Patrick Winnertz wrote:
Okay, here are several things to fix:
[...]
Thanks, I have addressed them all.
Source package:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/ccontrol/ccontrol_0.9.1+20071204-2.dsc
Change history: http://tedp.id.au/gitweb/?p=ccontrol-debian.git;a=shortlog
--
\0
--
To
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.9.1+20071204-1
of my package ccontrol. My previous sponsor (Amaya) is currently AFK.
It builds this binary package:
ccontrol - Compilation controller
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The upload would fix bug 447832.
The package can be
Hello mentors!
I have a new ccontrol package ready for upload. Once again it is a minor
change from the last version:
* Force-disable GCC stack protection as it is incompatible with the
current dietlibc (Ubuntu #109157).
* Don't ignore errors in $(MAKE) distclean.
The first change will
Justin Pryzby wrote:
On Fri, Aug 10, 2007 at 11:27:25PM +1000, Ted Percival wrote:
I have prepared a package of fetchexc, a program for retrieving email from
Microsoft Exchange servers. I am seeking comments on the packaging.
Which exchange versions? I think exch5 and exch2k have different
I have prepared a package of fetchexc, a program for retrieving email
from Microsoft Exchange servers. I am seeking comments on the packaging.
I am not seeking sponsorship at the moment - Amaya showed some interest
in sponsoring the package a while ago.
I have posted to the
Martin Kelly wrote:
It builds these binary packages:
pyecm - Factors large numbers (= 50 digits) using ECM (Elliptic Curve
Method)
I suggest changing the short description to:
Factors large numbers (up to 50 digits) using the Elliptic Curve
Method (ECM)
And possibly even leaving off the
... will do. Do I need to delete the package from
mentors.debian.net and then re-upload it or just change the description
before a sponsor accepts it?
Martin
Ted Percival wrote:
Martin Kelly wrote:
It builds these binary packages:
pyecm - Factors large numbers (= 50 digits) using ECM
Martin Kelly wrote:
After trying to build my package (pyecm), I recieved the following error:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/Desktop/pyecm-0.1$ dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot
parsechangelog/debian: error: badly formatted trailer line, at file
debian/changelog line 5
dpkg-buildpackage: unable to
Charles Plessy wrote:
I am packaging a software which includes tests to check if the binary is
fully funcionnal. However, those tests are much more processor intensive
than the compilation itself. Is there a general policy about what to do
with them? Is it enough to run them when testing the
any feedback on how the package can be improved,
and if it is good enough, to have it uploaded.
Cheers,
-Ted Percival
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Frederic Lehobey wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my source package qrfcview.
The package is linda and lintian clean and compiles with pbuilder.
Lintian 1.23.22 has a warning, the solution is simple - take out the
libqt4-{gui,core} entries from the Depends line and allow shlibs:Depends
contains:
deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free
Thanks for your consideration.
-Ted Percival
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free
Thanks for your consideration.
-Ted Percival
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
I've just uploaded version 1.10-2 of fetchexc which uses dpatch to patch
the build.xml file rather than doing it directly through the .diff.gz,
and also adds upstream's changelog.gz which I generated from the
upstream website (aka the README.html file in the package).
I seem to remember seeing
Ted Percival wrote:
I've just uploaded version 1.10-2 of fetchexc which uses dpatch to patch
the build.xml file rather than doing it directly through the .diff.gz,
and also adds upstream's changelog.gz which I generated from the
upstream website (aka the README.html file in the package
Here are two users' checklists that I have used for reference.
http://people.debian.org/~neilm/sponsorship.html
http://people.debian.org/~mpalmer/sponsorship_checklist.html
-Ted
Panu Kalliokoski wrote:
I wonder, whether there is a list of these common gotchas in packaging
somewhere, or a
Paul Wise wrote:
* debian/changelog: the version should be 0.0.20051212 or
0.0.0.20051212 or something so that if upstream changes their
version scheme, you won't have to use [an] epoch.
Isn't that exactly what the epoch is for?
-T
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP
Ek Zindagoi wrote:
I would like to build rpms on a debian system for use on a redhat
system. Can I do that on a debian system ?
Even if I wanted to install the RPM on a debain system, can I run the
rpmbuild -bb command on a debian system and successfully build an RPM
You can certainly
18 matches
Mail list logo
