Bug#660049: mosh sponsorship and name

2012-04-02 Thread Paul Tagliamonte
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 4:06 AM, David Banks wrote: > Hi Christine, > > On 25 March 2012 20:39, Christine Spang wrote: >> As you may have noticed from the activity on your mosh ITP, I didn't >> check the WNPP bugs list before sponsoring another package with the name >> 'mosh', which has now clear

Bug#660049: mosh sponsorship and name

2012-03-27 Thread David Banks
Hi Christine, On 25 March 2012 20:39, Christine Spang wrote: > As you may have noticed from the activity on your mosh ITP, I didn't > check the WNPP bugs list before sponsoring another package with the name > 'mosh', which has now clearned NEW and entered the archive. > > Would you be willing to

Processed: Re: Bug#660049: mosh sponsorship and name

2012-03-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reopen 660049 = Bug #660049 {Done: "Paul R. Tagliamonte" } [sponsorship-requests] RFS: mosh/0.2.7+dfsg-1 [NEW] -- fast R6RS Scheme interpreter Bug reopened Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #660049 to the same values previously se

Bug#660049: mosh sponsorship and name

2012-03-25 Thread Paul Tagliamonte
reopen 660049 = reopen 631139 = thanks On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 3:39 PM, Christine Spang wrote: > hi David, > > As you may have noticed from the activity on your mosh ITP, I didn't > check the WNPP bugs list before sponsoring another package with the name > 'mosh', which has now clearned NEW and e

Bug#660049: mosh sponsorship and name

2012-03-25 Thread Christine Spang
hi David, As you may have noticed from the activity on your mosh ITP, I didn't check the WNPP bugs list before sponsoring another package with the name 'mosh', which has now clearned NEW and entered the archive. Would you be willing to rename your mosh package to, say, mosh-scheme? I'd be happy t