Re: Bug#678992: RFS: grive/0.2.0-1 [ITP #675310]

2012-08-20 Thread José Luis Segura Lucas
Only a reminder about this RFS. Are anybody interested on sponsor the package? Best regards El 23/07/12 18:09, José Luis Segura Lucas escribió: I know that these are difficult times for the new packages, but a little of charity for a new Debian maintainer, please :-P Best regards El 26/06

Re: Bug#678992: RFS: grive/0.2.0-1 [ITP #675310]

2012-07-23 Thread José Luis Segura Lucas
I know that these are difficult times for the new packages, but a little of charity for a new Debian maintainer, please :-P Best regards El 26/06/12 17:36, Benoît Knecht escribió: severity 678992 wishlist thanks Hi José, José Luis Segura Lucas wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for my

Default RFS update behavior

2012-07-17 Thread José Luis Segura Lucas
an sponsor. Is it ok or it would be considered as spam? Thanks in advance for your replies -- José Luis Segura Lucas Blue Telecom -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http

Bug#681444: RFS: grive/0.2.0-1 [ITP #675310]

2012-07-13 Thread José Luis Segura Lucas
-x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/grive/grive_0.2.0-1.dsc -- José Luis Segura Lucas signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#678992: RFS: grive/0.1.1+20120619git27g55c0f4e-1 [ITP #675310]

2012-07-09 Thread José Luis Segura Lucas
on mentors.debian.net any issue related to the packaging. Benoît, are you interested on sponsor this package? Thanks in advance and best regards. [1] http://mentors.debian.net/package/grive -- José Luis Segura Lucas signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#678992: RFS: grive/0.1.1+20120619git27g55c0f4e-1 [ITP #675310]

2012-06-28 Thread José Luis Segura Lucas
Hi! I had contacted upstream author and I get a good response from him: 1.- I can remove Matchman Green from the copyright file. 2.- I added libcppunit-dev as build-depend and the test suite is built now, but never executed. As we suspect, make test doesn't work. Which rule on debian/rules must

Bug#678992: RFS: grive/0.1.1+20120619git27g55c0f4e-1 [ITP #675310]

2012-06-28 Thread José Luis Segura Lucas
/* license to GPL-2+ as you suggested. Best regards -- José Luis Segura Lucas signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#678992: RFS: grive/0.1.1+20120619git27g55c0f4e-1 [ITP #675310]

2012-06-28 Thread José Luis Segura Lucas
El 28/06/12 09:16, José Luis Segura Lucas escribió: I have only a questions before uploading the package again to mentors.debian.net: which rule I must override on debian/rules to execute the unit tests? Best regards I can answer myself: overriding the rule dh_auto_test. I had worked

Bug#678992: RFS: grive/0.1.1+20120619git27g55c0f4e-1 [ITP #675310]

2012-06-28 Thread José Luis Segura Lucas
:-) -- José Luis Segura Lucas signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#678992: RFS: grive/0.1.1+20120619git27g55c0f4e-1 [ITP #675310]

2012-06-27 Thread José Luis Segura Lucas
debian version. Best regards -- José Luis Segura Lucas signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#678992: RFS: grive/0.1.1+20120619git27g55c0f4e-1 [ITP #675310]

2012-06-26 Thread José Luis Segura Lucas
circumstances with their man page when it arrives. Only a question: do I need to update the debian-version number for each revision or I only have to update it when it is at debian archives? Best regards and thanks again. -- José Luis Segura Lucas signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Doubt about an old ITP

2012-06-25 Thread José Luis Segura Lucas
+20120619git27g55c0f4e... First question: how can I change my ITP to put the correct information? Second question: can I put a upstream version number based on a git change set instead a final version? Thanks in advance and best regards. [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=675310 -- José Luis

Re: Doubt about an old ITP

2012-06-25 Thread José Luis Segura Lucas
to the ITP to give advice Yes, it is better to talk upstream into making a proper release though. Well, I hope they release 0.2.0 ASAP. When it happens, I will forget about packaging git-versions :-) Thanks for your help Br -- José Luis Segura Lucas signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital

Bug#678992: RFS: grive/0.1.1+20120619git27g55c0f4e-1 [ITP #675310]

2012-06-25 Thread José Luis Segura Lucas
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package grive * Package name: grive Version : 0.1.1+20120619git27g55c0f4e-1 Upstream Author : Matchman Green match...@gmail.com and Nestal Wan m...@nestal.net * URL :

Re: GPL and OpenSSL

2012-06-05 Thread José Luis Segura Lucas
that *after* developing it. I have copied and pasted your answer to them and waiting news about it. Hope that they change the necessary. Thanks a lot for your answers -- José Luis Segura Lucas signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

GPL and OpenSSL

2012-06-04 Thread José Luis Segura Lucas
:-) [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=675310 -- José Luis Segura Lucas signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: GPL and OpenSSL

2012-06-04 Thread José Luis Segura Lucas
have copied and pasted your answer to them and waiting news about it. Hope that they change the necessary. Thanks a lot for your answers -- José Luis Segura Lucas signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Reply to a RFP on the right way

2011-10-09 Thread José Luis Segura Lucas
El 09/10/11 14:17, Bart Martens escribió: Retitle the RFP to ITP and set yourself as the owner. http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/ And, how can I do that? I think that it is OK to name the source package jsoncpp. I suggest that you have a look at similar packages already in Debian. Ok, I