Hi,
I have to write a newline along with other things to a config file from
postinst. I was told and discovered that echo -e '\nline' is not
supported in every shell. What would be the best solution for this? I
think I should use printf '\nline' as it seems to work in every shell.
Is it ok, or
* martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-10-10 17:21:55 +0200]:
also sprach Mathias Weidner [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004.10.10.1706 +0200]:
W: siefs source: configure-generated-file-in-source config.log
W: siefs source: configure-generated-file-in-source config.status
W: siefs source:
Hi,
I have to write a newline along with other things to a config file from
postinst. I was told and discovered that echo -e '\nline' is not
supported in every shell. What would be the best solution for this? I
think I should use printf '\nline' as it seems to work in every shell.
Is it ok, or
* martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-10-10 17:21:55 +0200]:
also sprach Mathias Weidner [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004.10.10.1706 +0200]:
W: siefs source: configure-generated-file-in-source config.log
W: siefs source: configure-generated-file-in-source config.status
W: siefs source:
Hi,
I have a lot of trouble reaching alioth. First I have network problems
between:
[...]
12 sl-bb20-par-14-0.sprintlink.net (213.206.129.65) 40.305 ms 51.128 ms 50.846 ms
13 sl-bb23-nyc-14-0.sprintlink.net (144.232.20.45) 119.830 ms 117.052 ms 143.078 ms
14
Hi,
I have a lot of trouble reaching alioth. First I have network problems
between:
[...]
12 sl-bb20-par-14-0.sprintlink.net (213.206.129.65) 40.305 ms 51.128 ms
50.846 ms
13 sl-bb23-nyc-14-0.sprintlink.net (144.232.20.45) 119.830 ms 117.052 ms
143.078 ms
14
* Chris Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-08-27 17:02:43 -0400]:
If I recall correctly, an epoch cannot be removed or else people with
the epoch packages will never have a sane upgrade path.
Exactly. Someone has only one chance: upstream reasons; they change
name, so package name has to be
* Chris Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-08-27 17:02:43 -0400]:
If I recall correctly, an epoch cannot be removed or else people with
the epoch packages will never have a sane upgrade path.
Exactly. Someone has only one chance: upstream reasons; they change
name, so package name has to be
* Anibal Monsalve Salazar [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-08-24 13:17:10 +1000]:
On Sat, Aug 21, 2004 at 02:54:27PM +0200, Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi wrote:
[1] http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/crasm/
debian/copyright is missing the following line [6][7]:
Copyright (c) 1987 Leon Bottou
* Anibal Monsalve Salazar [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-08-24 12:13:26 +1000]:
On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 01:25:36AM +0200, Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi wrote:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/sidplay-libs/
sidplay-libs_2.1.0.orig.tar.gz doesn't exist:
--11:25:54--
http
* Anibal Monsalve Salazar [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-08-24 12:46:32 +1000]:
On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 11:43:08AM +1000, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
Check the list of binary packages of sidplay-libs at:
http://packages.qa.debian.org/s/sidplay-libs.html
and you will see libresid-dev listed
* Anibal Monsalve Salazar [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-08-24 13:17:10 +1000]:
On Sat, Aug 21, 2004 at 02:54:27PM +0200, Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi wrote:
[1] http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/crasm/
debian/copyright is missing the following line [6][7]:
Copyright (c) 1987 Leon Bottou
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-08-23 18:16:20 +0200]:
Could anyone give me a hint where I have to look to find my (certainly trivial)
error?
Can we look into the package's source? Without checking we have a hard
time guessing.
Regards,
Laszlo/GCS
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Hi Mentors, David,
I am looking for a sponsor for sidplay-libs and sidplay, both available
from mentors.debian.net[1][2]. Both needed to play Commodore C64 music
files (.sid) on Linux. As sidplay-libs fixes a FTBFS bug, I would be
very thankful if someone can look into it and upload soon. Please
* Nelson A. de Oliveira [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-08-23 20:16:34 -0300]:
There is no license for the program, but talking with the auhtor, he
allows the inclusion of the program on Debian.
DFSG[1]:
8. License Must Not Be Specific to Debian
The rights attached to the program must not depend on
* Anibal Monsalve Salazar [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-08-24 12:13:26 +1000]:
On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 01:25:36AM +0200, Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi wrote:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/sidplay-libs/
sidplay-libs_2.1.0.orig.tar.gz doesn't exist:
--11:25:54--
http
* Anibal Monsalve Salazar [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-08-24 12:46:32 +1000]:
On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 11:43:08AM +1000, Anbal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
Check the list of binary packages of sidplay-libs at:
http://packages.qa.debian.org/s/sidplay-libs.html
and you will see libresid-dev listed
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-08-23 18:16:20 +0200]:
Could anyone give me a hint where I have to look to find my (certainly
trivial) error?
Can we look into the package's source? Without checking we have a hard
time guessing.
Regards,
Laszlo/GCS
Hi Mentors, David,
I am looking for a sponsor for sidplay-libs and sidplay, both available
from mentors.debian.net[1][2]. Both needed to play Commodore C64 music
files (.sid) on Linux. As sidplay-libs fixes a FTBFS bug, I would be
very thankful if someone can look into it and upload soon. Please
* Nelson A. de Oliveira [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-08-23 20:16:34 -0300]:
There is no license for the program, but talking with the auhtor, he
allows the inclusion of the program on Debian.
DFSG[1]:
8. License Must Not Be Specific to Debian
The rights attached to the program must not depend on
Hi,
I was writing to Ivo Timmermans[1] that I would like to continue with some
of his packages, as he has not updated them for a while. They are music
players (mean: binary, libs) for C64 music formats, ie: SID emulator.
He said it is OK for him, but when I have updated the packages, fixed bugs,
* Jay Berkenbilt [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-08-22 09:54:58 -0400]:
If Ivo gave you explicit permission to do this and isn't responding,
you are within your right to ask someone else to sponsor the uploads,
Thanks, I did this meanwhile.
but you should keep Ivo in the loop.
Well, my sponsor just
Hi,
My sponsor uploaded sidplay related packages for me. It was like before
with other packages: I get a message that the upload was ok, then that
it was accepted. However for two binary packages I get this snippshet:
-- snip --
(new) libresid-dev_2.1.0-3_i386.deb optional devel
WARNING: Already
* Andreas Metzler [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-08-21 16:01:53 +0200]:
It has been fixed, but the information on p.qa.d.o is delayed by a
day,
I waited more then, but it seems p.qa.d.o is still not updated.
xpat2 has successfully propagated to testing:
http://packages.debian.org/xpat2
I look for
* Jay Berkenbilt [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-08-22 09:54:58 -0400]:
If Ivo gave you explicit permission to do this and isn't responding,
you are within your right to ask someone else to sponsor the uploads,
Thanks, I did this meanwhile.
but you should keep Ivo in the loop.
Well, my sponsor just
Hi,
My sponsor uploaded sidplay related packages for me. It was like before
with other packages: I get a message that the upload was ok, then that
it was accepted. However for two binary packages I get this snippshet:
-- snip --
(new) libresid-dev_2.1.0-3_i386.deb optional devel
WARNING: Already
* Andreas Metzler [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-08-21 16:01:53 +0200]:
It has been fixed, but the information on p.qa.d.o is delayed by a
day,
I waited more then, but it seems p.qa.d.o is still not updated.
xpat2 has successfully propagated to testing:
http://packages.debian.org/xpat2
I look for
* Andreas Metzler [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-08-18 16:54:27 +0200]:
The testing scripts did not run succesfully tonight.
Any expected date when they will be fixed? It seems they are still
broken, at least I do not see packages.qa.debian.org updating.
Regards,
Laszlo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Hi,
I am looking for comments, if my package is correct. Some basic
information:
* Package name: crasm
Version : 1.3
Upstream Author : Leon Bottou
* URL : http://crasm.sourceforge.net/crasm.html
* License : (GPL, LGPL, BSD, MIT/X, etc.)
Description :
* Andreas Metzler [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-08-18 16:54:27 +0200]:
The testing scripts did not run succesfully tonight.
Any expected date when they will be fixed? It seems they are still
broken, at least I do not see packages.qa.debian.org updating.
Regards,
Laszlo
Hi,
I am looking for comments, if my package is correct. Some basic
information:
* Package name: crasm
Version : 1.3
Upstream Author : Leon Bottou
* URL : http://crasm.sourceforge.net/crasm.html
* License : (GPL, LGPL, BSD, MIT/X, etc.)
Description :
* Faheem Mitha [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-08-17 01:12:46 +]:
I've been trying to package subversion, version 1.1.0-rc2,
I think David already started with it, as we got a request for the
package. But please note two things: we short of postponed it, as it
won't make into Sarge and David is
* Faheem Mitha [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-08-17 01:12:46 +]:
I've been trying to package subversion, version 1.1.0-rc2,
I think David already started with it, as we got a request for the
package. But please note two things: we short of postponed it, as it
won't make into Sarge and David is
Hi,
I can not reach my sponsor for a while now, who is Martin F. Krafft.
Can someone help me out instead, and look up gradm2 package for me? It
was newly uploaded last month, and more than two weeks passed since
then, but no sign if it is accepted or rejected.
Thanks,
Laszlo/GCS
--
BorsodChem
Hi,
I can not reach my sponsor for a while now, who is Martin F. Krafft.
Can someone help me out instead, and look up gradm2 package for me? It
was newly uploaded last month, and more than two weeks passed since
then, but no sign if it is accepted or rejected.
Thanks,
Laszlo/GCS
--
BorsodChem
* Marcin Orlowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-08-09 10:23:58 +0200]:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/k/
Please make the source available as well.
[...], however when you list
/usr/share/apps/ksplash/Themes/ you would see that
among Nouvola there's empty nouvola directory
created as
* Marcin Orlowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-08-09 10:23:58 +0200]:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/k/
Please make the source available as well.
[...], however when you list
/usr/share/apps/ksplash/Themes/ you would see that
among Nouvola there's empty nouvola directory
created as
* elijah wright [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-08-05 22:19:07 -0500]:
is there any chance that the software could be ported to compile with one
of the free pascal compilers? several of those seem quite featureful on
debian.
No, it uses Kylix components as well, not present in free tools
ofcourse. I
Hi,
I contributed a very small amount to the subversion package. What I see
from packages.qa.debian.org is that building it on alpha and other archs
are failed as the newest apache2 cause trouble with the dependencies.
The problem is that apache2 has an arch=all part, and arch=any ones as
well;
* elijah wright [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-08-05 22:19:07 -0500]:
is there any chance that the software could be ported to compile with one
of the free pascal compilers? several of those seem quite featureful on
debian.
No, it uses Kylix components as well, not present in free tools
ofcourse. I
Hi,
I contributed a very small amount to the subversion package. What I see
from packages.qa.debian.org is that building it on alpha and other archs
are failed as the newest apache2 cause trouble with the dependencies.
The problem is that apache2 has an arch=all part, and arch=any ones as
well;
Dear Mentors,
I have a seemingly stupid question. Say I am not a DD yet, and has a
security bug in a package I help maintaining. Upstream fixed it, so the
package is ready, but upstream requires new library version from a
dependency than the current Debian version. Asked the library maintainer
Dear Mentors,
I have a seemingly stupid question. Say I am not a DD yet, and has a
security bug in a package I help maintaining. Upstream fixed it, so the
package is ready, but upstream requires new library version from a
dependency than the current Debian version. Asked the library maintainer
Hi,
I maintain cvs2svn, and my sponsor uploaded a new version of the
package four days ago. Still, Testing Status shows the previous
package: * 21 days old (needed 10 days); * Valid candidate etc.
Is this known, or should I file a bugreport? Skimming over 'general'
bugs in BTS does not show
Hi Jay,
* Jay Berkenbilt [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-07-23 11:46:45 -0400]:
I maintain cvs2svn, and my sponsor uploaded a new version of the
package four days ago. Still, Testing Status shows the previous
package: * 21 days old (needed 10 days); * Valid candidate etc.
Is this known,
* Santiago Vila [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-07-21 01:45:58 +0200]:
There is a python policy that you should probably read.
Thanks. I have checked at http://www.debian.org/devel/ , but I could
not find that there. But after searching around, I found
Hi,
I maintain cvs2svn, and my sponsor uploaded a new version of the
package four days ago. Still, Testing Status shows the previous
package: * 21 days old (needed 10 days); * Valid candidate etc.
Is this known, or should I file a bugreport? Skimming over 'general'
bugs in BTS does not show
Hi Jay,
* Jay Berkenbilt [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-07-23 11:46:45 -0400]:
I maintain cvs2svn, and my sponsor uploaded a new version of the
package four days ago. Still, Testing Status shows the previous
package: * 21 days old (needed 10 days); * Valid candidate etc.
Is this known,
* Santiago Vila [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-07-21 01:45:58 +0200]:
There is a python policy that you should probably read.
Thanks. I have checked at http://www.debian.org/devel/ , but I could
not find that there. But after searching around, I found
Dear Mentors,
I would like to ask advice with Python. I have a package, which depends
on it, and previously I depended on an exact version (2.3) thus altered
the interpreter in each file to be python2.3 instead of generic python.
It worked, but upstream put extra effort into that it should work
Dear Mentors,
I would like to ask advice with Python. I have a package, which depends
on it, and previously I depended on an exact version (2.3) thus altered
the interpreter in each file to be python2.3 instead of generic python.
It worked, but upstream put extra effort into that it should work
* Joshua Bernstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-07-19 18:22:29 -0700]:
The debian packages and files can be found here:
http://www.lpl.arizona.edu/~bjosh/
Just fetched.
I know they aren't perfect, but its the first one I've done, so I'd
like to have some help!
There are some mistakes: first,
* Sergio Cayuqueo [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-07-19 22:51:21 -0300]:
deb http://bif.lunix.com.ar/deb/ ./
http://bif.lunix.com.ar/deb/bif3_0.3.11_all.deb
the original (orig) tgz file is
http://bif.lunix.com.ar/tgz/bif3-0.3.11.tgz
Your package fails for the first look. :( Please split out the
* Joshua Bernstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-07-19 18:22:29 -0700]:
The debian packages and files can be found here:
http://www.lpl.arizona.edu/~bjosh/
Just fetched.
I know they aren't perfect, but its the first one I've done, so I'd
like to have some help!
There are some mistakes: first,
* Sergio Cayuqueo [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-07-19 22:51:21 -0300]:
deb http://bif.lunix.com.ar/deb/ ./
http://bif.lunix.com.ar/deb/bif3_0.3.11_all.deb
the original (orig) tgz file is
http://bif.lunix.com.ar/tgz/bif3-0.3.11.tgz
Your package fails for the first look. :( Please split out the
* Kai Hendry [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-07-08 13:00:32 +0300]:
But that makes the diff huge and it looks horrible. I was hoping diff
could spot a rename, obviously not.
It won't as you experienced.
So I need to nice way to feed:
dh_installman doc/fr/man/zoneserver.fr.8
Although the actual
* Andreas Metzler [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-07-08 15:32:22 +0200]:
On 2004-07-08 Kai Hendry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
So I need to nice way to feed:
dh_installman doc/fr/man/zoneserver.fr.8
Although the actual file is:
doc/fr/man/zoneserver.8
The file is doc/fr/man/zoneserver.8
* Kai Hendry [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-07-08 13:00:32 +0300]:
But that makes the diff huge and it looks horrible. I was hoping diff
could spot a rename, obviously not.
It won't as you experienced.
So I need to nice way to feed:
dh_installman doc/fr/man/zoneserver.fr.8
Although the actual
* Andreas Metzler [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-07-08 15:32:22 +0200]:
On 2004-07-08 Kai Hendry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
So I need to nice way to feed:
dh_installman doc/fr/man/zoneserver.fr.8
Although the actual file is:
doc/fr/man/zoneserver.8
The file is doc/fr/man/zoneserver.8
* Andreas Metzler [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-07-04 08:39:59 +0200]:
On 2004-07-04 Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One of my packages require a device to be crated for functioning. It is
ok if the user has a normal /dev/, but how should I handle the udev
case? I can detect
* Andreas Metzler [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-07-04 12:12:27 +0200]:
Thanks Andreas. But how can I specify major and minor numbers? As I
know and seems MAKEDEV supports only a list of devices it knows. As my
device entry would be specific, I get:
/sbin/MAKEDEV: don't know how to make device
* Andreas Metzler [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-07-04 08:39:59 +0200]:
On 2004-07-04 Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One of my packages require a device to be crated for functioning. It is
ok if the user has a normal /dev/, but how should I handle the udev
case? I can detect
* Andreas Metzler [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-07-04 12:12:27 +0200]:
Thanks Andreas. But how can I specify major and minor numbers? As I
know and seems MAKEDEV supports only a list of devices it knows. As my
device entry would be specific, I get:
/sbin/MAKEDEV: don't know how to make device
Hi,
One of my packages require a device to be crated for functioning. It is
ok if the user has a normal /dev/, but how should I handle the udev
case? I can detect it, no problem; still I am looking forward for
documentation how should I achieve this with udev and/or examples how
other packages
Hi,
One of my packages require a device to be crated for functioning. It is
ok if the user has a normal /dev/, but how should I handle the udev
case? I can detect it, no problem; still I am looking forward for
documentation how should I achieve this with udev and/or examples how
other packages
* Geert Stappers [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-07-01 13:58:04 +0200]:
That is a solid RFS!
I still didn't made time to check it out
and will not able the next few days.
Try to find a sponsor at Debian mailinglist that have
interrest in other architectures and/or embedded application.
This
* Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-07-01 00:57:22 -0500]:
Maybe kernel-package?
Exactly. That's the best place for it IMHO.
Umm , I missed the beginnihg of this thread. What does
ketchup do?
Fetch the latest kernel version based on the user's choice (stable,
-pre, -mm),
* Geert Stappers [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-07-01 13:58:04 +0200]:
That is a solid RFS!
I still didn't made time to check it out
and will not able the next few days.
Try to find a sponsor at Debian mailinglist that have
interrest in other architectures and/or embedded application.
This
* Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-07-01 00:57:22 -0500]:
Maybe kernel-package?
Exactly. That's the best place for it IMHO.
Umm , I missed the beginnihg of this thread. What does
ketchup do?
Fetch the latest kernel version based on the user's choice (stable,
-pre, -mm),
* Anibal Monsalve Salazar [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-06-28 22:21:14 +1000]:
I don't think you should create a debian package for small script, IMO.
Agree. Even if I don't know where it should go, but definiately finding
a backage which would include ketchup sounds a better idea.
I would like to
* Anibal Monsalve Salazar [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-06-28 13:30:28 +1000]:
BTW, why http://bugs.debian.org/251472 has Goedson Teixeira Paixao
[EMAIL PROTECTED] as owner of the ITP?
Goedson made a mistake, he wants to sponsor the upload, but he wrongly
put himself as the owner. But Dan is the one
* Dan Korostelev [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-06-28 20:39:41 +0400]:
Is there an easy and automated way to create a mozilla locale package?
Looks like they're all similar. Debian lacks russian mozilla locale
package.
See my mozilla-locale-hu package, will be available from the pool, after
the next
* Dan Korostelev [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-06-28 19:41:27 +0400]:
Is it possible to make some files installed by 'make install' excluded
from deb package???
Delete them after 'make install' from debian/rules . You may tamper
with the Makefile as well, but be it as a last resort, only if the
* Anibal Monsalve Salazar [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-06-28 22:21:14 +1000]:
I don't think you should create a debian package for small script, IMO.
Agree. Even if I don't know where it should go, but definiately finding
a backage which would include ketchup sounds a better idea.
I would like to
Hi Colin, Rene,
* Rene Engelhard [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-06-28 10:29:32 +0200]:
Colin Watson wrote:
On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 01:15:58AM +0200, Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi wrote:
Anyway I think as perl is not build-essential, itself should show up in
Build-Depends even.
/usr/bin/perl
* Anibal Monsalve Salazar [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-06-28 13:30:28 +1000]:
BTW, why http://bugs.debian.org/251472 has Goedson Teixeira Paixao
[EMAIL PROTECTED] as owner of the ITP?
Goedson made a mistake, he wants to sponsor the upload, but he wrongly
put himself as the owner. But Dan is the one
* Dan Korostelev [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-06-28 20:39:41 +0400]:
Is there an easy and automated way to create a mozilla locale package?
Looks like they're all similar. Debian lacks russian mozilla locale
package.
See my mozilla-locale-hu package, will be available from the pool, after
the next
* Dan Korostelev [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-06-28 01:47:55 +0400]:
On Sun, 2004-06-27 at 23:36 +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
ah ok, i will search you package with google :)
you have forgotten an url to the pacage.
Oh, maybe I'm stupid, but I don't have any web space to place my stuff
to.
* Dan Korostelev [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-06-28 02:33:37 +0400]:
On Sun, 2004-06-27 at 23:36 +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
Psst, okay, download it here:
http://warqraft.sourceforge.net/temporary/ ;-)
Psst, that's look like a dead project. But be serious; your package has
fatal problems:
1) in the
* Joshua Kwan [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-06-27 15:23:30 -0700]:
On Wed, 23 Jun 2004 20:50:16 +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
You probably want this message sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED].
But if the disk is full no one will see the message...
Then who can be reached? I have sent a mail to that
* Dan Korostelev [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-06-28 03:59:14 +0400]:
Now you can download the test package of GNOME PPP from mentors.debian.
net. I hope it works.
Thanks. It looks much better now. Unfortunately I can not sponsor you,
but at least your package has only minor nits to pick now:
-
* Dan Korostelev [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-06-28 01:47:55 +0400]:
On Sun, 2004-06-27 at 23:36 +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
ah ok, i will search you package with google :)
you have forgotten an url to the pacage.
Oh, maybe I'm stupid, but I don't have any web space to place my stuff
to.
* Dan Korostelev [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-06-28 02:33:37 +0400]:
On Sun, 2004-06-27 at 23:36 +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
Psst, okay, download it here:
http://warqraft.sourceforge.net/temporary/ ;-)
Psst, that's look like a dead project. But be serious; your package has
fatal problems:
1) in the
* Joshua Kwan [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-06-27 15:23:30 -0700]:
On Wed, 23 Jun 2004 20:50:16 +0200, Adeodato Sim wrote:
You probably want this message sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED].
But if the disk is full no one will see the message...
Then who can be reached? I have sent a mail to that
* Dan Korostelev [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-06-28 03:59:14 +0400]:
Now you can download the test package of GNOME PPP from mentors.debian.
net. I hope it works.
Thanks. It looks much better now. Unfortunately I can not sponsor you,
but at least your package has only minor nits to pick now:
-
85 matches
Mail list logo
