On Mon, 16 Jul 2012 06:42:19 +, Bart Martens wrote:
I'm personally not a fan of DEP5, because I have not yet seen any benefits,
only more work for the packager, and less readable for humans than plain text.
Side remark: I personally find a structured Copyright-Format 1.0 file
much easier
Bart Martens ba...@debian.org writes:
I'm personally not a fan of DEP5, because I have not yet seen any
benefits,
I wrote git-copyright-scan to be able to automatically update the list
of copyright holders from git:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2011/04/msg7.html
I couldn't
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 06:00:59PM -0400, Aliaksei Sheshka wrote:
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 2:04 PM, Bart Martens ba...@debian.org wrote:
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 10:51:46AM -0400, Aliaksei Sheshka wrote:
I've read the policy but still confused, if some one can help, please
take a look.
Aliaksei Sheshka sheshka...@gmail.com writes:
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 2:04 PM, Bart Martens ba...@debian.org wrote:
If you intend to package this software, then please retitle [bug
report #392333] to ITP and set yourself as the owner.
I would like, but not sure yet I have skills *today*.
Aliaksei Sheshka sheshka...@gmail.com writes:
1) should a package 'inherit' license from the original COPYING file if
not stated otherwise ?
I don't know how to understand that sentence.
If you are asking whether the mere presence of a ‘COPYING’ file, but no
explicit license grant, applies
On Monday 16 July 2012 04:00:17 Aliaksei Sheshka wrote:
You still have to look through your debian/copyright file manually to
check for any mistakes or inconsistencies, but at the very least, the
syntax would be correct. There's also a DEP-5 parser that you can use
to check the syntax
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 7:01 AM, Ben Finney ben+deb...@benfinney.id.auwrote:
Aliaksei Sheshka sheshka...@gmail.com writes:
1) should a package 'inherit' license from the original COPYING file if
not stated otherwise ?
I don't know how to understand that sentence.
If you are asking
Aliaksei Sheshka sheshka...@gmail.com writes:
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 7:01 AM, Ben Finney ben+deb...@benfinney.id.auwrote:
The grant needs to be explicit, written, specifying exactly what
work is being licensed, in a statement from the copyright holder.
Ideally of the form:
This is
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 08:59:51AM -0400, Aliaksei Sheshka wrote:
I don know any real life proper multi-license new format Debian package to
use as a reference,
cd /usr/share/doc
find . -name copyright |xargs grep
'http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/'
--
1AE0
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 9:41 AM, gustavo panizzo gfa g...@zumbi.com.arwrote:
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 08:59:51AM -0400, Aliaksei Sheshka wrote:
I don know any real life proper multi-license new format Debian package
to
use as a reference,
cd /usr/share/doc
find . -name copyright |xargs
On 2012-07-16 10:35:03 -0400 (-0400), Aliaksei Sheshka wrote:
Sorry, but not helpful. They only represent ~13% on nearly default
Wheezy setup
[...]
While still not a perfect example, my weather-util package has
ISC-licensed and public domain components...
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 10:35:03AM -0400, Aliaksei Sheshka wrote:
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 9:41 AM, gustavo panizzo gfa
g...@zumbi.com.arwrote:
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 08:59:51AM -0400, Aliaksei Sheshka wrote:
I don know any real life proper multi-license new format Debian package
to
On Monday 16 July 2012 14:59:51 Aliaksei Sheshka wrote:
I don know any real life proper multi-license new format Debian package to
use as a reference, which makes packaging for beginner even harder.
Here's one that was not trivial to write:
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 10:55 AM, Dominique Dumont d...@debian.org wrote:
On Monday 16 July 2012 14:59:51 Aliaksei Sheshka wrote:
I don know any real life proper multi-license new format Debian package to
use as a reference, which makes packaging for beginner even harder.
Here's one that was
Ben Finney ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au writes:
Aliaksei Sheshka sheshka...@gmail.com writes:
2) Which license do have auto generated files, like 'configure',
'Makefile', *am', etc ?
If there is no human creativity in the generation of the files, then my
understanding of international
Aliaksei Sheshka sheshka...@gmail.com writes:
I don know any real life proper multi-license new format Debian package
to use as a reference, which makes packaging for beginner even
harder.
http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/r/remctl/current/copyright
includes all of the
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 9:41 AM, gustavo panizzo gfa
g...@zumbi.com.arwrote:
cd /usr/share/doc
find . -name copyright |xargs grep
'http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/'
Le Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 10:35:03AM -0400, Aliaksei Sheshka a écrit :
Sorry, but not
Hi Debian-Mentors!
Is anyone aware/have a script to populate debian/copyright file ?
I'm trying to build a package for irrtoolset
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=392333
but the source code has multiple licenses, one file licence a, another b
and so on.
I've told that I have to
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 10:51:46AM -0400, Aliaksei Sheshka wrote:
Hi Debian-Mentors!
Is anyone aware/have a script to populate debian/copyright file ?
No idea.
I'm trying to build a package for irrtoolset
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=392333
If you intend to package
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 06:04:25PM +, Bart Martens wrote:
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 10:51:46AM -0400, Aliaksei Sheshka wrote:
Hi Debian-Mentors!
Is anyone aware/have a script to populate debian/copyright file ?
No idea.
Probably not. As far as I have seen the debian/copyright file is
* Daniel Martí mv...@mvdan.cc [120715 20:17]:
Is anyone aware/have a script to populate debian/copyright file ?
No idea.
Probably not. As far as I have seen the debian/copyright file is
carefully made, since not only the licenses must be listed but the
copyright owners too.
Hello,
Hi,
On 15/07/12 20:08, Daniel Martí wrote:
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 06:04:25PM +, Bart Martens wrote:
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 10:51:46AM -0400, Aliaksei Sheshka wrote:
Hi Debian-Mentors!
Is anyone aware/have a script to populate debian/copyright file ?
No idea.
Probably not. As far as
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 2:04 PM, Bart Martens ba...@debian.org wrote:
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 10:51:46AM -0400, Aliaksei Sheshka wrote:
Hi Debian-Mentors!
Is anyone aware/have a script to populate debian/copyright file ?
No idea.
I'm trying to build a package for irrtoolset
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 7:51 AM, Aliaksei Sheshka sheshka...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Debian-Mentors!
Is anyone aware/have a script to populate debian/copyright file ?
$ licensecheck --copyright -r . | /usr/lib/cdbs/licensecheck2dep5
debian/copyright
You still have to look through your
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 6:11 PM, Vincent Cheng vincentc1...@gmail.comwrote:
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 7:51 AM, Aliaksei Sheshka sheshka...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Debian-Mentors!
Is anyone aware/have a script to populate debian/copyright file ?
$ licensecheck --copyright -r . |
Vincent Cheng vincentc1...@gmail.com writes:
$ licensecheck --copyright -r . | /usr/lib/cdbs/licensecheck2dep5
debian/copyright
You still have to look through your debian/copyright file manually to
check for any mistakes or inconsistencies, but at the very least, the
syntax would be
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 12:03 AM, Ben Finney ben+deb...@benfinney.id.auwrote:
Vincent Cheng vincentc1...@gmail.com writes:
$ licensecheck --copyright -r . | /usr/lib/cdbs/licensecheck2dep5
debian/copyright
You still have to look through your debian/copyright file manually to
check
27 matches
Mail list logo
