Hi,
On 10/09/2013 12:40, intrigeri wrote:
Thanks for all the fixes. I've just reviewed and built 0.4.15 and
hoped to upload right away, but Lintian is still not happy:
W: bilibop-rules: extended-description-contains-empty-paragraph
N:
N:The extended description (the lines after the
Hi,
quidame wrote (20 Jul 2013 10:56:58 GMT) :
First, was the target distribution change in debian/changelog
intentional? (0.4.12 has experimental, 0.4.13 has unstable.)
Yes it is; the target distribution was set to experimental for the
wheezy's freeze duration... after what it was
Hi,
and thanks for this review
On 19/07/2013 20:25, intrigeri wrote:
First, was the target distribution change in debian/changelog
intentional? (0.4.12 has experimental, 0.4.13 has unstable.)
Yes it is; the target distribution was set to experimental for the
wheezy's freeze duration... after
Hi,
intrigeri wrote (04 Jul 2013 06:49:08 GMT) :
I plan to review, and hopefully upload bilibop next week.
Here we go.
First, was the target distribution change in debian/changelog
intentional? (0.4.12 has experimental, 0.4.13 has unstable.)
Second, it looks like important changes and
Hi,
On 04/07/2013 08:49, intrigeri wrote:
Hi,
I plan to review, and hopefully upload bilibop next week.
Nice to hear :)
The last bilibop version is 0.4.13 [1].
The git repository [2] is ahead of 2 commits (fix minor errors).
Thank you
quidame
[1]:
Hi,
quid...@poivron.org wrote (16 Jun 2012 00:52:22 GMT) :
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/bilibop/bilibop_0.3.0.dsc
Hopefully, I'll review this before the end of the month.
Other potential sponsors: if you can be faster than me, please do.
So, I don't understand the
Hi,
Le 2012-06-09 15:01, intrigeri a écrit :
quid...@poivron.org wrote (08 Jun 2012 22:35:21 GMT) :
I am waiting:
- for new comments from you or another DD
- to find by myself something to optimize in the code
How long do you intend to wait?
This was not a question of time. Here is the new
quid...@poivron.org wrote (08 Jun 2012 22:35:21 GMT) :
OK. But packaging is not a goal in itself, so I think I will
not send a new version with just (in the changelog):
* Fix typos, unclear sentences and language errors in
debian/control, in the documentation and in the comments
of
Hi,
Le 2012-06-08 04:06, intrigeri a écrit :
Hi,
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/bilibop/bilibop_0.2.dsc
Great!
+ * New OpenPGP key.
I doubt this is relevant to debian/changelog.
+ * debian/control: change 'Achitecture: all' to 'Architecture:
linux-any' for
+all
Hi,
quid...@poivron.org wrote (08 Jun 2012 10:46:14 GMT) :
+ * debian/control: more precise description of the packages, their
purposes
+and features. Add a statement about the required kernel version.
I doubt this statement is in debian/control.
[...]
The first paragraph of the
Hi,
Le 2012-06-08 14:14, intrigeri a écrit :
quid...@poivron.org wrote (08 Jun 2012 10:46:14 GMT) :
2. Fix typos and other things, add a new changelog entry and
increment
the version number (0.2.1) ?
Yes.
In that case, how to deal with the irrelevant or useless
informations of
Le 2012-06-05 20:57, intrigeri a écrit :
Here is a first, quick review.
Thank you.
The whole thing is arch:all, but some shell functions require a Linux
kernel shouldn't bilibop-common have a versioned dependency on Linux
kernel = 2.6.37 (needed by backing_file_from_loop), and be
Hi,
quid...@poivron.org wrote (07 Jun 2012 12:53:34 GMT) :
The whole thing is arch:all, but some shell functions require a Linux
kernel shouldn't bilibop-common have a versioned dependency on Linux
kernel = 2.6.37 (needed by backing_file_from_loop), and be
arch:linux-any instead?
I don't
Message original
Objet: Re: Bug#675532: RFS: bilibop/0.1 (ITP #675467)
Date: 2012-06-08 02:28
De: quid...@poivron.org
À: intrigeri intrig...@boum.org
Hi,
Le 2012-06-07 15:05, intrigeri a écrit :
So, really, I think the only sane way is to move everything
Hi,
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/bilibop/bilibop_0.2.dsc
Great!
+ * New OpenPGP key.
I doubt this is relevant to debian/changelog.
+ * debian/control: change 'Achitecture: all' to 'Architecture: linux-any'
for
+all binaries.
I think you mean all binary packages,
Hi,
bilibop project wrote (02 Jun 2012 00:07:22 GMT) :
I am looking for a sponsor for my package bilibop
Here is a first, quick review.
First of all, this is great work. In case this is your first Debian
packaging work, as you seem to indicate in the ITP bug, then congrats!
The whole thing is
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package bilibop
* Package name: bilibop
Version: 0.1
Upstream Author: bilibop project quid...@poivron.org
* URL: https://poivron.org/~quidame/bilibop_project/
* License: GPL-3.0+
17 matches
Mail list logo
