags are very close, if not identical, to the Debian
short form of the license. So, in theory, you can grep for 'GPL-v2' for
example. But
On Sun, 2020-09-06 at 12:22 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Thu, 2020-09-03 at 14:12 -0400, Jeremiah C. Foster wrote:
>
> > I would like to add that I've recently learned that the Derivatives
> > Census can help determine programmatically the delta between Debian
> > and
>
On Thu, 2020-09-03 at 10:04 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> Hi all,
Hello Pabs!
> I'm looking for collaborators on the Debian derivatives census. The
> census involves a mixture of social and technical work as well as
> following different information feeds to find new Debian derivatives
> and passing
Thank you Ricardo,
That did the trick.
However, now i wander whether would be appropriate to bring up this
inconsistency between the two tools. For instance the Debian Reference
document section 8.6.35.1 states:
A chroot Debian environment can easily be created by the debootstrap
On Monday 25 August 2008 16:11:01 Jeremiah C. Foster wrote:
the tarball is fine now, so that's resolved. I noticed that you've
deleted the file README.Debian from the new revision, is that on purpose?
Yes, I should have mentioned it in the changelog, or at least via
email. :-/
Yes
On Thursday 12 June 2008 17:59:25 Jeremiah C. Foster wrote:
Done. (The new tarball is 35k vs. the 140K of the other -2 tarball.)
Hi Jeremiah,
you're almost done ;-) However, the original tarball has not been changed,
you've generated a .diff.gz with those changes. So, in order to create
On Wednesday 11 June 2008, Jeremiah C. Foster wrote:
--cut--
% --- snip ---
I don't understand. How do I create a diff.gz? (I know how to use
diff, but what is this a diff of? Two different tarballs?)
It is a diff between the original_upstream_source_directory
On Wednesday 11 June 2008 17:49:38 Jeremiah C. Foster wrote:
Done, the new upstream tarball is at
http://jeremiahfoster.com:8080/swedish-1.4.5.tar.gz
That tarball is roughly ten times the size of the last version.
Yuck. I will fix that.
Please run
make distclean before generating
On Monday 09 June 2008 15:32:30 Jeremiah C. Foster wrote:
- It seems to be common practice to use the phrase Swedish dictionary
words for /usr/share/dict as the package synopsis for wordlist packages,
i.e. wswedish. Also, the synopsis should not start with The or A(n),
so please
On Thursday 05 June 2008 10:50:47 Jeremiah Foster wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.4.5
of my package swedish.
Hi Jeremiah,
Hi Tobias,
here are some comments on your package:
- Please don't include automatically generated files in the tarball. Those
On Monday 09 June 2008 15:32:30 Jeremiah C. Foster wrote:
Hi Jeremiah,
I've got another round of comments. :-) I didn't mean that you should remove
the long description from iswedish, please add that again. Also add the long
description for wswedish again. I meant that you should only
On Thursday 05 June 2008 10:50:47 Jeremiah Foster wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.4.5
of my package swedish.
Hi Jeremiah,
Hi Tobias,
here are some comments on your package:
- Please don't include automatically generated files in the tarball. Those
are
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.4.5
of my package swedish.
It builds these binary packages:
iswedish - The Swedish dictionary for ispell
wswedish - The Swedish dictionary
The package appears to be lintian clean. (I ran it through lintian
myself after building
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.4.5
of my package swedish.
It builds these binary packages:
iswedish - The Swedish dictionary for ispell
wswedish - The Swedish dictionary
The package appears to be lintian clean. (I ran it through lintian
myself after
14 matches
Mail list logo
