On Mon, Mar 04, 2019 at 05:03:30PM +0200, Andrius Merkys wrote:
> On 2019-03-04 16:56, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > But, are they actually available from the published API?
>
> Yes, they are; readelf --symbols prints them.
readelf doesn't know about the API.
The published API is in the docs and in the
On Mon, Mar 04, 2019 at 01:37:51PM +0200, Andrius Merkys wrote:
> The upstream says that the renamed functions are not documented,
> therefore they are private-ish. However, strictly speaking these
> functions are public, as they are accessible in the ABI.
Please tell the upstream to not export the
On 2019-03-04 16:56, Adam Borowski wrote:
> But, are they actually available from the published API?
Yes, they are; readelf --symbols prints them.
> And do reverse dependencies use those functions?
Not that I am aware of. The renamed functions were introduced for the
development only.
Thanks,
A
On Mon, Mar 04, 2019 at 01:37:51PM +0200, Andrius Merkys wrote:
> On 2019-03-04 13:32, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> > What does the upstream say about this?
>
> The upstream says that the renamed functions are not documented,
> therefore they are private-ish. However, strictly speaking these
> func
On 2019-03-04 13:32, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> What does the upstream say about this?
The upstream says that the renamed functions are not documented,
therefore they are private-ish. However, strictly speaking these
functions are public, as they are accessible in the ABI.
> The ideal way would
On Mon, Mar 04, 2019 at 01:29:44PM +0200, Andrius Merkys wrote:
> I am maintaining a package which has recently endured a
> backwards-incompatible ABI change due to a couple of function renames. I
> could restore the ABI compatibility by providing aliases (via patches)
> for the renamed functions.
Dear Mentors,
I am maintaining a package which has recently endured a
backwards-incompatible ABI change due to a couple of function renames. I
could restore the ABI compatibility by providing aliases (via patches)
for the renamed functions. My question is: would this be a viable
solution, or shoul
7 matches
Mail list logo