[RFS] min12xxw (binary-new)

2011-11-04 Thread Stefan Potyra
Hi, (please CC me on replies, as I'm not subscribed). please sponsor min12xxw as found on mentors.debian.net. It has to go through binary new, so I can't upload it myself. For your convenience: dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/min12xxw/min12xxw_0.0.9-6.dsc It closes 647538.

RFS: min12xxw (0.0.9-3) - svn

2009-08-23 Thread Stefan Potyra
(0.0.9-3) UNRELEASED; urgency=low * Makefile.am: Don't list manpage in both dist_man_MANS and man_MANS, fixing FTBFS (Closes: #543100). * debian/control: Bump standards-version, no changes needed. -- Stefan Potyra sistp...@ubuntu.com Sun, 23 Aug 2009 14:41:29 +0200 Thanks, Stefan

Re: How to not break dependant packages

2008-07-17 Thread Stefan Potyra
Hi, On Thursday 17 July 2008 15:15:25 Sean McE wrote: On current packaging there is no way to express the dependency on upstream version only, [..] actually, there is: Depends: foo (= 1.2.1), foo ( 1.2.1+) [..] by the current Depends/Conflicts pair may be wider than [..] This sounds

Re: How to not break dependant packages

2008-07-17 Thread Stefan Potyra
Hi, On Thursday 17 July 2008 16:17:09 Thibaut Paumard wrote: [..] Then I believe the maintainer could do something with the dependencies, but I'm not sure what. Setting Conflicts in claws-mail on the previous version of the plug-ins would ensure that you don't keep installed plug-in that

Re: Copyright question

2008-02-06 Thread Stefan Potyra
Hi, Am Mittwoch, 6. Februar 2008 16:30 schrieb Jean Parpaillon: Hi, I intend to package HPL benchmarks. Copyright file contains the following statements: -- 1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright notice, this list of conditions and the

Re: changelog-should-mention-nmu

2007-12-12 Thread Stefan Potyra
Hi, Am Mittwoch, 12. Dezember 2007 17:52 schrieb chaica: [..] N: Maybe you didn't intend this upload to be a NMU, in that case, please N: doublecheck that the most recent entry in the changelog is N: byte-for-byte identical to the maintainer or one of the uploaders. N: My package is

Re: Orphaned clanlib package

2007-12-01 Thread Stefan Potyra
Hi, Am Samstag 01 Dezember 2007 11:27:27 schrieb Patrick Matthäi: Hello Maintainers, I'm searching for a new maintainer for the orphaned package clanlib. Here are some informations about the package: WNPP: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=414533 p.d.o:

Re: RFS: kopete-otr 0.7-1

2007-11-16 Thread Stefan Potyra
Hi, Am Freitag 16 November 2007 21:33:55 schrieb Paul Wise: [..] There are a couple of using uninitialised variable and other warnings from gcc 4.2, please investigate them and send patches upstream. I have checked the code but is a developer choise. :) Unless the warnings are

Re: Jabbin packages now available, need fixing+sponsor

2006-08-04 Thread Stefan Potyra
Hi, Am Freitag 04 August 2006 13:16 schrieb Christoph Haas: [If anyone has an idea how to run lintian from a Python program and having it controlled by a timeout I'd be glad. No idea why lintian hangs for a day.] maybe the attached example might be useful. Cheers, Stefan.

RFS: min12xxw

2006-07-20 Thread Stefan Potyra
, but not needed, since min12xxw is a very small package, which doesn't cause lots of work. Upstream is active and responsive :). Please CC me, as I'm not (yet) on the list. Kind regards Stefan Potyra pgppiLgr0StFO.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Proposal for collaborative maintenance of packages

2006-01-04 Thread Stefan Potyra
Hi, I'll just try to restart the discussion with a proposal: Currently I maintain one package (min12xxw, see [1]) for ubuntu, have filed an ITP (#334093) in debian but haven't tried hard enough to find a sponsor yet. Since this package is quite small one, it might be well suited to just try out

Re: Proposal for collaborative maintenance of packages

2005-12-19 Thread Stefan Potyra
Hi, first of all big thanks to Raphael for your great proposal! I'd also be more than happy to join the project. Am Montag 19 Dezember 2005 16:25 schrieb Asheesh Laroia: Thanks. I agree with the Ubuntu side of this discussion that dealing with non-distributed svn would be a pain; I don't