(bouncing to debian-mentors, as I forgot to CC the list)
Hi,
On 12.06.2012 23:43, Michael Gilbert wrote:
I'll just try this selectricity poll for now so we don't get billions
of votes here:
http://selectricity.org/quickvote/debianrfslist
what's the status here? After Bart enjoyed us 100+
On Fri, 22 Jun 2012, Arno Töll wrote:
On 12.06.2012 23:43, Michael Gilbert wrote:
I'll just try this selectricity poll for now so we don't get billions
of votes here:
http://selectricity.org/quickvote/debianrfslist
what's the status here? After Bart enjoyed us 100+ mails today, I think
On Fri, 22 Jun 2012, Don Armstrong wrote:
On Fri, 22 Jun 2012, Arno Töll wrote:
On 12.06.2012 23:43, Michael Gilbert wrote:
I'll just try this selectricity poll for now so we don't get billions
of votes here:
http://selectricity.org/quickvote/debianrfslist
what's the status
Hi,
On 06/12/2012 11:55 PM, Don Armstrong wrote:
4) Those who don't want to receive BTS mail can trivially filter it out
If they know how to do so. Please keep in mind that we want new
contributors to subscribe to -mentors and we already throw a lot of
stuff to learn at them. Putting even more
On Wed, 13 Jun 2012, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
No, as far as I know the current plan was to change the maintainer for
the pseudo-package and then subscribe -mentors@ to only the discussion
part via the PTS (the bts keyword there, but not bts-control).
Ah; I didn't realize the PTS split these
Don Armstrong d...@debian.org writes:
On Wed, 13 Jun 2012, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
No, as far as I know the current plan was to change the maintainer for
the pseudo-package and then subscribe -mentors@ to only the discussion
part via the PTS (the bts keyword there, but not bts-control).
Ah;
Package: lists.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
Hello,
upon rough consensus and after discussing with formorer [1] I'd like to to
request
a new list dedicated to sponsorship requests. The list would be used to manage
sponsorship-requests bug traffic as a pseudo-package owner [2].
Name
At
On Tue, 12 Jun 2012, Arno Töll wrote:
upon rough consensus and after discussing with formorer [1] I'd like
to to request a new list dedicated to sponsorship requests. The list
would be used to manage sponsorship-requests bug traffic as a
pseudo-package owner [2].
I'd personally prefer that
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 4:58 PM, Don Armstrong d...@debian.org wrote:
On Tue, 12 Jun 2012, Arno Töll wrote:
upon rough consensus and after discussing with formorer [1] I'd like
to to request a new list dedicated to sponsorship requests. The list
would be used to manage sponsorship-requests bug
I'll just try this selectricity poll for now so we don't get billions
of votes here:
http://selectricity.org/quickvote/debianrfslist
So, I don't think those options accurately describe the choices. The
options really are:
1. Send useful bts discussion as well as verbose control messages to
On Tue, 12 Jun 2012, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
This drives people who sponsor off the list -- we therefore loose
people, not gain any.
Except that anyone who sponsors has to learn about the sponsorship
request. I'm not particularly interested in sending the same mail to
two different lists.
Don
On Tue, 12 Jun 2012, Michael Gilbert wrote:
I'll just try this selectricity poll for now so we don't get billions
of votes here:
http://selectricity.org/quickvote/debianrfslist
So, I don't think those options accurately describe the choices. The
options really are:
1. Send useful
12 matches
Mail list logo
