Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package qastools.
* Package name: qastools
Version : 0.17.1-1
Upstream Author : Sebastian Holtermann
* URL : http://xwmw.org/qastools
* License : GPL-3
Sorry, copy'n paste mistake.
Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:
dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/q/qastools/qastools_0.17.0-1.dsc
Current version is
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/q/qastools/qastools_0.17.1-1.dsc
--
A Debian user hinted that the painting was totally screwed in
experimental ( Qt 4.8 ).
That's fixed in the new package:
dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/q/qastools/qastools_0.17.1-1.dsc
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Well, still true.
Btw. the ITP
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package qastools.
* Package name: qastools
Version : 0.17.0-1
Upstream Author : Sebastian Holtermann
* URL : http://xwmw.org/qastools
* License : GPL-3
Section : sound
It builds those binary
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package qastools.
* Package name: qastools
Version : 0.16.2-1
Upstream Author : Sebastian Holtermann sebh...@xwmw.org
* URL : http://xwmw.org/qastools
* License : GPL-3
Section : sound
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package qastools.
* Package name: qastools
Version : 0.16.2-1
Upstream Author : Sebastian Holtermann sebh...@xwmw.org
* URL : http://xwmw.org/qastools
* License : GPL-3
Section : sound
It builds
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package qastools.
The current multipackage version is now uploaded to mentors.
* Package name: qastools
Version : 0.16.1-1
Upstream Author : Sebastian Holtermann sebh...@xwmw.org
* URL : http://xwmw.org/qastools
It builds those binary packages:
qastools-common - QasTools: Common files
qastools-qasconfig - QasTools: ALSA configuration browser
qastools-qashctl - QasTools: High level Control Interface ALSA mixer
qastools-qasmixer - QasTools: ALSA mixer for the desktop
I understand you want to
The naming scheme then would look like this:
qastools-common - QasTools common files
qasconfig - ALSA configuration browser
qashctl - High level Control Interface ALSA mixer
qasmixer - ALSA mixer for the desktop
Rebuilt and uploaded:
http://mentors.debian.net/package/qastools
dget -x
I haven't looked into the details, but I don't think you need to patch
your CMakelists.txt at all. Simply use debian/${package}.install files
to tell debhelper which files belong to which binary package (see
dh_install(1)).
That's looks even easier.
But together with the manpage fixes I
Am 13.12.2011 20:22, schrieb Sune Vuorela:
On 2011-12-13, Benoît Knecht benoit.kne...@fsfe.org wrote:
Sebastian H. wrote:
Why regroup qasmixer and qasconfig into one package? Wouldn't it be
better having them Recommend each other? It doesn't seem like an
improvement forcing users to install
A few comments about your man pages:
- Your .TH line is wrong (you shouldn't use the command name and
section number a second time after the date); have a look at
/usr/share/man/man7/man-pages.7.gz for a better example.
- qasconfig and qashctl don't take any options; please
So? It's difficult for me to get your point when you're asking questions
without making any statement. I'd be grateful if you could clarify.
Depending on the answers, my statements would be different. In general,
I see to 'primary' reasons for a package split in a package with kind of
A few comments about your man pages:
- Your .TH line is wrong (you shouldn't use the command name and
section number a second time after the date); have a look at
/usr/share/man/man7/man-pages.7.gz for a better example.
- qasconfig and qashctl don't take any options; please
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package qastools.
* Package name: qastools
Version : 0.16.0-1
Upstream Author : Sebastian Holtermann sebh...@xwmw.org
* URL : http://xwmw.org/qastools
* License : GPL-3
Section : sound
It builds
Hi Benoît
Why regroup qasmixer and qasconfig into one package? Wouldn't it be
better having them Recommend each other? It doesn't seem like an
improvement forcing users to install both tools instead of giving them
the choice. But maybe I'm missing something.
The short answer is, it makes
Why regroup qasmixer and qasconfig into one package? Wouldn't it be
better having them Recommend each other? It doesn't seem like an
improvement forcing users to install both tools instead of giving them
the choice. But maybe I'm missing something.
The short answer is, it makes package
Why regroup qasmixer and qasconfig into one package? Wouldn't it be
better having them Recommend each other? It doesn't seem like an
improvement forcing users to install both tools instead of giving them
the choice. But maybe I'm missing something.
The short answer is, it makes package
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package qasmixer.
* Package name: qasmixer
Version : 0.15-1
Upstream Author : Sebastian Holtermann sebh...@xwmw.org
* URL : http://xwmw.org/qasmixer
* License : GPL-3
Section : sound
It builds
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package qasmixer-l10n.
* Package name: qasmixer-l10n
Version : 0.15.0-1
Upstream Author : Sebastian Holtermann sebh...@xwmw.org
* URL : http://xwmw.org/qasmixer
* License : GPL-3
Section : sound
In the progress of separating localizations for QasMixer into a separate
package qasmixer-l10n I've stumbled over the following linitan warning:
W: qasmixer-l10n: desktop-command-not-in-package
usr/share/applications/qasmixer.desktop qasmixer
[..]
qasmixer-l10n installs a new version of
1. It allows to add new translations or update existing ones
without having to change/revalidate the (fat) qasmixer package.
2. The l10n package can be used for all architectures.
This should save some precious bytes on the package servers.
It is possible to use this structure:
package
qasmixer-l10n --remove --rename \
--divert /usr/share/qasmixer/qasmixer.desktop.no_l10n \
/usr/share/applications/qasmixer.desktop
fi
Should I just ignore the warning or is there a better (standard?)
approach for this issue?
Regards,
Sebastian H
In the progress of separating localizations for QasMixer into a separate
package qasmixer-l10n I've stumbled over the following linitan warning:
W: qasmixer-l10n: desktop-command-not-in-package
usr/share/applications/qasmixer.desktop qasmixer
[..]
qasmixer-l10n installs a new version of
Am 01.11.2011 15:46, schrieb Teus Benschop:
On Tue, 2011-11-01 at 15:34 +0100, Sebastian H. wrote:
1. It allows to add new translations or update existing ones
without having to change/revalidate the (fat) qasmixer package.
2. The l10n package can be used for all architectures.
This should
Am 01.11.2011 16:05, schrieb Alexander Reichle-Schmehl:
Hi!
Am 01.11.2011 15:34, schrieb Sebastian H.:
Why? Why not install the desktop file with the localized strings in
with the proper package?
1. It allows to add new translations or update existing ones
without having to change
Am 01.11.2011 15:52, schrieb Andrew Starr-Bochicchio:
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Teus Benschop teusjanne...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, 2011-11-01 at 15:34 +0100, Sebastian H. wrote:
1. It allows to add new translations or update existing ones
without having to change/revalidate the (fat
Hello Kilian
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 02:16:24PM +0200, Sebastian H. wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package qasconfig.
* Package name: qasconfig
Version : 0.2.0-1
Upstream Author : Sebastian Holtermann sebh...@xwmw.org
* URL : http://xwmw.org
I am looking for a sponsor for my package qasmixer.
[...]
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/q/qasmixer/qasmixer_0.14.0-1~bpo60+1.dsc
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Reviewed (and yes, I did see the missing QT change! ;-)), built, signed and
uploaded.
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package qasmixer.
* Package name: qasmixer
Version : 0.14.0-1~bpo60+1
Upstream Author : Sebastian Holtermann sebh...@xwmw.org
* URL : http://xwmw.org/qasmixer
* License : GPL-3
Section : sound
It
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package qasmixer.
* Package name: qasmixer
Version : 0.14.0-1
Upstream Author : Sebastian Holtermann sebh...@xwmw.org
* URL : http://xwmw.org/qasmixer
* License : GPL-3
Section : sound
It builds
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package qasmixer.
* Package name: qasmixer
Version : 0.13.0-1
Upstream Author : Sebastian Holtermann sebh...@xwmw.org
* URL : http://xwmw.org/qasmixer
* License : GPL-3
Section : sound
It builds
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package qasmixer.
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Please ignore this request as an updated version will be avilable very soon.
Sorry for any inconvenience.
--
Sebastian Holtermann
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Hi Kilian
On Tue, Aug 02, 2011 at 12:47:35PM +0200, Sebastian H. wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for the backport version 0.12.2-1~bpo60+1
of my package qasmixer.
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/q/qasmixer/qasmixer_0.12.2-1~bpo60+1.dsc
Built, Signed, Uploaded with the only
I've another question.
Is there a recommendation in Debian for using bzip2, gzip or xz for
packing source tarballs?
No.
Only that xz is not available in older versions of apt/dpkg/etc..
Ok. Then I'm going to use the .bz2 tarball for things coming.
(adjust watch file etc.)
Regards,
Hi Kilian
The upload would fix these bugs: 635233
...
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Thanks for your work!
Thanks for your time :)
As a best practice such a cosmetic update shouldn't be shipped as new
upload.
Just as a reminder: New uploads that are not a
Please check if there's any more substantial edit to also needs fixing
and include this fix with that.
If there's long time (read: weeks) without any need to update anything
else please come back and we can throw in this update as a
check-if-is-still-buildable-in-unstable or so.
That's
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.12.2-2
of my package qasmixer.
It builds these binary packages:
qasmixer - ALSA sound mixer with a size adaptive Qt GUI
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The upload would fix these bugs: 635233
The package can be found on
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.12.2-1
of my package qasmixer.
It builds these binary packages:
qasmixer - ALSA sound mixer with a size adaptive QT4 GUI
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- URL:
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Rebuilt with the orig.tar.gz (instead of the orig.tar.bz2 that you had)
as debian/watch pulled that one in for me, signed and uploaded.
Thank you Kilian!
If you see tar.bz2 as the better alternative please bump debian/watch to
reflect
Got it and found the package in the NEW queue.
http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html
It shows source and i386 which is fine for (my) netbook(s).
I wonder though, will there be an amd64 package at some point?
Packages get build for all architectures after they reach the archive,
ie. after
Hi Kilian
The whole point for the 0.12.1 release was to make Debian
integration smoother. Since most things seem to work now I've
uploaded the tarball to the SF project page. uscan still doesn't
find it but that's probably because the SF mirrors are not
synchronized, yet.
Yes, that's to be
Hello Kilian
Also thanks to you for taking the time to review this package.
The new package source is uploaded.
looking closer at your package I find the following:
1. It's an intial upload to Debian AFAICT. Yet your debian/changelog is
cluttered with a number of entries already. For
Am 04.07.2011 10:14, schrieb Benoît Knecht:
Hi Sebastian,
Sebastian H. wrote:
Ok, I've read through a few of the doc pages, fixed some (most?) of the
issues and prepared a new package.
lintian from squeeze now doesn't report any problems anymore.
Except for the too new standards 3.9.2
I've tried the bugreport utility from squeeze to report an ITP but it
seems to have crashed before sending. I can try it again with the sid
version tomorrow.
You can also report the bug via email [2] if really reportbug doesn't
work for you.
After switching the reportbug interface from the
After switching the reportbug interface from the gtk to curses it worked.
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=632642
But you forgot to add a '(Closes: #632642)' instruction in your
debian/changelog...
Sorry, I'm not too familiar with this bug tracking thing.
How does this
Great! Don't hesitate to ask if anything is unclear.
Ok, I've read through a few of the doc pages, fixed some (most?) of the
issues and prepared a new package.
lintian from squeeze now doesn't report any problems anymore.
Except for the too new standards 3.9.2 but that's because
lintian is too
Hello Benoît
Thank you for reviewing!
I'll have a look at the issues you mentioned.
Just a few additional comments, now that I've finished building your
package:
- lintian -I --pedantic qasmixer_0.12.0-3_amd64.changes reports:
W: qasmixer source: empty-debian-diff
I:
To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package qasmixer.
* Package name: qasmixer
Version : 0.12.0-3
Upstream Author : Sebastian Holtermann sebh...@xwmw.org
* URL : http://xwmw.org/qasmixer/
* License : GPL V3
49 matches
Mail list logo
