On 2008-10-07, Laurent Léonard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What's with all those commented dh_ foo lines in the rules file ?
Mmm it's default dh_ commands, I suppose I have to delete what I don't need=
?
They clutter reading of the rules file, no reason to keep them around.
You asked about
On 2008-10-08, Laurent Léonard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--nextPart1282828.IVFam4LvNy
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Can I simply update the package after the modifications or do I have to=20
increment
On 2008-10-07, Laurent Léonard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--nextPart1512095.XNzvprD9R2
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package kio-ftps-kde4.
* Package
On 2008-10-05, Laurent Léonard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--nextPart1380824.HK0hGSmbvk
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Hi,=20
I try to build the package kio-ftps, but the 0.2 version (for KDE 4) uses=20
On 2008-10-06, Jose Luis Blanco [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If your question is how to build a Debian package... I don't know about any
standard procedure. I had to do such one package and I created a dummy
configure scripts which in turn calls cmake with some proper variables
set.
Apart from
On 2008-10-06, Robin Cornelius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
cmake does not have a proper clean target in the unix makefiles in
generates, which is a pain. Or not one that cleans as you would fully
expect. It does keep its working files in the current directory so a
the way i have done this is to
On 2008-10-06, Robin Cornelius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 4:52 PM, Sune Vuorela [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
roduces working debs and keeps the orig.tar.gz clean too.
This does seem a little dirty which makes me think i'm not quite doing
it right though so if anyone has
On 2008-09-14, Raphael Geissert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Russ Allbery wrote:
Raphael Geissert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
if [ -e ${where}debian/rules -a -d ${where}debian/patches ]; then
export QUILT_PATCHES=debian/patches
Shouldn't it be
export
On 2008-09-09, Michael Biebl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
while quilt push ; do quilt refresh ; done
quilt new 05_README_changes.diff
quilt edit README
quilt refresh
I assume you have set QUILT_PATCHES=3Ddebian/patches in ~/.quiltrc for
this to work properly?
yes. along with a lot of other
On 2008-09-02, Andreas Schildbach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now, when I (or a co-maintainer) check out the project from SVN, I get
(as expected) a nearly empty project directory, containing just the
debian directory. But, how am I supposed to actually create the patches
that go into
On 2008-08-28, Salvatore Ansani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package plasma-netgraph.
* Package name: plasma-netgraph
Version : 0.3-1
Upstream Author : John Varouhakis
* URL : http://code.google.com/p/ivplasma/
*
On 2008-06-07, David Paleino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any opinion about this? Is there a consensus on how to behave? Is that a ma=
tter
of taste?
Leave it and educate upstream.
/Sune
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
On 2008-04-20, Andrea De Iacovo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
They're all solved in 2.5.0 (already in sid) and someone is solved
also in 2.3. However I'm waiting fort hte first package upload to
close a buch of bugs.
Etch is 2.0 series
/Sune
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
On 2008-03-04, Neil Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are sponsors going to start recommending changing SONAMEs in an NMU
next? Adding -dbg packages? Of course not, NMUs are different to typical
RFS activity.
of course is changing SONAMEs in a NMU appropriate if it is appropriate.
Having a
On 2008-03-05, Neil Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1. Let orange be removed from Lenny due to the existing RC bug, or
2. Let orange behave as it has in previous stable releases without
fixing a bug that nobody seems to care about.
3. Fixing the bugs.
/Sune
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On 2008-03-05, Neil Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, fix known bugs but don't delay the RC bugs just to fix less
important ones. That's perverse.
Do two uploads ;) - one to now and one to delayed.
All I'm saying here is that sponsors should not expect NMUs to fix the
full range of
On 2008-03-05, Richard Hecker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If the maintainer is truly MIA, that is a bigger issue than any
single bug. Others have made this argument that we should
Yes. but luckily, we can do both at the same time (fixing bugs and
figuring out wether a maintainer is MIA)
And a
On 2008-02-05, Salvatore Ansani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I need to change package_name-version-1 to package_name-version-2 before
upload on mentors ???
I don't think that is needed.
/Sune
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
On 2008-02-04, Salvatore Ansani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package kde4-style-qtcurve.
* Package name: kde4-style-qtcurve
Version : 0.55.2-1
Upstream Author : Craig Drummond [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL :
On 2008-01-18, Iván Forcada Atienza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--yLVHuoLXiP9kZBkt
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi mentors!!
I am interested in kgtk application [1]. After a search, I've found that
it
On 2007-12-23, Free Ekanayaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Sorry, wrong terminology. It's a very useful multimedia application,
which many people use and would expect to find in Debian. Therefore it
is worth making the extra effort to keep it well maintained IMO. The
point being that
On 2007-10-03, Kartik Mistry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
My package Xosview is failed to build on (atleast) two arch with same
reason. Following are links from buildd.
Hi!
Did you actualy read the logs?
It says quite clearly: your config.guess and config.sub is outdated.
Find newer
On 2007-09-12, Raphael Geissert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/09/2007, Francesco Cecconi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 11 September 2007, Raphael Geissert wrote:
On 10/09/2007, Francesco Cecconi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear DD,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package
On 2007-08-15, Krzysztof Burghardt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
xawtv-plugin-qt - quicktime plugin for xawtv and motv
Has this been fixed in a way that doesn't make it segfault all the time?
And become buildable with newer libquicktime?
(I was the one hacking the quicktime plugin out of the package
On 2007-08-08, Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmm, I have something crap to ask...
As you may have noticed, wxwidget 2.8 is not available in Debian.
However Mathias Klose maintain it in Ubuntu...
Would you sponsor my wx2.8 ubuntu sync uploads ?
Please coordinate with ron,
On 2007-05-27, Jabka Atu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Package name: klthemes
Version : 1.003-1
Upstream Author : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : scex.sf.net
* License : GPLv3
Section : contrib/kde
Why contrib??
It builds these binary packages:
On 2007-05-25, Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Bas Wijnen:
This is slightly off-topic, for which I apologise. It's just that I
learned about symbol versioning during my NM process, and nobody outside
Debian seems to understand what it is. :-(
*sigh* It's a bit sad that this is
On 2007-05-09, Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
chrooting into the dir, the error is that base-files postinst
cannot find awk. mawk had indeed been configured earlier. So, while
/etc/alternatives/awk exists, and points to mawk, there is no symlink
/usr/bin/awk created.
On 2007-03-21, Charles Plessy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The easiest way to manage patches I know is cdbs, but I was not brave
enough to study wether it is possible to separate this feature from the
others.
It is possible to use cdbs patchsys in non-cdbs packages, but it is very
ugly and I
On 2007-03-18, Michael Rasmussen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi mentors,
When packaging for Debian you have two distinct ways of doing it,
native versus orig.
My question is, if I am in close contact with upstream and upstream
always adds my patches to upstream source is there then any reason
On 2007-03-16, Daniel Leidert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
What would you choose and why?
If there is a need for a click-wrap license - look at the sun java
packages.
But if the license don't require click-wrap, I would just ship it in
debian/copyright. People should know that non-free stuff is
On 2007-01-26, Andrea Bolognani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2. Edit the Makefile only in the Debian package, commenting out the
offending
lines
3. Remove the file in debian/rules, *after* installing it
I would go for 3)
it is the easiest - and often fiddling around with upstream
On 2007-01-14, Justin Pryzby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
maintscripts often don't support downgrades just because downgrading has
always
been advertised as not guaranteed to work, so very few maintainers put the
additional effort and clutter into their code.
It is not about 'additional effort'
On 2007-01-01, Nico Golde [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I guess not since this is not defined in the policy. Maybe=20
if Homepage becomes a real control field.
with two spaces it is formatted on the web like this:
http://packages.debian.org/unstable/kde/yakuake
with one space like this:
On 2006-12-11, Neil Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What are the problems with CDBS (apart from debian/control automation)?
The biggest problem are the layers of obscurity added by cdbs and the
fact that the best docs are diving into the source.
(and the fact that there has been some cdbs
On 2006-11-26, Matthias Julius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmm, the opinion on this matter seems to be somwhat devided. Some
people suggest the revision should be increased every time an upload
is made to a public place like mentors.d.n.
I have only seen keep -2 if you uploaded somewhere that
On 2006-11-14, Ritesh Raj Sarraf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How would I then add entry of the old changelog into the current knetstats
package i.e. 1.6.2 ?
I hope there is a proper way to tackle such situations.
apt-get install devscripts
man uupdate
it does exactly what you ask for.
/Sune
On 2006-09-11, James Healy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The upstream tarball has an examples directory which I am installing
into the package using dh_installexamples. None of the examples are
shell scripts or ELF binaries, yet they seem to untar with executable
permissions.
What is the best way
On 2006-09-11, Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think exec bit in a tarball is right. Best way is to repack upstream
sources.
No. Upstream should only be repacked in rare cases like when it contains
non-free materials.
/Sune
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
On 2006-07-13, Nigel Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From memory, aren't NMU's (even more so, non-DD NMU's) only meant to
fix RC bugs? Not new upstream releases?
0-day nmus are to fix RC bugs.
/Sune
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
On Sunday 02 July 2006 21:45, Zsolt Rizsanyi wrote:
OTOH I don't really like the idea of manually trimming down the size of the
diff.gz.
I have not manually trimmed down the size. I have just chosen the relevant
parts of the patches to the autofoo generated files and only applied them.
Also
On 2006-07-01, George Danchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looks correct... a couple of extra things you may want to correct anyway:
- since nothing goes to usr/{s}bin you don't need the debian/dirs file, so
you
can safely remove it.
Removed.
- also remove the last two commented lines in
On 2006-06-25, Sune Vuorela [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am looking for comments - and hopefully a sponsorship - for
kwin-style-dekorator.
Source: kwin-style-dekorator
Section: kde
Priority: optional
Maintainer: Sune Vuorela [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Build-Depends: debhelper (= 5), autotools-dev
Hi!
I am looking for comments - and hopefully a sponsorship - for
kwin-style-dekorator.
Source: kwin-style-dekorator
Section: kde
Priority: optional
Maintainer: Sune Vuorela [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Build-Depends: debhelper (= 5), autotools-dev, kdebase-dev
Standards-Version: 3.7.2
Package: kwin-style
On 2006-05-01, Sune Vuorela [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2006-04-22, Sune Vuorela [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
I have a couple of ITPs where I finally got the two packages in shape to
close
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=348101 and
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin
Hi!
I have a package ready for kwin-style-crystal.
ITP:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=364360
Source: kwin-style-crystal
Section: kde
Priority: optional
Maintainer: Sune Vuorela [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Build-Depends: debhelper (= 4.0.0), autotools-dev, kdebase-dev
Standards-Version
ITP:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=338635
Source: polyester
Section: kde
Priority: optional
Maintainer: Sune Vuorela [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Build-Depends: debhelper (= 5.0.0), automake1.9, autoconf, libtool,
kdelibs4-dev (= 4:3.2), kdebase-dev (= 4:3.2)
Standards-Version: 3.7.2
On 2006-05-28, Christoph Haas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And the package is here:
http://mirror.pusling.com/polyester-rfs/
Could you name the source package kde-style-polyester, too? I find it
confusing when source and binary packages have totally different names.
Sure. Reuploadet.
/Sune
On 2006-05-28, Christoph Haas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://mirror.pusling.com/kgorilla
Just checking kde-icons-korilla. Lintian is right:
E: kde-icons-korilla; The font
Gah.
I just did something to the packages now.
/Sune
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
On 2006-04-22, Sune Vuorela [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
I have a couple of ITPs where I finally got the two packages in shape to
close
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=348101 and
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=348103
They are quite similar, it is only
On 2006-04-26, Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, if update-alternatives --list shows nothing, and symlinks are left in
place on the filesystem, that sounds like a bug in u-a to me.
But shouldn't a bug in u-a be easy to reproduce ?
I tried something minimal:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/# for
On 2006-04-25, Sune Vuorela [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have just recieved a bug: #364742 - and piuparts is as always right.
Something fails in removing alternatives again.
I had a typo in my prerm script. Will fix it soon.
if someone does a 's/ComixCursorss/ComixCursors-/' in the prerm
Hi !
I have just recieved a bug: #364742 - and piuparts is as always right.
Something fails in removing alternatives again.
/usr/share/icons/default/index.theme pointing into alternatives
# update-alternatives --display x-cursor-theme
x-cursor-theme - status is auto.
link currently points to
On 2006-04-26, Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
what does update-alternatives --list x-cursor-theme list in this case?
It shows nothing.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/# update-alternatives --list x-cursor-theme
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/#
It really looks to me like a u-a bug, not a bug in the calling
Hi!
I have a couple of ITPs where I finally got the two packages in shape to
close
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=348101 and
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=348103
They are quite similar, it is only approx. the name that differs.
And the packaging is quite
On 2006-03-10, Marco Cabizza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The only error i get is binary-without-manpage because the package
actually has no manpage.
That task is quite easy to solve ;)
Just write a man page ...
perhaps help2man can help you
/Sune
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 2006-03-07, Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
They process NEW binary packages quite fast, within one to three days to
my impression.
that _WAS_ also my impression ... but having a package stuck for more
than two months without any notices have changed my impression.
(look on top-8 on
On 2006-01-26, Al Nikolov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I assumed though that ITP should be closed after that the package was become
ready and was appeared in the pool. I'm i wrong?
It should be closed in the changelog. Then it will automagically be
closed when package get build.
/Sune
Vice
On 2006-01-11, Bram Neijt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How long is some time ago. I have the same problem and was wondering
when a RFS should be seen as dead? So what is the avarage time it
takes for a new package to become sponsored?
My packages has taken a couple of weeks.
1) post rfs.
2) read
I have this teeny weeny package called kde-style-comix, which gives a
nice widget style and window decorations to your kde.
It closes a one year old itp: #286205
the package is located here:
http://mirror.pusling.com/comix-rfs/
and it is almost lintian clean. upstream provides CVS-dir, which
On 2005-12-10, I wrote:
I have now a package ready to close my ITP: #338554
It is not lintian clean - upstream did not run make distclean before
releasing - so lintian complains about some files being present - but
they are removed in the clean tag. Linda complains about the same thing.
Only
On 2005-12-14, Justin Pryzby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The templates have a liberal license. Your modifications, if not
trivial, are copyright you, and it would be good to note that. It
I will describe my modifications as really trivial. adding
--disable-rpath to one line - and remove some
On 2005-12-10, Justin Pryzby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please add the years of copyright holding in ./debian/copyright. Also
Done.
consider adding, at least to ./debian/rules and ./debian/copyright, a
phrase like Modifications are a work of Sune Vuorela during the year
2005, and are hereby
Hi!
I have now a package ready to close my ITP: #338554
It is not lintian clean - upstream did not run make distclean before
releasing - so lintian complains about some files being present - but
they are removed in the clean tag. Linda complains about the same thing.
Only fix for this is
On 2005-11-15, Michael Biebl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe a bit offtopic but I looked at #338554 and noticed that there are
now several different naming schemes for kwin window decorations:
I am working on this too.
/Sune
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
On 2005-11-15, Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Obviously you didn't read
file:///usr/share/doc/developers-reference/ch-best-pkging-practices.en.html#s-bpp-origtargz
I have read that - and yes - I think repacking is not in normal best
practice.
But I sure don't override linda _errors_
On 2005-11-15, Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
fakeroot debian/rules binary directly won't get bitten. Other than
that, I would do nothing - it is a bug, therefore a lintian override is
inappropriate, but it is not serious enough to justify messing with the
tarball.
So you suggest
Hi!
I am working on #338554 - and I am almost there. I have one big problem,
though.
Upstream did not run make distclean before releasing the tarball. Of
course, linda and lintian complains about this.
Should I add overrides for lintian warnings and linda _errors_ to
address this problems - or
On 2005-11-13, sebastien marbrier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have two solutions, the first one is to install both sarge and sid but this
is a dirty work, I am also thinking about making the packages in a chrooted
environnement but I have never done that so far.
Can you give some advice
On 2005-11-06, Christoph Haas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the package looks a lot better now. Thanks for your work. I have just
uploaded the package.
Thank you.
Unfortunatly, it got rejected due to no orig.tar.gz-file.
Some minor things you may want to look at for your next revision:
You
On 2005-11-02, Jakson A. Aquino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think that I don't need the files below:
dirs postinst.ex preinst.ex statist-default.ex
compat postrm.exprerm.ex
Can I delete them?
Try ;)
- or at least move them to somewhere else ;)
(compat are needed)
/Sune
--
On 2005-11-01, Christoph Haas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- the debian/copyright lacks the years of copyright
Fixed
- insane number of Build-Depends - are they all necessary?
Maybe not. working on this - it was the 'shortcut' mentioned in new
maintainers guide - maybe it was wrong to use it.
It is
On 2005-11-02, Ana Guerrero [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
it fails. You must change it to:
Build-Depends: debhelper ( 3.0.0), kdelibs4-dev
fixed that.
-The program is a systray app, so it would be good to Recommend: kicker
Quite reasonable; will add that.
-Some files are placed in incorrect
101 - 173 of 173 matches
Mail list logo
