Re: [BTS] Bug number $bug not found.

2001-10-28 Thread Josip Rodin
On Sun, Oct 28, 2001 at 01:26:37AM -0200, Carlos Laviola wrote: On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 06:23:53PM +0200, Amaya wrote: I am trying to reopen a bug, tag it and merge it with a more recent one. This is the answer I get from the BTS: Debian Bug Tracking System said: Processing commands

Re: [BTS] Bug number $bug not found.

2001-10-28 Thread Josip Rodin
On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 05:27:25PM -0500, Colin Watson wrote: I am trying to reopen a bug, tag it and merge it with a more recent one. This is the answer I get from the BTS: [...] I guess it's older than 28 days, but... can't I access it anymore? Unfortunately not, although the BTS

Re: [BTS] Bug number $bug not found.

2001-10-28 Thread Amaya
Josip Rodin dijo: That's primarily because it's worked like this for years, and because people shouldn't ever need this as the bugs shouldn't get wrongly closed and then neglected for a month. Theoretically, bugs shouldn't reappear in newer releases of software, too :) IMNSHO, the bug is

Re: [BTS] Bug number $bug not found.

2001-10-28 Thread Josip Rodin
On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 06:23:53PM +0200, Amaya wrote: I am trying to reopen a bug, tag it and merge it with a more recent one. This is the answer I get from the BTS: Debian Bug Tracking System said: Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reopen 109629 Bug number 109629 not found.

Re: [BTS] Bug number $bug not found.

2001-10-28 Thread Colin Watson
On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 06:23:53PM +0200, Amaya wrote: I am trying to reopen a bug, tag it and merge it with a more recent one. This is the answer I get from the BTS: [...] I guess it's older than 28 days, but... can't I access it anymore? Unfortunately not, although the BTS administrators

Re: [BTS] Bug number $bug not found.

2001-10-28 Thread Amaya
First, thanks for your quick reply :-) Santiago Vila dijo: After a bug is archived, it is available for search, but its history is frozen, so no commands to change its status are accepted. Ack. Somebody suggested once a resurrect command for this, but not everybody likes the idea of being

Re: [BTS] Bug number $bug not found.

2001-10-28 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 06:23:53PM +0200, Amaya wrote: I am trying to reopen a bug, tag it and merge it with a more recent one. This is the answer I get from the BTS: Debian Bug Tracking System said: Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reopen 109629 Bug number 109629 not found.

Re: [BTS] Bug number $bug not found.

2001-10-28 Thread Carlos Laviola
On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 06:23:53PM +0200, Amaya wrote: I am trying to reopen a bug, tag it and merge it with a more recent one. This is the answer I get from the BTS: Debian Bug Tracking System said: Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reopen 109629 Bug number 109629 not found.

Re: [BTS] Bug number $bug not found.

2001-10-28 Thread Josip Rodin
On Sun, Oct 28, 2001 at 01:26:37AM -0200, Carlos Laviola wrote: On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 06:23:53PM +0200, Amaya wrote: I am trying to reopen a bug, tag it and merge it with a more recent one. This is the answer I get from the BTS: Debian Bug Tracking System said: Processing commands

Re: [BTS] Bug number $bug not found.

2001-10-28 Thread Josip Rodin
On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 05:27:25PM -0500, Colin Watson wrote: I am trying to reopen a bug, tag it and merge it with a more recent one. This is the answer I get from the BTS: [...] I guess it's older than 28 days, but... can't I access it anymore? Unfortunately not, although the BTS

Re: [BTS] Bug number $bug not found.

2001-10-28 Thread Amaya
Josip Rodin dijo: That's primarily because it's worked like this for years, and because people shouldn't ever need this as the bugs shouldn't get wrongly closed and then neglected for a month. Theoretically, bugs shouldn't reappear in newer releases of software, too :) IMNSHO, the bug is

Re: [BTS] Bug number $bug not found.

2001-10-27 Thread Josip Rodin
On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 06:23:53PM +0200, Amaya wrote: I am trying to reopen a bug, tag it and merge it with a more recent one. This is the answer I get from the BTS: Debian Bug Tracking System said: Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reopen 109629 Bug number 109629 not found.

Re: [BTS] Bug number $bug not found.

2001-10-27 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 06:23:53PM +0200, Amaya wrote: I am trying to reopen a bug, tag it and merge it with a more recent one. This is the answer I get from the BTS: Debian Bug Tracking System said: Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reopen 109629 Bug number 109629 not found.

Re: [BTS] Bug number $bug not found.

2001-10-27 Thread Carlos Laviola
On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 06:23:53PM +0200, Amaya wrote: I am trying to reopen a bug, tag it and merge it with a more recent one. This is the answer I get from the BTS: Debian Bug Tracking System said: Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reopen 109629 Bug number 109629 not found.

Re: [BTS] Bug number $bug not found.

2001-10-27 Thread Colin Watson
On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 06:23:53PM +0200, Amaya wrote: I am trying to reopen a bug, tag it and merge it with a more recent one. This is the answer I get from the BTS: [...] I guess it's older than 28 days, but... can't I access it anymore? Unfortunately not, although the BTS administrators

Re: [BTS] Bug number $bug not found.

2001-10-27 Thread Santiago Vila
Amaya wrote: I am trying to reopen a bug, tag it and merge it with a more recent one. This is the answer I get from the BTS: Debian Bug Tracking System said: Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reopen 109629 Bug number 109629 not found. tags 109629 upstream Bug number 109629

[BTS] Bug number $bug not found.

2001-10-26 Thread Amaya
I am trying to reopen a bug, tag it and merge it with a more recent one. This is the answer I get from the BTS: Debian Bug Tracking System said: Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reopen 109629 Bug number 109629 not found. tags 109629 upstream Bug number 109629 not found. merge

[BTS] Bug number $bug not found.

2001-10-26 Thread Amaya
I am trying to reopen a bug, tag it and merge it with a more recent one. This is the answer I get from the BTS: Debian Bug Tracking System said: Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reopen 109629 Bug number 109629 not found. tags 109629 upstream Bug number 109629 not found. merge