According to [0], python-ck has not its corresponding ITP bug, despite #799268
title.
Please, could you file this ITP bug?
Thanks for your work!
[0] http://qa.debian.org/~bartm/wnpp-rfs-mentors/wnpp-inconsistencies.txt
According to [0], cvars has not its corresponding ITP bug, despite 802703 title.
Please, could you file this ITP bug?
Thanks for your work!
[0] http://qa.debian.org/~bartm/wnpp-rfs-mentors/wnpp-inconsistencies.txt
According to [0], ultraeasy has not its corresponding ITP bug, despite 802797
title.
Please, could you file this ITP bug?
Thanks for your work!
[0] http://qa.debian.org/~bartm/wnpp-rfs-mentors/wnpp-inconsistencies.txt
According to [0], objeck-lang-i386 has not its corresponding ITP bug, despite
#775946 title.
Please, could you file this ITP bug?
Thanks for your work!
[0] http://qa.debian.org/~bartm/wnpp-rfs-mentors/wnpp-inconsistencies.txt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
According to [0], rc has not its corresponding ITP bug, despite 774573 title.
Please, could you file this ITP bug?
Thanks for your work!
[0] http://qa.debian.org/~bartm/wnpp-rfs-mentors/wnpp-inconsistencies.txt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
According to [0], ip2location has not its corresponding ITP bug, despite 768251
title.
Please, could you file this ITP bug?
Thanks for your work!
[0] http://qa.debian.org/~bartm/wnpp-rfs-mentors/wnpp-inconsistencies.txt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with
According to [0], libopenshot has not its corresponding ITP bug.
Please, could you file it?
Thanks for your work!
[0] http://qa.debian.org/~bartm/wnpp-rfs-mentors/wnpp-inconsistencies.txt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe.
According to [0], libopenshot-audio has not its corresponding ITP bug.
Please, could you file it?
Thanks for your work!
[0] http://qa.debian.org/~bartm/wnpp-rfs-mentors/wnpp-inconsistencies.txt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe.
According to [0], pw3270 has not its corresponding ITP bug, despite 757180
title.
Please, could you file this ITP bug?
Thanks for your work!
[0] http://qa.debian.org/~bartm/wnpp-rfs-mentors/wnpp-inconsistencies.txt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
According to [0], python-nameparser has not its corresponding ITP bug, despite
736281 title.
Please, could you file this ITP bug?
Thanks for your work!
[0] http://qa.debian.org/~bartm/wnpp-rfs-mentors/wnpp-inconsistencies.txt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
According to [0], libvarnam has not its corresponding ITP bug, despite 742309
title.
Please, could you file this ITP bug?
Thanks for your work!
[0] http://qa.debian.org/~bartm/wnpp-rfs-mentors/wnpp-inconsistencies.txt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
According to [0], arnu has not its corresponding ITP bug, despite 733022 title.
Please, could you file this ITP bug?
Thanks for your work!
[0] http://qa.debian.org/~bartm/wnpp-rfs-mentors/wnpp-inconsistencies.txt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
According to [0], hh has not its corresponding ITP bug, despite 736672 title.
Please, could you file this ITP bug?
Thanks for your work!
[0] http://qa.debian.org/~bartm/wnpp-rfs-mentors/wnpp-inconsistencies.txt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
According to [0], libde265 has not its corresponding ITP bug, despite 740626
title.
Please, could you file this ITP bug?
Thanks for your work!
[0] http://qa.debian.org/~bartm/wnpp-rfs-mentors/wnpp-inconsistencies.txt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
Roberto Luiz Debarba roberto.deba...@gmail.com writes:
I'm working yet.
An ITP (Intent to Package) bug should be done before you start working,
to try to avoid that anyone else starts to work on the same package. So,
if you're working on this package, an ITP bug should exist.
Cheers.
--
To
According to [0], deal.ii has not its corresponding ITP bug, despite 734125
title.
Please, could you file this ITP bug?
Thanks for your work!
[0] http://qa.debian.org/~bartm/wnpp-rfs-mentors/wnpp-inconsistencies.txt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
According to [0], arnu has not its corresponding ITP bug, despite 733022 title.
Please, could you file this ITP bug?
Thanks for your work!
[0] http://qa.debian.org/~bartm/wnpp-rfs-mentors/wnpp-inconsistencies.txt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
of the ITA fixed the issue.
In any case, don't worry about that, the issue is fixed now :)
Cheers!
On Nov 2, 2013, at 11:16 AM, Mònica Ramírez Arceda mon...@debian.org
wrote:
According to [0], sane-backends has not its corresponding ITA bug, despite
728292 title.
Please, could you
According to [0], sane-backends has not its corresponding ITA bug, despite
728292 title.
Please, could you retitle #728292 to mark it as an ITA bug?
Thanks for your work!
[0] http://qa.debian.org/~bartm/wnpp-rfs-mentors/wnpp-inconsistencies.txt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
According to [0], wiktionarytodict has not its corresponding ITP bug, despite
724896 title.
Please, could you file this ITP bug?
Thanks for your work!
[0] http://qa.debian.org/~bartm/wnpp-rfs-mentors/wnpp-inconsistencies.txt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
According to [0], metar has not its corresponding ITP bug, despite 723582 title.
Please, could you file this ITP bug?
Thanks for your work!
[0] http://qa.debian.org/~bartm/wnpp-rfs-mentors/wnpp-inconsistencies.txt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
retitle 682716 ITP: yadifa -- name server
owner 682716 martijn cielen mcie...@gmail.com
thanks
On Thu, 2013-08-29 at 14:03 +0200, martijn cielen wrote:
Hi,
I would still like to see yadifa packaged, but I don't have any spare
time at the moment. Could you rename the bug for me?
Done!
Hi,
Are you still interested in packaging clean-compiler? If you are not, please
close this bug.
Otherwise, could you retitle #682680 to ITP?
Thanks.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Hi,
Are you still interested in packaging yadifa? If you are not, please close this
bug.
Otherwise, could you retitle #682716 to ITP?
Thanks.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
According to [0], sosreport has not its corresponding ITP bug, despite 717931
title.
Please, could you file this ITP bug?
Thanks for your work!
[0] http://qa.debian.org/~bartm/wnpp-rfs-mentors/wnpp-inconsistencies.txt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
According to [0], feincms-elephantblog has not its corresponding ITP bug,
despite 717733 title.
Please, could you file this ITP bug?
Thanks for your work!
[0] http://qa.debian.org/~bartm/wnpp-rfs-mentors/wnpp-inconsistencies.txt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
El dv 19 de 07 de 2013 a les 09:16 +0400, en/na Anton Balashov va
escriure:
Thank you for your pay attention on that.
I made a new letter:
From: Anton Balashov sicn...@darklogic.ru
To: sub...@bugs.debian.org
Subject: ITP: curseofwar/1.1.4-1
With the same text.
Is that right?
No, you
According to [0], curseofwar has not its corresponding ITP bug, despite 717262
title.
Please, could you file this ITP bug?
Thanks for your work!
[0] http://qa.debian.org/~bartm/wnpp-rfs-mentors/wnpp-inconsistencies.txt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with
According to [0], goodbye has not its corresponding ITP bug, despite 716905
title.
Please, could you file this ITP bug?
Thanks for your work!
[0] http://qa.debian.org/~bartm/wnpp-rfs-mentors/wnpp-inconsistencies.txt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
Hi!
On Wed, 2013-07-03 at 11:14 +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote:
On Tue, 2 Jul 2013 20:25:51 +0200
Mònica Ramírez Arceda mon...@debian.org wrote:
Sponsorship requests should not be assigned to wnpp package.
I'm undoing last actions sent to control server.
How do we handle this sponsorship
On Wed, 2013-07-03 at 21:55 +0900, Mitsuya Shibata wrote:
Hi,
2013/7/3 Mònica Ramírez mon...@debian.org:
Sponsorship requests should not be assigned to wnpp package.
I'm undoing last actions sent to control server.
How do we handle this sponsorship-requests pseudo package?
According to [0], simplenat has not its corresponding ITP bug.
Please, could you file it?
Thanks for your work!
[0] http://qa.debian.org/~bartm/wnpp-rfs-mentors/wnpp-inconsistencies.txt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
According to [0], ctesf-console has not its corresponding ITP bug, despite
712805 title.
Please, could you file this ITP bug?
Thanks for your work!
[0] http://qa.debian.org/~bartm/wnpp-rfs-mentors/wnpp-inconsistencies.txt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
According to [0], orientdb has not its corresponding ITP bug, despite 712806
title.
Please, could you file this ITP bug?
Thanks for your work!
[0] http://qa.debian.org/~bartm/wnpp-rfs-mentors/wnpp-inconsistencies.txt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
According to [0], distkeys has not its corresponding ITP bug.
Please, could you file it?
Thanks for your work!
[0] http://qa.debian.org/~bartm/wnpp-rfs-mentors/wnpp-inconsistencies.txt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
According to [0], ctesf has not its corresponding ITP bug, despite 712799 title.
Please, could you file this ITP bug?
Thanks for your work!
[0] http://qa.debian.org/~bartm/wnpp-rfs-mentors/wnpp-inconsistencies.txt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
According to [0], bittwist has not its corresponding ITP bug.
Please, could you file it?
Thanks for your work!
[0] http://qa.debian.org/~bartm/wnpp-rfs-mentors/wnpp-inconsistencies.txt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
Hi,
According to [0], freeplane has not its corresponding ITA bug, despite 704789
title.
In fact, freeplane package is not orphaned:
http://packages.qa.debian.org/freeplane
You may get in touch with freeplane maintainer and ask him if he wants to
orphan this package or co-maintain it with
According to [0], tilda has not its corresponding ITA bug, despite #702072
title.
#583248 and #695574 show that this package is not being maintained,
but I think you should get in contact with MIA Team m...@qa.debian.org to ask
them to orphan tilda. Then, you could adopt it with the
Hi,
According to [0], there is not the corresponding ITP bug for this
package. You should file it and close it in your debian/changelog file.
Thanks!
[0]
http://qa.debian.org/~bartm/wnpp-rfs-mentors/wnpp-inconsistencies.txt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
According to [0], szg has not its corresponding ITP bug, despite #691270
title. Please, could you file this ITP bug?
Thanks for your work!
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Hi,
According to [0], jampal has not its corresponding ITP bug. This bug is
needed because jampal has been removed from Debian.
If you want to reintroduce the package, please, could you file this ITP
bug?
Thanks for your work!
[0]
Hi,
According to [0], mysql-tzdata has not its corresponding ITP bug.
Please, could you file it?
Thanks for your work!
[0]
http://qa.debian.org/~bartm/wnpp-rfs-mentors/wnpp-inconsistencies.txt
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Hi,
According to [0], fvwm has not its corresponding ITA bug, despite
#689441 title.
Please, could you file this ITA bug?
Thanks for your work!
[0]
http://qa.debian.org/~bartm/wnpp-rfs-mentors/wnpp-inconsistencies.txt
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Hi,
According to [0], sweethome3d-furnitures-nonfree has not its
corresponding ITP bug, despite #689167 title.
Please, could you file this ITP bug?
Thanks for your work!
[0]
http://qa.debian.org/~bartm/wnpp-rfs-mentors/wnpp-inconsistencies.txt
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally
Hi,
I am working on packaging a Java application called BT747 [0]. For now,
I have some doubts (I think I'll have more in the future ;-)):
* Licenses: this package has quite a lot of licenses, one of the
licenses is GPL (without the version). Is it a problem? The exact header
is:
/**
*
El dg 15 de 05 de 2011 a les 19:08 +0800, en/na Paul Wise va escriure:
Yep, package any embedded code copies separately.
For modified code copies, try to get the changes into their proper
upstream or the Debian package if it exists.
Ok, I'll try it, altough this library doesn't exist in
El dg 15 de 05 de 2011 a les 13:10 +0200, en/na Arno Töll va escriure:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Mònica
* Licenses: this package has quite a lot of licenses, one of the
licenses is GPL (without the version). Is it a problem? The exact header
is:
This is no
not an easy package. Any help is welcome! (In fact,
you're already helping answering all my quesions! Further below you have
more...)
On 15/05/11 13:22, Mònica Ramírez Arceda wrote:
El dg 15 de 05 de 2011 a les 19:08 +0800, en/na Paul Wise va escriure:
Yep, package any embedded code copies
El dg 23 de 01 de 2011 a les 13:34 +0100, en/na Fabrizio Regalli va
escriure:
Hi,
Il giorno sab, 22/01/2011 alle 18.28 +0100, Mònica Ramírez Arceda ha
scritto:
Hi,
El dv 21 de 01 de 2011 a les 18:30 +0100, en/na Fabrizio Regalli va
escriure:
Dear mentors,
I am looking
Hi,
El dv 21 de 01 de 2011 a les 18:30 +0100, en/na Fabrizio Regalli va
escriure:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package piwik.
* Package name: piwik
Version : 1.1.1-1
Upstream Author : Fabrizio Regalli fab...@fabreg.it
* URL :
El ds 22 de 01 de 2011 a les 21:33 +0100, en/na Jakub Wilk va escriure:
* Mònica Ramírez Arceda mon...@probeta.net, 2011-01-22, 18:28:
* debian/install: some lines have absolute path and others relative
path. Absolute paths are wrong: you should convert absolute paths to
relative.
Why
Hi Stefan,
22/11/2010 11:52 +0100, Stefan Tomanek wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package tartarus.
* Package name: tartarus
Version : 0.9.4-2
Upstream Author : Stefan Tomanek stefan.tomanek+tarta...@wertarbyte.de
* URL :
Hi,
El dj 11 de 11 de 2010 a les 10:45 +0200, en/na Cristian Henzel va
escriure:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package clipit.
* Package name: clipit
Version : 1.2.1-1
Upstream Author : Cristian Henzel o...@web-tm.com
* URL :
Ooops!
El dj 11 de 11 de 2010 a les 11:02 +0100, en/na Benoît Knecht va
escriure:
Hi Cristian,
Cristian Henzel wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package clipit.
* Package name: clipit
Version : 1.2.1-1
Upstream Author : Cristian Henzel
El dj 11 de 11 de 2010 a les 12:52 +0100, en/na Alexander
Reichle-Schmehl va escriure:
HI!
Am 11.11.2010 12:48, schrieb Mònica Ramírez Arceda:
* Lintian: W: clipit source: out-of-date-standards-version 3.8.4
(current is 3.9.1)
You should change this version in debian/control file
56 matches
Mail list logo
