Re: [Pkg-alsa-devel] RFS: alsa-tools

2005-02-01 Thread Frank Küster
Walter Landry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > "Marco d'Itri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> >> >Do we have to split the alsa-tools source into two packages, one free >> >and one non-free/contrib? It will make it a bit harder. >> No. > > Unfortunately, that is not the ca

Re: [Pkg-alsa-devel] RFS: alsa-tools

2005-01-31 Thread Walter Landry
"Marco d'Itri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >Do we have to split the alsa-tools source into two packages, one free > >and one non-free/contrib? It will make it a bit harder. > No. Unfortunately, that is not the case. All of the source for packages in main must satis

Re: [Pkg-alsa-devel] RFS: alsa-tools

2005-01-26 Thread Mikael Magnusson
Dan Chen wrote: --- Mikael Magnusson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I have debianized alsa-tools and am looking for a sponsor. What is the status of alsa-tools being in Debian legally? Rather, what is debian-legal's stance on these packages? Since the firmware has been separated out into upstream's als

Re: [Pkg-alsa-devel] RFS: alsa-tools

2005-01-26 Thread Thomas Hood
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 19:40:05 +0100, Dan Chen wrote: > What is the status of alsa-tools being in Debian > legally? Rather, what is debian-legal's stance on > these packages? Since the firmware has been separated > out into upstream's alsa-firmware, there shouldn't be > any problems, but it's never t

Re: [Pkg-alsa-devel] RFS: alsa-tools

2005-01-26 Thread Dan Chen
--- Mikael Magnusson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have debianized alsa-tools and am looking for a > sponsor. What is the status of alsa-tools being in Debian legally? Rather, what is debian-legal's stance on these packages? Since the firmware has been separated out into upstream's alsa-firmware,