Bug#895681: RFS: arc/5.21q-6

unsubscribe On Sat, Apr 14, 2018 at 7:19 AM, Ricardo wrote: > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: normal > > Dear mentors, > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "arc" > > * Package name: arc > Version : 5.21q-6 > Upstream Author : Howard Chu

How to deal with arch-specific paths in .install files

Hi I have a package .install file where a library expects to go into /usr/lib/ x86_64-gnu/[subdirectory] on amd64 systems. I realize this is not portable. What regex can I use to substitute for the arch directory in my .install file? Thanks, shawn

Re: .desktop file handling

On Thursday, September 15, 2016 13:22:33 Jens Reyer wrote: > On 15.09.2016 09:21, Shawn Sörbom wrote: > > Hi > > I have run into a few projects lately that don't include .desktop files > > but > > should. my usual approach to handle this is to write a patch with quilt

.desktop file handling

this approach works, but is it the "right" way? Does it matter? Thanks, --Shawn

Re: noopt not working

On Sunday, April 24, 2016 13:22:59 Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Shawn Sörbom <sh...@sorbom.com>, 2016-04-23, 15:28: > >The problem is that optimization appears to cause a segfault during > >runtime. > > I'd normally advise fixing the root cause of segfault, instead

Re: noopt not working

On Saturday, April 23, 2016 22:16:50 Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Shawn Sörbom <sh...@sorbom.com>, 2016-04-23, 12:47: > >In a debian/rules file, I have the variable > >export DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=noopt > > You should never do that in debian/rules. > DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS is supp

noopt not working

m assuming no, but setting DEB_CFLAGS_STRIP = -02 doesn't seem to work either? What am I doing wrong? Thanks, --Shawn

What are the rules about submitting beta projects to Debian?

, --Shawn

Re: how to use pbuilder without .dsc files?

On Monday, August 24, 2015 14:58:18 Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: On Sun, Aug 23, 2015 at 05:07:15PM -0700, Shawn Sörbom wrote: Hi, I am using pbuilder for the first time and I was wondering: How does one build a package in pbuilder if they haven't generated .dsc files? I am trying to build

how to use pbuilder without .dsc files?

, so there are no .dsc or .changes files. what should I do? Thanks, --Shawn

Re: How to deal with configs in non-standard locations

Thanks Jakub, This will be very useful the next time I need to do an override. On Tuesday, May 19, 2015 12:17:27 Jakub Wilk wrote: * Shawn Sörbom sh...@sorbom.com, 2015-05-18, 13:54: I am playing with the Snes9x source code, and I can't get it to compile via debhelper. Snes9x has its config

How to deal with configs in non-standard locations

Hi, I am playing with the Snes9x source code, and I can't get it to compile via debhelper. Snes9x has its config files in a subfolder of the sources called unix. What is the proper way of overriding dh_auto_install and dh_auto_build to point debhelper to the correct location? I have tried

Re: How to deal with configs in non-standard locations

Worked great! Thanks! On Monday, May 18, 2015 14:05:55 Vincent Cheng wrote: Hi Shawn, On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 1:54 PM, Shawn Sörbom sh...@sorbom.com wrote: Hi, I am playing with the Snes9x source code, and I can't get it to compile via debhelper. Snes9x has its config files

Re: Bug#773760: RFS: kcm-systemd/0.7.0-1 [ITP]

I keep forgetting to post this, but I have changed the name of the package to kde-config-systemd. Sorry if this causes any inconvenience. On Tuesday, December 23, 2014 23:51:28 Matthias Klumpp wrote: 2014-12-23 0:56 GMT+01:00 Shawn Sörbom sh...@sorbom.com: Package: sponsorship-requests

Re: Bug#773760: RFS: kcm-systemd/0.7.0-1 [ITP]

Thanks! On Tuesday, December 23, 2014 11:47:47 Riley Baird wrote: On 23/12/14 10:56, Shawn Sörbom wrote: Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package kcm-systemd * Package name: kcm-systemd Version

debian/control: replaces field

things I fixed in this package, so I thought now might be a good time to change the name to kde-config-ufw. Thanks, --Shawn -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https

Re: kcm-ufw follow-up

I think you are right, but I don't have the skill with qt yet for something so ambitious. I would be willing to learn as I go though. --Shawn On Sunday, December 21, 2014 10:34:05 Paul Wise wrote: On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 7:21 AM, Shawn Sörbom wrote: maintaining kcm-ufw I wonder if a better

Bug#773760: RFS: kcm-systemd/0.7.0-1 [ITP]

can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/k/kcm-systemd/kcm-systemd_0.7.0-1.dsc More information about kcm-systemd can be obtained from https://github.com/rthomsen/kcmsystemd. Regards, Shawn Sörbom -- To UNSUBSCRIBE

kcm-ufw follow-up

for determining when the next release is ready for Debian? Thanks, --Shawn -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/4761592.9tAc0iScm7@medusa

Bug#758163: Subject: RFS: kcm-ufw/0.4.3-1 ITP

Thanks! On Sunday, November 09, 2014 13:17:36 Eriberto Mota wrote: Hi Shawn, I uploaded your package to experimental, to honor the Jessie freeze policy[1]. Thanks for your work. Cheers, Eriberto [1] https://release.debian.org/jessie/freeze_policy.html 2014-11-07 23:14 GMT-02

Bug#758163: Subject: RFS: kcm-ufw/0.4.3-1 ITP

/#file-syntax Copyright issues should be fixed. This upload also contains the fixed github links I contacted you about a few weeks ago. I hope everything is in order. Thanks, --Shawn On Sunday, October 12, 2014 22:19:30 Eriberto wrote: Hi Shawn, I am glad to know that your work over

Bug#758163: Subject: RFS: kcm-ufw/0.4.3-1 ITP

these information in d/copyright without any care. Eriberto 2014-09-30 4:52 GMT-03:00 Shawn Sörbom sh...@sorbom.com: Hi Eriberto, Sorry there had been a problem with my local git repo erlier this evening. As a result, the lintian-overrides file was from one of the previous uploads. I have fixed

Bug#758163: Subject: RFS: kcm-ufw/0.4.3-1 ITP

Fixed. Regarding Github: I changed the URL and tried it in two separate browsers. But the old URL should have redirected to the correct one. Thanks, --Shawn On Monday, September 29, 2014 17:18:49 Eriberto wrote: Hi Shawn, In d/control, your Vcs-Git still pointing to an invalid address

Bug#758163: Subject: RFS: kcm-ufw/0.4.3-1 ITP

Hi Eriberto, Sorry there had been a problem with my local git repo erlier this evening. As a result, the lintian-overrides file was from one of the previous uploads. I have fixed it now. Thanks, --Shawn On Monday, September 29, 2014 17:18:49 Eriberto wrote: Hi Shawn, In d/control, your Vcs

Bug#758163: Subject: RFS: kcm-ufw/0.4.3-1 ITP

Hi Eriberto, Sorry, one more fix. I patched the About dialogue so that the license displayed matches that of the COPYING file in the source tree. Thanks, --Shawn On Monday, September 22, 2014 17:20:56 Eriberto wrote: 2014-09-22 4:21 GMT-03:00 Shawn Sörbom sh...@sorbom.com: Hi Eriberto Hi

Bug#758163: Subject: RFS: kcm-ufw/0.4.3-1 ITP

these points are cleared up. Thanks, --Shawn On Saturday, September 27, 2014 16:57:18 Eriberto wrote: Hi Shawn, You need do some adjustments in your package. Please: 1. d/changelog: rewrite this file, refering to the last version only. You can see an example here[1]. [1] https

Bug#758163: Subject: RFS: kcm-ufw/0.4.3-1 ITP

Fixed. On Saturday, September 27, 2014 23:33:28 Eriberto wrote: 2014-09-27 21:31 GMT-03:00 Shawn Sörbom sh...@sorbom.com: Hi Eriberto, Hi, Regarding your list: 1. I don't understand whats wrong here. I checked another changelog just to be sure: http://metadata.ftp

Bug#758163: Subject: RFS: kcm-ufw/0.4.3-1 ITP

am a robot, so they blocked public access to my repo. I will fix that today. Otherwise, everything else should be in order. Thanks, --Shawn On Monday, September 22, 2014 17:20:56 Eriberto wrote: 2014-09-22 4:21 GMT-03:00 Shawn Sörbom sh...@sorbom.com: Hi Eriberto Hi! I was unable to find

Bug#758163: Subject: RFS: kcm-ufw/0.4.3-1 ITP

Hi Eriberto, I just fixed the description in debian/control and re-uploaded. The package should work perfectly now. On to the Github issue... I will check back soon. --Shawn On Monday, September 22, 2014 17:20:56 Eriberto wrote: 2014-09-22 4:21 GMT-03:00 Shawn Sörbom sh...@sorbom.com: Hi

Bug#758163: Subject: RFS: kcm-ufw/0.4.3-1 ITP

because I wasn't sure if kcm-ufw qualified. If it does, I would much prefer using Alioth. Thanks, --Shawn On Sunday, September 21, 2014 00:56:13 Eriberto wrote: 2014-09-20 2:18 GMT-03:00 Shawn Sörbom sh...@sorbom.com: Hi Eriberto, Hi Shawn, Sorry this is taking so long. I had a lot

Re: gbp-create-remote-repo fails when using github

Thats why I wanted to use gbp, I was afraid of missing details. Ideally, I would have preferred to use Debian alioth servers, but after reading the FAQ, I didn't think my package qualified. Thank you both for your replies. --Shawn On Sunday, September 21, 2014 10:44:19 Felix Natter wrote

gbp-create-remote-repo fails when using github

the test they recommended (ssh -vT g...@github.com ), everything worked fine. How can I make sure that gbp is actually using the right key? The relevant github help is here: https://help.github.com/articles/error-permission-denied-publickey Thanks, --Shawn Sörbom -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian

Bug#758163: Subject: RFS: kcm-ufw/0.4.3-1 ITP

to have man pages. 3b. What utilities do you recommend in relation to question 3? I have never used docbook before. Thanks, --Shawn I hope to have the fixes you mentioned done by Sunday. On Monday, September 15, 2014 19:41:43 Eriberto wrote: Hi Shawn, About your package, please: 1. Please

Bug#758163: Subject: RFS: kcm-ufw/0.4.3-1 ITP

Got it. I will do that today. Thanks, --Shawn On Sunday, September 14, 2014 14:22:15 Eriberto wrote: Sorry for my delay. I am travelling. I was mistaken when I sent for you an example that closes #758163. The #758163 is your RFS bug. Do you need open an ITP bug[1] and close this ITP in d

Bug#758163: Subject: RFS: kcm-ufw/0.4.3-1 ITP

Hi Eriberto, Sorry this took so long. I copied the changelog entry directly from your e-mail and re-uploaded the changes to mentors.debian.net. The error about improperly closing the wishlist bug is still persisting. I'm *really* confused now. what am I still doing wrong? Thanks, Shawn Sörbom

Bug#758163: (no subject)

Control: retitle -1 RFS: kcm-ufw/0.4.3-1 [ITP] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/3284484.B4zM2f94u9@medusa

Bug#758163: Subject: RFS: kcm-ufw/0.4.3-1 ITP

Hi Eriberto, I saw an error stating that I had closed the bug improperly when I uploaded to the mentors page. I was a bit confused though, did I do something wrong in the debian/changelog file, or did I do something improper with the subject line in the BTS? Thanks, --Shawn Edit: I re-uploaded

Subject: RFS: kcm-ufw/0.4.3-1 [ITP]

=137789. Changes since the last upload: remove templates, fix some lintian errors. Regards, Shawn Sörbom -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org

Bug#758163: Subject: RFS: kcm-ufw/0.4.3-1 ITP

=137789. Changes since the last upload: remove templates, fix some lintian errors. Regards, Shawn Sörbom -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org

Bug#717762: RFS: connman-ui/0~20130115-1 ITP

upload: connman-ui (0~20130115-1) unstable; urgency=low * Initial release. (Closes: #717366) -- Shawn Landden shawnland...@gmail.com Fri, 19 Jul 2013 12:23:07 -0700 [your most recent changelog entry]

Re: Bug#679816: unblock: kyotocabinet/1.2.76-2

On Sat, 2012-07-07 at 13:34 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 12:43:26 -0700, shawn wrote: If the default behavior is to not have kyotocabinet in wheezy, then I am OK with that. I think this is the way to go. This has not changed, however, a positive review from

Bug#676722: RFS: ruby-kyotocabinet/1.32-1 [ITP] -- DBM-Ruby bindings

On Sun, 2012-07-01 at 18:40 +, Bart Martens wrote: Hello Shawn, I don't see ruby-kyotocabinet at mentors. What happened ? Regards, Bart Martens Have you taken a look at this package now? http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-ruby-extras/ruby-kyotocabinet.git;a=summary -- -Shawn Landden

Bug#676722: RFS: ruby-kyotocabinet/1.32-1 [ITP] -- DBM-Ruby bindings

On Sun, 2012-07-01 at 18:40 +, Bart Martens wrote: Hello Shawn, I don't see ruby-kyotocabinet at mentors. What happened ? Regards, Bart Martens After kyotocabinet got uploaded to unstable with an out-of-date version I was worried that old versions (of same version number

Bug#676722: RFS: ruby-kyotocabinet/1.32-1 [ITP] -- DBM-Ruby bindings

On Sun, 2012-07-01 at 18:40 +, Bart Martens wrote: Hello Shawn, I don't see ruby-kyotocabinet at mentors. What happened ? Regards, Bart Martens Yeah I must have forgot to re-upload http://mentors.debian.net/package/ruby-kyotocabinet -- -Shawn Landden -- To UNSUBSCRIBE

Bug#676722: RFS: ruby-kyotocabinet/1.32-1 [ITP] -- DBM-Ruby bindings

On Sun, 2012-07-01 at 19:09 +, Bart Martens wrote: On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 11:50:58AM -0700, shawn wrote: also, make note that because #679683 this package will not build against libkyotocabinet-dev 1.2.76-1 (but it will against the -2 I have uploaded to mentors) Do you mean

Bug#676722: RFS: ruby-kyotocabinet/1.32-1 [ITP] -- DBM-Ruby bindings

On Sun, 2012-07-01 at 19:09 +, Bart Martens wrote: On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 11:50:58AM -0700, shawn wrote: also, make note that because #679683 this package will not build against libkyotocabinet-dev 1.2.76-1 (but it will against the -2 I have uploaded to mentors) Do you mean

Bug#676722: kyotocabinet uploaded

kyotocabinet, whish this package depends on, has been uploaded and is in NEW at the moment. (Thank you Sylvestre Ledru sylves...@debian.org) -- -Shawn Landden -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas

Re: New Package Developer

On Monday 29 April 2002 02:47 am, Michael Weber wrote: * Shawn P. Garbett [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-04-25T13:58-0500]: Secondly, The package is an extension to ghc (haskell compiler). It has scripts and library files. I've run into the problem in the make file of it refering to things like

Fwd: Re: New Package Developer

I've forwarded this message of mine to this group and will be looking forward to any help I can get. I put the following line in for where to install the library routines in the makefile: GHCDSTLIB = debian/tmp/lib/`ghc --version | tr -d a-zA-Z ,`/Fudgets It seems to work. Shawn Garbett

Re: Fwd: Re: New Package Developer

-${GHCVERSION}/Fudgets The question then is this a good form for a Debian package? On Friday 26 April 2002 08:11 am, Shawn P. Garbett wrote: I've forwarded this message of mine to this group and will be looking forward to any help I can get. I put the following line in for where to install the library

Re: New Package Developer

Here's another question. The package uses a version naming scheme such that the current version is 'h13u'. Creating a Debian package, do I need to have a straight forward naming scheme like '1.01' or should I just keep the version as 'h13u'? Shawn -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL

Fwd: Re: New Package Developer

I've forwarded this message of mine to this group and will be looking forward to any help I can get. I put the following line in for where to install the library routines in the makefile: GHCDSTLIB = debian/tmp/lib/`ghc --version | tr -d a-zA-Z ,`/Fudgets It seems to work. Shawn Garbett

Re: Fwd: Re: New Package Developer

}/Fudgets The question then is this a good form for a Debian package? On Friday 26 April 2002 08:11 am, Shawn P. Garbett wrote: I've forwarded this message of mine to this group and will be looking forward to any help I can get. I put the following line in for where to install the library

Re: New Package Developer

Here's another question. The package uses a version naming scheme such that the current version is 'h13u'. Creating a Debian package, do I need to have a straight forward naming scheme like '1.01' or should I just keep the version as 'h13u'? Shawn -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL