Re: More C++ help needed (Was: Bug#811866: fixed in hyphy 2.2.6+dfsg-4)

AddVariable(_String*)': /build/hyphy-2.2.6+dfsg/src/gui/HYChartWindow.cpp:4530:45: error: no matching function for call to '_Formula::_Formula(_String&, NULL, bool)' These don't seem a good candidate in this case. In any event, it's probably upstream who should take a look at this, becaus

Bug#683840: RFS: razorqt/0.4.1-1~exp1 [ITP]

appreciate if somebody advises on how to get rid of it, never experienced it before, and it's happening only in one of the binary packages when in fact the structure for most of them is the same. Cheers. -- Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo manuel.montez...@gmail.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian

Bug#683840: RFS: razorqt/0.4.1-1~exp1 [ITP]

instead of razor-qt-policykit-agent). But in short, there's no strong reason. Cheers. -- Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo manuel.montez...@gmail.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Re: RFS: tupi -- 2D Animation design and authoring tool

Hi, Including debian-mentors@ so other people can chime in -- I thought that I already did in my initial reply, sorry. 2011/12/29 Dmitry Smirnov only...@member.fsf.org: 1) README.source in debian/ is unnecessary, I think Sorry, I'm not sure what do you mean - where did you find README.source

Re: RFS: libqglviewer

On Tuesday 13 Dec 2011 23:18:13 Artur R. Czechowski wrote: Hello, I am looking for a sponsor for my package libqglviewer. I'm not a Debian Developer so I cannot sponsor, but this is a review with comments and considerations. I will appreciate if people more knowledgable than me confirm or

Re: berlios closing; where should my projects escape to?

Sending the reply to the list too, maybe there are other people interested and nobody mentioned it yet... 2011/10/18 Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo manuel.montez...@gmail.com: 2011/10/18 Paul Elliott pelli...@blackpatchpanel.com: On Tuesday, October 18, 2011 01:22:15 AM Paul McEnery wrote

Fwd: openscenegraph_2.9.11-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

I get the REJECTion only on a couple of them -- maybe because their binary package name is different, while the name of the rest of the packages is the same as in past versions? Thanks in advance for any reply which might help me to understand the problem. -- Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo

Re: Review of pev

a look at my package now. I think that it is more than ready now :) Cheers. -- Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo manuel.montez...@gmail.com -- Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo manuel.montez...@gmail.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject

Re: Review of pev

now :) Cheers. -- Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo manuel.montez...@gmail.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201101121737.35684.manuel.montez

Re: Review of pev

to this mailing list the source and maybe binary packages (as built by debuild). Cheers, and congratulations for your first package :) -- Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo manuel.montez...@gmail.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe

Re: Review of pev

.debian.tar.gz (substituted your initial pev_0.22-1.diff.gz, it has the same contents but in tar format) - pev_0.22-1.dsc - pev_0.22-1_i386.changes Cheers. -- Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo manuel.montez...@gmail.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject

Re: Time of a package to be processed by FTP-masters

for these cases, a la Ubuntu PPA? I don't think so, from what I could gather... Cheers. -- Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo manuel.montez...@gmail.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive

Re: Time of a package to be processed by FTP-masters

On Thursday 16 December 2010 18:28:33 Luke Faraone wrote: On 12/16/2010 11:08 AM, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote: On Wednesday 27 October 2010 16:24:38 Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote: 2.1- If so, what's would be the time appropriate to ask? 1 month for 1 Month sounds reasonable

Time of a package to be processed by FTP-masters

. -- Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo manuel.montez...@gmail.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201010271550.17221.manuel.montez...@gmail.com

Re: Time of a package to be processed by FTP-masters

;) The copyright peer-review sounds like an useful thing to do, though -- I'll look into it when I have some time available. Cheers, and thanks again! -- Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo manuel.montez...@gmail.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject

Re: Rescue Plan for apt-listbugs

. I've now contacted him and will see where this leads. Francesco, if you fear someone's MIA, please feel free to contact (or CC) the MIA team at m...@qa.debian.org. I just happened to see your concerns here. Hauke on behalf of Debian QA/MIA -- Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo manuel.montez

Re: purging upstream source tarball, or not?

do it in a million years and would insist that it's better for their target users (and informal surveys of users' opinions seem to confirm that). Your Mileage May Vary, though. Do you know of cases where upstream agreed to do that? Cheers. -- Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo manuel.montez

Re: How to test a manpage? ‘nroff -man | less’ does not display like ‘man’.

. -- Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo manuel.montez...@gmail.com

Re: Litte problem with Build-Depends and architectures

Hello, On Wednesday 07 July 2010 16:46:20 Jakub Wilk wrote: * Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo manuel.montez...@gmail.com, 2010-07-07, 02:01: --- I: Building the package I: Running cd tmp/buildd/*/ dpkg-buildpackage -us -uc

Re: Litte problem with Build-Depends and architectures

-linux architectures just failing as they do now, or try to disable the specific dependency in some other way (surely more packages have this issue and they have to solve it in some way or another), or what. Cheers. -- Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo manuel.montez...@gmail.com

Re: Litte problem with Build-Depends and architectures

Hello, On Wednesday 07 July 2010 23:37:26 Holger Levsen wrote: Hi, On Mittwoch, 7. Juli 2010, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote: This is bug #363193. But what should I do, then? use the patch from that bug? According to the link (and other threads in debian-wb-team) that Jakub

Litte problem with Build-Depends and architectures

: Running cd tmp/buildd/*/ dpkg-buildpackage -us -uc -rfakeroot [...] dpkg-buildpackage: source package k3d dpkg-buildpackage: source version 0.8.0.2-2 dpkg-buildpackage: source changed by Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo manuel.montez...@gmail.com dpkg-buildpackage: host architecture i386 dpkg

Fwd: failed hppa build of aqsis 1.6.0-1.2

also be caused by other packages, temporary uninstallabilities and arch-specific breakages. A look at the build log despite this disclaimer would be appreciated however. - -- Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo manuel.montez...@gmail.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE

Re: Fwd: failed hppa build of aqsis 1.6.0-1.2

Hi, On Wednesday 30 June 2010 22:05:25 The Fungi wrote: On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 03:20:10PM +0200, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote: Can anybody tell me what I'm supposed to do with this? It builds fine in the rest of architectures: https://buildd.debian.org/pkg.cgi?pkg=aqsis

Re: Fwd: failed hppa build of aqsis 1.6.0-1.2

On Thursday 01 July 2010 00:15:12 The Fungi wrote: On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 11:41:53PM +0200, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote: [...] It takes about ~10 minutes to compile in my 2 year old, dual core not very powerful laptop. I don't know how hppa compares to these ones, but just