Hi Hugh,
On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 10:43:01 +, Hugh McMaster wrote:
> Changes since the last upload:
> * Non-maintainer upload.
> * debian/control:
> - Mark libxft-dev Multi-Arch: same (Closes: #884176).
>
IMO this is nothing that warrants a NMU, or an upload on its own.
Cheers,
On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 16:57:18 +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> >> 3.22.9-1 is a whole new upstream release, with changes that actively break
> >> unrelated packages. As you just mentioned, it does at least require themes
> >> to be updated, and, as usual for GTK 3 new
On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 15:11:34 +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
On Thu, Jul 02, 2015 at 09:36:59AM +0200, David Douard wrote:
Version : 0.12.0-1
I think the common practice is to bump the version after a ftp-team
reject.
Yes, but i've discussed this Julien (jcristau) and
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 19:45:40 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
Hi,
I hope this is the correct list to ask this questions - if not please
redirect me (and also please CC me in your reply). [debian-mentors in
CC as well - may be some other people have a similar problem.]
I know that qiime
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 23:51:51 +0100, Jonathan McCrohan wrote:
On 30/05/12 20:05, Julien Cristau wrote:
There seems to be just about 0 creative content in that file. What
exactly is the problem with it?
Figlet 2.2.5 has just been released with the following changelog [1
tag 675167 moreinfo
kthxbye
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 08:58:07 +, Bart Martens wrote:
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Please remove figlet 2.2.2-1 from unstable, testing, stable and oldstable.
The package contains material that must not be distributed. One example is
that
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 02:34:51 +, Jonathan McCrohan wrote:
As far as I can see, sitplus is the only package involved in other
transitions. Once the opencv transition is over, am I ok so look for a
sponsor to review and upload my package to unstable?
Feel free to go ahead now.
Cheers,
Hi Vedran,
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 12:18:52 +0100, Vedran Furač wrote:
On 12.01.2012 11:21, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
Hey, since you're DD, and I am not, would you be so kind and sponsor the
upload?
I am and I would be willing. Could you please provide a package also
fixing
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 19:21:02 +, Jonathan McCrohan wrote:
I have upload a new version of libconfig to mentors, with the
following changelog:
this change to debian/rules looks weird:
- $(MAKE) install DESTDIR=$(CURDIR)/debian/tmp
+ $(MAKE) install
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 23:08:17 +, Jonathan McCrohan wrote:
This is my first upload which requires a transition, and I am unsure
of what happens next. It seems common for packages to be uploaded to
experimental for a time prior to the actual transistion to allow other
maintainers update
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 15:00:23 +, Jonathan McCrohan wrote:
On 27/01/12 19:23, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 10:24:56 +, Jonathan McCrohan wrote:
Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote:
Please don't change the -dev package name.
All of the packages
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 10:24:56 +, Jonathan McCrohan wrote:
Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote:
Please don't change the -dev package name.
All of the packages except one have versioned Build-depends on
libconfig8-dev. Surely this needs to be replaced with libconfig-dev
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 01:02:57 +, Jonathan McCrohan wrote:
Hi Cyril,
AFAICT the primary ABI change between these versions is that upstream
has depreciated longs and replaced with ints in an effort to
standardise lengths across platforms.
Assuming updating the Build-depends field in
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 02:12:18 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Felix Geyer debfx-...@fobos.de (17/01/2011):
I didn't realize that you were talking about the patch itself.
Attaching it now.
Thanks, sponsored. Thanks for spotting I failed to get it fixed in the
first place, too.
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 16:19:11 -0400, David Bremner wrote:
On Sun, 16 Jan 2011 18:08:13 +0100, Felix Geyer debfx-...@fobos.de wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my NMU of the package hugs98.
The upload would fix this RC bug: http://bugs.debian.org/608220
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 23:40:43 +0100, Felix Geyer wrote:
I've upload a new version to Debian Mentors without the LDFLAGS change
and CCed the bug.
Well you've still not sent a patch to the bug, afaict.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 15:19:40 +0200, Julien Viard de Galbert wrote:
I'm writing to both X Strike Force and Mentors as my previous questions
to X strike force [1] did not get any response I'm guessing X Strike
Force is too bust with the release and bugs in other packages to mentor
a newbie
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 13:00:15 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 12:37 PM, Bhavani Shankar R bh...@ubuntu.com wrote:
The respective updated dsc file can be found at:
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 10:50:53 +0530, Bhavani Shankar R wrote:
henceforth I am attaching the diff from the present version in
sid/squeeze for your kind review
Looks ok for a freeze exception. Please let -release know when the
package is accepted in the archive.
Cheers,
Julien
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 10:05:36 +0800, Liang Guo wrote:
On Friday 21 May 2010 04:08:53 Julien Cristau wrote:
You're calling dh_prep in debian/rules clean, this is wrong, should be
replaced by dh_clean. dh_prep is used in the install target before
running make install, and obsoletes
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 01:54:45 +0800, Liang Guo wrote:
There is a strange file debian/xserver-xorg-video-qxl.debhelper.log in
generated package xserver-xorg-video-qxl_0.0.12-1.debian.tar.gz, shoud I
remove it?
You're calling dh_prep in debian/rules clean, this is wrong, should be
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 23:19:20 +0800, Liang Guo wrote:
I've upload a new version xserver-xorg-video-qxl to mentor, it can be get
from
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xserver-xorg-video-qxl/xserver-
xorg-video-qxl_0.0.12-2.dsc
its git repository is
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 13:46:30 +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
No, policy is very clear on that: if you call the build target, you
_must_ satisfy Build-Depends-Indep and Build-Conflicts-Indep:
And policy is clearly not followed by any actual practice on this point.
So that's as much a bug
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 19:01:41 +0200, Petr Pudlak wrote:
Hi, I was trying to attend a reported bug (#521918) of a recently uploaded
package 'eprover', but unfortunately I didn't know what to do about it. I've
already asked on debian-mentors, but nobody replied.
The problem is that if
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 00:19:39 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What I meant by don't work is that, as you mention, these two options
are no-ops.
According to the update-fonts-dir(1) man page, these options should not
be no-ops:
===
update-fonts-dir creates a fonts.dir file
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 08:37:12 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thank you. I can write a proposed addition to the Policy Manual for
TrueType fonts after I'm done with the current package unless someone
else wants to do it. The update-fonts-dir utility currently only
handles fonts in the
On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 22:13:27 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
3) Even if mkfontdir were invoked directly or if it's okay to give
update-fonts-dir an absolute path (in which case its man page needs to
be updated and the warning removed), isn't it also advisable to
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 08:50:57 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
Julien Cristau [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It will always fail, because the user running the script (root) won't
normally have access to the X server.
See, I thought that too, and then I tried it and it seemed to work fine.
Maybe
On Mon, Dec 24, 2007 at 06:02:35 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
Also, it is a bit frustrating that unless digging in the logs, it is not
possible to know that the operation failed. If the problem is more the
configuration of the BTS, could at least DEBEMAIL be used to deliver an
error message ?
On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 22:38:56 +0300, Dmitry E. Oboukhov wrote:
I needed to test the building of one of my packages with gcc4.3.
However it turns out that gcc-snapshot from unstable contains the critical
bug, which makes impossible using it. At the same time the previous
version of the
[I'm not subscribed to -mentors]
On Wed, Aug 8, 2007 at 20:10:41 +0200, Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) wrote:
Hmm, I have something crap to ask...
As you may have noticed, wxwidget 2.8 is not available in Debian.
However Mathias Klose maintain it in Ubuntu...
Would you sponsor my wx2.8 ubuntu
On Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 17:09:45 +0100, A Mennucc wrote:
hi
(CC: to d-mentors : I need some help here)
Steve Langasek ha scritto:
I think in conclusion I would prefer t-p-u for this.
I tried it ;
I uploaded a package (using dput) ;
the first line in debian/changelog was
gpr
On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 14:02:03 +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
I see no problem with autobuilders and virtual build-dependencies since
they're supposed to be configured with just unstable repositories.
Actually, I think autobuilders also have an apt source for the incoming
directory on
33 matches
Mail list logo
