Re: AGPL (was Re: Please try expo.debian.net)

2011-07-28 Thread Andrew Starr-Bochicchio
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 4:06 PM, Adam Borowski wrote: > On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 12:03:03PM -0400, Andrew Starr-Bochicchio wrote: >> Launchpad is most certainly free software (though it would have to be >> re-branded, the icons/images are not free). [0]: >> >> "Canonical Ltd ("Canonical") distribut

Re: AGPL (was Re: Please try expo.debian.net)

2011-07-27 Thread Pietro Battiston
Il giorno mer, 27/07/2011 alle 22.06 +0200, Adam Borowski ha scritto: > On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 12:03:03PM -0400, Andrew Starr-Bochicchio wrote: > > Launchpad is most certainly free software (though it would have to be > > re-branded, the icons/images are not free). [0]: > > > > "Canonical Ltd ("C

Re: AGPL (was Re: Please try expo.debian.net)

2011-07-27 Thread The Fungi
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 10:06:25PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote: > I can't see how someone can claim that AGPL is a free software > license. [...] I was recently reviewing some new software (a FUSE backend) for an acquaintance who wanted to release it under AGPL3. I did mention to him the BSD-advert

AGPL (was Re: Please try expo.debian.net)

2011-07-27 Thread Adam Borowski
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 12:03:03PM -0400, Andrew Starr-Bochicchio wrote: > Launchpad is most certainly free software (though it would have to be > re-branded, the icons/images are not free). [0]: > > "Canonical Ltd ("Canonical") distributes the Launchpad source code > under the GNU Affero General