On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 4:06 AM, David Banks wrote:
> Hi Christine,
>
> On 25 March 2012 20:39, Christine Spang wrote:
>> As you may have noticed from the activity on your mosh ITP, I didn't
>> check the WNPP bugs list before sponsoring another package with the name
>> 'mosh', which has now clear
Hi Christine,
On 25 March 2012 20:39, Christine Spang wrote:
> As you may have noticed from the activity on your mosh ITP, I didn't
> check the WNPP bugs list before sponsoring another package with the name
> 'mosh', which has now clearned NEW and entered the archive.
>
> Would you be willing to
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reopen 660049 =
Bug #660049 {Done: "Paul R. Tagliamonte" }
[sponsorship-requests] RFS: mosh/0.2.7+dfsg-1 [NEW] -- fast R6RS Scheme
interpreter
Bug reopened
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #660049 to the same values
previously se
reopen 660049 =
reopen 631139 =
thanks
On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 3:39 PM, Christine Spang wrote:
> hi David,
>
> As you may have noticed from the activity on your mosh ITP, I didn't
> check the WNPP bugs list before sponsoring another package with the name
> 'mosh', which has now clearned NEW and e
hi David,
As you may have noticed from the activity on your mosh ITP, I didn't
check the WNPP bugs list before sponsoring another package with the name
'mosh', which has now clearned NEW and entered the archive.
Would you be willing to rename your mosh package to, say, mosh-scheme?
I'd be happy t
5 matches
Mail list logo