Re: Bug#678914: RFS: fuse-convmvfs/0.2.6-2

2012-06-27 Thread Stanislav Maslovski
Hi, Package updated and re-uploaded to mentors.debian.net to reflect the comment by Bart Martens: The information of version 0.2.6-1.1 is missing in debian/changelog. Please, consider sponsoring. -- Stanislav -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a

Bug#678914: RFS: fuse-convmvfs/0.2.6-2

2012-06-24 Thread Stanislav Maslovski
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version of my package fuse-convmvfs. This upload enables for build on kFreeBSD (Bug #634216). Kudos to Robert Millan for providing a patch. Related changes: fuse-convmvfs (0.2.6-2) unstable;

Re: Bug#671710: marked as done (RFS: kbdd/0.6-4, bugfix)

2012-05-17 Thread Stanislav Maslovski
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 12:06:23PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: Date: Sat, 12 May 2012 12:04:24 + From: Bart Martens ba...@debian.org Subject: RFS: kbdd http://packages.qa.debian.org/k/kbdd/news/20120512T073332Z.html This is just to say thanks for uploading! Even though

Bug#671710: RFS: kbdd/0.6-4, bugfix

2012-05-06 Thread Stanislav Maslovski
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version of my package kbdd. This is a bugfix upload that includes a patch for Debian bug #644661. The patch is accepted upstream, as well as all other patches in the package. The list of

RFS: kbdd/0.6-3 FTBFS fix with glib = 2.31

2012-03-24 Thread Stanislav Maslovski
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version of my package kbdd. The upload would fix the following bug of severity important: Bug #665562: Including individual glib headers no longer supported Here are the respective changelog entries: kbdd (0.6-3) unstable; urgency=low

RFS: kbdd (new version)

2011-08-27 Thread Stanislav Maslovski
download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/k/kbdd/kbdd_0.6-2.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards, Stanislav Maslovski -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org

Re: RFS: kbdd (new version)

2011-08-27 Thread Stanislav Maslovski
On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 01:29:40PM +, Bart Martens wrote: On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 04:27:12PM +0400, Stanislav Maslovski wrote: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/k/kbdd/kbdd_0.6-2.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Done. Thank you

Re: RFS: kbdd

2011-08-19 Thread Stanislav Maslovski
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 11:44:18PM +0100, Michael Tautschnig wrote: Hi Stas, The package is again available on mentors.debian.net website. Could someone please review and upload it if everything is ok? I've built, signed, and uploaded your package as-is. Yet the following issues

Re: News about the mentors.debian.net transition to upgraded software

2011-08-18 Thread Stanislav Maslovski
Hello, On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 09:13:04AM -0400, Asheesh Laroia wrote: I agree that this is a bug. I just filed a bug report: https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=313293group_id=100127atid=413115 We're working through issues and making reasonably good progress. I

Re: RFS: kbdd

2011-08-18 Thread Stanislav Maslovski
Hello, The package is again available on mentors.debian.net website. Could someone please review and upload it if everything is ok? Thanks! Stas On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 02:42:52PM +0400, Stanislav Maslovski wrote: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package kbdd. * Package

Re: News about the mentors.debian.net transition to upgraded software

2011-08-18 Thread Stanislav Maslovski
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 05:13:42PM +0200, Arno Töll wrote: I fixed that. Actually the problem was, that the watch-file plugin checked the wrong exit status and thought uscan failed. The new (correct) behavior is, not to display uscan output at all, unless there was a problem with it. Thanks

Re: News about the mentors.debian.net transition to upgraded software

2011-08-14 Thread Stanislav Maslovski
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 01:00:50PM +0200, Arno Töll wrote: ... still points to old package! Seems like the transition to the new system was done in a hurry... One could argue, this is by design. It is not supported to re-upload a new package with the same Debian version to official

Re: News about the mentors.debian.net transition to upgraded software

2011-08-14 Thread Stanislav Maslovski
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 01:51:45PM +0200, Arno Töll wrote: In fact, until very recently we had no support to upload the same source package several times at all, so the status quo is already an improvement. As far as I can tell, there are the following problems with (multiple) uploads of the

Re: News about the mentors.debian.net transition to upgraded software

2011-08-14 Thread Stanislav Maslovski
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 10:57:30PM +1000, Ben Finney wrote: Andrew Starr-Bochicchio a.star...@gmail.com writes: I've always been told (and it has been repeatedly mentioned on this very list) that packages should only bump their version numbers for versions that actually entered the

Re: News about the mentors.debian.net transition to upgraded software

2011-08-14 Thread Stanislav Maslovski
Hi, On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 04:34:17PM +0200, Arno Töll wrote: On 14.08.2011 15:18, Stanislav Maslovski wrote: But *you* provided the function in the web interface to delete the uploaded package. FTR: I didn't. That you above supposed to mean people who care about debexpo and take

Re: News about the mentors.debian.net transition to upgraded software

2011-08-13 Thread Stanislav Maslovski
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 04:50:42AM -0400, Asheesh Laroia wrote: As of Thu Aug 11 08:47:29 UTC 2011, mentors.debian.net now runs the Debexpo code. FTP upload should be working. There is a cron job that looks for FTP-based uploads every 30 minutes. This provides compatibility with the

Re: News about the mentors.debian.net transition to upgraded software

2011-08-13 Thread Stanislav Maslovski
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 01:48:31PM +0400, Stanislav Maslovski wrote: I guess, the HTTP-based method does not have this absurd 30 minutes long delay... Trying to login and sort things out... Noticed one more thing on the page with the information about the uploaded package (look below

RFS: kbdd

2011-08-13 Thread Stanislav Maslovski
Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/k/kbdd/kbdd_0.6-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards, Stanislav Maslovski -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ

Re: News about the mentors.debian.net transition to upgraded software

2011-08-13 Thread Stanislav Maslovski
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 03:18:06PM +0200, Alessandro Ghedini wrote: Another problem I see, is that if I upload a package (with the same version) twice, the second upload gets ignored. Even if I delete the package, and then re-upload it, I see only the first upload. The old mentors updated the

Re: RFS: kbdd

2011-08-13 Thread Stanislav Maslovski
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 02:42:52PM +0400, Stanislav Maslovski wrote: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package kbdd. [skipped] The package was deleted from mentors.debian.net, and will be reuploaded after debexpo bug [1] gets fixed (please, do it quick!). [1] http

Re: RFS: triggerhappy (retry)

2011-03-13 Thread Stanislav Maslovski
On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 02:57:12PM +0100, Stefan Tomanek wrote: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package triggerhappy. [skipped] Dear Stefan, Thanks for your work on this software. I am not a DD, and cannot be an uploader for your package, but I have a strong opinion that

RFS: xkbind

2011-02-20 Thread Stanislav Maslovski
repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xkbind/xkbind_2010.05.20-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Stanislav Maslovski -- Stanislav -- To UNSUBSCRIBE

Re: esekeyd and triggerhappy (Re: RFS: triggerhappy)

2010-12-11 Thread Stanislav Maslovski
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 11:43:17AM +0100, Stefan Tomanek wrote: Dies schrieb Stanislav Maslovski (stanislav.maslov...@gmail.com): Just a note for completeness: although not properly documented, acpid reacts to quite a few non-acpi events, including volume control buttons and cd-related

Re: esekeyd and triggerhappy (Re: RFS: triggerhappy)

2010-12-05 Thread Stanislav Maslovski
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 01:14:21AM +0100, Stefan Tomanek wrote: Dies schrieb Jonathan Nieder (jrnie...@gmail.com): This information could be useful for both package descriptions. (Maybe, for triggerhappy: That is, this is similar to esekeyd but it also supports such and such,

Re: RFS: xpdf (updated package)

2010-06-05 Thread Stanislav Maslovski
On Sat, Jun 05, 2010 at 12:24:15PM -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote: On Sat, 5 Jun 2010 02:20:22 +0400 Stanislav Maslovski wrote: On the other hand, xpdf opens all files without any problems, but can be a bit slower in scrolling sometimes. The last is not a problem. I am simply afraid

Re: RFS: xpdf (updated package)

2010-06-04 Thread Stanislav Maslovski
On Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 12:29:07AM -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote: In terms of xpdf performance, can those concerned please try files that they consider big with the poppler-ized version and compare that to the original xpdf so we can actually quantify the impact (if there even is one).

Re: RFS: xpdf (updated package)

2010-06-04 Thread Stanislav Maslovski
On Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 04:05:21PM -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote: I can't say anything definitive, but I can speculate that it will not be a problem, and here is the logic: xpdf's rendering code is itself essentially an older version of poppler. I doubt the poppler developers have

Re: RFS: xpdf (updated package)

2010-06-03 Thread Stanislav Maslovski
On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 10:38:33PM -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 3.02-3 of my package xpdf. It builds these binary packages: xpdf - Portable Document Format (PDF) suite xpdf-common - Transitional package for xpdf

Re: RFS: xpdf (updated package)

2010-06-03 Thread Stanislav Maslovski
On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 02:43:38PM -0300, Rogério Brito wrote: Hi, there. On Jun 03 2010, Stanislav Maslovski wrote: This change is for sure quite significant. BTW, do you know if the internal code in xpdf is equivalent feature wise to poppler? I know that poppler was a spin-off

Re: migration to testing

2010-04-14 Thread Stanislav Maslovski
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 04:19:18PM +0300, Stanislav Maslovski wrote: The package builds on kfreebsd just fine, but I never tested if it really works there. Actually, before the last upload the package did not have any explicit dependency on fuse-utils, that is why it migrated to testing

Re: migration to testing

2010-04-14 Thread Stanislav Maslovski
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 06:38:38PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: Le Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 12:34:03PM +0400, Stanislav Maslovski a écrit : Because nobody on kfreebsd list was interested, and I myself is not interested in that architecture, I decided to limit the ARCHs by only those

Re: RFS: aircrack-ng (updated package) (fix RC bug)

2010-04-10 Thread Stanislav Maslovski
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 12:31:10AM +0100, Tim Retout wrote: On 9 April 2010 23:58, Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) gand...@le-vert.net wrote: Subject: RFS: aircrack-ng (updated package) Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1:1.0-2 of my package aircrack-ng. It's good

Re: migration to testing

2010-04-05 Thread Stanislav Maslovski
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 01:38:56PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote: On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 01:05:37PM +0100, Simon Paillard wrote: On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 02:16:58PM +0300, Stanislav Maslovski wrote: One of my packages, fuse-convmvfs (uploaded by a sponsor), cannot migrate to testing

Re: RFS: antennavis (updated package)

2010-04-04 Thread Stanislav Maslovski
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 02:04:10PM +0200, Nanakos Chrysostomos wrote: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/antennavis/antennavis_0.3.1-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. FTBFS on my machine with the following error: install -m 0644 antennavis.1

Re: RFS: gtk2-engines-cleanice: adopted, ITA #553506

2010-03-28 Thread Stanislav Maslovski
Hi, On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 12:58:03PM +0300, Stanislav Maslovski wrote: Dear mentors, I have adopted gtk2-engines-cleanice (ITA bug #553506). The package source format has been changed to 3.0 (quilt). The orig.tar.gz has not been changed. I am asking for a review and an upload

Re: RFS: gtk2-engines-cleanice: adopted, ITA #553506

2010-03-28 Thread Stanislav Maslovski
Dear Rogério, Thanks for your detailed review! My comments follow below: On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 06:41:18AM -0300, Rogério Brito wrote: Dear Stanislav: On Mar 27 2010, Stanislav Maslovski wrote: I have adopted gtk2-engines-cleanice (ITA bug #553506). The package source format has been

Re: RFS: gtk2-engines-cleanice: adopted, ITA #553506

2010-03-28 Thread Stanislav Maslovski
On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 12:30:13PM -0300, Rogério Brito wrote: Thank you very much for adopting this package and doing QA work. I did not even know that it existed. I just installed it and I have already switched from thinice to this one (its binary is smaller and I don't need the other

RFS: gtk2-engines-cleanice: adopted, ITA #553506

2010-03-27 Thread Stanislav Maslovski
Dear mentors, I have adopted gtk2-engines-cleanice (ITA bug #553506). The package source format has been changed to 3.0 (quilt). The orig.tar.gz has not been changed. I am asking for a review and an upload if everything looks ok. The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix

migration to testing

2010-03-27 Thread Stanislav Maslovski
Hi, One of my packages, fuse-convmvfs (uploaded by a sponsor), cannot migrate to testing. The migration is blocked by kfreebsd: * fuse-convmvfs/kfreebsd-amd64 unsatisfiable Depends: fuse-utils * fuse-convmvfs/kfreebsd-i386 unsatisfiable Depends: fuse-utils What is the recommended way of solving

Re: RFS: lmfit - Levenberg-Marquardt least squares fitting

2010-03-27 Thread Stanislav Maslovski
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 11:14:39AM +0100, Wuttke, Joachim wrote: Dear mentors, I am writing again to ask for a sponsor for my package lmfit. * Package name: lmfit Version : 3.1-1 Upstream Author : myself * URL : http://www.messen-und-deuten.de/lmfit/lmfit.html

Re: migration to testing

2010-03-27 Thread Stanislav Maslovski
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 01:05:37PM +0100, Simon Paillard wrote: On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 02:16:58PM +0300, Stanislav Maslovski wrote: One of my packages, fuse-convmvfs (uploaded by a sponsor), cannot migrate to testing. The migration is blocked by kfreebsd: * fuse-convmvfs/kfreebsd-amd64

Re: RFS: lmfit - Levenberg-Marquardt least squares fitting

2010-03-27 Thread Stanislav Maslovski
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 01:46:30PM +0100, Wuttke, Joachim wrote: Dear Stanislav: as I am not (yet?) a Debian specialist, your remarks are arcane for me. When I run $ lintian lmfit_3.1-1_i386.deb then I get one single warning: W: lmfit: new-package-should-close-itp-bug though the

Re: RFS: lmfit - Levenberg-Marquardt least squares fitting

2010-03-27 Thread Stanislav Maslovski
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 06:12:48PM +0300, Stanislav Maslovski wrote: If you want to install some more files into /usr/share/doc/ of _every_ package, list them in debian/docs. Actually, I was incorrect with this claim: files listed in debian/docs will be installed only to the first package acted

Re: Shared library packaging question

2010-03-27 Thread Stanislav Maslovski
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 06:35:42PM +0100, Wuttke, Joachim wrote: Dear specialists, I need more help. Specifically, I am going to ask 3 questions. My debian directory is still messed up, as it has been from the beginning: either the automatic scripts are not ready to assist in generating a

Re: Shared library packaging question

2010-03-27 Thread Stanislav Maslovski
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 06:57:03PM +0100, Wuttke, Joachim wrote: One more question (which possibly elucidates my previous questions): The upstream project is structured as follows: lmfit/configure.ac lmfit/Makefile.am # ... and all the resulting autotools stuff lmfit/lib/ # contains

Re: Shared library packaging question

2010-03-27 Thread Stanislav Maslovski
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 08:24:05PM +0100, Wuttke, Joachim wrote: Thank you, Stanislav, for your helpful explanations. Regarding the name of the package: For many years the upstream project has been called lmfit (since the main application is curve fitting), but the shared library has been

RFS: fuse-convmvfs (updated package)

2010-01-25 Thread Stanislav Maslovski
would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Stanislav Maslovski -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Re: RFS: fuse-convmvfs (updated package)

2010-01-25 Thread Stanislav Maslovski
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 01:04:59PM +0300, Stanislav Maslovski wrote: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.2.4-3 of my package fuse-convmvfs. This upload includes some packaging fixes. Uploaded by Dmitry E. Oboukhov un...@debian.org, thanks, Dima! -- Stanislav

Re: upstream has license which is an edited GPL

2008-08-05 Thread Stanislav Maslovski
On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 11:40:19PM +1000, Ben Finney wrote: Stanislav Maslovski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: One thing that I have to note also that after this standard header the author writes: For more details see the file COPYING. which is the changed GPL. I would expect the explicit

Re: upstream has license which is an edited GPL

2008-08-04 Thread Stanislav Maslovski
On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 07:20:09PM +1000, Ben Finney wrote: So, even if they preserve the copyright notice, they still may not redistribute changed copies of the GPL document. Only verbatim copies may be redistributed. That is true. That is what I ment. The recommended way to license a work

upstream has license which is an edited GPL

2008-08-03 Thread Stanislav Maslovski
Hello, I was going to package CDDE [1] but noticed that upstream ships it with a license file which is GPL v.2 without the preamble and the appendix so it starts from GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR COPYING, DISTRIBUTION AND MODIFICATION end ends with

Re: upstream has license which is an edited GPL

2008-08-03 Thread Stanislav Maslovski
oops, the link to ITP forgotten: [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=493593 -- Stanislav -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: versioned Build-Depends on debhelper

2008-07-31 Thread Stanislav Maslovski
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 11:57:44PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote: On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 02:14:53PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: Stanislav Maslovski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: My sponsor asked me to delete versioned build dependency on debhelper. I think this is bad advice. I agree

ftp-masters

2008-07-30 Thread Stanislav Maslovski
If a package has been uploaded to NEW, but has not been yet approved or rejected by ftp-masters, and if this package has a mistake that is better to be corrected before the package gets into unstable, then what is the official procedure of doing such correction? -- Stanislav -- To

versioned Build-Depends on debhelper

2008-07-30 Thread Stanislav Maslovski
Hello again, My sponsor asked me to delete versioned build dependency on debhelper. I had it in the form debhelper (= 5) and changed it to just debhelper. I am wondering if this is right. In debian/compat I put 5. -- Stanislav -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of

Re: versioned Build-Depends on debhelper

2008-07-30 Thread Stanislav Maslovski
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 08:30:15PM +0200, Romain Beauxis wrote: Le Wednesday 30 July 2008 20:22:18 Stanislav Maslovski, vous avez écrit : Hello again, Hi ! My sponsor asked me to delete versioned build dependency on debhelper. I had it in the form debhelper (= 5) and changed

Re: A question about adopting a package

2008-04-26 Thread Stanislav Maslovski
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 11:42:41AM +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote: It seems that you have awaken the previous maintainer who have stolen your ITA. I hope that this won't bug you. Yes, I have already noticed. That is perfectly ok with me. To Alan Bain: - If you are reding this list,

A question about adopting a package

2008-04-24 Thread Stanislav Maslovski
Hello mentors, Reading the list of orphaned packages I have noticed that package nec has been orphaned [1]. Because I use NEC2 in antenna related research I think that I can adopt this package. At the moment I am not a maintainer of any package in Debian nor a DD, however I have been packaging

Re: A question about adopting a package

2008-04-24 Thread Stanislav Maslovski
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 02:36:37PM -0500, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote: On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 11:25:11PM +0400, Stanislav Maslovski wrote: Shall this mail sent from my own address to [EMAIL PROTECTED] suffice for setting an ITA? === 8

RFS: fuse-convmvfs

2008-02-24 Thread Stanislav Maslovski
repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/fuse-convmvfs/fuse-convmvfs_0.2.4-2.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Stanislav Maslovski -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email

RFS: fuse-convmvfs

2007-10-03 Thread Stanislav Maslovski
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package fuse-convmvfs. * Package name: fuse-convmvfs Version : 0.2.4-1 Upstream Author : Z.C. Miao [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL : http://fuse-convmvfs.sourceforge.net/ * License : GPL Section : utils

Re: RFS: fuse-convmvfs

2007-10-03 Thread Stanislav Maslovski
On Thu, Oct 04, 2007 at 09:14:51AM +0400, Stanislav Maslovski wrote: convmvfs is a FUSE (File System in Userspace) utility that tranparently Just noticed this misprint in the description and the man page, corrected, package

RFS: avinfo

2005-05-01 Thread Stanislav Maslovski
on i386, PowerPC, amd64. Also, I have compiled avinfo under Sparc Solaris. Package description and the files can be found on http://users.tkk.fi/~stas/avinfo/control http://users.tkk.fi/~stas/avinfo/copyright http://users.tkk.fi/~stas/avinfo/ -- With best regards, Stanislav Maslovski -- To UNSUBSCRIBE

Re: [OT] need a sponsor for my parens

2005-04-28 Thread Stanislav Maslovski
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, and just for the minutes, you need the same kind of sponsor letter if you want to invite visa-foreigners to the European Union (at least for France and Germany, but I think it's general), where you basically engage yourself as if they were your own children (pay for

Re: build test

2005-04-28 Thread Stanislav Maslovski
Jamie Jones wrote: Builds on amd64. Oops. Forgot to attach the build log earlier. Thanks to Jamie and Geert, your build reports helped me to hunt couple of bugs in the upsream's source and also in ./debian/rules! The package is updated: http://users.tkk.fi/~stas/avinfo/ Still seeking for a

Re: build test

2005-04-28 Thread Stanislav Maslovski
Jamie Jones wrote: On Thu, 2005-04-28 at 16:29 +0300, Stanislav Maslovski wrote: No problems. Built the new package on amd64. Still some warnings in avinfo.c about cast from pointer to integer of different size Thanks! That was my stupidity: an unchanged line remained in the code. Corrected

Re: build test

2005-04-28 Thread Stanislav Maslovski
Jamie Jones wrote: On Thu, 2005-04-28 at 16:29 +0300, Stanislav Maslovski wrote: No problems. Built the new package on amd64. Still some warnings in avinfo.c about cast from pointer to integer of different size Thanks! That was my stupidity: an unchanged line remained in the code. Corrected

Re: RFS: YSM ICQ client

2005-04-27 Thread Stanislav Maslovski
Ilya M. Slepnev wrote: You can download files here: http://kastalia.cs.msu.su/~khext/debian/ysmv7/ Ilya, I could not access both of your links. Looks like the server is down. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: build test

2005-04-27 Thread Stanislav Maslovski
Geert Stappers wrote: Post in a follow-up message where to find the AVInfo work you did. And see if you get any feedback like It compiles fine on $ARCH The package is on http://users.tkk.fi/~stas/avinfo/ lintian-clean, builds in pbuilder w/o problems. have been also checked by several people in

Re: RFS: YSM ICQ client

2005-04-27 Thread Stanislav Maslovski
Ilya M. Slepnev wrote: That's very strange.. Try please, follow link: http://kastalia.cmc.msu.ru/~khext/debian/ysmv7/ Tried. This did not work (DNS error). A misprint in the url, perhaps? or via IP: http://158.250.11.100/~khext/debian/ysmv7/ And this worked! But actually, your old links worked for

build test

2005-04-26 Thread Stanislav Maslovski
Hello, It seem that nobody has got interested in sponsoring AVInfo yet. Perhaps, my advertising was too pushing ;) Anyway, I have got a question I would like to ask. Is there any kind of testing buid system (maybe unofficial one), I mean something where I can upload my package to and try to

RFS: avinfo

2005-04-24 Thread Stanislav Maslovski
/~stas/avinfo/ Check them and if you like the program and the package please support my wish of making AVInfo a part of the Debian distribution. With my best regards, Stanislav Maslovski e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe

Re: RFS: avinfo

2005-04-24 Thread Stanislav Maslovski
Noticed a mistake in one of the links in my last mail. The AVInfo section on shounen.ru is under http://shounen.ru/soft/avinfo/ The source files can be downloaded from http://shounen.ru/soft/avinfo/download.shtml -- With best regards, Stanislav Maslovski -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL