On 20010103T174923-0800, Sudhakar Chandra wrote:
As you can see, dpkg-genchanges does not understand the options.
Ah, of course! (Stupid me for not noticing earlier.)
The relevant command is dpkg-gencontrol, not dpkg-genchanges.
--
%%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % [EMAIL PROTECTED] %
On 20010103T174923-0800, Sudhakar Chandra wrote:
As you can see, dpkg-genchanges does not understand the options.
Ah, of course! (Stupid me for not noticing earlier.)
The relevant command is dpkg-gencontrol, not dpkg-genchanges.
--
%%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % [EMAIL PROTECTED] %
On 02-Jan-2001 Sudhakar Chandra wrote:
Hi,
I packaging new upstream versions of my packages and noticed that
dpkg-buildpackage is not generating the .changes file. Has anything about
dpkg-buildpackage changed?
dpkg-genchanges is to be called with the -isp arguments if i recall.
--
Sean 'Shaleh' Perry proclaimed:
On 02-Jan-2001 Sudhakar Chandra wrote:
Hi,
I packaging new upstream versions of my packages and noticed that
dpkg-buildpackage is not generating the .changes file. Has anything about
dpkg-buildpackage changed?
dpkg-genchanges is to be called with
On 20010103T112440-0800, Sudhakar Chandra wrote:
Sean 'Shaleh' Perry proclaimed:
dpkg-genchanges is to be called with the -isp arguments if i recall.
dpkg-genchanges does not seem to recogonize the -p option.
It's -isp, not -i -s -p. It's a contraction from -is -ip
--
%%% Antti-Juhani
On 02-Jan-2001 Sudhakar Chandra wrote:
Hi,
I packaging new upstream versions of my packages and noticed that
dpkg-buildpackage is not generating the .changes file. Has anything about
dpkg-buildpackage changed?
dpkg-genchanges is to be called with the -isp arguments if i recall.
Sean 'Shaleh' Perry proclaimed:
On 02-Jan-2001 Sudhakar Chandra wrote:
Hi,
I packaging new upstream versions of my packages and noticed that
dpkg-buildpackage is not generating the .changes file. Has anything about
dpkg-buildpackage changed?
dpkg-genchanges is to be called with
Easy answer: just let debhelper do the work for you. Makes packaging quite a
bit easier and takes care of a good deal of policy grunt work like the usr/doc
- usr/share/doc symlinking.
it looks like dpkg --build should do the right thing, my two packages that do
not use debhelper do not call
On 20010103T112440-0800, Sudhakar Chandra wrote:
Sean 'Shaleh' Perry proclaimed:
dpkg-genchanges is to be called with the -isp arguments if i recall.
dpkg-genchanges does not seem to recogonize the -p option.
It's -isp, not -i -s -p. It's a contraction from -is -ip
--
%%% Antti-Juhani
Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho proclaimed:
On 20010103T112440-0800, Sudhakar Chandra wrote:
Sean 'Shaleh' Perry proclaimed:
dpkg-genchanges is to be called with the -isp arguments if i recall.
dpkg-genchanges does not seem to recogonize the -p option.
It's -isp, not -i -s -p. It's a contraction
Hi,
I packaging new upstream versions of my packages and noticed that
dpkg-buildpackage is not generating the .changes file. Has anything about
dpkg-buildpackage changed?
Thanks.
Thaths
--
Homer: [hurt] You signed my name? I feel so violated.
Marge: You've signed my name lots of times!
Hi,
I packaging new upstream versions of my packages and noticed that
dpkg-buildpackage is not generating the .changes file. Has anything about
dpkg-buildpackage changed?
Thanks.
Thaths
--
Homer: [hurt] You signed my name? I feel so violated.
Marge: You've signed my name lots of times!
12 matches
Mail list logo
