Bug#671701: RFS: autofs

2012-05-25 Thread William Dauchy
Hi Bart, On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 12:59 PM, Bart Martens wrote: > You wrote on 671436: >> Now working with Dmitry Smirnov on RFS #671701 >> will work together on this package in the future. > > Please remove this package from mentors: > http://mentors.debian.net/package/autofs5 I did it but forgo

Bug#671701: RFS: autofs

2012-05-19 Thread Bart Martens
Hi William, You wrote on 671436: > Now working with Dmitry Smirnov on RFS #671701 > will work together on this package in the future. Please remove this package from mentors: http://mentors.debian.net/package/autofs5 Regards, Bart Martens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@l

Bug#671701: RFS: autofs/5.0.6-1 [ITA] -- kernel-based automounter for Linux

2012-05-09 Thread Michael Tokarev
On 09.05.2012 22:42, Michael Tokarev wrote: [] > I'm checking the package now, it all appears to be quite good (as I > already mentioned initially). > > I'm verifying now whenever the transition works correctly. Did you test > this place? Is it possible to downgrade back to current version (and

Bug#671701: RFS: autofs/5.0.6-1 [ITA] -- kernel-based automounter for Linux

2012-05-09 Thread Michael Tokarev
On 06.05.2012 10:16, Dmitry Smirnov wrote: > On Sun, 6 May 2012 15:24:10 Michael Tokarev wrote: >> And note that whole 5.0.6-allow-for-kernel-packet-size-change.patch >> is NOT NEEDED, it should be reverted upstream. *SIGH*, we spent >> a ton of time and emails discussing this matter, please find

Bug#671701: RFS: autofs/5.0.6-1 [ITA] -- kernel-based automounter for Linux

2012-05-09 Thread William Dauchy
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 6:11 AM, Dmitry Smirnov wrote: > Since you're on board with us may I suggest that you'll close your RFS > bug yourself? done. -- William -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@li

Bug#671701: RFS: autofs/5.0.6-1 [ITA] -- kernel-based automounter for Linux

2012-05-08 Thread Dmitry Smirnov
Dear William, Since you're on board with us may I suggest that you'll close your RFS bug yourself? (I'm a bit overwhelmed with work at the moment) Michael, I set up package repository at collab-maint: http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/autofs.git All the best, Dmitry. On 9 M

Bug#671701: RFS: autofs/5.0.6-1 [ITA] -- kernel-based automounter for Linux

2012-05-08 Thread William Dauchy
Hello, On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 7:01 AM, Michael Tokarev wrote: > I'm very much interested in this package myself, and > wanted to do some packaging as well, but got distracted > by other things, and especially by the famous 32/64bit > user<=>kernel space interface issues we found recently > (there

Bug#671701: RFS: autofs/5.0.6-1 [ITA] -- kernel-based automounter for Linux

2012-05-06 Thread Michael Tokarev
On 06.05.2012 09:45, Dmitry Smirnov wrote: >> ++p = (unsigned int)atoi(strtok(my_utsname.release, ".")); >> ++q = (unsigned int)atoi(strtok(NULL, ".")); >> ++r = (unsigned int)atoi(strtok(NULL, ".")); >> ++return KERNEL_VERSION(p, q, r); >> ++} >> >> This will break

Bug#671701: RFS: autofs/5.0.6-1 [ITA] -- kernel-based automounter for Linux

2012-05-05 Thread Dmitry Smirnov
On Sun, 6 May 2012 15:24:10 Michael Tokarev wrote: > And note that whole 5.0.6-allow-for-kernel-packet-size-change.patch > is NOT NEEDED, it should be reverted upstream. *SIGH*, we spent > a ton of time and emails discussing this matter, please find > the recent LWN feature article about it (a goo

Bug#671701: RFS: autofs/5.0.6-1 [ITA] -- kernel-based automounter for Linux

2012-05-05 Thread Dmitry Smirnov
> There's one more issue with the new package. I already > told Ian about it, but apparently he ignored it. This > new code being added as a patch to debian package, > originally from upstream author: > > ++static inline unsigned int linux_version_code(void) > ++{ > ++struct utsname my_u

Bug#671701: RFS: autofs/5.0.6-1 [ITA] -- kernel-based automounter for Linux

2012-05-05 Thread Dmitry Smirnov
Hi Michael, Thank you for quick reply. On Sun, 6 May 2012 15:01:42 Michael Tokarev wrote: > I'm very much interested in this package myself, and > wanted to do some packaging as well, but got distracted > by other things, and especially by the famous 32/64bit > user<=>kernel space interface issue

Bug#671701: RFS: autofs/5.0.6-1 [ITA] -- kernel-based automounter for Linux

2012-05-05 Thread Michael Tokarev
On 06.05.2012 09:21, Michael Tokarev wrote: > On 06.05.2012 09:01, Michael Tokarev wrote: >> On 06.05.2012 07:14, Dmitry Smirnov wrote: >>> Package: sponsorship-requests >>> Severity: normal >>> >>> Dear mentors, >>> >>> I am looking for a sponsor for package "autofs" >>> >>> * Package name:

Bug#671701: RFS: autofs/5.0.6-1 [ITA] -- kernel-based automounter for Linux

2012-05-05 Thread Michael Tokarev
On 06.05.2012 09:01, Michael Tokarev wrote: > On 06.05.2012 07:14, Dmitry Smirnov wrote: >> Package: sponsorship-requests >> Severity: normal >> >> Dear mentors, >> >> I am looking for a sponsor for package "autofs" >> >> * Package name: autofs >>Version : 5.0.6-1 There's one m

Bug#671701: RFS: autofs/5.0.6-1 [ITA] -- kernel-based automounter for Linux

2012-05-05 Thread Michael Tokarev
On 06.05.2012 07:14, Dmitry Smirnov wrote: > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: normal > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for package "autofs" > > * Package name: autofs >Version : 5.0.6-1 Hello Dmitry. I'm very much interested in this package myself, an

Bug#671701: RFS: autofs/5.0.6-1 [ITA] -- kernel-based automounter for Linux

2012-05-05 Thread Dmitry Smirnov
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for package "autofs" * Package name: autofs Version : 5.0.6-1 Upstream Author : Transmeta corporation * URL : http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/daemons/autofs/v5/ * License