Hello Sergey, Hello Niels,
I'd be willing to look at awstats 7.2~dfsg-1 and upload it if it looks
OK to me. Is there a packaging-related reason why Niels did not upload
it for you so far?
Bye
Willi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
Am 2013-12-28 19:11, schrieb Niels Thykier:
On 2013-12-28 16:20, Willi Mann wrote:
Hello Sergey, Hello Niels,
I'd be willing to look at awstats 7.2~dfsg-1 and upload it if it looks
OK to me.
Uploaded. The repository at git.debian.org still only has some 7.1.1
version, though.
WM
Hello Martin, Hello Sven,
is there a particular reason why this bug on sponsorship-requests is
still open?
thanks
WM
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
Raúl Benencia wrote:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package zeroc-icee
I'll sponsor it as the changes really only fix the RC bug. The package
should get some love from its maintainer though.
Willi Mann from
Raúl Benencia wrote:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package zeroc-icee
I'll sponsor it as the changes really only fix the RC bug. The package
should get some love from its maintainer though.
Willi Mann from
Raúl Benencia wrote:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package zeroc-icee
I'll sponsor it as the changes really only fix the RC bug. The package
should get some love from its maintainer though.
Willi Mann from the Salzburg
Michelle Konzack schrieb:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package tdicons.
* Package name: tdicons
Version : 0.0.3-2
Upstream Author : Michelle Konzack
* URL : http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/tdicons
* License : Artistic
at the upstream site, the patch is advertised as:
Updated Templates for version 5.1.3 - Martin Kos (updated Patch against
5.1.3 english)
This looks like it is a sqwebmail derivation with additional,
translation related copyright of the patch author. I'd say you try now
to contact Martin
Hi!
I'm searching a sponsor for the my completely redone sqwebmail-de
package. The current version in sid is very outdated: You cannot even
send mail (with current sqwebmail in sid).
I've redone the packaging completely, because the current build
procedure is so simple that I didn't want to
Hi!
I'm searching for a temporary sponsor for logwatch 7.3.1-2. It's
available from
http://pkg-logwatch.alioth.debian.org/apt/pool/main/l/logwatch/
I want to get 7.3.1 into etch, because the current 7.3-2 doesn't
properly support postfix 2.3 any more and reports some other lines
concerning logs
Hi!
I have no idea how to properly handle the following situation: My
package logwatch previously had all their configuration files in
/etc/logwatch/conf. They were marked as conffiles so dpkg was
responsible for policy-compliant upgrading.
However, since version 7.0 logwatch has a very
If i'm wrong, please correct me.
http://qa.debian.org/~anibal/debian-NEW-summary.html says that Kenshi Muto
has already uploaded 855resolution.
See also:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=300341
Willi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe.
Martin Michlmayr schrieb:
* Christoph Berg [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-03-16 14:41]:
Isn't there an owner tag for WNPP bugs? Then Shachar could set
himself as the owner.
This won't get you the messages forwarded either.
Of course it will. The owner receives messages sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What's
Frank Küster wrote:
Willi Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For the general problems associated with different licenses in one
package, you might find a look at http://bugs.debian.org/218105
informative. (Although I hope that your package isn't as mixed as
ours).
Thanks.
Can anyone tell me
Frank Küster wrote:
Willi Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For the general problems associated with different licenses in one
package, you might find a look at http://bugs.debian.org/218105
informative. (Although I hope that your package isn't as mixed as
ours).
Thanks.
Can anyone tell me please
Hi!
I'm facing a small problem with my package logwatch[0]. Logwatch's licensing
file (License) [1] doesn't match the reality in two ways:
1) Logwatch consists of many perl scripts, many of them not written by the
maintainer of logwatch (Kirk Bauer), but by various contributors (including
Hi!
I'm facing a small problem with my package logwatch[0]. Logwatch's licensing
file (License) [1] doesn't match the reality in two ways:
1) Logwatch consists of many perl scripts, many of them not written by the
maintainer of logwatch (Kirk Bauer), but by various contributors (including
me).
Hi!
I'm searching for a sponsor for my ripmime package:
Package name: ripmime
Version : 1.3.1.1
Upstream Author : Paul L Daniels [EMAIL PROTECTED]
URL : http://www.pldaniels.com/ripmime
License : 3-clause BSD
Description : extracts attachments from mails
Hi!
I'm searching for a sponsor for my ripmime package:
Package name: ripmime
Version : 1.3.1.1
Upstream Author : Paul L Daniels [EMAIL PROTECTED]
URL : http://www.pldaniels.com/ripmime
License : 3-clause BSD
Description : extracts attachments from mails
19 matches
Mail list logo
