Re: Bizzar error with dpkg-buildpackages

2011-04-05 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Tue, 05 Apr 2011, Michelle Konzack wrote: Hello Mentors, I am not compiling the package the first time, but today I got an error on Squeeze which could be lead to the yesterdays upgrade: No, not related. Ehm, on the top, dpkg-deb say signfile xmem_1.20-29+b1.dsc and then at

Re: Bizzar error with dpkg-buildpackages

2011-04-05 Thread Michelle Konzack
Thankyou Raphael, Because +b1 means bin-nmu 1 and is never part of the source version. That's policy. Don't put +bX at the end of your version and you'll be fine. OK (it was working some ears ago...), but how to build the same Package Version for different Releases (unstable, stable and

Re: Bizzar error with dpkg-buildpackages

2011-04-05 Thread Alexander Reichle-Schmehl
Hi! * Michelle Konzack linux4miche...@tamay-dogan.net [110405 01:23]: Ehm, on the top, dpkg-deb say signfile xmem_1.20-29+b1.dsc and then at dpkg-genchanges I get ../xmem_1.20-29.dsc can't be read. I compiled the last two days 16 Packages and it was working and now not more. Any

Re: Bizzar error with dpkg-buildpackages

2011-04-05 Thread Michelle Konzack
Hello Alexander, Am 2011-04-05 19:51:23, hacktest Du folgendes herunter: Do you know what the +b1 means? A +b1 never has an actual source package, therefore the b1 is cut off. I was told it is used as NMU upload... But how can I provide packages for 3 releases in the same time without

Re: Bizzar error with dpkg-buildpackages

2011-04-05 Thread Didier Raboud
Michelle Konzack wrote: Can I use e.g.: 1.20-29 - unstable (source included) 1.20-29b1 - stable/squeeze 1.20-29b2 - oldstable/lenny I was thinking there could be an upgrade problem later if I use this or is there a special naming scheme for multi-release? (I

Re: Bizzar error with dpkg-buildpackages

2011-04-05 Thread Harald Jenny
Hi On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 09:22:43PM +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote: I have this problem with 17 packages. Can I use e.g.: 1.20-29 - unstable (source included) 1.20-29b1 - stable/squeeze 1.20-29b2 - oldstable/lenny I think you might find

Re: Bizzar error with dpkg-buildpackages

2011-04-05 Thread Michelle Konzack
Hello Harald Jenny, Am 2011-04-06 00:01:20, hacktest Du folgendes herunter: I think you might find http://backports.debian.org/Contribute/#index5h3 interesting, specifically point 4 - this would translate for you to: 1.20-29 - unstable (source included) 1.20-29~bpo60+1 -

Bizzar error with dpkg-buildpackages

2011-04-04 Thread Michelle Konzack
Hello Mentors, I am not compiling the package the first time, but today I got an error on Squeeze which could be lead to the yesterdays upgrade: 8-- snip dh_builddeb dpkg-deb: Paket »xmem« wird in »../xmem_1.20-29+b1_i386.deb«

Re: Bizzar error with dpkg-buildpackages

2011-04-04 Thread Paul Wise
Please re-post your message with English in the warning/error messages: http://www.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact