Re: Binaries for other architectures

1999-04-07 Thread Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
On Tue, Apr 06, 1999 at 02:35:52PM +0200, Peter Makholm wrote: Lars Who? Lars Wirzenius [EMAIL PROTECTED]. He's currently on an indefinitely long leave, though. -- %%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % [EMAIL PROTECTED] % http://www.iki.fi/gaia/ %%% Good Times are back again!

Re: Binaries for other architectures

1999-04-06 Thread Peter Makholm
James Troup [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Lars runs dbuild on the source from time to time, but from conversations with him, I gather he doesn't even vaguely have time to process all the logs it produces. [...] Lars Who? I don't think I've heard a call for volunteers. If the logs aren't big and

Re: Binaries for other architectures

1999-04-05 Thread Roderick Schertler
On Sat, 3 Apr 1999 11:45:28 +, Mika Fischer [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: On Fri, 02 Apr at 14:30 +, Mika Fischer wrote: Is there a digest-version of debian-devel-changes? That's a bit too much for my dialup-connection otherwise. Is it recommended to be subscribed to that group? I guess:

Re: Binaries for other architectures

1999-04-03 Thread Mark Brown
On Fri, Apr 02, 1999 at 11:59:31PM +0100, James Troup wrote: Mika Fischer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: But isn't there a i386 build daemon? Not yet, but there will be. I thought Lars already had one up and running, but just wasn't uploading anything? -- Mark Brown mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Binaries for other architectures

1999-04-03 Thread Mika Fischer
Hi! Thanks for all the answers. On Fri, 02 Apr at 14:30 +, Mika Fischer wrote: Another question: Is there a digest-version of debian-devel-changes? That's a bit too much for my dialup-connection otherwise. Is it recommended to be subscribed to that group? I guess: yes. But what about

Re: Binaries for other architectures

1999-04-03 Thread James Troup
Mark Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Fri, Apr 02, 1999 at 11:59:31PM +0100, James Troup wrote: Mika Fischer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: But isn't there a i386 build daemon? Not yet, but there will be. I thought Lars already had one up and running, but just wasn't uploading

Binaries for other architectures

1999-04-02 Thread Mika Fischer
Hi, all! I've packaged vfu. The source and i386 packages are already uploaded. Now I was wondering how the binary packages for the other architectures are created. Do I have to: - Wait because it's done automatically (if yes, why am I actually uploading i386-binaries?) - Find someone who

Re: Binaries for other architectures

1999-04-02 Thread Steven Work
Mika Fischer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: BTW: Why is the main Debian-server using qmail (non-free)? Seems a bit contradictory to me. But I guess, that doesn't belong here :-) Qmail's non-free to Debian because the author doesn't allow distribution of binaries (or something like that). Debian's

Re: Binaries for other architectures

1999-04-02 Thread James Troup
Mika Fischer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: - Wait because it's done automatically (if yes, why am I actually uploading i386-binaries?) This option. m68k and powerpc have build daemons which scan for new packages and compile them. Other architectures are either in the process of switching or

Re: Binaries for other architectures

1999-04-02 Thread Mika Fischer
Hi, James! On Fri, 02 Apr at 19:40 +0100, James Troup wrote: - Wait because it's done automatically (if yes, why am I actually uploading i386-binaries?) This option. m68k and powerpc have build daemons which scan for new packages and compile them. Other architectures are either in

Re: Binaries for other architectures

1999-04-02 Thread Christopher C Chimelis
On Fri, 2 Apr 1999, Mika Fischer wrote: This is a possibility for at least m68k, powerpc and alpha (kullervo, tervola and faure @ debian.org), but unless you specifically want to or need to, I wouldn't bother. Na, I don't think I want to. I don't blame you on this :-) I'm one of the

Re: Binaries for other architectures

1999-04-02 Thread James Troup
Mika Fischer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: But isn't there a i386 build daemon? Not yet, but there will be. If there are errors while building, am I notified? Or someone else? Logs go to the build daemon adminstrator first, who will file bugs if it's a problem with the source package and not the