Le samedi, 2 juin 2012 16.56:10, vous avez écrit :
2) Handling of the transition
I just tested with a clean user: the current kde-config-gtk-style creates
one .gtkrc-2.0-kde while your new kde-config-gtk-style creates one
.gtkrc-2.0-kde4 that is a symlink to .gtkrc-2.0 . You should
Hi,
Sorry, but no. I just tested and it doesn't work.
With the attached .gtkrc-2.0-kde as created by the current src:kcm-gtk, when
entering the dialog of src:kde-gtk-config, the dialogs don't show Raleigh
nor DejaVu Sans 9, but oxygen-gtk and Bitstream Charter 12 (and Emacs
for the GTK3
Hi,
Sorry, but no. I just tested and it doesn't work.
With the attached .gtkrc-2.0-kde as created by the current src:kcm-gtk, when
entering the dialog of src:kde-gtk-config, the dialogs don't show Raleigh
nor DejaVu Sans 9, but oxygen-gtk and Bitstream Charter 12 (and Emacs
for the GTK3
Hi,
Thank you for a reply.
2) Handling of the transition
I just tested with a clean user: the current kde-config-gtk-style creates one
.gtkrc-2.0-kde while your new kde-config-gtk-style creates one .gtkrc-2.0-kde4
that is a symlink to .gtkrc-2.0 . You should probably cope with
(Hereby ignoring the tone of your private ping)
Le mercredi, 16 mai 2012 23.23:02, Boris Pek a écrit :
Great! Could you look on the package now?
Yeah. I took a look.
1) Versioning
So, what I wrote before about the version is not completely true: bumping the
epoch is not _strictly_ needed as
Hi Boris and thanks for your mail,
Le 14.05.2012 12:23, Boris Pek a écrit :
Sorry for disturbing. But could you comment message [1]?
First, pinging me after two-and-a-half days across a week-end is putting
an unreasonable expectation in terms of responsiveness on me: it's not
motivating, sorry.
Hi,
Thank you for a reply.
We are talking about replacing the package kcm-gtk by package
kde-gtk-config which has wider functionality.
That's debatable.
I can't agree with you: kde-gtk-config has wider functionality objectively.
As I wrote earlier, kcm-gtk does not allow to:
* select
Hi,
I uploaded updated package. There are such changes in it:
* compat level and debhelper version were increased to 8
(not to 9 because I still support packages for Ubuntu Oneiric)
* debian/control was updated:
- binary package was renamed to kde-config-gtk2-gtk3-styles
- binary
On 2012-05-09, Boris Pek tehnic...@yandex.ru wrote:
My regular sponsor is very busy now and I am looking for a sponsor for my new
package kde-gtk-config.
Description : KDE configuration module for GTK+ 2.x and GTK+ 3.x style
selection
first, kde configuration modules are packaged as
Hi,
Thank you for a reply.
first, kde configuration modules are packaged as kde-config-foo
Ok, I can rename binary package to kde-config-gtk2-gtk3-style for example.
Does it look good for you? Or have you another suggestion?
second, what does it do that kde-config-gtk-style doesn't do ?
It
On 2012-05-11, Boris Pek tehnic...@yandex.ru wrote:
kde-config-gtk-style does not allow to:
* select themes for Gtk 3.x applications
* preview available themes for Gtk 2.x and Gtk 3.x applications
* custmize toolbars and menus for Gtk applications
* select icon themes for Gtk applications
*
Sorry for a broken message. Here is the correct one:
Hi,
You could read the beginning of this thread:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2012/05/threads.html#00115
(Please Cc me in replies, I am not subscribed to pkg-kde-extras mailing list)
kde-config-gtk-style does not allow to:
*
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
My regular sponsor is very busy now and I am looking for a sponsor for my new
package kde-gtk-config.
* Package name: kde-gtk-config
Version : 2.0-1
Upstream Author : Aleix Pol Gonzalez aleix...@kde.org
* URL
13 matches
Mail list logo
