Hey again,
Jonas Meurer:
>>> So here's the idea we came up with: We could explicitely broaden the
>>> scope of debian-mentors to include any questions regarding Debian
>>> infrastructure software.
>>> That basicly would mean to explicitely mention "
Hello,
Jonas Meurer:
> Jonas Meurer:
>> So here's the idea we came up with: We could explicitely broaden the
>> scope of debian-mentors to include any questions regarding Debian
>> infrastructure software.
>> That basicly would mean to explicitely mention "question
Package: lists.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hello,
as discussed on debian-project and debian-mentors [1], the scope of
debian-mentors@lists.d.o was broadened to explicitely include questions
regarding Debian infrastructure projects.
The DebianMentorsFaq already has been updated accordingly [2,
Hey Wookey,
In general, I think that we should aim for webapps being accessible (and
usable) out-of-the-box after installation while still allowing later
customization by admins.
Wookey:
> The app consists of one main program file (boc.pl), a config file,
> and a set of resource files (html,
Hi again,
Jonas Meurer:
> So here's the idea we came up with: We could explicitely broaden the
> scope of debian-mentors to include any questions regarding Debian
> infrastructure software.
> That basicly would mean to explicitely mention "questions on
> infrastruc-ture p
Hi,
During MiniDebConf in Hamburg, I had an interesting conversation about
the question of how we can attract more people to contribute to Debian
infrastructure projects. There seems to be some consensus that such
infrastructure projects are the ones in Debian that most badly need
more
Am 03.08.2016 um 06:20 schrieb Sean Whitton:
> On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 11:06:31PM -0500, Paul Elliott wrote:
>> Sometimes a user gets a sbuild chroot so screwed up that it does not
>> work anymore, and the user has no idea how to fix it, because he does not
>> know what he did wrong.
>>
>> He
On 20/07/2009 Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
In 20090719235708.gb22...@resivo.wgnet.de, Jonas Meurer wrote:
- in cryptdisks_{start|stop} only one device is setup anyway. here I
simply don't use set -e and check for the error code instead.
While I understand your goal here, I think you
Hello,
in the cryptsetup init and cryptdists_{start|stop} scripts we use some
shell magic with set -e, while read ... done and input/output
redirection. i have to admit that this magic demonstrated me the limits
of my shell scripting skills.
the code in question is:
set -e
...
egrep -v
Hello,
On 19/07/2009 Chow Loong Jin wrote:
On Sunday 19,July,2009 07:45 PM, Jonas Meurer wrote:
so the script needs to be changed to exit the while loop with
information about whether
- the target was found in crypttab
You already have that information. In the snippet of code:
found
On 19/07/2009 Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
In 20090719114552.ga15...@resivo.wgnet.de, Jonas Meurer wrote:
so second thought was to use return codes inside the while loop and
check for them after the while loop. but that failed due to 'set -e'
being set. therefore any return code != 0 caused
Hello,
At preparing zope2.11.3 packages, I found several python (test-)modules
that do have python2.5/python2.6 code. This code is mostly for checking
python2.5/python2.6 support, and thus isn't relevant for the
functionality of zope itself.
Zope2.11.3 still requires python2.4, so when the
Hello,
On 02/07/2009 Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
[Jonas Meurer, 2009-07-02]
At preparing zope2.11.3 packages, I found several python (test-)modules
that do have python2.5/python2.6 code. This code is mostly for checking
python2.5/python2.6 support, and thus isn't relevant
Hey Jan,
thanks a lot for the detailed analysis :-)
On 26/05/2009 Jan C. Nordholz wrote:
[_ZN8DwStringixEj]
that symbol is defined in mimelib/mimelib/string.h as
] inline char DwString::operator [] (size_t aPos)
It is pulled in by mimelib/param.cpp because of
] void
Hey,
On 27/05/2009 Russ Allbery wrote:
Jonas Meurer jo...@freesources.org writes:
so only one question remains for me: do I need to bump the soname or at
least provide a symbols file for added library symbols? or can I simply
ignore them as well?
You should not bump the SONAME. You
Hey,
First thanks for your very valuable answers, they helped me a lot.
On 25/05/2009 Russ Allbery wrote:
Jonas Meurer jo...@freesources.org writes:
At packaging mimelib1 from standalone-source I patched the sources to
use strncpy/strncat instead of strlcpy/strlcpy along with several
Hello,
On 26/05/2009 Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
In 20090526113058.ga5...@resivo.wgnet.de, Jonas Meurer wrote:
On 25/05/2009 Russ Allbery wrote:
More concerning is the last symbol removal, which indicates that the
library has removed:
DwString::operator[](unsigned long)
DwString
Hello again,
This is the third time I'm writing to debian-mentors. I don't know why
nobody replied to my former mails, but maybe I didn't describe the
problem good enough, or the answers to my questions where to obvious.
At packaging mimelib1 from standalone-source I patched the sources to
use
Hello again,
I'm still in the process of preparing mimelib1 packages for debian
unstable. Now I realized that the packages which I prepare do have
slightly different symbols than the old libmimelib1c2a package from
kdepim/3.5.9-1.
I tracked down the changes to some changes/patches I applied to
Hello again,
I'm still in the process of preparing mimelib1 packages for debian
unstable. Now I realized that the packages which I prepare do have
slightly different symbols than the old libmimelib1c2a package from
kdepim/3.5.9-1.
I tracked down the changes to some changes/patches I applied to
On 25/04/2009 Sven Joachim wrote:
On 2009-04-25 09:26 +0200, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
In 20090425001917.gb6...@resivo.wgnet.de, Jonas Meurer wrote:
Ok, I see your point. I'll change the package to be non-native again.
But how about all the links to upstream places that lintian expects
Hey,
On 27/04/2009 Luca Niccoli wrote:
in a package I'm preparing I need to build depend on linux headers,
but if I just put linux-headers in debian/control lintian shrieks
virtual-package-depends-without-real-package-depends
The problem is that AFAICS all the real packages in question are
Hello,
I intend to maintain libmimelib1 as a seperate source package now that
kdepim 3.5.9 has been removed from debian/unstable.
I finally do have a working package, but before I upload it to
debian/unstable, I'd like somebody else to take a look at it.
In particular, I'm unsure about the
On 24/04/2009 Russ Allbery wrote:
Jonas Meurer jo...@freesources.org writes:
- I bumbed the library version to 1.1.4 and kept soname libmimelib.so.1
from the libmimelib1c2a package. The source changes I made where
simple strlcpy() - strncpy() migration, so a soname bump should
On 24/04/2009 Russ Allbery wrote:
Jonas Meurer jo...@freesources.org writes:
Unfortunately ron discovered a far worse issue. The way str[ln]cat()
is used in mimelib makes it very error-prone to buffer overflows:
#define SEND_BUFFER_SIZE 1024
...
mSendBuffer = new char
On 24/04/2009 Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
In 20090424190226.gb6...@resivo.wgnet.de, Jonas Meurer wrote:
- I packaged mimelib as a native debian package as no real upstream
package does exist any more.
That's not a good enough reason. Could the sources be useful in a non-
Debian-derived
On 24/04/2009 Russ Allbery wrote:
Jonas Meurer jo...@freesources.org writes:
But in that case I've a simple question: if I put both defines into a
seperate c source file strl___.c, how do I teach the autotools to use
this file when compiling nntp.cpp, pop.cpp and uuencode.cpp
On 25/04/2009 Paul Wise wrote:
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 3:02 AM, Jonas Meurer jo...@freesources.org wrote:
I intend to maintain libmimelib1 as a seperate source package now that
kdepim 3.5.9 has been removed from debian/unstable.
What does lurker link against on other distros that have
Hello,
I plan to package libmimelib 1.1.2 for debian/unstable. Until now this
has been built/provided by kdepim from kde3, but as part of the kde4
transition kdepim3 has been removed from debian/unstable. Still lurker
depends on libmimelib1c2a, and migrating to libmimelib4 is not an option
as it
hello,
for lurker i need to set the lurker system group password in postinst.
unfortunately there seems to be no way for changing group passwords in
batch mode.
for system user passwords 'chpasswd' exists, but i cannot find an
equivalent for system group passwords.
would it be generally useful?
On 30/01/2006 Jan C. Nordholz wrote:
Hi,
indeed, it sounds exactly like what i'm searching for.
but unfortunately it looks like cryptsetup does not have support for
reading the password from stdin or command-line.
ah, I see, it is using getpass(3) if no keyfile has been
specified.
On 29/01/2006 Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jan 2006, Jonas Meurer wrote:
now my question is, where should i place the check scripts instead?
is /lib/cryptsetup/{pre,post}check correct?
Yes.
thanks.
...
jonas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
hello,
i'dd like to implement a timeout function into cryptdisks, an init
script for cryptsetup.
cryptsetup is run for every entry in /etc/crypttab. It unlocks a
encrypted partition with either a keyfile or a passphrase.
the passphrase prompt should have a timeout, as otherwise boot of
headless
hello,
cryptdisks, the initscript for cryptsetup, runs some checks over the
dm-crypt device after creating it (for example it can check for a
filesystem).
currenctly the check scripts are stored in
/usr/share/cryptsetup/prechecks and postchecks, but unfortunately /usr
is often a seperate local
On 17/05/2003 Joey Hess wrote:
$3 is empty, the previous version is in $2
Oh, thanks a lot ;)
bye
mejo
--
Efficiency and progess is ours one more
Now that we have the Neutron bomb
It's nice and quick and clean and gets things done
Kill kill kill kill kill the poor tonight
Hello,
I've some problems with my package lurker. You can find the source of my
actuall packaging version at http://people.freesources.org/~jonas/lurker/
My problems:
The database format from lurker 0.6 to lurker 0.7 changed, but upstream
provides a convert-script. I want to inform people if they
On 16/05/2003 Joe Nahmias wrote:
if dpkg --compare-versions $3 = 0.1g
then
db_input high lurker/upgrade01_info || true
db_go
elif dpkg --compare-versions $3 = 0.5
then
db_input high
On 22/02/2003 Jan Dittberner wrote:
I packaged my gimp-perl plugin btn4ws.pl and need a sponsor to include
it in the debian distribution. The package is available at
http://www.dittberner.info/file/btn4ws_0.6-1_all.deb
Normally a sponsor doesn't need the .deb. He needs .orig.tar.gz,
.diff.gz
On 22/02/2003 Jan Dittberner wrote:
I packaged my gimp-perl plugin btn4ws.pl and need a sponsor to include
it in the debian distribution. The package is available at
http://www.dittberner.info/file/btn4ws_0.6-1_all.deb
Normally a sponsor doesn't need the .deb. He needs .orig.tar.gz,
.diff.gz
Hello,
I started my NM-process at the 5. July 2002, and it was checked by my
advocate at the 10. July 2002. Now 25 days (more than 3 weeks) passed,
and still no AM contacted me. I know that the NM-team has a hard job,
but I just want to ask how long you have to wait normally at the moment.
My
Hello,
I started my NM-process at the 5. July 2002, and it was checked by my
advocate at the 10. July 2002. Now 25 days (more than 3 weeks) passed,
and still no AM contacted me. I know that the NM-team has a hard job,
but I just want to ask how long you have to wait normally at the moment.
My
On Mon, May 20, 2002 at 10:23:22PM +0200, Jonas Meurer wrote:
I have build a debian-package of gween (gween.freesources.org).
Would anyone be advocate for me? I don't have a signed key at the moment (I
[...]
I found a sponsor. Now gween is in debian and I will start my nm-process in
the next
Hello,
I have build a debian-package of gween (gween.freesources.org).
gween is a web engine based on php. It replaces the template-system and
helps administrating php webpages. You already can find it with adding this to
your sources.list:
deb http://apt.freesources.org/debian sid main
deb-src
43 matches
Mail list logo
