On Sat, Jul 02, 2005 at 02:33:02PM +0200, Markus Schulz wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 29. Juni 2005 19:28 schrieb Tilman Koschnick:
On Wed, 2005-06-29 at 14:36 +0200, Markus Schulz wrote:
Unpacking replacement antzsystem-dispatcher ...
Setting up antzsystem-dispatcher (2.1) ...
Starting
Subject: rpncalc: Standards-Version Max-Standards_Version
Package: rpncalc
Severity: normal
On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 10:23:38PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
On 30.06.2005, at 21:32, Claudio Matsuoka wrote:
Changed to 3.6.2.1, which I assume it's the latest policy manual
version.
I noticed
On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 11:31:02PM +0100, David Given wrote:
On Thursday 23 June 2005 20:04, John Skaller wrote:
[...]
No, this is the ACK, the toolchain that was written for Minix. It's been open
sourced and, despite having timestamps over twenty years old, still works
rather well --- if
On Sun, Jun 19, 2005 at 10:29:45PM +0200, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
Hi,
I've packaged a game called Shotgun Debugger, available at:
http://sdb.gamecreation.org/
You can see a brief description of the game at:
http://www.happypenguin.org/show?Shotgun%20Debugger
According to the following web
On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 09:06:23PM +0200, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
--- Justin Pryzby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I guess you could Recommend: endianpkg1 | endianpkg2.
That wouldn't select the approppriate one when installing, will it?
Only half the time:) If you assume that i386 is most common
On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 01:26:30AM +1000, John Skaller wrote:
Can anyone throw any light on why I am getting this message:
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: format of rtl/libflx_dynamic.so not recognized
The filename doesn't include a soname. Look in /lib/ and /usr/lib/ to
see how shared libraries
On Sun, May 15, 2005 at 05:24:08AM +0200, David Gil wrote:
Hello,
I am looking for a sponsor for the reddo application that I
develop myself.
Package name: reddo
Licence : GPL
Short description : reddo internet translator
Long description: Reddo is a command
On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 09:25:27PM -0300, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
Hi
I am having a problem... When running ./configure on a dir with the
source of a program, it reads 3 files inside the dir autoconf/make:
depend.mk~
filelist.mk~
modules.mk~
Everything runs fine, it creates the
On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 02:33:27PM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
Howdy mentors,
I'm attempting to start my long slide into package maintainership :-)
There is a wealth of material available on how to be a Debian package
maintainer. I'm trying to find my way through it slowly. Here's what
I've
On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 12:38:06AM +0400, Eugene Sudyin wrote:
Hello
I intend to maintain laptop-netconf package (see WNPP bug #307071:
ITA: laptop-netconf -- network detection)
So I am ready to close important and normal bugs for this package
(see #217029 and #303330) but I am worried
On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 12:04:15PM -0600, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
I've put up a new version of the cogito package I'm working on (0.8-2)
here:
http://highlab.com/~seb/debian
I added the needed Build-Depends so this version builds with pbuilder
under Sarge.
I still get lintian
I searched the new maintainer guide and found and read the section on
pbuilder, and also the pbuilder man page, and this (making the package)
seems way more complicated than I thought it would be. Could you explain how
I use it to find the build dependancies?
You list the build-dependencies
On Sun, Apr 17, 2005 at 08:43:08PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
On 17 Apr 2005, at 20:24, François-Denis Gonthier wrote:
The soname doesn't seem to be the problem in that case:
E: codeblocks: sharedobject-in-library-directory-not-actually-a-shlib
usr/lib/libcodeblocks.so.1.0-beta6
On Sat, Apr 09, 2005 at 12:09:53AM +0200, Rakotomandimby (R12y) Mihamina wrote:
Hello,
When I build a debian package, and I fill the dsc file:
The .dsc file should be created automatically by dpkg-buildpackage,
no?
How would I know the binary will run on all architectures or will only
run
On Sat, Apr 02, 2005 at 12:31:25AM +0200, Bas Wijnen wrote:
Sven Mueller wrote:
Installations with debian packages are far too verbose already for my
taste. Please don't bother the admin (me) with questions at uninstall
time as well. I hate giving an (un)install command, only to come back a
On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 01:01:53AM +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote:
Hello,
I am packing a program which create at its first start the neccessary
config file /etc/program and two directories /var/log/program/ and
/var/spool/program/.
How should the files and directories be handled if I PURGE
On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 01:29:50AM +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote:
Hello,
This is the first experience using debconf to configure a bunch of
options in a program.
The program I am packing generate a config at its first start. Then the
admin must config it and can use the program, else it
On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 02:57:32AM +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote:
Hi,
Am 2005-04-04 20:08:45, schrieb Justin Pryzby:
templates: defines the interactive prompts
config: this is a shell script which asks the questions defined by
templates. It handles things like if you answer
That's not a problem. The initial password is an empty file. Since
it has a different owner and non-standard permissions it's a bit of
a headache to create and remove properly in post{inst,rm}, but no
big deal.
Just to be clear, there should be no non-conffile configuration file
shipped in a
Shemesh
Lingnu Open Source Consulting ltd.
Have you backed up today's work? http://www.lingnu.com/backup.html
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Justin Pryzby
whois jgalt
References
[0
On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 05:52:09PM +0100, Michelle Konzack wrote:
Hello Mentors,
I am reading me to dead... because I have some tools (BASH/Perl scripts)
which are architecture independant but it builds every time as
package_X.X.X_i386.deb AND NOT package_X.X.X_all.deb
Ist there
On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 11:15:36PM +0100, Nico Golde wrote:
Hi,
I package a program which creates symlinks with different
names which point to one man page. lintian complains that
the files are not gzipped. if i only rename them to .gz
lintain says:
E: mutt-ng:
I was hoping that someone else would respond to this, since I'm just
fumbling for an answer. Maybe I can provoke one:)
On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 12:02:34PM -0500, Kevin B. McCarty wrote:
Hi list,
I am packaging mn_fit (source package is named mn-fit; currently stuck
in NEW). Upstream tells
Oops, I thought I sent this about 12 hours ago..
On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 02:03:09PM +0200, Charles Majola wrote:
martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Charles Majola [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005.03.18.1202 +0100]:
how does dephelper handle file permissions? issit or to have a
file with +x by
On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 12:59:40PM -0300, Lucas Di Pentima wrote:
Hello!
I'm reading the Policy Manual so I can correct any errors I have in my
control file before sending my program to Lucas Wall, that had accepted
to be my sponsor.
Reading this URL:
On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 08:54:50PM +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 04:50:27PM -0300, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi mentors
When we have a program xyz.tgz and when uncompressing it, it extracts
everything
On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 01:01:06AM +0100, Osamu Aoki wrote:
I got attached messages for this and previous upload of maint-guide.
(I changed everything other than english to extra in this upload since
they are secondary info.)
What should I do?
AIUI, you should file a bug on ftp.debian.org,
On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 03:57:21PM +0100, Tommaso Moroni wrote:
On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 02:20:42PM +, Steve Kemp wrote:
On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 03:14:56PM +0100, Tommaso Moroni wrote:
checking for vsnprintf... yes
checking for snprintf... yes
checking for X... configure: error:
On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 11:51:00AM +0100, Lars Roland wrote:
Hi
I have created a package that replaces another package, but uses the
same dependencies and have the same functionality. Given that I want
to maintain a minimum of changes to existing packages I want to know
if it is possible to
On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 04:04:27PM +0100, Lars Roland wrote:
On Tue, 8 Mar 2005 08:50:13 -0500, Justin Pryzby
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You can uses a Provides: in the control file (providing a non-virtual
package).
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html
On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 09:34:04PM +0100, Rakotomandimby (R12y) Mihamina wrote:
Hello.
I did not make a backup copy of my rules file, and I edited it like a
pig.
I would like to do it again but with a clean rules file.
I would like to re-generate the rules file. How to?
A=$(mktemp -d); cd $A;
On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 08:11:24PM -0300, Lucas Wall wrote:
On 03/08/2005 07:15 PM, Justin Pryzby wrote:
On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 11:02:19PM +0100, Rakotomandimby (R12y) Mihamina
wrote:
2 )
To install the configuration file, I append to what I written (in the
install section yet
On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 01:53:55PM +0800, pabs wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering if there is any info about best practice in the
situation where upstream source packaging doesn't use the standard
foo-0.1.2/ inside of foo-0.1.2.tar.gz scheme?
I suppose repacking the tarball/etc before using
On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 02:03:48PM +, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
Justin Pryzby ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
If you have to repackage it, (FE for DFSG compliance), then you should
create the tarball name_version.orig.tar.gz which extracts to the
directory name-version.orig
On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 01:58:57AM +0100, Rakotomandimby (R12y) Mihamina wrote:
Hello,
I have a sparc box
I want to recompile some packages only available for x86 to make
packages for sparc.
If I just try to fetch the source package with 'apt-get source
package_name' from the sparc it
On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 06:46:50PM +0100, Rakotomandimby (R12y) Mihamina wrote:
Hello,
I would like to learn building multiple binaries package and libraries.
As well as the Debian maintainer guide just covers single binary package
and no library, I would like your advices on any document
On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 04:14:53PM -0500, Hubert Chan wrote:
Hmm. My first attempt to post this was eaten somewhere along the line.
Let's try again...
Michelle == Michelle Konzack [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Michelle Am 2005-03-03 21:13:16, schrieb Justin Pryzby:
Is dh_installdocs being
On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 10:54:32PM +0100, Rakotomandimby (R12y) Mihamina wrote:
On Fri, 2005-03-04 at 14:37 -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
You should read the Library Packaging Guide [0]
Thanks, I will.
apt-get -b source will always work; or use debian/rules binary, or
dpkg-buildpackage
On Sat, Mar 05, 2005 at 12:06:45AM +0100, Rakotomandimby (R12y) Mihamina wrote:
On Fri, 2005-03-04 at 17:34 -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
Do you now understand?
No. But dont anger please:-)
No worries.
Why? And why do you need to modify the rules? I guess you want some
special
On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 02:41:54AM +0100, Michelle Konzack wrote:
OK, now I am confused, because if I use
dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -k0xC492F812
it does not work, but
fakeroot dpkg-buildpackage -k0xC492F812
Is dh_installdocs being called by the binary rule?
Rereading your
On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 07:18:57PM +0100, Michelle Konzack wrote:
Hello,
curently I am packing some stuff from differnt Websites and it is
the first time I have used dh_installdocs but it give me an error:
__( '/home/michelle.konzack/src/stuffit-520/build.log' )__
/
|
On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 08:07:16PM +0100, Michelle Konzack wrote:
Am 2005-03-02 13:27:08, schrieb Justin Pryzby:
Why does it not work with fakeroot ?
Are you somewhere setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH?
Ehm, - no !
Do I need it ?
No:)
But I ran into a problem because of it. fakeroot works
On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 09:47:38PM +0100, Mattia Belletti wrote:
Hi all - here's Mattia/RedGlow. I'm a brand new wannabe debian packager ^_^.
I'm packaging VDE (http://vde.sourceforge.net), and I've encountered a
problem: in the source package, multiple documentation files are all
named
On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 10:37:14AM +0100, Hervé Cauwelier wrote:
Hi,
I'm glad with the dot one because graphviz is now free but my problem is
with the Dia one. In a fakeroot environment as debuild launches, Dia
insists on creating a user preferences file (some ~/.dia), but cannot
due to the
Hi all,
I seek a sponsor:
saods9 - Astronomical image tool
DS9 is an application for astronomical imaging and data
visualization.
DS9 is the modern imtool used by astronomers. It is most
distinguished by its support for displaying 16 bit greyscale images
(such as FITS). Most
On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 04:34:44PM +0100, Lars Roland wrote:
Hi
This may be newbie questions, but anyway here goes: We have a
commercial system, that we are planing to make available open source
(GPL) - right now the plan is to have deb packages and tgz files for
the installation. The tgz
On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 06:15:15PM +0100, Lars Roland wrote:
On Tue, 1 Mar 2005 16:51:02 +0100, Romain Beauxis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Le Mardi 1 Mars 2005 16:34, Lars Roland a écrit :
2) When you update the database software from, say, version 1.0 to 1.1
then it would be preferable to
be considered GNU GPL?
This is a common mistake, and you should correct upstream, and
probably wait until they provide corrected source before trying to get
Debian to distribute it.
The GPL (a so-called copyleft license) is a license. Copyright
2005 by Justin Pryzby indicates the copyright holder
On Sun, Feb 27, 2005 at 02:38:19PM -0500, Mike O'Connor wrote:
Package name: tpg
Version : 3.0.4
Upstream Author : Christophe Delord [EMAIL PROTECTED]
URL : http://christophe.delord.free.fr/en/tpg/
License : GPL
Description : Toy Parser Generator - a
On Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 07:46:44PM +, Noel Torres wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Nico Golde escribió:
| Hello Noel,
|
| Have a look at this:
| http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/column/libpkg-guide/libpkg-guide.html
| Regards Nico
Thnks, I'll look it again (I
On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 09:59:20PM +, Noel Torres wrote:
Can somebody help me to package it? I want it to become (some day) a
piece of Debian.
Yes, we will do our best to help you. I think everyone here would
prefer that you ask specific questions on-list, and we will reply
on-list. That
On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 10:42:22PM +, Noel Torres wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Justin Pryzby escribió:
| On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 09:59:20PM +, Noel Torres wrote:
| Can somebody help me to package it? I want it to become (some day) a
| piece of Debian
On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 11:57:42PM +, Noel Torres wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Justin Pryzby escribió:
| On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 11:25:24PM +, Noel Torres wrote:
| Justin Pryzby escribió:
| | On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 10:42:22PM +, Noel Torres wrote
On Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 12:38:12AM +, Noel Torres wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Justin Pryzby escribió:
| Okay, can you make the build tree, including debian/, publicly
| available for us to scrutinize?
|
| Justin
|
|
http://envite.rolamasao.org/~envite
, the .diff.gz
is functionally equivalent to a tar cjf --- debian/. If you have lots
of changes, then it doesn't make sense to do it like that (unless you
use dpatch, or similar, in which case all of those changes *will* be
in debian/).
--
Justin Pryzby
whois jgalt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
On Fri, Feb 18, 2005 at 10:52:48PM +, Helder Correia wrote:
Hello!
Hi,
I have used many GNU/Linux systems for 8 years, but only very recently I
found Debian, or at least the real wonder it is :)
I would like to start the process of becoming a DD as soon as possible, so I
want to learn
On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 10:17:52PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Antonio S. de A. Terceiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005.02.10.2215
+0100]:
Should I rebuild the PDF's from the LyX inputs to generate my -doc
package (and thus build-depend on lyx), or it's ok to just include
the
Justin
On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 11:47:51PM +0100, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
--- Justin Pryzby
[EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
PDF can be trojaned, so you should at least *provide* a way to
generate them from their sources, even if that makefile rule is
not called by default, and the additional build
On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 05:15:07PM +0100, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
--- Justin Pryzby [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 07:36:42AM +0100, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
Yep, you were right, I had to link all the
objects.
Thanks for the clue!! :)
Cool; can you give us a comparison
-to-the-library?
Cheers,
--
Justin Pryzby
Now seeking qualified employers.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 08:53:06AM +0100, Adrian von Bidder wrote:
On Thursday 03 February 2005 01.54, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
As you can see the package is tiny. All it does is provide a dummy
alternative for x-session-manager that is _not_executable_ so the
I think this should not
On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 01:09:26PM +0100, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
If I can not put that .so inside the package, the other solution
might be getting 3 packages from maserver: libmaserver,
libmaserver-dev and maserver itself. libmaserver would have the
shared library and libmaserver-dev the header
On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 02:31:27AM +0100, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
Hi,
Hiya,
Now running lintian...
E: maserver:
sharedobject-in-library-directory-not-actually-a-shlib
usr/lib/libmaserver.so.1.0
Finished running lintian.
Try lintian -i: you'll see this type of thing:
A shared object was
On Sun, Jan 30, 2005 at 09:17:56PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
HI,
I take it you are upstream as well? I think the recommended way of
doing upstream+debian is to have the .diff include all of ./debian/,
such that other distros don't have to deal with it. Also, that way
you can do a
On Sun, Jan 30, 2005 at 10:27:08PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 30 Jan 2005, Justin Pryzby wrote:
I take it you are upstream as well? I think the recommended way of
doing upstream+debian is to have the .diff include all of ./debian/,
such that other distros don't have to deal
On Sat, Jan 29, 2005 at 09:58:16AM -, dwiti mehta wrote:
I am trying to make a Debian distribtuion CD. I have downloaded
netinstaller(Woody) in which i tried to add some packages and follow
the steps to make a debian custom Cd given on the wikidebain site.
On Fri, Jan 28, 2005 at 06:33:29PM +0100, Jan Kesten wrote:
Hi Justin and others!
'ello,
Right again. No reason for mailinglists to depend on a relational SQL
DB. (Since I can do perfectly good search with zgrep). If you want
to allow users to import them into SQL, I recommend providing
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 04:57:16PM +0200, Mugurel Tudor wrote:
Hi,
I created some DEB packages, and everything is OK with one exception:
for every package that I created, at instalation time, I get the
following error (on Debian Stable and also on Debian Unstable):
# apt-get install foo
On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 08:32:17AM +0100, Jan Kesten wrote:
Hi again,
'ello.
FWIW the X.1 numbering scheme is usually for NMU uploads (but that
probably doesn't apply to native packages?)
[...]
Do you have a reader interface for the mbox files? Maybe the scripts
from lists.debian.org so
On Sun, Jan 23, 2005 at 03:09:59PM +0100, Jan Kesten wrote:
Hi,
at first thanks Magnus and Frank for the hint to find a documentaion
only package to look at. Finally I managed to get working packages, that
install mbox-archives of mailinglists under /usr/share/doc/mailinglists
Nice idea.
On Sun, Jan 23, 2005 at 05:08:15PM +0100, Jan Kesten wrote:
Justin Pryzby wrote:
Nice idea. Where do you get the mbox from?
By now I archiving or better buliding up an archive of different
mailinglists. Right now they are stored in a database for easy checking
if there are new mails
On Sun, Jan 23, 2005 at 06:00:31PM +0100, Jan Kesten wrote:
.deb. The .deb *is* the source package, just with a control file
and a copyright file and whatever, and compressed and relocated as
necessary to /usr/share/.
ACK. Forgot to mention - since my package uses dh_compress the
On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 01:19:37PM +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 01:37:07PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 07:12:54PM +0100, Alexis Sukrieh wrote:
- Should I make my own .orig.tar.gz tarball whenever a new upstream
release
On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 07:12:54PM +0100, Alexis Sukrieh wrote:
Hello mentors.
There is an issue with the upstream tarball, it includes CVS direcories
and .cvsignore files. That's not welcome in source packages, as lintian
says and I'd like to avoid providing all that CVS stuff.
-
On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 11:08:57PM +0800, Cameron Patrick wrote:
Frank Küster wrote:
,
| %% Any modified versions of this file must be renamed
| %% with new filenames distinct from svninfo.cfg.
`
Furthermore, this sentense renders the package non-free.
According to DFSG
On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 01:04:18PM +0100, Pierre Ancelot wrote:
Theoricaly, this shouldn't ever happen but anyways and since it's written, i
think i be better to tell about it even if i'm certainly wrong on what really
happened.
After running dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot as written on
Your .diff, please?
On Tue, Jan 11, 2005 at 04:26:13PM +0100, Adrian von Bidder wrote:
[not subscribed to tetex-maint, so please cc: me if replying there.]
Yo!
I created a quick package of Achim Brucker's svninfo latex Package.
http://www.brucker.ch/projects/svninfo/index.en.html
On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 04:22:14AM +0100, Pierre Ancelot wrote:
Hi, i am adopting a package to maintain.
As it is my very first package, i'm reading many things actualy.
i sent a mail to adopt it to the control server and set it as ITA
Its good that you want to help, and this will be a good
On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 06:23:39AM -0800, TIFR students wrote:
Hi,
we're having some problems while trying to create a
.deb package using dh_make followed by
dpkg-buildpackage command. dh_make works fine.It
creates a debian dir n all(We made the necessary
changes in the control file),however
On Sat, Jan 08, 2005 at 12:18:24AM -0500, Jereme Corrado wrote:
Sven Mueller wrote:
Jereme Corrado wrote on 07/01/2005 21:34:
And my second question... The new version, (1.5.4) ships with
a little web interface...
Well, I don't know how tightly the web interface is linked (not in
Hi Kevin,
On Sat, Jan 08, 2005 at 10:00:01AM -0500, Kevin B. McCarty wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
I've ITP'ed Mn_Fit, an interactive fitting and analysis program (bug #
288959), and I have most of the packaging finished. I could use some
help figuring
I just checked your line, and it works locally. But see this bug:
http://bugs.debian.org/242884
Also see the related thread on -devel in October: Sourceforge
dislikes uscan is what it boils down to.
Justin
On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 01:53:37PM +0100, Roland Gruber wrote:
Hi all,
I added a
On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 10:17:24AM +0100, Rakotomandimby (R12y) Mihamina wrote:
[ I already posted this to debian-dev, they told me
here was the right place. I really need help to learn
building debian packages ]
Hello,
I'm learning making debian packages.
I choosed to learn on a very
On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 05:09:07PM +0100, Rakotomandimby (R12y) Mihamina wrote:
On Thu, 2005-01-06 at 08:46 -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
Especially where to tell the package builder not to use
'debian/minimalist/DEBIAN/control' but 'debian/control' ?
DEBIAN/control is created from debian
On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 06:04:54PM +0100, Roland Gruber wrote:
Luk Claes schrieb:
It's indeed very strange. Someone suggested to use something like
ftp://ftp2.sf.net/l/la/lam/ldap-account-manager_(.*)\.tar\.gz though.
Thus:
ftp://ftp2.sf.net/first_letter/2_first_letters/project_name/tarball
On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 07:30:20PM +0100, Rakotomandimby (R12y) Mihamina wrote:
On Thu, 2005-01-06 at 11:20 -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
If it had been created by dh_make, why wouldn't it find it?
Its not created by dh_make. dh_make just creates some template files
in ./debian/ (many
You may have found youself a lintian bug, as there is no real
conclusion to last year's discussion:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2003/04/msg00094.html
Justin
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 11:52:57AM +0100, Eric Lavarde wrote:
Hi,
I have a java package (i.e. Architecture all), freemind,
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 04:42:32PM -0500, William Ballard wrote:
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 04:32:07PM -0500, William Ballard wrote:
echo '/Long-Description/entry/packages'
^^^
Should have closed the CDATA tag here. The short description
tag should probably be wrapped in CDATA
On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 02:24:56AM -0500, Antonio Ognio wrote:
Hello mentors and everyone,
I'm currently learning to package software for Debian
so I'm making some packages just to learn this art ;)
I'll try to list briefly what comments/doubts/issues I have with
this packages.
On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 01:01:35AM -0800, TIFR students wrote:
We would like to know if there is any way by which we can create an debian
distro ISO which contains packages of our choice.
On debian site there r basically 2 ways defined:
2.Using net install.
Well we got the basic minimal ISO
Hi all,
I'm trying to clean up WNPP.
As you may recall, I'm encouraging people to use ITP+patch to mean
This packages is ready to be uploaded, and I'm only waiting on a
sponsor. As part of my effort, I've created a webpage [0] of such
packages.
So, if you have an opened ITP, and you are still
On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 07:11:29AM -0800, TIFR students wrote:
We've been using the extract_compressed_fs command to
extract ISOs from a knoppix CD. However on running the
command extract_compressed_fs we encountered the
following error :
$ extract_compressed_fs /cdrom/KNOPPIX/KNOPPIX
On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 01:52:00PM +, Ben Crowell wrote:
Matthew Palmer wrote:
[...] Specifically, you'll need to
provide your sponsor with a standard Debian source package (containing
orig.tar.gz, diff.gz, and dsc files).
when_1.0.15-1_all.deb: Debian binary package (format
On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 10:20:42PM +0100, Magnus Therning wrote:
On Fri, Dec 17, 2004 at 06:34:12PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
[..]
2. How do I handle the cache directory it uses? Currently I only
create it at install, but don't remove it afterwards. I don't want
to remove
On Fri, Dec 31, 2004 at 06:28:57PM +0100, Erik Schanze wrote:
Hi Justin!
Justin Pryzby [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Fri, Dec 31, 2004 at 02:33:46PM +0100, Erik Schanze wrote:
Carlos Parra Camargo [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
- Contained XPMs stand under BSD-like license, not GPL, see
./etc
On Sat, Jan 01, 2005 at 02:43:31AM +0100, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
I've just made a new package: Stellarium Astronomy
Software
Hi Miriam,
You might also be interested in SkyChart:
http://handhelds.freshmeat.net/projects/skychart/
Its by the author of Cartes du Ciel, which is pretty well known and
On Thu, Dec 30, 2004 at 10:39:09AM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Alejandro Exojo [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004.12.30.1031 +0100]:
Ideally, source packages would contain only true man-written
sources. If your diff is big because generated files are being
changed, then have
What package? Is it itself a library? Do other packages actually use
its library?
Justin
On Mon, Dec 27, 2004 at 08:06:07PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello
On Mon, Dec 27, 2004 at 12:36:44AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was looking into packaging a software that has a soname:
On Mon, Dec 27, 2004 at 08:17:19PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What package? Is it itself a library? Do other packages actually use
its library?
No
Are there multiple executables? If not, then you might as well just
use static linking. Maybe note your rationale in README.Debian.
On Mon, Dec 27, 2004 at 12:36:44AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello
I was looking into packaging a software that has a soname:
SONAME libyate.so
but no version, and also upstream doesn't want any version on this library.
During dh_shlibdeps i get :
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning:
501 - 600 of 694 matches
Mail list logo
