` for this purpose:
<https://pbuilder-team.pages.debian.net/pbuilder/>
--
Sebastian Kuzminsky
irection.
I'm not a Developer or Maintainer (just a user with aspirations at this
point) so I can't help you with sponsorship.
But I'm a FreeCAD user, and have been for several years, and I would be
super happy to see it in Debian. It would be a strong enabler for folks
who into open-source persona
-7.dsc
--
Sebastian Kuzminsky
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
--
Sebastian Kuzminsky
On 02/01/2018 11:13 AM, Juhani Numminen wrote:
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Sebastian Kuzminsky kirjoitti 26.01.2018 klo 20:15:
Dear Mentors/Sponsors,
I am looking for a Sponsor for my package "dxf2gcode":
Here's my short review of the package, but I can't sponsor it.
Thank you
(which I should have used the mentors.d.n RFS
template for, but didn't):
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=888526
Thanks!
--
Sebastian Kuzminsky
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear Mentors/Sponsors,
I am looking for a Sponsor for my package "dxf2gcode":
https://mentors.debian.net/package/dxf2gcode
It builds a single binary-all package also named dxf2gcode.
More info is available at upstream's wiki here:
Hi folks, I've finally updated the cogito package after almost 2 months.
Can someone please upload it for me?
You can grab it here:
http://highlab.com/~seb/debian
--
Sebastian Kuzminsky
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
conflict with GNU
Interactive Tools and have git-the-vcs be compatible with non-debian
universe. That seems like the lesser of two evils. But everyone else
on debian-devel seems to want it the other way so I gave in for now.
--
Sebastian Kuzminsky
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
programs.
I guess I just prefer getting flamed by the git/cogito people rather
than the Debian people. :-/
--
Sebastian Kuzminsky
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Adam Majer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
Hi folks, I have a noob question for you. I maintain the Cogito package
(my first), and it wants to install an executable as /usr/bin/git. The
GNU Interactive Tools package (git) also wants to install an executable
as /usr/bin
Michelle Konzack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am 2005-06-10 23:21:54, schrieb Sebastian Kuzminsky:
The new cogito package (0.11.3+20050610-1) is on its way into sid.
It does not install /usr/bin/git or /usr/bin/cg, and so it does not
conflict with git or with cgvg.
I think, this is a realy
to package Linus' git for Debian.
Make sense?
--
Sebastian Kuzminsky
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
...
--
Sebastian Kuzminsky
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sebastian Kuzminsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hm, given that git-from-cogito seems to have a fatal flaw (it doesnt
shift the script name out of the arguments list), I'm guessing it's
not widely used. I'll request that the upstream people remove it from
the distribution.
Oops, my fingers
it.
--
Sebastian Kuzminsky
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Interactive
Tools git package?
--
Sebastian Kuzminsky
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
it
breaks). But I dont think either of those suggest good manpage names. ;)
So. Does git-core(1) seem reasonable?
--
Sebastian Kuzminsky
Marie will know I'm headed south, so's to meet me by and by
-Townes Van Zandt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe
I've updated the Cogito package to compile against the upstream-included
GPL SHA1 implementation lifted from Mozilla, instead of the (possibly)
GPL-incompatible OpenSSL code. Thanks to Florian Weimer and Anibal
Monsalve Salazar for bringing this issue to my attention. I have a
terrible head for
Christoph Hellwig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 11:44:05PM -0600, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
I've updated the Cogito package to compile against the upstream-included
GPL SHA1 implementation lifted from Mozilla, instead of the (possibly)
GPL-incompatible OpenSSL code
Vincent Danjean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 12:46:27PM -0600, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
Why does your cogito package Depend on rcs?
Someone tells me that cogito use the 'merge' program from the rcs
package. So I added this dependency. But I do not know if the latest
The upstream now includes docs for the GIT core, though still not for
Cogito. The docs are available in .txt and .html, and they _would_
be available as manpages except for a bug in asciidoc. The asciidoc
maintainer has been offered a patch.
You can grab the new cogito package here:
Andres Salomon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 11 May 2005 14:05:28 -0600, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
You can grab the new cogito package here:
http://highlab.com/~seb/debian
FYI, you can make the packages and source apt-get'able w/ a script like
http://www.acm.rpi.edu/~dilinger
Ben Finney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
] It could be better described, yes. My understanding of /usr/share as
] architecture-independent (and read-only, as the description
] continues) is that /usr/share/can potentially be mounted read-only
] for multiple machines of different architectures.
Ok, I
cogito_0.10-2 is up, it now puts the internal scripts and the shell
library in /usr/share/cogito instead of /usr/lib/cogito. Thanks to Ben
Finney and Peter Samuelson for cluing me in.
You can get the package here:
http://highlab.com/~seb/debian
The only problem I know of with the package
Anibal Monsalve Salazar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
] On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 11:22:17AM -0600, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
] I'm also looking to have my GPG key signed (I live in Colorado, USA),
] and for an Advocate.
]
] What city in Colorado. Maybe there is a DD in the same city as yours.
] You
Anibal Monsalve Salazar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
] On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 11:22:17AM -0600, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
] I'm looking for a Debian Sponsor to upload this package to the archive.
]
] I'll upload it. However, we'll have to wait until the license issue
] raised by Florian Weimer
Anibal Monsalve Salazar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
] On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 08:57:56PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
] The package is GPLed, but depends on OpenSSL, whose license is not
] GPL-compatible. Please ask upstream for a linking exception, or use
] some other SHA-1 implementation.
Ah,
Peter Samuelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
] [Sebastian Kuzminsky]
] Before 0.10, the upstream installed both the binaries (actually shell
] scripts) and the shell libraries in /usr/bin. Starting with 0.10,
] the shell libraries are moved to /usr/lib/cogito.
]
] Correct, except that it should
Martin Waitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
] On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 09:42:39PM -0600, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
] I think the package is ready for a wider audience. I just updated it
] to the just-released upstream version 0.9, it's available here:
]
] why do you patch the Makefile?
] does 'make
Get it here:
http://highlab.com/~seb/debian
Before 0.10, the upstream installed both the binaries (actually shell
scripts) and the shell libraries in /usr/bin. Starting with 0.10, the
shell libraries are moved to /usr/lib/cogito. This seems to me like a
fine thing to do, any reason Debian
Hi Vincent, I just looked over your cogito package, comparing it to the
one I have made (they look pretty similar).
Why does your cogito package Depend on rcs?
Your Build-Depends is missing libz-dev, libcurl-dev, and libssl-dev.
And it repeats some dependencies in a strange way - it depends on
Hi folks, I'm a wanna-be new maintainer looking for a sponsor. I've been
using Debian since 0.93 and I've made some little goofy packages for local
use. I finally made a package that others may find useful, of cogito:
http://highlab.com/~seb/debian
It's lintian and linda clean, _except_
33 matches
Mail list logo
