Sean Whitton wrote:
> After the release of stretch, I intend to work on removing xpdf from the
> archive for the reason that it is unmaintainable, not because it depends
> on poppler.
Orphaning does not mean that a package is unmaintainable. As I've
stated elsewhere I will continue to be willing
Svante Signell wrote:
> What else do you need? What are your problems with a _real_ upstream xpdf?
You don't seem to get what everyone is telling you. If you are not
capable of or willing to maintain xpdf with the poppler backend, then
you should not be its maintainer.
If a non-popplerized xpdf
I just want to let everyone know that I will be making myself
available to sponsor packages after the freeze again. My interest is
more toward keeping testing and testing security in good shape rather
than new and shiny stuff, although I will look at the occasional game.
With that said, here are
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 9:31 AM, Alfonso Sabato Sicilianowrote:
Hi,
I would make my first package so
I would retitle this http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=652580
from RFP to ITP. I am still not DM, can I do it? I need to have a
sponsor ti retitle the WNPP bug?
Yes, of course!
Well, I thought this was only the case when there is no other option, because
the version has to be smaller than the one in unstable (when testing has
4.3.6-1 and unstable has 4.3.6-2 with unacceptable changes). I did a t-p-u
update like this (without the deb7u suffix) yesterday (for fossil),
On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 4:31 PM, Ivo De Decker wrote:
Hi Mike,
On Sun, Dec 02, 2012 at 03:20:25PM -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote:
Well, I thought this was only the case when there is no other option,
because
the version has to be smaller than the one in unstable (when testing has
4.3.6-1
On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 4:41 PM, Ivo De Decker wrote:
Mike,
On Sun, Dec 02, 2012 at 04:36:23PM -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote:
Yes. I don't have a link to the final decision, but you can easily
verify the veracity of that statement by looking at the versioning of
packages that have gone
Hi, I've taken a look at the bugs tagged patch, and the following 11
strike me as likely being rather easy to fix.
677861
681457
687396
687848
692129
693208 - seems to just need a tpu upload
693980
694015
694061
694340
694417
So, let's fix these easy 11 bugs!
Best wishes,
Mike
--
To
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 10:29 AM, roucaries bastien wrote:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the package lcdf-typetools
I have found two license problem on this package:
- #694352 lcdf-typetool include non free adobe data; glyph
On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 8:17 AM, Dominik George n...@naturalnet.de wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package redmine
Hi, thanks for working on these issues. I'd like to see a few things
corrected in the changelog, but otherwise it looks good.
* NMU to fix RC bugs.
There is specific
On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 10:07 PM, Michael Gilbert wrote:
The following look like they'll be pretty easy, so they're a prime
opportunity for mentees to build, test, and prepare a package to be
potentially sponsored:
So, it's been almost a week, and I decided to take a look at where
things stand
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 7:28 PM, Michael Gilbert wrote:
On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 10:07 PM, Michael Gilbert wrote:
The following look like they'll be pretty easy, so they're a prime
opportunity for mentees to build, test, and prepare a package to be
potentially sponsored:
So, it's been almost
Reviewed and uploaded. Thanks!
Make sure to send your debdiff to the bug report to stay in compliance
with nmu rules:
http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/pkgs.html#nmu-guidelines
Thanks,
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 9:21 AM, Markus Koschany wrote:
thanks for taking the time to review the changes. Indeed the author of
etw already checks for PATH_MAX in etw.c and stores the result in
TEMP_DIR. On the other hand he uses 1024 bytes for the buffer at most
and truncates the rest if it
On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 2:29 AM, Bart Martens wrote:
Hello,
As I wrote earlier on debian-devel [1] I have a few reports [2] about DM
upload
permissions. According to the announcement [3] the permissions only via
DMUA=yes will be revoked on 24th of November 2012, and that date is coming
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 12:58 PM, Markus Koschany wrote:
Changes since the last upload:
* New Maintainer. (Closes: #544922)
* Eat the Whistle will be maintained in a Git repository from now
on. Change the Vcs-fields in debian/control accordingly.
* debian/patches:
Add
Hi,
I had a quick look through the rc bugs that have a patch:
http://udd.debian.org/bugs.cgi?release=wheezy_and_sidpatch=onlymerged=igndone=ignfnewerval=7rc=1sortby=idsorto=ascchints=1ctags=1cdeferred=1
The following look like they'll be pretty easy, so they're a prime
opportunity for mentees to
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 4:03 AM, Lazarus Long wrote:
Hi:
The deferred NMU uploader has canceled it in behalf of mine.
I'm not sure how to proceed now. Should I remove my version, or should
it be re-evaluated as a RC bug fix?
Preferably the nmu will be re-uploaded since it's a targeted
control: severity -1 normal
control: retitle -1 RFS: sqldeveloper-package/0.3.0
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 9:40 PM, Lazarus Longwrote:
- Download links updated (Closes: #618650)
(Reported by Sergio Fernandez)
Since there is already a deferred nmu fixing the rc issue, I'm
downgrading the
control: retitle -1 RFS: roundup/1.4.20-2
control: severity -1 normal
Downgrading the severity of this request since an nmu was uploaded to
fix the rc issue.
Before further review, the package will need to be updated to
incorporate the nmu, and at this point the upload should probably
target
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 7:54 PM, Jean-Michel Vourgère wrote:
* CVE-2012-4527: stack-based buffer overflow by encryption / decryption
of
overly long file names (Closes: #690924)
I've reviewed this and it looks mostly good. However, can you explain
why you chose ERRWIDTH=PATH_MAX+1024
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 11:33 AM, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
I'm removing the not-fit-for-wheezy tag since Thomas claims to have
improved on that matter.
It still have the tag `not-fit-for-wheezy'.
This is more evidence that this tag doesn't actually provide anything useful.
This package was
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Jean-Michel Vourgère wrote:
I don't see the point to upload a version of just that to mentors.
Just use:
patch -p 1 80-width patch
, update the changelog and you're done with the NMU.
It gives you a chance to be the one contributing to the release. I'm
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 6:24 PM, Kai Storbeck wrote:
Hi Mike,
Thanks for your prompt review.
It seems I wasn't fully aware of the Freeze Policy. I was under a wrong
assumtion that I could make the package's state better during the freeze.
I've spoken with Salvatore who proposed an NMU for
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 10:11 AM, gustavo panizzo wrote:
hello, i've prepared an updated version of slapd package which fix
the bug #665199
Hi, I've just reviewed this, and it looks reasonable. However, the
changelog note is not really descriptive enough:
* Fix a bug while upgrading from
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 3:09 PM, Jean-Michel Vourgère wrote:
mcrypt (2.6.8-1.3) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Non-maintainer upload.
* CVE-2012-4527: stack-based buffer overflow by encryption / decryption of
overly long file names (Closes: #690924)
I've reviewed this and it looks
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 6:40 AM, Thibaut Paumard wrote:
First of all, you are free to view the bug page with the ordering you
prefer. Try using ordering=standard:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=sponsorship-requests;ordering=standard
Thanks for the hint. Reverting to
control: retitle -1 RFS: libpam-ssh/1.92-15 [ITP] [REINTRODUCTION]
Unfortunately this package was removed from unstable, so it won't be
considered for upload until after wheezy unfreezes. Removing RC since
as a NEW package the RC categorization does not apply.
Best wishes,
Mike
--
To
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 6:18 PM, Kai Storbeck wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package roundup. I have a dedicated
uploader (Toni Mueller), but another eye on my changes needn't hurt. It
fixes 3 outstanding bugs, one of which is an RC bug.
Hi,
I've just reviewed this.
+ * patch
Hi,
I remember being rather frustrated during past freezes (before I was a
DD) at the lack of interesting things to do (since the fun stuff like
ITPs tend to go nowhere at these times). I assume there are a lot of
others in a similar situation now, so I just want to give a couple
suggestions.
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 7:51 PM, Paul Wise wrote:
It is possible to target a package for testing during the freeze even
though it does not fix any RC bugs, see everthing other than item one
here:
http://release.debian.org/testing/freeze_policy.html
I am certainly well aware of the freeze
Just to let everyone know, I am making myself available to sponsor
uploads that fix RC bugs. Those uploads may be either NMUs or
maintainer uploads, just make sure to mark your sponsorship-request
with RC and I (and others) will notice it.
Best wishes,
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Hi,
I feel like the current for-wheezy and fit-for-wheezy usertags
actually make the sponsorship-requests bug page harder to use than it
needs to be.
In actuality, any bug tagged ITP and QA should not have either of
those tags (since no itp or qa upload is going in until the freeze is
lifted
On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 3:14 AM, Christian Welzel wrote:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package swftools
* Package name: swftools
Version : 0.9.2+ds1-3
Hi,
I've just reviewed these changes. The fix
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 2:26 PM, Ma Xiaojun wrote:
There is no reason shipping 4.0 beta3 rather than latest 4.20.
If we check change Changelog, it is clear that the package get active
uploads until 4.0 beta3 is uploaded.
On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 3:53 PM, Stephen Kitt wrote:
Dear mentors,
I maintain the wine-gecko package (wine-gecko-1.4), which is in an
interesting situation because its build-dependencies can't be satisfied on all
architectures, but it builds an Architecture: all package. Something
similar
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 7:05 AM, Bart Martens wrote:
Hello,
I see that the package at mentors is no longer there. What happened ? Can the
RFS be closed, or can you restore the package at mentors ?
no package at mentors for RFS 664181 trustmanager 3.0.5-1
no package at mentors for RFS
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 1:06 PM, Michael Gilbert wrote:
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 9:04 PM, Jonathan Niehof wrote:
Dear mentors--
I'm not sure if the etiquette for nag requests has been sorted out
given the move of RFS to the bug tracker, but I submitted this RFS two
weeks ago and have
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Andrew Starr-Bochicchio wrote:
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 8:07 AM, Arno Töll wrote:
Hi,
On 11.07.2012 13:34, Bart Martens wrote:
Is it OK that a sponsor adds modifications to a sponsored package ?
I see it regularly that sponsors do little modifications of
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 11:01 AM, Andreas Rütten wrote:
Hi Mike,
do you still have some time available for reviewing NMUs?
If so I would like to point you attention to this one:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=676927
Hi,
The bugs solved in your version are not release
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 9:04 PM, Jonathan Niehof wrote:
Dear mentors--
I'm not sure if the etiquette for nag requests has been sorted out
given the move of RFS to the bug tracker, but I submitted this RFS two
weeks ago and have not received so much as a nibble. If anyone is able
to devote
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 11:11 AM, Daniel Martí wrote:
Would you mind incorporating the libtool fixes that I pushed in the -6
upload?
Sure. But please, if you want to incorporate more changes, either do it
all at once or email them to me so I can add them to the newer package.
I'm starting
I've read quite a bit on the kfreebsd-i386 problems with ELF, but I
have encountered a different solution in every thread on the internet.
Some said to patch libelf.h, which is sadly not shipped with prelink. We
have libelf-0.7.0.patch, but that patchs a nonexistent file. We do have
I'll just try this selectricity poll for now so we don't get billions
of votes here:
http://selectricity.org/quickvote/debianrfslist
So, I don't think those options accurately describe the choices. The
options really are:
1. Send useful bts discussion as well as verbose control messages to
Since the last time I did the 20111012-1 package from 2090925-1 it
worked flawlessly with the same dpatch - quilt script, I'm assuming
some change took effect between revisions 1 and 4 that broke this
package for quilt, but apparently not for dpatch.
There were two patches applied in -2 that
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 12:37 PM, Daniel Martí wrote:
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 12:11:30PM -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
There were two patches applied in -2 that were cherry-picked from the
upstream version you're working on now. The patch systems will still
be trying to apply those, but quilt
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 4:27 PM, Daniel Martí mv...@mvdan.cc wrote:
Dear Debian Mentors,
A new package can be found up at mentors.debian.net:
http://mentors.debian.net/package/prelink
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/prelink/prelink_0.0.20111012-1.dsc
Here is the full
Changes since the last upload are:
* Fixed buffer overruns.
* Fixed FTBFS bug in debian/rules file. (Closes: Bug#666357)
Thanks to Lucas Nussbaum and Anibal Monsalve Salazar
for their help and for pointing this out.
Hi,
I've just reviewed this package. Since this apparently fixes some
On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 5:17 PM, Michael Gilbert
michael.s.gilb...@gmail.com wrote:
Changes since the last upload are:
* Fixed buffer overruns.
* Fixed FTBFS bug in debian/rules file. (Closes: Bug#666357)
Thanks to Lucas Nussbaum and Anibal Monsalve Salazar
for their help and for pointing
Hi,
I've reviewed this package, and it looks good. A couple other tasks
need to be done though:
1. Please send your nmu debdiff to #658830.
2. Since this is fixing a potential security issue, please send a
message (including patch and a good description of the problem) to
oss-sec [0]
Hi,
I just reviewed this package. It looks good except for a couple issues:
1. bin/credits.rpl seems to be a binary file in the repacked upstream
source (there may be others, but I stopped at that one)
2. I'm not sure that it's good practice to apply the patch directly
within the upstream
Hi,
I'm going to be making some of my time available to review packages.
So, I'm primarily interested in looking at work that fixes
release-critical bugs, security issues, and just regular bugs as well
(i.e. non-maintainer uploads, NMUs). So, if you're the bug fixing
type, this is for you. I
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 5:27 AM, Stephen Gran wrote:
In terms of gpg public keys, the user could simply upload theirs to a
public_html alioth location, which would allow the mentors scraping
algorithms to pick that up. That process itself would be rather
simple, and could be documented in a
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 1:17 AM, Stephen Gran wrote:
This one time, at band camp, Michael Gilbert said:
Based on discussion about making mentors official, one of the key
requirements is contributor DMUP agreement and upload authentication.
One thought I had recently was to move the file
Based on discussion about making mentors official, one of the key
requirements is contributor DMUP agreement and upload authentication.
One thought I had recently was to move the file hosting functionality
over to alioth, which already has the necessary authentication
infrastructure. The process
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 10:30 PM, Paul Wise wrote:
I don't think that will work, since you need to be in a project to get
SSH access to alioth:
http://wiki.debian.org/Alioth/SSH#I.27m_unable_to_Connect_via_SSH.2C_...
They could be made part of a new contributors project to start them
out.
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 8:07 PM, Don Armstrong wrote:
On Tue, 24 Jan 2012, Arno Töll wrote:
Hence, please add a sponsorship-requests pseudo-package with
debian-mentors@lists.debian.org as a package owner and we can get started.
This seems like a good name to me as well.
I still need the text
As for the usertag names, I came up with the following when writing
support for this into reportbug:
'new': a sponsorship request for a brand new package,
'update': a sponsorship request for an update to a
package you've gotten sponsored and uploaded
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 1:27 PM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Hi,
I'm generally not a big fan to overuse the BTS for stuff it wasn't
really designed for. This tends to result in complex processes that are
difficult to follow for newcomers.
That statement actually describes the Debian project as a
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 1:07 PM, Russ Allbery wrote:
Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org writes:
* Gergely Nagy alger...@balabit.hu, 2012-01-19, 17:24:
I might be mistaken, but the amount of NEW
Why only NEW? Checking only NEW packages doesn't buy us more than, say,
checking only package with with
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 6:47 AM, Arno Töll wrote:
DSA is the team which makes a DNS CNAME record, or provides a hosting
facility. In my interpretation they are not making facts by that. Making
mentors.debian.net a .org makes the project official part of Debian,
just like any other core team,
Hi,
I just wanted to join the growing chorus of supporter for this
proposal. I think its wonderful, and that's only partially because I
resurrected the discussion a few months ago.
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 9:26 AM, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
Hi,
On Wed Jan 18, 2012 at 08:40:34 +0100, Raphael
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 7:43 AM, Arno Töll wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On 18.01.2012 08:40, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Dear DSA, do you think it's possible to have a CNAME mentors.debian.org
pointing to mentors.debian.net? It's currently not hosted on a .d.o
Hi,
I'm trying to make use of the mentors soap interface, but it seems to
be broken. I've tried both python-soappy and python-suds and get
different errors for each. Here is the output of the attached scripts
that demonstrate the problems:
$ ./test-soappy
[...]
KeyError: u'xs'
$
On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 17:30:49 +0200 Arno Töll wrote:
Finally, a random poll: Are you bored from announcements like this, I
make on this mailing list regarding Debexpo software updates and bugs
since that's not /entirely/ on-topic here and you would hence prefer to
use our own mailing list for
Hi,
On Thu, 29 Sep 2011 12:23:35 +0200 Arno Töll wrote:
I appreciate your efforts and I like the idea of reportbug integration.
I won't comment about the patch itself, I am not maintaining the
reportbug package, so I can't judge.
Thanks for your kind words.
However please note,
On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 23:27:28 +0200 Arno Töll wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Michael,
On 30.09.2011 21:57, Michael Gilbert wrote:
Then let's get mentors officialized to tear down this barrier!
This is not something I or you or anyone else could push forward
Paul Elliott wrote:
What version of debian must you have to develop debian packages?
mentors.debian.net complains about my standards version:
W: libswe source: out-of-date-standards-version 3.9.1 (current is 3.9.2)
But if I set this version 3.9.2 on the control file
Then lintian
Paul Elliott wrote:
lintian -i -I is complaining about architecture-independent data:
I: libswe-dev: arch-dep-package-has-big-usr-share 2121kB 78%
N:
N:The package has a significant amount of architecture-independent data
N:(over 4MB, or over 2MB and more than 50% of the package)
-6.2.1gilbert1/debian/changelog 2011-09-29 00:16:40.0 -0400
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+reportbug (6.2.1gilbert1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Add support for mentors.debian.org pseudo package.
+
+ -- Michael Gilbert michael.s.gilb...@gmail.com Thu, 29 Sep 2011 00:16:21 -0400
+
reportbug (6.2.1) unstable
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package minetest.
* Package name: minetest
Version : 0.2.20110731.3-1
Upstream Author : celero...@gmail.com
* URL : http://celeron.55.lt/minetest
* License : GPL-2+
Section : games
It builds
if someone uploaded
this package for me.
Best wishes,
Michael Gilbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/20110913222650.5d7b47eb846a5c0c3ec79...@gmail.com
Hi,
I've been thinking about how mentors works lately (after watching
Asheesh's debconf11 talk). It seems like the 4 day response effort
worked somewhat well for a while, but kind of tailed off, and I've been
pondering what could be done instead that would have some staying power.
I've noticed
On Mon, 5 Sep 2011 20:51:47 +0100 Michael Tautschnig wrote:
I'm all for tracking RFS in some more formal way, it would quite a bit reduce
the load on my inbox (which I'm currently using for tracking).
There is one fundamental difference, however, to, e.g, the release team: there
is no
On Mon, 5 Sep 2011 22:46:11 +0200 Jakub Wilk wrote:
This is not a new idea:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2002/08/msg00262.html
After reading through that old discussion, I conclude that the highly
confrontational approach chosen by Raphael at that time lead to people
basically tuning
Vsevolod Velichko wrote:
Dear Charles,
this the very thing I want to do, but as far as I can understand, I
should replace that variables myself, am I right? When I try to put
the variables in debian/changelog, dpkg-buildpackage fails with error:
dpkg-buildpackage: source version
On Thu, 11 Aug 2011 20:06:29 +0200 Paul Gevers wrote:
On top of that, there are a few spelling corrections, and a couple
cases of refactoring/improving the code in the standalone version.
If this is really the case, I would propose to get these improvements
into the libxpm package (and
On Mon, 08 Aug 2011 21:31:11 +0200 Paul Gevers wrote:
Have you investigated the changes made by upstream lesstif in the
embedded code and verified that they are not necessary?
Hi,
On the surface, the diff between the embeded library in lesstif and
the standalone libxpm seem rather large.
,
Michael Gilbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/20110808003320.710df0f1058ebb2b99a73...@gmail.com
Nikolaus Rath wrote:
Hello,
http://packages.qa.debian.org/f/fuse.html reports 4 open security
issues. I prepared an upload that fixes them, but how do I tell the
package tracking system that they are fixed? There seem to be no
associated debian BTS numbers.
I've added fixed version info
Michael Tautschnig wrote:
Hi Michael,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package gordon.
* Package name: gordon
Version : 0~git20101011-1
Section : utils
[...]
I had previously reviewed that package; sorry for taking so long for yet
another
round of
Hi,
I'm adopting amphetamine to close bug #544910, and I've brought the
packaging more up to date. I would greatly appreciate review/sponsorship
of the new packages:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/amphetamine
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/amphetamine-data
Best
On Mon, 21 Feb 2011 11:52:08 +0100, Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
Hello,
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 08:03:41PM -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package enemy-territory.
* Package name: enemy-territory
Version : 2.60-1
Upstream Author : id
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package yui-builder.
* Package name: yui-builder
Version : 1.0.0b1-1
* URL : http://yuilibrary.com/projects/builder
* License : BSD
It builds these binary packages:
yui-builder - a build environment for YUI
The
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package unix-privesc-check.
* Package name: unix-privesc-check
Version : 1.4-1
* URL : http://pentestmonkey.net/tools/unix-privesc-check
* License : GPL-2
Section : utils
It builds these binary packages:
/gordon/gordon_0~git20101011-1.dsc
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Best wishes,
Michael Gilbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http
-free
- dget
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/contrib/e/enemy-territory/enemy-territory_2.60-1.dsc
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Kind regards
Michael Gilbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
On Sun, 20 Feb 2011 19:56:29 -0500 Michael Gilbert wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package unix-privesc-check.
* Package name: unix-privesc-check
Version : 1.4-1
* URL : http://pentestmonkey.net/tools/unix-privesc-check
* License
Hi,
Would anyone be so kind as to sponsor an RC bug fix upload for xpdf?
A diff is attached. The package is available for review at:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xpdf
Thanks,
Mike
xpdf.debdiff
Description: Binary data
On Mon, 20 Dec 2010 00:31:52 + Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 07:21:46PM -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote:
Would anyone be so kind as to sponsor an RC bug fix upload for xpdf?
A diff is attached. The package is available for review at:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian
On Thu, 11 Nov 2010 18:37:39 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
Michael Gilbert michael.s.gilb...@gmail.com writes:
Would anyone be willing to sponsor another RC-fix upload? This new
libvdpau package fixes bug #603220:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libvdpau
Thank you very much
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 22:09:46 +0100, Michael Tautschnig wrote:
Hi Michael,
On Thu, 11 Nov 2010 18:37:39 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
Michael Gilbert michael.s.gilb...@gmail.com writes:
Would anyone be willing to sponsor another RC-fix upload? This new
libvdpau package fixes bug
On Thu, 11 Nov 2010 17:54:53 -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote:
Hi,
Would anyone be willing to sponsor another RC-fix upload? This new
libvdpau package fixes bug #603220:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libvdpau
Just FYI, I'm withdrawing this request since the maintainers
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 22:58:23 +0100, Michael Tautschnig wrote:
Hi again,
[...]
I'm sure you are aware of [1]. The second item of Before doing an NMU
states:
Did you give enough time to the maintainer? Unless I got something
wrong,
there weren't more than a few hours
Hi,
Would anyone be willing to sponsor another RC-fix upload? This new
libvdpau package fixes bug #603220:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libvdpau
Thanks,
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 2:03 AM, gregor herrmann wrote:
On Mon, 08 Nov 2010 23:08:50 -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote:
Would anyone be willing to sponsor an RC-fix upload? This new wine
package fixes bug #602872:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/w/wine
Uploaded to DELAYED/7.
Thanks
Hi,
Would anyone be willing to sponsor an RC-fix upload? This new wine
package fixes bug #602872:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/w/wine
Thanks,
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 08:55:11 -0500, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote:
On 11 October 2010 19:02, Russ Allbery r...@debian.org wrote:
Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso jord...@gmail.com writes:
The *real* problem is that labelling Firefox 3.6 as experimental is
downright silly.
Hm, okay. I guess
On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 14:44:51 -0500, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote:
I just realised, the packages I'm complaining about are essentially
squeeze backports. That is, they're packages that the packager wishes
could have gone into squeeze but can't because of the freeze, so they
go into
On Tue, 5 Oct 2010 16:30:37 +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote:
One is to use the mentors mailing list as the maintainer for mentee
packages. That way the burden of quickly orphaned packages is dispersed
over the whole set of mentors rather than just one. Perhaps that will
encourage more DD
1 - 100 of 174 matches
Mail list logo
