Christoph Haas wrote:
On Monday 17 October 2005 23:15, Bastian Venthur wrote:
Hehe, I guess my package is relatively perfect (and uploaded) now ;)
The $(CURDIR) is redundant in dh_installchangelogs. But I won't harass
you with that any more. :)
But one last question. What if upstream
Christoph Haas wrote:
On Saturday 15 October 2005 14:59, Bastian Venthur wrote:
[...]
kde-icons-nuovext
+ http://packages.qa.debian.org/k/kde-icons-nuovext.html
+ http://venthur.de/debian/nuovext/
closes: #324505 (Includes text files under /usr/share/icons)
Notes for
Hi, Bastian...
regarding kde-icons-nuovext...
On Monday 17 October 2005 13:10, Bastian Venthur wrote:
Christoph Haas wrote:
- it may be a matter of taste but I would not extract the upstream
tarball right into the debian/... directory. Why not using that file
as an *.orig.tar.gz.
Christoph Haas wrote:
Hi, Bastian...
regarding kde-icons-nuovext...
On Monday 17 October 2005 13:10, Bastian Venthur wrote:
Christoph Haas wrote:
- it may be a matter of taste but I would not extract the upstream
tarball right into the debian/... directory. Why not using that file
On Monday 17 October 2005 18:00, Bastian Venthur wrote:
Christoph Haas wrote:
Okay. Just keep in mind that you cannot change the orig.tar.gz which
is currently in Debian. You can only provide new *.diff.gz files for
the same upstream tarball. So it's more a todo when your upstream
Christoph Haas wrote:
Yes, that sounds like a rather good idea. Doesn't look too ugly and tricks
the version comparison system. :) If you don't know it already... see the
man page for dpkg. There is a nice option called --compare-versions
which allows you to find out whether a revision is
On Monday 17 October 2005 21:36, Bastian Venthur wrote:
Christoph Haas wrote:
I suggest you rather use dh_installchangelogs for that. Please see its
man page. (That means also removing the debian/docs file.)
The general problem here is, that upstream sometimes provides the
filenames of
Christoph Haas wrote:
On Monday 17 October 2005 21:36, Bastian Venthur wrote:
Christoph Haas wrote:
I suggest you rather use dh_installchangelogs for that. Please see its
man page. (That means also removing the debian/docs file.)
The general problem here is, that upstream sometimes
On Monday 17 October 2005 23:15, Bastian Venthur wrote:
Hehe, I guess my package is relatively perfect (and uploaded) now ;)
The $(CURDIR) is redundant in dh_installchangelogs. But I won't harass
you with that any more. :)
But one last question. What if upstream provides a README, which want
On Sat, 15 Oct 2005 22:47:26 +0200
Bastian Venthur [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- a lot of commented-out debhelper calls in debian/rules
Hmm, this is rather cosmetical, isn't it?
Is not only cosmetics, is also disk space and bandwidth for holding
useless stuff.
--
Ricardo Mones
~
The
On 15-Oct-2005, Bastian Venthur wrote:
Christoph Haas wrote:
- a lot of commented-out debhelper calls in debian/rules
Hmm, this is rather cosmetical, isn't it?
It's poor style, which more than cosmetics is also distraction and a
waste of every reader's time. There is no downside to
Ricardo Mones wrote:
On Sat, 15 Oct 2005 22:47:26 +0200
Bastian Venthur [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- a lot of commented-out debhelper calls in debian/rules
Hmm, this is rather cosmetical, isn't it?
Is not only cosmetics, is also disk space and bandwidth for holding
useless stuff.
Ok
On Sun, 16 Oct 2005 14:21:06 +0200
Bastian Venthur [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The difference in *bytes* is exactly 338 -- this is ~5-10 times smaller
than the size of *one* single cursor contained in this package.
Your package being big is no excuse to make it bigger without need to,
better do
On Saturday 15 October 2005 22:47, Bastian Venthur wrote:
Christoph Haas wrote:
On Saturday 15 October 2005 14:59, Bastian Venthur wrote:
I'm searching for sponsorship of my packages:
crystalcursors
+ http://packages.qa.debian.org/c/crystalcursors.html
+
Christoph Haas wrote:
On Saturday 15 October 2005 22:47, Bastian Venthur wrote:
- a lot of commented-out debhelper calls in debian/rules
Hmm, this is rather cosmetical, isn't it?
Mostly. But the template is merely there as a superset of things you could
possibly need. It doesn't do any
Ricardo Mones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 16 Oct 2005 14:21:06 +0200
Bastian Venthur [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The difference in *bytes* is exactly 338 -- this is ~5-10 times smaller
than the size of *one* single cursor contained in this package.
Your package being big is no
Christoph Haas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Saturday 15 October 2005 22:47, Bastian Venthur wrote:
Hmm, this is rather cosmetical, isn't it?
Mostly. But the template is merely there as a superset of things you could
possibly need. It doesn't do any harm to leave it in there. And I don't
On Sun, 16 Oct 2005 13:53:11 -0400
Peter S Galbraith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ricardo Mones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 16 Oct 2005 14:21:06 +0200
Bastian Venthur [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The difference in *bytes* is exactly 338 -- this is ~5-10 times smaller
than the size of
Ricardo Mones wrote:
I have lots of commented-out debhelper lines which sometimes later get
used when upstream does add a relevant file.
If you like things all prim and proper, that's fine, but please don't
impose it on others.
I think the one who should take a break is you. I'm
Hi Mentors,
I'm searching for sponsorship of my packages:
crystalcursors
+ http://packages.qa.debian.org/c/crystalcursors.html
+ http://venthur.de/debian/crystalcursors/
closes: #328298 (Hot Point of Lefthanded Themes Wrong)
kde-icons-nuovext
+
On Saturday 15 October 2005 14:59, Bastian Venthur wrote:
I'm searching for sponsorship of my packages:
crystalcursors
+ http://packages.qa.debian.org/c/crystalcursors.html
+ http://venthur.de/debian/crystalcursors/
closes: #328298 (Hot Point of Lefthanded Themes Wrong)
Notes for
Christoph Haas wrote:
On Saturday 15 October 2005 14:59, Bastian Venthur wrote:
I'm searching for sponsorship of my packages:
crystalcursors
+ http://packages.qa.debian.org/c/crystalcursors.html
+ http://venthur.de/debian/crystalcursors/
closes: #328298 (Hot Point of Lefthanded
22 matches
Mail list logo
