Could you provide the bug #number to see the whole? On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 9:09 AM, Andrew O. Shadoura <bugzi...@tut.by> wrote: > Hello, > > On Wed, 29 Jun 2011 23:39:31 +0200 > Jakub Wilk <jw...@debian.org> wrote: > >> * Andrew O. Shadoura <bugzi...@tut.by>, 2011-06-30, 00:30: >> >> 5. Lintian issues (lintian -iI --pedantic): >> >> W: tnat64: package-name-doesnt-match-sonames libtnat64-0.1 >> >> W: tnat64: non-dev-pkg-with-shlib-symlink >> >> usr/lib/libtnat64.so.0.1 usr/lib/libtnat64.so >> >> I: tnat64: no-symbols-control-file usr/lib/libtnat64.so.0.1 > >> >Isn't really relevant, as this is a LD_PRELOAD-able library. > >> Then there's no reason to install the library into /usr/lib. Install >> it to a private directory instead. And you don't need any symlinks >> either. > > Agree. In that case this is also relevant to tsocks package (Cc'ed). > > -- > WBR, Andrew >
-- VWOL Tamas SZERB <t...@rulez.org> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/banlktikjqve0gy6u0utzlczaft9ussd...@mail.gmail.com